I often find these explanations amusing and/or somewhat poetic. Last night I noticed that "Bright Star" is rated PG for, among other things, "incidental smoking."
― congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
sorry if this is a little http://cdn.videogum.com/img/thumbnails/videos/pheMLogPnDE.jpg
― congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
i always enjoy the different kinds of violence there are. i think i first noticed this with 'casino' ("strong brutal violence"). then there's 'public enemies' ("gangster violence"), etc etc
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
henry: portrait of a serial killer was rated X for "tone."
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 11 February 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)
In Australia, some things are rated MA for 'Ribald coarse language', which has a nice Nineteenth-century ring to it.
― Attention please, a child has been lost in the tunnel of goats. (James Morrison), Thursday, 11 February 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)
My favorite: Matrix rated R for "sci-fi violence."
― vacation to outer darkness (Abbott), Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)
I forget which movie was rated for "excessive slime"
― sarahel, Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)
Twister was given "PG-13 for intense depiction of very bad weather."
― vacation to outer darkness (Abbott), Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:21 (fifteen years ago)
that was the you cant do that on television movie
xpost
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)
District 9 is rated R "for bloody violence and pervasive language."
― crazy ass between (askance johnson), Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)
pervasive?
― vacation to outer darkness (Abbott), Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:24 (fifteen years ago)
xp strongo: I think it was Ghostbusters actually.
― sarahel, Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:24 (fifteen years ago)
Alien Vs Predator was rated PG-13 for "violence, language, horror images, slime and gore"
― da Wesley CRUSHER (latebloomer), Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:36 (fifteen years ago)
oh man i went OFF one time in a theater to some friends about how the flukies at the riaa don't know what "pervasive" means.
― goole, Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:38 (fifteen years ago)
"Adult Content"
― Fox Force Five Punchline (sexyDancer), Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)
OTM tbf
― El Poopo Loco (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 12 February 2010 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
http://movies.nytimes.com/2010/07/30/movies/30extra.html
ok i don't rly give a fuck about this movie, but what the hell is with the rating??
“The Extra Man” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It has sexual situations and cross-dressing.
― goole, Monday, 2 August 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
There Will Be Blood - Rated R for some violence.
I think, maybe save a dirty word or two, you could show this unaltered on network television. I think it got an R based on mood alone, which makes no sense.
― SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Monday, 2 August 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)
have always been partial to "intense creature violence"
― CharlieS, Monday, 2 August 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
i'm sure i've seenSTRONG REAL SEX
― baby i know that you think i'm just a lion (schlump), Monday, 2 August 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
i can't remember what movie it was, but i remember "vampire sexuality" ... maybe Coppola's Dracula?
― tylerw, Monday, 2 August 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
x-post NYtimes regularly tosses in gag ratings explanations.
When he finally submitted it for an informal rating, John Waters likes to boast with pride that "Pink Flamingos" got "Rated NC-17 for a wide range of perversions in explicit detail."
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 August 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)
gag ratings explanations.
omg really?
― goole, Monday, 2 August 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)
A couple good ones here:
http://media.gunaxin.com/mpaa_ratings/45758
― no turkey unless it's a club sandwich (polyphonic), Monday, 2 August 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
Also, "Once" - Once!!!!!" - got slapped "Rated R for language." Rated R! I think there are one or two mumbled "fucks" in the whole film, which is otherwise almost as wholesome as movies get these days.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 August 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
"Rated R for mumbled fucks" would be a pretty good one.
― no turkey unless it's a club sandwich (polyphonic), Monday, 2 August 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)
legit lol @
Rated PG-13 for non-stop ninja action.
― goole, Monday, 2 August 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)
i guess the intent has to be to demonstrate that they've watched the movie, right?
― goole, Monday, 2 August 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
Scott's "Inception" review gets a winky "“Inception” is rated PG-13. The violence is stylized and sometimes bloody, but not likely to cause nightmares." "Salt" is notes is PG-13 for "fisticuffs and gunplay, accompanied by swearing."
See? NYTimes, always bringing the LOLs. Not an official MPAA rating, granted, but often the critic having a bit of fun at its expense.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 August 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
Re: a couple of mumbled fucks, that's apparently all it takes to get an R rating. One 'fuck' in a PG-13 movie (or several in a PG movie ca. 1986) is allowable, but anything beyond that crosses a line. I mean, come on: if you're exposing kids to the word, you're exposing kids to the word. It's not like a second 'fuck' is gonna make 'em knife a pensioner in the balcony.
― SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Monday, 2 August 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)
Usage of "fuck" matters, too. Hit your thumb with a hammer and say "fuck," PG-13. Later say "fuck you," R. Say "I'm going to fuck you up," possibly PG-13. "I'm going to fuck you," instant R.
In "Once," I doubt kids could understand a single word, anyway.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 August 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)
"I'm going to fuck you," instant R.
...Kelly?
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, 2 August 2010 23:20 (fifteen years ago)
Rated R. for Real Talk
― the itsytitchyschneider (s1ocki), Monday, 2 August 2010 23:30 (fifteen years ago)
― congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 12 August 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
Who is the guy in the second post in this thread?
― The world's leaders on pills (admrl), Thursday, 12 August 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)
actual funny SNL character, see here
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/update-nicholas-fehn/229107/
not sure what I was trying to say upthread though
― congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 12 August 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)