Four case studies from this board:
- Anthony E. starts a thread about the word "Eskimo". Majority reaction: this is nonsense, everyone calls them Eskimos etc. Acceptance that it might be offensive but generally considered not serious. Nobody actually uses the phrase "political correctness gone mad", at least.
- Anthony E. starts a thread using the word "piccaninny". Delayed reaction that this is a serious anti-black racial slur and that using it is bad. Meanwhile several people have used it elsewhere.
- The word "retard". Flows like water from the lips of a lot of American posters. Would be used with at least a frisson of guilt by most UK posters, if at all because of blatant slur status - this was mentioned on ILM once. No conclusion.
- The word "cunt". The .44 magnum of swear words and always always described in the 80s as being Offensive To Women. Used tons on the boards and not once complained about as far as I know.
So what's going on here - how do these words shift from inoffensive to offensive and out again? On what grounds do we criticise somebody for using word X when we scoff at somebody objecting to word Y? Where are the lines drawn, exactly? And so on.
― Tom, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Omar, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
1) Eskimos/Innuits/Etc have not reached a critical mass in terms of protesting the use of the word "eskimos". The only person I've ever seen, actually, protesting the word is Anthony. This includes a girl I knew who was one and didn't have issue with the word. I was truly baffled, and a bit disturbed by Anthony's issue with pointing out that the US still uses the word when, quite frankly, pretty much all countries do.
2) Most slurs against black people have been very heavily protested by blacks and are well known as being considered wrong to that group. The people using it elsewhere have all been Brits, as far as I know, and I am assuming it's not a known word in Europe.
3) "Retard" means two different things here versus there, in my opinion. I mean, you do realize that the word "retard" has a standard dictionary definition which certainly fits the common US usage of the word, correct? That being said I am still careful not to use the word on this board because of the cultural differences and because you don't know what other posters might have "wrong" with them.
4) The word "cunt" has been reclaimed, much like "bitch". It's basically as follows: a word is offensive. Group being slanders "reclaims" the word. The word then becomes right in some way, though generally only for use within that group and those associated within the group (ex girls calling each other "bitches", gays calling each other "fags", blacks calling each other "niggas").
My personal grounds on the "pickaninnie" slur is as follows: I wanted to point out it was not a proper word to use - I mean, someone said they thought it referred to Willie Wonka?!? I was under the assumption that most of the people suddenly using it had no clue what it meant, and before it started to seriously offend minority posters, it should be pointed out. However, that's when I realized the source of the slur was Anthony, who was the person who raised the biggest fuss that it's not how a person uses a word (ie an old person still saying Eskimo or "colored" because that's what they are used to, but being kind about it and not actually being a racist) but just the pure fact that they used it. So, by Anthony's own definition, he has become a racist and, quite frankly, that bothers me. Being as he's North American, I have an extremely hard time believing he has no idea what the word means, and I think that, in light of his stance on the Eskimo thread, he should apologize for using the word.
To be honest, if it had been anyone else starting up the trend of using that word, I would've just posted explaining this was a derogatory term, assuming Brits are unfamiliar, and left it at that. The fact that it was someone who was so offended by a somewhat non-slur (ie Eskimo started, whether or not it is now, as a technical terminology for a race. Pickaninnie was a term invented purely as a put down) really bothered me.
― Ally, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― anthony, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Which group of people were being slandered by the magnificent word cunt to have reclaimed it? It was reintroduced to my vocabulary by men and lovingly embraced by me.
― Emma, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
With the P-Word the offended group is large and powerful enough that simply by pointing out the offensiveness of the word it is expected people will stop using it.
With the R-Word the offended group is large but (it being offensive in UK only) not in close proximity so use can be continued but with discrimination.
With the E-Word you think it's fine to continue using it because not that many people are getting offended.
Is that fair?
The question is, at what point do you stop being senstive and accept that a word is now just a general insult? I mean the Spastics Society gave up and renamed itself SCOPE in the mid-90s meaningless charity names goldrush. Is it OK to call people 'spastic' now?
Personally, I get annoyed when people say 'schizophrenic' in a non-medical context. That's because I think it contributes to a complete misunderstanding of what the actual disease is about.
― Nick, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Is it such a casual word that you would use it in front of your parents? or boss?
― marianna, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mike Hanle y, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
re·tard n. Offensive Slang 2. A person considered to be foolish or socially inept.
Which is the same as here, I think. Surely both definitions are derived from the concept of mental retardation?
This message board is not a unified peer group, so people come in with different standards and you have these cultural clashes. Gradually it may form its own peer group with its own set of slur- standards, and this discussion is part of that process.
(I think I used the word "retarded" to describe Gorillaz in the pop focus group, by the way, and my quote was used in the web-posted version. Had no idea it was offensive in the UK, probably wouldn't use the same word again if I had known.)
― Ian White, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― AP, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
No. It doesn't. At all. Thank you for apologizing.
In terms of "retard", I agree that if someone finds it offensive it should not be used around them. But as I said it is a real word with a real definition not relating to mental illness or actual disability. This might be more US than anything else though...?
re·tard n. Offensive Slang 1. Used as a disparaging term for a mentally retarded person. 2. A person considered to be foolish or socially inept.
