After five years in the editing room, and the courts, it's out -- just barely -- and Paquin and Jeannie Berlin are both great in it. Catch it while you can:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2011/10/margaret-builds-momentum-with-critics-but-will-audiences-find-it.html
http://newyork.timeout.com/arts-culture/film/2002495/review-margaret
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 12:00 (thirteen years ago)
Nice one, Dr M. I loved You Can Count On Me, for a long time it looked like this would never get released.
― that mustardless plate (Bill A), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 12:06 (thirteen years ago)
Glenn Kenny also liked it.
http://somecamerunning.typepad.com/some_came_running/2011/10/margaret.html
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 13:12 (thirteen years ago)
v interested in this, assume i wont see it for months
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 13:16 (thirteen years ago)
YES!!!
― jed_, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 17:59 (thirteen years ago)
consumer warning: There are no characters named Margaret in the film.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 18:10 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, I really want to see this.
― Juggy Brottleteen (ENBB), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 18:11 (thirteen years ago)
(except in Matthew Broderick's English class)
xp
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 18:12 (thirteen years ago)
as of friday you all won't be seeing this until next year, unless you're in philly or boston
― licking your challops (Tape Store), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 21:26 (thirteen years ago)
the critical reaction seems much stronger than the studio anticipated
― Rory's new misogynist car (Gukbe), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 21:31 (thirteen years ago)
it's also playing in Montreal till at least next Thursday!
― Simon H., Wednesday, 12 October 2011 21:32 (thirteen years ago)
i think the situation is a little more complicated than that xpost
― licking your challops (Tape Store), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 21:33 (thirteen years ago)
i've been meaning to bump the sidney pollack thread re: this, but it deserves its own thread. it was much better than i expected (WAY better), but at the same time you can tell its a really fucked up version of what lonergan wanted it to be... there's some brilliant stuff in it though (the scene where emily tears into lisa) (morbs otm - jeannie berlin is great)
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 13 October 2011 00:10 (thirteen years ago)
austin, atlanta, and toronto next week as well
― omar little, Thursday, 13 October 2011 00:38 (thirteen years ago)
its already playing in atlanta
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 13 October 2011 00:56 (thirteen years ago)
she fuck any vampires in this?
― balls, Thursday, 13 October 2011 02:17 (thirteen years ago)
oh sorry, congrats to those cities
our market is shut out, like it's absolutely not happening
― licking your challops (Tape Store), Thursday, 13 October 2011 03:53 (thirteen years ago)
Jeannie Berlin gets an ace film part once every 39 years.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 13 October 2011 05:07 (thirteen years ago)
Huh, looks like tomorrow's my last chance to see it.
― Ice Old Bee (jaymc), Thursday, 13 October 2011 05:46 (thirteen years ago)
The reviews have been mixed, but the box office not good -- less than $1000 per screen last weekend in 14 theaters.
I found the UWS classroom donnybrooks over history and terrorism entirely convincing.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 October 2011 14:52 (thirteen years ago)
Liked this a lot, though I'd be be eager to see the "non-Scorsese cut" (if it indeed exists).
― Simon H., Friday, 14 October 2011 15:01 (thirteen years ago)
xp I found them unconvincing at first, before I realized they were taking place in a classroom full of "privileged liberal Jews."
― Ice Old Bee (jaymc), Friday, 14 October 2011 15:02 (thirteen years ago)
Sympathetic to Lonergan's vision, but I find it hard to imagine what an extra half-hour would've done for this film.
― Ice Old Bee (jaymc), Friday, 14 October 2011 15:03 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, it was long enough. While I find Matt Damon more enticing as a geometry teacher than as an action hero, I think going where they did was a mistake, one plot strand too many.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 October 2011 15:09 (thirteen years ago)
I'm gonna see this tonight in Austin. Hopefully I can time my bathroom break correctly.
