Young Money! Labour Leadership Contest 2010

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTF6N7EWzOA

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

Likely to be funnier than the General Election but less fun if you know what I mean.

they're all women so you'll probably like them (Noodle Vague), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

Your runners and riders:

Miliband, D 5/6
Johnson 8/1
Miliband, E 10/1
Balls 14/1
Burnham 16/1
Darling 18/1
Harperson amirite 20/1
Mandy 25/1
Cruddas 33/1
Sir Alan Sugar 200/1

Meowsy McDermott, Monday, 10 May 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

The only UK top 40 with the word "Johnson" in, sadly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ts-NtP-euKI

Meowsy McDermott, Monday, 10 May 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

lol mandy

caek, Monday, 10 May 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

wouldn't put it past him.

nevermind312, Monday, 10 May 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/05/10/article-1276661-09841FA8000005DC-123_308x104.jpg

mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Monday, 10 May 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_h7CJteTPowo/SqXBB89NbiI/AAAAAAAAMbk/vbFPhtXbjkk/s400/embarrasing+miliband+banana.jpg

Never gets old, imo.

Meowsy McDermott, Monday, 10 May 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)

Works very well with your screen name, onimo! Mierda defensa indeed, Mr Balls.

sharia twain (suzy), Monday, 10 May 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)

I'd vote for Balls for that pic.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 10 May 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

What's Ken Livingstone doing these days? Are there any circumstances where he could wind up a contender?

Ismael Klata, Monday, 10 May 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

these are crazy crazy crazy crazy nights, so in a way all bets are off. but i think not: he's backing ed balls.

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Monday, 10 May 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

doesn't the PM have to be a member of one of the houses of parliament?

caek, Monday, 10 May 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

lol o yeah

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Monday, 10 May 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

Edward Short's still alive and in the House of Lords, he could probably do a job.

Meowsy McDermott, Monday, 10 May 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

David Miliband just "accidentally" referred to himself as a candidate.

Shepherd, Reyes, Ford, Miliband.

mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 08:56 (fifteen years ago)

LOL.

sharia twain (suzy), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:04 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.beatlesource.com/bs/scans/odds/balls3.jpg

Mark G, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:09 (fifteen years ago)

what the hell is miliband's "banana moment"?

like, he was pictured holding a banana and looking a bit of a div?

is that it?

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:10 (fifteen years ago)

Tory bloggers went hard on it though, it truly was Britain's Pastor Wright moment.

Meowsy McDermott, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:12 (fifteen years ago)

y. pretty damning.

caek, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:12 (fifteen years ago)

this isn't even a thing, d-mil's the clear favourite

nakhchivan, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:13 (fifteen years ago)

He's at least *recognized* in America as that nebbish that Hillary Clinton MILF-flirts with.

sharia twain (suzy), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:15 (fifteen years ago)

I was thinking for ages that the most important thing was for Labour to reconnect with core supporters and while it's still hugely important it doesn't feel like they're as disconnected as I initially though, given the election result.

Working out AND ARTICULATING what the party stands for and how they're going to distance themself from the previous government still massively important, same as ideas and fresh policies given there isn't really any money to spend any more. David Miliband and Ed Balls both feel like variations on same-old-same-old, Blair's boy vs Brown's mate. But it doesn't really feel like there's much talent there. Suppose that's what happens when you only promote yes-men for a decade.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:05 (fifteen years ago)

Dunno, D Miliband still feels the most statesmanlike though. Foreign Secretary is good for that, and distances yourself from the domestic fuckups of the government.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:06 (fifteen years ago)

I think they're probably at least that disconnected, tbh, just not as disconnected as the alternatives

Black IP's (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:07 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, you wouldn't want any one of them in charge of your housing application tbh.

Black IP's (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)

http://gawker.com/5535848/britains-next-prime-minister-maybe-johnson-vs-balls/gallery/

^^ important commentary

i agree w. matt re "reconnecting". they seem to be p well connected and i find the idea that alan johnson is more authentic/relevant because he used to be a postman a bit patronizing. if there was something exceptional about him, fine, but... there isn't. he's just some guy. unison is apparently backing ed balls, but that whole charlie whelan vibe has been damaging to labour imo, and ed balls is no closer in background to the average labour voter than the millis. at least they grew up in a marxist home.

it'd be funny to see harman going up against her cousin david cameron.

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:12 (fifteen years ago)

^^^another reason it would never work for Harman. Inherited privilege always seems to cut women down at the last hurdle, if up against a man with the same privileges.