There are certain phrases which are derogatory towards black people that I cannot take seriously because they sound goofy. ("Jungle bunny" is the main one that leaps into my mind here; I get images of feral cartoon rabbits tearing the throats out of jaguars in the underbrush, which is actually pretty damn cool.) I had always thought of "piccaninny" the same way until I encountered the "count some piccaaninnies" suggestion on beating insomnia. It was kind of like a critical mass had been reached; the entire world red-shifted and I was two seconds away from transmuting myself into a datastream, zooming through the data lines and screaming, "SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH GOD DAMN PICCANINNY BULLSHIT!" The thing that upset me the most is that I thought I'd inured myself to that type of thing, but I realized that the reason it was bothering me so much was because it was used in a matter-of-fact rather than a hateful manner; people were treating the word as if it was a perfectly acceptable term to use to describe someone. In other words, I was interpreting it as, "It's not a bad thing to be a piccaninny. After all, you can't help it; you were born that way." Admittedly, there are tons of baggage I'm bringing to the table that caused me to read it that way.
At any rate, I noticed that Anthony started an apology thread and I really thank him for that. I know that none of the people on this board are looking to intentionally wound any of the other posters (unless done in a jaw-droppingly funny manner, of course), which is why I didn't start tearing people new ones.
I'd also like to say that Mike Hanle y is FUCKING FUNNY.
― Dan Perry, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
What Antony says above about so called ridiculous slang insults like jungle bunny or pickaninny is exactly where such terms get their power from. Making a description sound silly is a simple way of making the subject appear silly too. Hence the migration from spastic to Spazz.
― Pete, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Oh and just because a word started off inoffensive, doesn't mean it will always stay that way. Negro - derived from Negra merely means black.
Bound up with all this is my own, often repeated question about why it's OK to slag people off for being stupid when on the whole one can do less about it than one can about, say one's weight.
Nick, possibly:
slagging off stupidity caused by ignorance = classic
slagging off stupidity caused by misfiring synapses = dud
― cabbage, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Um, actually BOCES is an agricultural/farming program, like deals with animals and shit like that. Unless it's something completely different in Boston than in NY. Though quite frankly you'd have to be dumb to want to be around animals. Ugh.
Seriously though, you're right, there's very little one can do about being stupid if they truly are low IQ. But loads of people are idiots without actually being of low IQ. There's a difference between lack of sense and being actually stupid, and I think people can gain sense. It's very different from race.
But then again I think people should be slagged off for anything you want to, and my point was more of an idealogical/principal one than anything else, so there you go.
― Sam, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I wonder if the Blue Peter people ever realised what they'd unleashed.
God we were horrible kids
But Nick, why would anyone have called you Joey for gods' sake?
That's very interesting, I wonder if that's where the term actually comes from in the end anyhow: people used it on each other, Southern whites picked it up on their plantations and started using it to take the piss, then it spread. I never knew that it had a "base", though I assumed there was a base word in there somewhere because it seems a bizarre term to just make up out of the blue.
Funnily enough, I used to spend a great deal of time hanging around the BOCES department, because it was the only one that actually had a Mac, for some reason.
― Kate the Saint, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jonnie, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
This is territory that will never settle: I had half an argument on ILM with much-missed Guy Beckett, months ago, in re "gay" vs "queer" (I *FAR* prefer the second, at leaast in defn of ME, because the first strikes me as assimilationist, apologetic and somewhat nervously non-inclusive: bi men are queer but not gay, are lesbians gay etc etc....)
― mark s, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(Chambers insists that nincompoop is NOT from NON COMPOS MENTIS, which is kind of a pity...)
― Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bnw, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― junichiro, Tuesday, 7 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Wednesday, 8 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― DG, Wednesday, 8 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ally, Wednesday, 8 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dan Perry, Wednesday, 8 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Schizophrenia is validated and awful to live with. Entirly seperate things.
― anthony, Wednesday, 8 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 8 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bnw, Wednesday, 8 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mike Hanley, Wednesday, 8 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I don't see either how "retard" cannot be a reference to people with mentally disabilities. I've always grown up thinking it an offensive term that people use anyway, like "gay."
― sundar subramanian, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I understand the distinction you are making, Tom, but would add that there is still a whole lotta 'ignorance, mistrust, and often fear' with the public's dealing with disabled people as well. I remember doing a cookie sale with my residential treatment center kids (see "Retard" thread) one time in front of a suburban department store in PA. Although we had obtained permission beforehand, we were nonetheless asked to close up shop and depart after about fifteen minutes. The people who approached our table as they were entering the store were just too freaked out by the kids, and complained to the management.
― Joe, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yes, Multiple Personalities is currently called "Dissociative Identity Disorder" (DID). Controversial with good reason: there's the case of Kenneth Bianchi (the Hillside Strangler) who faked the symptoms to back his insanity defense in the 70s, and the frequency of reports of DID seem to rise and fall with the societal tides.
Schizophrenia is an absolutely horrible illness.