The Sight and Sound Critics Poll is 50 years old!! This is what they voted for (I am not responsible: i am a mere REVIEWER) (also i wd have voted for something like Popeye just to piss ppl off)
1. Citizen Kane 2. Vertigo 3. La Règle du jeu 4. The Godfather pts 1&2 5. Tokyo Story < 6. 2001: A Space Odyssey 7= Battleship Potemkin 7= Sunrise 9. 8 1/2 10. Singin in the Rain
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 8 August 2002 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)
1. Citizen Kane 2. Godather 1&2 3. 8 1/2 4. Lawrence of Arabia 5. Dr Strangelove 6= Bicycle Thieves Raging Bull Vertigo 9 = Rashomon La Règle du jeu Seven Samurai
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 8 August 2002 21:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― lyra (lyra), Friday, 9 August 2002 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham, Friday, 9 August 2002 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Graham (graham), Friday, 9 August 2002 02:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― keith, Friday, 9 August 2002 03:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― di smith (lucylurex), Friday, 9 August 2002 07:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― katie (katie), Friday, 9 August 2002 07:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Jones, Friday, 9 August 2002 07:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 9 August 2002 07:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Friday, 9 August 2002 07:54 (twenty-two years ago)
haha slavoj zizek voted for DUNE in his ten!! i cd kiss him: that is the closest i can find to a proper mark s-type intervention
actually a couple of the directors have similarly wacky one-off votes (ferris beuler!! back to the future!!) but perverse imagination is thin on the ground
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L, Friday, 9 August 2002 09:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― DavidM (DavidM), Friday, 9 August 2002 09:21 (twenty-two years ago)
but NOW everyone's constrained by the feeling they've only seen a tiny fraction (even obsessively diligent critics), and tend to pick from the pool of films they assume everyone's kinda seen (everyone "critically minded", that is), a mode of non-thought that flips them back into blimey-will-i-ever-master-this filmstudent mode
(there were no film students 50 years ago)
(ok some of this more me than nick james)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Jones, Friday, 9 August 2002 09:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Daddino, Friday, 9 August 2002 09:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Jones, Friday, 9 August 2002 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 9 August 2002 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)
john waters voted for the tingler and faster pussycat, but even the latter seems a bit Hoho CounterCanon Ahoy to me (the tingler is genius, admittedly)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete, Friday, 9 August 2002 10:18 (twenty-two years ago)
actually i wz gunna quiz someone on how godather one/two votes got counted (did they just amalgamate the vote, or did they then divide the amalgamated vorted by two?)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― nick.K (nick.K), Friday, 9 August 2002 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― the pinefox, Friday, 9 August 2002 11:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete, Friday, 9 August 2002 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Jones, Friday, 9 August 2002 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Jones, Friday, 9 August 2002 12:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L, Friday, 9 August 2002 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― nick.K (nick.K), Friday, 9 August 2002 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― the pinefox, Friday, 9 August 2002 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 August 2002 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L, Friday, 9 August 2002 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 9 August 2002 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― jamesmichaelward, Friday, 9 August 2002 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― nick.K (nick.K), Friday, 9 August 2002 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole, Friday, 9 August 2002 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― the pinefox, Friday, 9 August 2002 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete, Friday, 9 August 2002 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 August 2002 15:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 9 August 2002 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham, Friday, 9 August 2002 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeff W (Jeff W), Friday, 9 August 2002 15:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 9 August 2002 16:51 (twenty-two years ago)
I love everyone of the top ten movies. I dont agree with them, exactly and I'd certainly pick items from many of the directors - maybe different Kubrick, Hitchcock and Coppola. But they are all pretty well deserved in one way or another.
The least interesting aspect of an opinion is how 'surprising' it is. I wouldn't expect the people choosing these movies to ONLY like these movies.
