David Broder - RIP

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

lol shall I even try to mutter the expected things?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/09/AR2011030902821.html?hpid=top

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 18:14 (fourteen years ago)

conventional 'wisdom' just got younger

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 18:25 (fourteen years ago)

By two months.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 18:29 (fourteen years ago)

Broder wasn't always as irrelevant as he has been lately. Back when there was a substantial middle ground in US politics, he was one of its central voices. Between his own aging and the changes in Congress that accelerated with Gingrich's ascendency, his columns had no vitality at all in the 00's. Too bad. He played a useful role, once.

Aimless, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 18:36 (fourteen years ago)

I read his columns fixating on his definitions of moderation and bipartisanship for years, and they nearly always bugged me. He at least seemed less arrogant than the rest of the insiders.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 18:37 (fourteen years ago)

Why he sucked.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 18:42 (fourteen years ago)

During the Clinton years, I got to like him on the Sunday morning shows. He did seem out of it at times in 2008. I remember him praising McCain towards the end for keeping everything elevated. I wondered which election he was following.

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:16 (fourteen years ago)

He sucked every week on Bob Williams' XMPR show. Rip, I guess.

Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:20 (fourteen years ago)

never gave a fuck about this dude

You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:24 (fourteen years ago)

During the Clinton years, I got to like him on the Sunday morning shows.

especially when he called on Clinton to resign as the only "honorable thing" he could do.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:26 (fourteen years ago)

He was hardly alone on that. I mean that I liked his manner, his temperament; I don't have to agree with every single pronouncement from someone to like them. One thing I liked about him is that he wasn't big on sarcasm.

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:41 (fourteen years ago)

That was his problem though! The guy was this Dickensian grind, so self-assured, positively granitic in his received wisdom.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:43 (fourteen years ago)

He was an old guy who had some romanticized, false version of a time when everything was more civil. I don't mind that at all. If what's replaced him is the way some people conduct themselves on those shows today, you're welcome to it. As far as his received wisdom, I never knew David Broder well enough to make that call.

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:54 (fourteen years ago)

It isn't just his demeanor, clemenza. He had no problem tut-tutting critics who demanded investigations into Bush-era crimes. Who wants Broderian evenhandedness if it it treats every act the same?

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 22:36 (fourteen years ago)

and he was a horribly pedestrian writer too.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 22:36 (fourteen years ago)

his columns were a useful gauge on what Beltway people were thinking and talking about. but you could say that about a zillion other journos these days and since his writing wasn't all that i only kept track of whatever he wrote second-hand.

RIP, tho' ... at least he didn't eat kittens.

Nguyễn Phúc Bích (Eisbaer), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:46 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.