really, can't let Scorsese dominate the doddering auteurs' new films discussion.
I like 'serious' Pierce Brosnan, at least in The Tailor of Panama.
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 20 February 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)
kind of excited about this!
― max, Saturday, 20 February 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)
me too!
are u joking about tailor of panama morbs? i mean i liked that movie ok but he's playing a parody role! "serious"?
― f1ocki (s1ocki), Saturday, 20 February 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)
this got me stoked:
http://somecamerunning.typepad.com/some_came_running/2010/02/the-ghost-writer.html
― f1ocki (s1ocki), Saturday, 20 February 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)
awesome still too.
glenny ken was weirdly committed to polanski during rape-gate and i kind of wonder if he's working an angle (because i think he's a hack). otoh, im relatively psyched for the film.
― sharter the unstoppable ilx machine (history mayne), Saturday, 20 February 2010 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
yes, his positive review is part of a plan to advance the cause of rapists.
― f1ocki (s1ocki), Saturday, 20 February 2010 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
im not afraid to go there
― sharter the unstoppable ilx machine (history mayne), Saturday, 20 February 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)
i think the secret of the prime minister in this flick is that he is strongly pro-rape
― max, Saturday, 20 February 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.rickstv.com/tvo/gwjamal.jpg
― MY RUSTIC CHURCHWARDEN PIPE TOBACCOS; WITH RED T-SHIRT OF SURF (Curt1s Stephens), Saturday, 20 February 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
Thank you Crütz.
― Dark Notion (Abbott), Saturday, 20 February 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)
roman polanski's the HOST RAPER
― just supersayin (Lamp), Saturday, 20 February 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)
wow, you guys! ;-) :-O
― by another name (amateurist), Saturday, 20 February 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)
mark, by Serious Pierce I mean moreso than Remington/007 -- ie, everything.
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 20 February 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)
so is it like Frantic, only better?
― Zeno, Saturday, 20 February 2010 19:12 (fifteen years ago)
i'm hopeful, but after Men Who Stared At Goats I'm worried its another film where Ewan McGregor plays a boring lead learning about a far more interesting character.
― da croupier, Saturday, 20 February 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKE9W0O8bX8
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 February 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8526500.stm
― Zelda Zonk, Saturday, 20 February 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)
was watching At The Movies last night and the basic message of the whole show was "fuck Shutter Island, son, The Ghost Writer is that shit"
― waka flock*a*teens (some dude), Saturday, 20 February 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
i believe those were A.O. Scott's exact words, in fact
so he won best director in Berlin now
― Zeno, Saturday, 20 February 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
What a disaster for auteurism this weekend is.
Oh wait.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Saturday, 20 February 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Saturday, February 20, 2010 1:53 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
ya it's just that tailor of panama is totally him being a bond parody, right?
― f1ocki (s1ocki), Saturday, 20 February 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
he's a better Bond in Tailor than in his Bond movies.
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 February 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
i actually like his not-bond in "the matador."
― f1ocki (s1ocki), Saturday, 20 February 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)
i like his gay hustler assassin in the last good friday
― by another name (amateurist), Sunday, 21 February 2010 00:13 (fifteen years ago)
rapington steele
― i know who the sockpuppet master of ilx is (velko), Sunday, 21 February 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)
I wish this was an adaptation of the Roth novel.
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 21 February 2010 00:41 (fifteen years ago)
i wish this were a remake of the nic cage film
― sharter the unstoppable ilx machine (history mayne), Sunday, 21 February 2010 00:43 (fifteen years ago)
i wish this was http://www.scaryforkids.com/pics/ghost-writer-01.jpg
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 21 February 2010 01:38 (fifteen years ago)
s1ocki, I boycotted the Brosnan Bonds.
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 21 February 2010 01:53 (fifteen years ago)
did you picket them too?
― f1ocki (s1ocki), Sunday, 21 February 2010 06:35 (fifteen years ago)
this was ok. polanski is still p. great at music & mood imo. pierce was good, wilkinson is always awesome (only has 1 scene unfortunately).
i do wish the ending was a bit more uncertain/subtle
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*spoiler talk~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
er isnt it rather stupid/implausible that the us govt/cia would deem the book a threat to nat'l security and attract/validate any suspicion ? i mean, i really liked the tenuousness of wilkinson's character's link 2 the cia (ewen sez "it's on the internet") and feel like everything was v. rushed from the pt pierce gets murked
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 6 March 2010 02:58 (fifteen years ago)
a hard-drinking hack of a ghost writer
^minor pt but this bugs me from GKs review. guy has a few drinks, like most ppl. it marginally helps me think of him as more of a real person. i know i remember depp's character in the 9th gate was the same way
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 6 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)
this reminded me strongly of the ninth gate. not in a good way, but not in a terrible way either. i didn't like the script. overall wasn't really feeling it.