The Postman Alan thing is only good for PMQ zings. I think Ed Balls would be a big, big mistake.

sharia twain (suzy), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)

lol max breaking it down for the u.s. audience

caek, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)

(one of) ed milliband's problem is he wrote the current manifesto

caek, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)

"Ed, like his brother David, is the son of famous Marxist Ralph Miliband"

caek, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)

He's been cribbing off the Britishers/expats for long enough to communicate the system over here without doing that smug but wrong thing.

sharia twain (suzy), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)

Well, we'll know James Murdoch is really rolling out the Fox model if the biggest bloviators on Sky start getting creeped out by SOCIALISM.

sharia twain (suzy), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:22 (fifteen years ago)

(one of) ed milliband's problem is he wrote the current manifesto

― caek, Tuesday, May 11, 2010 12:19 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

i think the current feeling is that labour actually did ok in this election, "considering". i didn't read the manifesto, but ne way these things are surely guided by "other people" too aka mandy.

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:23 (fifteen years ago)

i just wrote that so i could use the headline 'johnson vs. balls'

max, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:23 (fifteen years ago)

Chancellor Alistair Campbell nicknamed him "brains," due to his "brains."

psst alaastair was never the chancellor (or indeed any sort of elected politician)

thinking about the candidates for the leadership does make me reassured that campbell and mandelson will be the éminences grises regardless, though

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)

haha *alastair

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:26 (fifteen years ago)

would rather read max on this hung parliament than nick robinson

caek, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:28 (fifteen years ago)

would rather hear more from adam boulton than either of them tho. max, boulton's crazy blow up yesterday seems gawker-friendly. go big on it, i say.

caek, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:29 (fifteen years ago)

think the johnson vs balls jokes need to combine with the "hung parliament" gags for the next post

joe, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)

word x2

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)

and the fact that they're all dicks

Black IP's (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i wanted to do boultons thing but i figured more people would click on a gallery, especially if "balls vs. johnson" was in the headline

max, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)

you guys with your clicks

caek, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)

campbell deserves to be better known, internationally. he's our rahm-e? gawker readers will all have seen 'in the loop' right?

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:32 (fifteen years ago)

Boulton is like the anti-Chris Matthews, too.

sharia twain (suzy), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:34 (fifteen years ago)

btw my previous posts on british politics have been picked up by famous british news-paper "the telegraph"

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/melissawhitworth/100037449/how-the-yanks-view-the-british-election-campaign/

max, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)

Boulton clearly angling himself as the O'Reilly/Beck of Sky's new Fox-ish lurch

Stevie Wonder in a weird phase during the 80's (stevie), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:37 (fifteen years ago)

(labour mp who impressed me the most who i hadn't heard of before = rachel reeves, who represents somewhere in...leeds, iirc. came across as really smart, as per her economics background, but also able to be quite down-to-earth and normal, albeit slightly awkward in a geeky kind of way.)

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:19 (fourteen years ago)

I've met Emily Thornberry, she was the Canterbury candidate in 2001 and drove me across Kent to interview Chris Smith. She was nice in a middle class mumsy way but I never for the life of me envisaged her as a potential shadow cabinet member, let alone a potentialy minister.

Matt DC, Friday, 8 October 2010 14:31 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/oct/08/new-labour-generation-ed-miliband

classic mandelson, saying new labour should have changed the party rules (to prevent ed winning)

rmde @ the romo dumplings (history mayne), Friday, 8 October 2010 19:17 (fourteen years ago)

didn't know about the shadow cabinet election til it happened

when did they come up with that idea?

journey to the end of nyt (nakhchivan), Friday, 8 October 2010 19:32 (fourteen years ago)

Anna Eagle was awful on PM today.

It would have been better with burger sauce (aldo), Friday, 8 October 2010 19:33 (fourteen years ago)

didn't know about the shadow cabinet election til it happened

when did they come up with that idea?

― journey to the end of nyt (nakhchivan), Friday, 8 October 2010 20:32 (56 minutes ago) Bookmark

apparently it's always been the case - i had no idea until now either! in the past they were elected every year, now it's going to be every two years. bit crazy though, and makes mandelson's bit for the graun there seem a bit less self-serving - labour party rules are not necessarily geared up to producing an election winning party. (but then idk what you do with the union vote - members' votes are better than the block vote, but would it be even better to have unions exerting their influence in tacit and totally unaccountable ways, the way that tory donors do? maybe for the labour party it would.)

joe, Friday, 8 October 2010 20:38 (fourteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

saw ed miliband in glasgow today. getting his picture taken across from the finnieston cran' with iain gray.