― ryan, Friday, 14 October 2011 15:13 (thirteen years ago)
149 minutes ain't no thing
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 October 2011 15:29 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah the real fools are the ones planning to catch Turin Horse and Once Upon a Time in Anatolia back-to-back at a local fest here in Mtl this weekend. That takes some kinda perseverance I can't match (having only seen the former).
― Simon H., Friday, 14 October 2011 16:33 (thirteen years ago)
I missed the four-hour Mysteries of Lisbon last weekend because its only showing interfered with dinner plans.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 14 October 2011 16:35 (thirteen years ago)
I'm guessing most of you recognized Lonergan as Lisa's dad? I didn't know he was in it, and probably haven't seen a photo or interview in years, but he has an Irish-artist lumpenness about him.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 October 2011 20:22 (thirteen years ago)
I recognized him.
I really, really liked this. Been thinking about it a lot since I saw it last weekend. I hope we get to see a "director's cut" at some point.
― ryan, Wednesday, 19 October 2011 20:50 (thirteen years ago)
I wasn't 100% sure it was him right away, but yeah. He's in YCCOM, too, as the priest.
― Google W. Buzz (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 October 2011 21:07 (thirteen years ago)
this movie is still buzzing around in my head.
i think, though, that in large measure that it's about the perils of empathy, and the ways we protect ourselves from it. (witness every single political discussion revolves around rejecting the very possibility of the other's real suffering or grievances.) Lisa's initiation into adult life is then, i guess, about developing this capacity for rejecting empathy, perhaps? (or the ways empathy gets refracted into things like opera..)
that's just a first pass at it, as I'm sure there's other things going on.
― ryan, Monday, 24 October 2011 19:54 (thirteen years ago)
I recenrly saw A Seperation and I kept thinking back to this film - intense family-related dramas that also comment on their societies at large, both revolving around injury/accident (to varying degrees). I think this is by far the richer movie, though.
― Simon H., Monday, 24 October 2011 20:18 (thirteen years ago)
*A Separation
― Simon H., Monday, 24 October 2011 20:19 (thirteen years ago)
that's high praise. psyched to catch this/if i can ever catch this.
― mid-song laughing elvis (schlump), Monday, 24 October 2011 20:36 (thirteen years ago)
Bear in mind I don't like A Saparation as much as virtually everyone else seems to.
― Simon H., Monday, 24 October 2011 20:39 (thirteen years ago)
hence the constant misspelling.
huh. just didn't love it or had problems with it? cause part of its strength was it just being unindictably thorough & well put together, to me, so i can understand how not being sold on the contents would change things somewhat.
― mid-song laughing elvis (schlump), Monday, 24 October 2011 20:59 (thirteen years ago)
Just didn't love it.
― Simon H., Monday, 24 October 2011 21:40 (thirteen years ago)
duuude
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Sunday, 8 January 2012 23:21 (thirteen years ago)
i wouldve watched 4 hours of this
― maghrib is back (Hungry4Ass), Sunday, 8 January 2012 23:29 (thirteen years ago)
yeah me too, easily.
― 404 (Lamp), Sunday, 8 January 2012 23:44 (thirteen years ago)
word. i was going to SPOILER reference a scene i wanted to mention, but i don't have to, because you can just choose any scene from the last third of the film and it still applies: it was so rich & multifaceted, everything was just laden with the dimensions & weight of everyone and everything involved.
SPOILER-ESQUE: so say the phone conference in the lawyer's office, there were these unfurling threads of money & blame & responsibility & guilt & mis-connecting & law & anguish & self-awareness. i kinda feel like the distributors for this should be tried for unamerican activities, it just felt crucial, useful.
quietly entered the canon of best-films-about-being-a-teenager, also.
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Sunday, 8 January 2012 23:55 (thirteen years ago)
This is, IMO, the best American movie since Mulholland Drive, and the best film I've ever seen on an initial screening run. As Ryan says upthread, empathy and solipsism are its primary concerns, but it finds a far more intangible paradigm amongst the drama: society as a mental construct, built and fractured within each character's mind, where everybody has their reasons and their righteousness but where conflict bears the subtle grace of inevitability.