― by another name (amateurist), Saturday, 20 March 2010 07:08 (fifteen years ago)
it also reminded me very heavily of eyes wide shut, not in a good or bad way.
partly it was the filmmaking style, also the weird europe-subbing-for-america ambience. and the portentousness of it all.
oh and kim cattrall's accent was HORRIBLE.
― by another name (amateurist), Saturday, 20 March 2010 07:10 (fifteen years ago)
actually the more i think about it this was kind of superficial and dumb, if reasonably well-made. something kind of antiseptic about polanski's work since the 70s though. maybe that's the kubrick connection.
― by another name (amateurist), Saturday, 20 March 2010 10:06 (fifteen years ago)
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr at that old "antiseptic = Kubrick" BS
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 20 March 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
Finally watching it this afternoon; will clean teeth with antiseptic mouthwash.
― The Magnificent Colin Firth (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 March 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
This was a solid movie.
― Cattle Grind, Saturday, 20 March 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
Kim Cattrall's accent WAS truly atrocious. I think it's pretty pathetic that actors in a local community theatre can approximate a better English accent than someone who is paid millions of dollars and can, I dunno, PAY FOR ELOCUTION LESSONS.
― Cattle Grind, Saturday, 20 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)
I'd no idea it was Kim Cattrall.
― The Magnificent Colin Firth (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 March 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't either till the credits. Liked this movie a lot leaving the theatre. 2-3 weeks later, I like it a lot less but by no means dislike it. Had opposite reaction to Shutter Island. Thought it well executed but almost couldn't believe Scorsese was doing something so gimmicky, but now am genuinely enthusiastic about it.
― Mister Jim, Saturday, 20 March 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
If I regard it as a nasty political comedy instead of a thriller (it's got little to no suspense), it's terrific.
― The Magnificent Colin Firth (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 March 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Saturday, March 20, 2010 7:43 AM (15 hours ago) Bookmark
it has a lot to do with camera movements and acting. i'm not some kubrick hater. it's just there.
― by another name (amateurist), Sunday, 21 March 2010 04:18 (fifteen years ago)
I never thought I'd see RP make an Alan Pakula Lite movie, even if it's a diverting one.
Was annoyed by the blatant looping of all the "fucks" (except one) so they could avoid an R rating. They think teens are gonna see this?
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:25 (fifteen years ago)
well it wasn't exactly a pakula lite movie but the 9th gate or whatever that one w/ johnny depp was had a lot of the same qualities (or lack thereof) as this one. both have pretty bad scripts.
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:26 (fifteen years ago)
re. kim cattrall's accent, she's actually of british origin and she still can't pull off an even halfway credible accent. she's a shit actress, no wonder she can't get work outside of sex and the city.
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)
these sort of medium-budget european-financed movies always have weird c-list american casting choices, cf. terence davie's the house of mirth with eric stolz and LOL dan ackroyd.
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:28 (fifteen years ago)
nah, this wasn't a BAD script. Holding the plot to plausibility standards is a mistake, tho that hoary decoding thing at the end was very unfortunate. As for Cattrall, sometimes the accent vanished completely.
(My main problem was believing Olivia Williams is supposed to be about 55.)
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:31 (fifteen years ago)
ok, maybe it wasn't BAD, but it wasn't too good.
yeah--olivia williams and pierce brosnan were supposed to have been classmates at college, but he's about 15 years older than her and it shows. olivia williams is pretty hot btw.
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)
honestly the more i think about it, a lot of the smaller roles here were pretty badly miscast. even macgregor, who can do no wrong in my eyes, was probably a bit too pretty-boy for the part. pierce brosnan was great though.
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:33 (fifteen years ago)
oh and tom wilkinson did a good job with his bit.
as for your HoMirth gibes, Stoltz and Aykroyd are fine actors who unfortunately have lived through an era where the industry doesn't give them good roles.
Tom Wilkinson is in a kind of "morally compromised" rut.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)
they are i guess ok actors (ackroyd is a good comic actor but i have yet to see him in an effective dramatic role to say the least) but they were dreadfully miscast in that film. that was the point of my analogy.