Truther Vandross (jim in glasgow), Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:45 (fourteen years ago)

iain "grey" gray

conrad, Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:02 (fourteen years ago)

Giein' the fryin' pan a wee dunt, just in case.

Dame Anna NAGL (aldo), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:27 (fourteen years ago)

Err?

http://imgur.com/Kd8XN.jpg

James Mitchell, Saturday, 30 October 2010 08:58 (fourteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/11/labour-party-hodges-miliband

sigh

rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Thursday, 25 November 2010 13:47 (fourteen years ago)

Probably best to just purge any fucker that wants to start shit, it's not like there's a load of "talent" for the Party to lose.

Ravacious Fortune (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 25 November 2010 13:51 (fourteen years ago)

Like whatever odious tosser was moaning on TV the other day because EMil had the temerity to launch a policy review rather than just shouting at the Tories about NuLab's tremendous record of the past decade.

Ravacious Fortune (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 25 November 2010 13:52 (fourteen years ago)

There seems to be a building consensus that EMil faces a revolt - you'd think he make at least through the locals next year and see how the numbers go.

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/matthew-norman/matthew-norman-bring-back-westminsters-barbra-streisand-2141934.html

Absurdly apocalyptic as this may sound, with Labour level or marginally ahead in the polls, the clock is close to beating Ed already. His legitimacy is questioned by both factions heading inexorably for a civil war to make the Tory one over Europe look like an arcane procedural squabble about parking regulations in the transport ministry of Camberwick Green. All that binds Blairites and Brownites is the shared belief that Ed is callow, shallow, directionless and not properly elected, and that he can be taken out before the next election.

Also claims that David Mil has been briefing that he's not quite done with his leadership hopes.

Lindsey Lohan is the new Extreme Noise Terror (onimo), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:22 (fourteen years ago)

If he's unseated by the MPs then the Labour Party really is fucking dead and I'll happily spit on the corpse. Almost funny to see Blair and Mandy cast this shadow across the Party from beyond the grave, but I've no doubt that this is the result of what they started in 1994.

Ravacious Fortune (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:27 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2010/11/david-miliband-party-shadow

Lengthy piece in the New Statesman that covers some of the same ground.

These people are just utter cocks. Do any of these various rival camps actually realise that New Labour FAILED? They were kicked out of office, they clearly don't know anywhere near as much about winning elections as they claim to.

And they don't seem to realise that the reason New Labour failed was not due to issues of presentation or electoral strategy but because the most basic economic principles that underpinned it were wrong, and one financial crisis later we're all suffering for it. But they continue to act like it's 1997/2001/2005.

Matt DC, Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:31 (fourteen years ago)

There seems to be a sizeable proportion of Blairite/Brownite people clinging to the delusion that they're "modernisers" when they're swiftly becoming dinosaurs and the sooner they realise that and fuck off out of politics the better. Or perhaps they could join the Tory Party? I have a feeling they'd be welcomed.

Matt DC, Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:34 (fourteen years ago)

The day they started talking about the electorate "not getting the message" - echoing every Tory minister during the last Major government - was the day you knew that these fuckers would never, ever get it.

Ravacious Fortune (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:35 (fourteen years ago)

If there was any sort of grassroots Party left then I'd urge constituencies to start threatening public malcontents with deselection, pronto. But as I say, I think NuLab's lasting legacy will be shifting the balance of power hard towards the PLP. EMil might be just the scapegoat they need to kill the Union connections once and for all, assuming they can find the party funding from somewhere else.

Ravacious Fortune (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:37 (fourteen years ago)

xps That is the same article. The link HM posted is just talking about the Hodges one.
It's all a bit disingenuous, Hodges is one of these people, supported DavidM and can't believe he lost.

specifically, the word talking (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:45 (fourteen years ago)

Absolutely get that these guys are spinning their own agenda, but to me that implies there's an agenda there wanting to be spun.

Ravacious Fortune (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:46 (fourteen years ago)

dmil is such a cunt

calpolaris (nakhchivan), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:50 (fourteen years ago)

Think you mean big stroppy bairn takes his ball home and has a fucking strop like a toddler fucking cunt.

Ravacious Fortune (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:53 (fourteen years ago)

i think what you'll actually find is that the process has been shown to be fault, and what i would say is look, the results have been someone miscalibrated but ultimately we have to sit down in dialogue and accede to a more just version of events

calpolaris (nakhchivan), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:57 (fourteen years ago)

incredibly dispiriting bunch of people

the envy, plotting, etc, are unsurprising, but this lot seem incapable of working through all that and doing a good job of opposition

meanwhile the students have an admirably universalist outlook imo

rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:58 (fourteen years ago)

There's something in the current student protests - some small fragile thing likely to be gone in a month, probably, but still - that anybody who gives a fuck about the future of the Left in the UK would do well to analyze and consider what could be grown out of it.