I mean, quite apart from its invoking of my favourite poet and its dynamite script (I laughed, I cried etc), it is a film where people's relevant and entirely believable problems interact with one another in a sympathetic, unresolving manner - the other film of recent years to do this (that I've seen) was The White Ribbon (which was, perhaps, less positive about its characters, but which bore the stench of warfare and deprivation to a far higher degree than the metropolitan excoriation of Margaret). The two movies are, I would say, the two best I've seen in the past decade. These are films that operate at the highest pitch of mystery and confluence - a movie must have confluence (or, more crudely, alchemy) for it to work, otherwise it is just screened logic (which sadly constitutes the vast majority of Hollywood and UK film atm). Did not La Regle Du Jeu operate in the same poetically all-embracing, affably intermeshed way as these films? Did not Bunuel's later movies demonstrate the worshipful truth of coincidence and confluence?
Margaret and The White Ribbon are movies of great heart. Each character is given weight, and each character is given their reasons. Of course, Margaret concentrates most rewardingly upon the central figure. Anna Paquin shows integrity, even when she lies. She discovers personal integrity even as everyone and everything around her becomes an extension of herself. And she leads the viewer into a story whose unbalanced complexity resembles their own life, and where resolution is less unrequired, more complete anathema. Such are the greatest of films - where the tale careens onward, beyond the cinema. (Certified Copy is another great ILE recommendation of recent times - my wife & I even had a Certified Copy roleplay evening afterwards, demonstrating the power that an unresolved analysis of pretence and present-moment reality can have. Not as good or exciting as Margaret, though - it's very much limited around a traditional marital paradigm rather than a societal one.)
As a subordinate point, I hope I've conveyed which kind of cinema appeals to me the most, and that some amongst you could suggest further viewing along (or parallel/perpendicular to) such lines. My gratitude besets you.
― once a week is ample, Monday, 9 January 2012 00:16 (thirteen years ago)
wtf paquin is like 30
― seasonal thug (some dude), Monday, 9 January 2012 00:57 (thirteen years ago)
she filmed this just after the piano though
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Monday, 9 January 2012 01:05 (thirteen years ago)
she's so good in this anyway
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Monday, 9 January 2012 01:06 (thirteen years ago)
like your post btw once-a-week, going to chew on it & come back to you when i've some time. this film reminded me of one i've forgotten since coming out of the theatre, but one of the reference points kicked around upthread is farhadi's a separation, which came out last year (or only just, in the states, i think) & topped a lot of lists for being v rounded & sympathetic. think you would dig if you don't already, & that there are probably other iranian routes you'd be into along similar lines
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Monday, 9 January 2012 01:15 (thirteen years ago)
oh ok somehow missed the mention in the OP of it being filmed so long ago
― seasonal thug (some dude), Monday, 9 January 2012 01:24 (thirteen years ago)
some backstory here if it's of interest:http://entertainment.time.com/2011/12/02/director-kenneth-lonergan-emerges-to-tell-us-hes-on-team-margaret/
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Monday, 9 January 2012 01:25 (thirteen years ago)
Didn't they do something wacky with the release like put the theatrical cut on blu-ray and the extended one on dvd and released it as a DVD/Blu-ray combo?
― Public Brooding Closet (cryptosicko), Saturday, 16 March 2013 17:36 (twelve years ago)
yep thats what they did
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 16 March 2013 17:45 (twelve years ago)
That's actually what I thought I was renting--there were three little tags affixed to the shelf--but it seems I was given a DVD-only version. I wouldn't watch it again for the missing 36 minutes; I was able to glean a couple of things I missed from the posts above.
― clemenza, Saturday, 16 March 2013 17:50 (twelve years ago)
Rental dvds are theatrical cut-only, which I think is the only way that versin is availible in that format.