― Sandy Blair, Friday, 9 August 2002 17:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)
i suspect the lack of very much deliberate or conscious contesting of the (apparent) orthodoxy is less a sign of sclerotic conservatism than that the outcome just doesn't MATTER that much to many of the people asked (which is possibly fair enough, after all: is a Ten Best of All Time a significant and-or serious critical idea? I can certainly imagine that a lot of the critics, who come from a wide variety of schools and styles, populist to political to theorynut, don't think it is... One of the weird facts abt S&S is that it has great prestige and cachet in Hollywood, with quite surprising, outwardly blockbuster-mainstream people, which if anything its own occasional pro-blockbuster pieces have dented rather than added to)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 18:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 August 2002 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 20:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 9 August 2002 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 9 August 2002 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)
(i was drunk when i posted it and had spent the evening in the company firstly of my old buds in S&S production, who were all super-sarcastic abt the whole deal because that's how you get trying to put something like this together w/o mistakes and w.idiot "luminary" contributors not delivering their votes till the last possible moment, then drinking w.funny but cynical entertainment industry journos and foax in present-day indie UK film distribution, who are all wounded compromised idealists- under-the-skin, so probably i did have a bit of rub-off 'tood in the initial post)
as a list, it could be a lot worse: but as an opportunity to seize the platform and PERFORM, well, it just struck me that hardly anyone treated it like that, which is quite odd given who many of these folks are (= argumentative egotists) (like me ie)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 21:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 21:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)
beyonce <3 nurse w.wound ever since stapleton was on the cover
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 9 August 2002 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Friday, 9 August 2002 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)
[Said he, who now spends half his day working out which articles are freelanced and must be cast into an electronic void.]
― N., Sunday, 11 August 2002 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete, Monday, 12 August 2002 08:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 12 August 2002 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Monday, 12 August 2002 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete, Monday, 12 August 2002 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― commonswings, Monday, 12 August 2002 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Tuesday, 13 August 2002 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)
I do Andrew! I really love Renoir! And at least the directors' top ten had two Kurosawas in it!
I was once put on the spot in a.... tense interview when I was asked 'What's the last great British Film?' Fortunately the answer that came to me then is the one I'd stand by now - 'Withnail and I'Tell me I'm wrong.
Very wrong indeed, in that it's rub and annoying people admire it and quote from it in a way exactly parallel to having "You don't have to be mad to work here - but it helps!" signs by their desks (i.e. as a desperate substitute for wit and personality).
the great films of the 1930s that influenced Kane (Preston Sturges, hello?)
As a big Preston Sturges fan, I'd love to hear more about this, Justin - I can't say that the influence is obvious to me. And he only directed his first the year before Kane - perhaps you mean as a writer rather than director?
While I'm knocking others, I will confess that I was recently asked to contribute to an infinitely less elevated poll. It was a top 30, but I'll inflict my top ten on you here.
1. Seven Samurai2. Bringing Up Baby3. The Life And Death Of Colonel Blimp4. Manhattan5. The Philadelphia Story6. An Actor's Revenge7. La Grande Illusion8. The Searchers9. Rashomon10. Double Indemnity
A British film at #3, I notice. Nothing new, though I did have 4 from the last five years in the 30. It's hard for something to establish itself so strongly in my favourites that quickly.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 17 August 2002 10:13 (twenty-two years ago)
First film seen without parental supervison: "Hair".
― Sean (Sean), Saturday, 17 August 2002 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 18 August 2002 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 18 August 2002 12:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 18 August 2002 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)
that counterpunch list! haha it WOULD be like the S&S list if tabulated, despite both Cockburn and St-Clair basically stating straight-off "erm sorry I haven't actually seen a film in decades"
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Sunday, 18 August 2002 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)
hmph
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 18 August 2002 17:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Actual Mr. Jones (actual), Sunday, 18 August 2002 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)
(Sorry it took me almost a year to reply but) Martin, the Preston Sturges film I was thinking of was The Power and the Glory, which he wrote but didn't direct. I dunno if Welles ever saw it but Herman Mankiewicz probably did.
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:03 (twenty-one years ago)
looked over the s&s list again. generally quite boring. but i heart charles tesson.
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 16:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)