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, 29 March 2010 03:50 (fifteen years ago)
*spoiler*
*****
Really, this is one of those "conspiracy" thrillers about a conspiracy that has no need to exist IRL. Every post-Thatcher British PM might as well be working for the CIA!
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 00:50 (fifteen years ago)
the HoMirth gibes are apropos of what?
My take.
― filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 00:55 (fifteen years ago)
Basically the nicely calibrated ambiguity -- Polanski's reluctance to choose sides in the dramatization of a genre film, fer god's sake -- really annoyed me.
― filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 00:57 (fifteen years ago)
but all the characters are essentially dicks, including MacGregor and the rogue minister.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 01:18 (fifteen years ago)
But Polanski did it in Chinatown!
― filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)
Polanski and Robert Harris don't see anyone who matters choosing sides. Dubya, Blair, Rumsfeld and Cheney will die free.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 01:25 (fifteen years ago)
I mean, I always thought the Chinatown ending was fatalistic twaddle, but the climax on this one, however well-choreographed, is just risible.
― filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 01:28 (fifteen years ago)
well, Polanski imposed the C'town ending on Robert Towne! He's a fatalistic guy, it appears.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 01:32 (fifteen years ago)
(but yes, it's pretty ridiculous)
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 01:33 (fifteen years ago)
There are lots of good-looking films out at the moment in the UK...do I need to make time to see this?
― David (davek_00), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
The script is a tad goofy, and Kim Catrall is absolutely atrocious, but apart from that me and Mrs Chuck thought it was top notch. Not much action but somehow still pretty exciting. It's in the vein of Michael Clayton and The Constant Gardener, except good.
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)
Also, er, plenty spoilers above so be careful. Brosnan is great, McGregor in Shallow Grave mode.
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
this is mostly very good. there are some problems with dialogue and accents, but it's the best put together thriller i've seen in a long-ass time. olivia williams kills in it too.
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Sunday, 9 May 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)
"best put together" sounds like faint praise, but after going through basically spastic arse-stains like "green zone" it's a relief to see shots put together right. i did enjoy "shutter island" but where this has holes, that... um well, yeah.
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Sunday, 9 May 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)
im with morbs, the 'decoding' thing at the end is really dummmmm
― max, Friday, 23 July 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
and also with morbs on olivia williams age
― max, Friday, 23 July 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)
not that she didnt look good
the 'decoding' thing at the end is really dummmmm
sort of like the last 140 minutes of your fave WW2 fantasy!
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:17 (fifteen years ago)
I need to rewatch this. So long as it stayed nasty it was a great time. But in the last third Polanski wants it both ways. The lack of outrage at the perfidy of Brosnan and Tom Wilkinson looks like a loss of nerve. It’s as if Polanski thinks he’s too smart to choose sides; the film could have been directed by the Ghost.
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:24 (fifteen years ago)
This is the opposite of one of those Wilder comedies where his insistence on letting everyone have it looks cynical. It's like Polanski finally came around to accepting the nihilistic ending of Chinatown as insightful.
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:26 (fifteen years ago)
the ending of Chinatown is not nihilistic, it's how things work.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:29 (fifteen years ago)
looking forward to rewatching this
― kim cardassian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:31 (fifteen years ago)
that house was pretty nice though huh
― max, Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:34 (fifteen years ago)
...in thrillers.
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:35 (fifteen years ago)
Also: plz more Pierce Brosnan in old-rotter roles.
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:36 (fifteen years ago)
ya his whole self-backlash at being bond is really producing his best work ever
― kim cardassian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
I'd no problem with Olivia Williams here; like Brosnan, she's good at being brittle. So is Kim Cattrall (whom I'd never seen before -- gasp, shock, etc).
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:41 (fifteen years ago)
my problem wasnt with olivia williams, it was just that theres no way shes brosnans age
― max, Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:49 (fifteen years ago)
Did you learn her age from the book? I don't remember hearing it in the movie (I could have missed it).
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:50 (fifteen years ago)
it's how things work.
no, Alfred. Examples: Steinbrenner will go in the Baseball Hall of Fame. Bush, Cheney and Obama will stay out of prison.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:52 (fifteen years ago)
no but its implied that her and PB went to college together
― max, Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)
yes, they are sposed to be contemporaries
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)
theres that thing about him registering as a labour party member in like... 72? or 75? which has got to be only a couple years after olivia williams was actually born
― max, Wednesday, 28 July 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)
But we're talking about films, not life, and Polanski's pretty maixm is too pat by half.
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)
*maxim