― Vol. 3: The Life & Times of E. "Boom" Carter (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 17 March 2013 00:00 (twelve years ago)
The Canadian combo pack said it contained both versions... but the blu-ray and dvd contained the same shorter version.
― abanana, Sunday, 17 March 2013 00:37 (twelve years ago)
clemenza, have you been to NYC? We scream at each other a lot.
― Pope Rusty I (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 17 March 2013 01:15 (twelve years ago)
I checked the Blu ray out of the library not knowing about how it was packaged the film but only got the DVD. After finding out I'd watched the extended cut, I was happier for it.
― Public Brooding Closet (cryptosicko), Sunday, 17 March 2013 02:03 (twelve years ago)
(xpost) A couple of times, yes; no one screamed at me, possibly because everyone sensed I was from out of town.
I meant to mention what I thought was the funniest line in the film (paraphrasing from memory): Kieran Culkin's "Yeah, but we're gonna skip that for now and keep moving ahead." And I think my favorite performance, admittedly a small part, was Jeannie Berlin's lawyer friend.
― clemenza, Sunday, 17 March 2013 04:12 (twelve years ago)
Damn, I was trying to figure out where I'd seen Paquin's younger brother--as himself in Mad Hot Ballroom!
― clemenza, Sunday, 17 March 2013 04:14 (twelve years ago)
Just saw this last night, the extended version (which was the only one they had at the actual, physical video rental store we got it from). It's exceptional. Has anyone compared it to the Sweet Hereafter? Both are about bus accidents, both about about the decision a young female must make for her witness statement.
― akm, Thursday, 9 May 2013 20:21 (twelve years ago)
I saw whatever version was on HBO and really liked it.
― da croupier, Thursday, 9 May 2013 20:33 (twelve years ago)
such a perfect movie for HBO - lots of stars, episodic, easy to get sucked in if you're flipping by, starring Anna Paquin as a young Lena Dunham
― da croupier, Thursday, 9 May 2013 20:36 (twelve years ago)
Lonergan to adapt Howards End for TV.
http://www.deadline.com/2013/10/kenneth-lonergan-to-script-howards-end-miniseries-bbc-playground-colin-callender/
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 October 2013 17:17 (eleven years ago)
Sure, why not?
― the vineyards where the grapes of corporate rock are stored (cryptosicko), Friday, 11 October 2013 17:27 (eleven years ago)
haha damn
http://badassdigest.com/2012/02/16/film-crit-hulk-smash-22-short-thoughts-about-margaret#comment-1137804165
― Hungry4Ass, Friday, 20 December 2013 06:55 (eleven years ago)
ha ha
― mustread guy (schlump), Friday, 20 December 2013 11:59 (eleven years ago)
this fucking film
― prolego, Friday, 20 December 2013 12:50 (eleven years ago)
Hadn't heard of this film pre the last revive, but read up on it, thought it sounded good, and bought / watched it yesterday. Really great.
― I can still taste the Taboo in my mouth when I hear those songs (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 22 December 2013 08:50 (eleven years ago)
Lonergan's play This Is Our Youth to be revived for Chicago and Broadway, starring ageless 'teens' Michael Cera and Kieran Culkin
http://www.theatermania.com/new-york-city-theater/news/04-2014/michael-cera-to-make-broadway-debut-in-this-is-our_68183.html/
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 April 2014 12:01 (eleven years ago)
Finally saw this last night, the 3 hour cut. Yes it could do with tightening up but I don't think that detracted too much. Thought the sound design was interesting with overlapping conversations and eg. passing traffic mixed as high as the main dialogue and making it difficult to focus, kind of suggesting how we all have these competing personal narratives struggling to make sense of the world. Really great film.