Ravacious Fortune (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 25 November 2010 15:01 (fourteen years ago)

seven months pass...

what the bloody hell is he doing

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13971770

i thought the video player was skipping at first!

lex pretend, Friday, 1 July 2011 10:35 (fourteen years ago)

ah proof that the labour policy of one member, 214,000 votes is a great idea

Once Were Moderators (DG), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:21 (fourteen years ago)

what the bloody hell is he doing

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13971770

i thought the video player was skipping at first!

Holy shit it's like they programmed an Ed robot with only three sentences.

Seriously wtf!

some greenzo (onimo), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:41 (fourteen years ago)

Oh man I'm watching it again and it's making me laugh out loud. It's like a piss take satirical sketch about politicians staying on message at any cost regardless of the question.

some greenzo (onimo), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:42 (fourteen years ago)

more from the journalist who did the i/v - http://www.twitlonger.com/show/bfensm

lex pretend, Friday, 1 July 2011 13:43 (fourteen years ago)

i think this might actually be career-endingly bad - obviously not right now but once mockery on this scale becomes part of the narrative, the seeds are planted.

lex pretend, Friday, 1 July 2011 13:44 (fourteen years ago)

D. Milliband's career seemed hampered by a banana, and this is worse than a banana

R. Stornoway (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:46 (fourteen years ago)

they're both fucking vile

nakhchivan, Friday, 1 July 2011 13:47 (fourteen years ago)

Hahaha I can't hear that at work, what's actually going on?

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2011 13:51 (fourteen years ago)

What, bananas and D.Milliband?

Mark G, Friday, 1 July 2011 13:53 (fourteen years ago)

He was asked six different question and give the exact same answer every time, almost verbatim. Lex otm - once you get to the third one you start thinking someone's fucking around with the video.

xp

some greenzo (onimo), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:54 (fourteen years ago)

Well, it worked for Jeremy Paxman, albeit in reverse.

Mark G, Friday, 1 July 2011 13:55 (fourteen years ago)

matt he keeps just saying 'look at my robot penis' and won't stop
xp
xp oh

devoted to boats (schlump), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:55 (fourteen years ago)

Haha wow. He's kind of like a sponge that will absorb any stupid shit someone exposes him to.

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2011 13:55 (fourteen years ago)

He'd loosened up a bit later for a chat with his chums.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/mm/image/19345.jpg

i can't, i won't (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:56 (fourteen years ago)

does seem kinda like a cliche-reinforcing cup choice from DC

devoted to boats (schlump), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:57 (fourteen years ago)

What, bananas and D.Milliband?

http://watchpeoplejump.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/david-milliband.jpeg

R. Stornoway (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2011 13:59 (fourteen years ago)

Actually - in the pic with Cameron and Clegg he reminds me of something else...
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3561/3441211181_d5327e4cdc.jpg

i can't, i won't (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 1 July 2011 14:04 (fourteen years ago)

there's a weird, barely visible portrait just behind cameron that looks like a tasteful framed oil painting of buzz lightyear

devoted to boats (schlump), Friday, 1 July 2011 14:06 (fourteen years ago)

E.Mil and Cameron are both doing something different with their hair these days (maybe so they look less like Clegg?)

R. Stornoway (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2011 14:07 (fourteen years ago)

damongreenITV

Before I wrote the blog, I contacted EdM's PR. He said 'no worries' about the itvw going viral: 'it means we are getting message out'.
about 4 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

lex pretend, Friday, 1 July 2011 18:54 (fourteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/8666354/Ed-Miliband-undergoes-successful-nose-operation.html

look out world

only bad dog on the street (history mayne), Wednesday, 27 July 2011 20:28 (fourteen years ago)

this was on the guardian's rolling breaking news scroller, with like ed miliband has successfully undergone an operation to correct his breathing problem, MORE SOON, & now there's an article up, and it's just, how much more can there be to this

i actually thought that this had happened a couple of months ago & had found myself thinking he sounded a lot better?, so either he has improved or i fool myself

jpeg 2000 (schlump), Wednesday, 27 July 2011 20:30 (fourteen years ago)

"I've spoken to him since the operation and his voice sounds exactly the same. It wasn't done in terms of changing his voice at all."

refund

Once Were Moderators (DG), Wednesday, 27 July 2011 20:31 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.