― ewar woowar (or something), Tuesday, 20 May 2014 09:41 (eleven years ago)
watched the 3-hr cut and immediately wanted to rewatch
not sure what was cut from it but i don't think anything needed to be. or there were a million things he could cut that were of equal significance/insignificance, because nearly everything seems like a subplot. the film enters this flat, sequential rhythm where every scene, even the Big ones, seem equally important and there's enough there in each that i wouldn't want to lose them. maybe they could've ended the legal drama sooner but then we'd miss the great image of lisa screaming into a machine (maybe the one time in the entire movie where the camera concentrates on something other than a human body or a skyscraper -- it was an impt break in that rhythm for me) or the all the matt damon shit, but i found that whole thing an interesting parallel/practically a retelling of the bus scene. i'm probably caught up in the hype of the whole "directors cut = true vision!!!" thing but i'm tickled (and sympathetic wrt) that lonergan must've found everything he included so necessary to lisa's story. i believe him!
there were at least 3 Great scenes in this
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Saturday, 20 September 2014 22:23 (ten years ago)
i haven't seen this for awhile, but how far removed the conference call scene is from the accident it's discussing, while still ostensibly being tethered to it, & how much is being folded into the incredibly insubstantial exchange that's happening -- it's so profound, & is such a moment, & yeah is the argument for the film accommodating just such a weight of incident & digression.
new lonergan & matt damon flick forthcoming btw. one day.
― schlump, Saturday, 20 September 2014 22:31 (ten years ago)
just remembered the other inanimate object the movie cared about, the shopping cart -- both stand-ins for human bodies obv
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Saturday, 20 September 2014 22:46 (ten years ago)
also the wiki cast list insists that ruffalo's wife's name was margaret (it was just "Mrs. Maretti" in the end credits iirc)
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Saturday, 20 September 2014 23:12 (ten years ago)
totally want to see this again
― jaymc, Sunday, 21 September 2014 05:50 (ten years ago)
For This Is Our Youth, does anyone have advice on seating or when to go?
― youn, Sunday, 21 September 2014 15:59 (ten years ago)
Second viewing, long version. I don't know how much was added, but the one scene that clearly wasn't there the first time I saw it--the drama group getting in touch with their feelings about each other--was pretty awkward (although undercut nicely by Kieran Culkin's benign ridicule). The rest of the film held up fine.
It's such a sprawl...What I thought especially strong this time was the mother-daughter stuff. One scene that bothered me the first time--Jeannie Berlin going off on Paquin--didn't this time. Paqin gives one of those Agnes Moorehead-in-Ambersons (or Julianne Moore-in-Magnolia) performances that is so odd and so intense that you're bound to have a strong reaction in one direction or the other. Liked both lawyers a lot. (The second one has a great deadpan moment, something like "You're going to get a lot of money"/"What's the point of doing this?"/"You're going to get a lot of money.") I've never set foot in a private school, but I found that one class (the one where they scream at each other about terrorism and Israel) a little weird. The teacher runs the class, but he has an assistant there to moderate?
― clemenza, Saturday, 13 June 2015 14:10 (nine years ago)
I loved the classroom scenes. Was the getting-in-touch-with-feelings one a different one than the discussion on the "as flies to wanton boys are we to the gods" speech from King Lear (I haven't seen it since it first hit DVD)? Cause if so, that may have been my fave scene in the whole film.
― The New Gay Sadness (cryptosicko), Sunday, 14 June 2015 00:38 (nine years ago)
Different scene, yes. The one you're remembering, where Broderick gets into the argument with the student, that's also one of my favourites (even though, as I said a few months ago, I think most teachers would welcome the disagreement). The theatre group is just in the long cut, and it verges on self-parody--Culkin saves it at the end.
― clemenza, Sunday, 14 June 2015 02:27 (nine years ago)
New movie:http://www.rogerebert.com/sundance/sundance-2016-manchester-by-the-sea
― ... (Eazy), Monday, 25 January 2016 19:02 (nine years ago)
That's good news! I look forward to seeing it in 2021.
― she pnuched me in my weinre when I was asleep (Old Lunch), Monday, 25 January 2016 19:07 (nine years ago)
this one seems fully edited
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 25 January 2016 19:08 (nine years ago)
"Anchored by a breathtaking performance from Casey Affleck"
is this possible
― remove butt (abanana), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 01:56 (nine years ago)
Excited about another film from this guy. Not so much another film starring an afleck as a working class dude from Boston
― Heez, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 02:58 (nine years ago)
oh c'mon he's been good in plenty of things xp
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 03:16 (nine years ago)
Kyle Chandler is kinda cornering the market on small-but-memorable roles in American indies, huh
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 03:17 (nine years ago)
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/11/07/the-cinematic-traumas-of-kenneth-lonergan
― Number None, Monday, 31 October 2016 19:38 (eight years ago)
manchester by the sea is p great imo. loved casey affleck in it
― harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 31 October 2016 20:08 (eight years ago)
oh cool, we saw Little Men yesterday and I told tt it reminded me a bit of Margaret so we have to watch it now
― imago, Monday, 31 October 2016 20:19 (eight years ago)
I'm not sure how I felt about the film overall but jesus christ the big Williams/Affleck scene at the end is just utterly devastating
― Number None, Sunday, 29 January 2017 02:49 (eight years ago)
Surely this deserves a thread of its own?
― Matt DC, Sunday, 29 January 2017 12:30 (eight years ago)
saw this a few weeks ago & was surprised there wasn't a thread or much discussion (even a post search just revealed a lot of lists of titles on that dreadful tetris thread)
I saw a preview which meant I went in without having seen a trailer, which probably helped. I really liked it, I was chuckling pretty much start to finish while also finding it quite affecting
― wins, Sunday, 29 January 2017 12:38 (eight years ago)
wasn't too sure about the broderick bit tho, it was funny but at a different pitch to the rest of the film, seemed like?
― wins, Sunday, 29 January 2017 12:45 (eight years ago)
I liked Manchester by the Sea, but maybe not as much as I think I should have, and definitely not as much as I expected to. Affleck is fantastic, and his scene with Williams towards the end (spoiled a bit by Oscar clips, though far more powerful once you know what it is actually about) is indeed devastating. After a while, though, I started to wonder how it might have played minus all of the flashback scenes (and certainly minus the one brief but terrible dream sequence) which felt a bit too telling-not-showing for me. I did like Broderick's scene, though, mostly because I love Broderick as a middle-aged sad sack (see also, Election, and You Can Count on Me). Also great: Lonergan's cameo, and "Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts" (!!) scoring a sex scene.
I dunno, though--it may grow on me in time, but Lonergan's already made two of my favourite movies, so this one cannot help but feel like a very minor letdown in comparison.
― some sad trombone Twilight Zone shit (cryptosicko), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 16:00 (eight years ago)
Broderick has the funniest of his middle-aged schlump roles in awhile in Rules Don't Apply.
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 16:03 (eight years ago)
The three hour cut of Margaret is on Hulu (even though it says it's the 2 1/2 hour version). Incredible performances all around. We knew nothing about it before watching last night and absolutely loved it.
― j.o.h.n. in evanston (john. a resident of chicago.), Wednesday, 3 July 2024 16:17 (eleven months ago)
It's great, one of my all-time favorites.
― birdistheword, Wednesday, 3 July 2024 21:52 (eleven months ago)
I still think the original theatrical cut is just about perfect, too. Very lucky to have seen it in 35mm during its one-week Oscar-qualifying run at the Landmark in Los Angeles
― beamish13, Wednesday, 3 July 2024 22:03 (eleven months ago)
and I wonder if Lonergan ever paid Matthew Broderick back that million dollars for extra editing time
― beamish13, Wednesday, 3 July 2024 22:04 (eleven months ago)
Lisa Cohen is the most realistically unbearable precocious teenager in movie history
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Friday, 5 July 2024 01:34 (eleven months ago)