CD organization techniques?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Does anyone have any good CD organizational schemes that don't involve alphabetizing?

I have basically an learning disability for phonetics/alphabetization, so I can't organize my stuff that way. It's not been too big of an issue until now (fewer than 70 or so CDs kept out) but I've unpacked all of my collection now, and for the last two weeks I've been struggling to locate anything. They were alphabetized, but the breaking point came when it took me 3 minutes to remember that J came before L (no K's out on my shelf, and I can't handle skips like that). I 'm trying to come up with a new organizational method:

  • group by color on the spine in ROYGBIV? (downfall here: most are black or white)
  • group by genre?
  • chronological by release date?
  • write out the alphabet on a strip of tape & hang it up?
  • ???

lyra (lyra), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 02:52 (twenty-three years ago)

new non-high-fidelity answers, please.

lyra (lyra), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 02:57 (twenty-three years ago)

I tend to group by genre first, and I understand that this is completely subjective. After genre, I figure out which artist I have the most of, and I put those first. All artists who only have single discs get grouped by label. But I am going back to genre then artist last name soon. I am switching from a CD booklet back to jewel cases. has anyone else made this switch? the booklet is more efficient, but I hate having to drag the thing from my bookcase, only to open it (it is *very* full) find the CD and struggle to close it. Jewel cases are much easier.

Even though it wasn't asked, my vinyl (virtually all techno/house 12"s) is organized by label, and then by catalog number within each label. (if my grammar is bad or I am rambling, blame OUZO!)

The best organization schemes allow one with large amounts of records to rediscover that which they have forgotten.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, but also being able to find the exact CD you want as you are running late for work is good too!

How do you possibly remember the catalog numbers for your vinyl?

lyra (lyra), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:11 (twenty-three years ago)

My cds are stacked on the floor. Sometimes the stacks become a pile. Whenever I need to find one to answer an ILM question it is a struggle. On top of the stacks are the cds I am listening to most recently.

Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:13 (twenty-three years ago)

i have loose genre on my lp's: rap, jazz, soul, electro/etc. and rock/everythingelse. then i have those plastic cards for letters, but in sets, like a-b-c, d-e-f, etc. that might be a good way to go, to have dividers, so that you can just see the letters you're looking for and don't have to think off the top of yr head where they belong in the alphabet. with my cd's the only things that are separated out are rap and jazz. everything else is disorganized and i have to rely on my memory of what the spines look like and where i saw them last (which is usually not a big problem but sometimes drives me bonkers.) i don't think i could get so anal as to alphebetize everything, because i like piles and scatter. cd's and lp's which are on the agenda are in stacks right around the stereo.

ron (ron), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:18 (twenty-three years ago)

plus if i have lots of albums by one artist they just might get their own special card!!

ron (ron), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:20 (twenty-three years ago)

"How do you possibly remember the catalog numbers for your vinyl?"

after a while, I tend to get a sense of where they belong. I have a relatively small collection (4 crates), and I don;t have more than 8 records per label. when I am practicing, I don't pull the sleeve out of the crate completrly. some labels that are run by one artist or group of artist seem to display cat #'s much more prominently. for instance, my favorite label, Combustible (best label that nobody knows for tribal tech house qurikiness) usually has something like "combustible 8" on the label, so I don't have to read the writing in the run-out grooves. I don't know if you deal with a lot of 12"s on independant labels, but the cat. no's are usually quite low, so it is not like I have to remember "Columbia 12-999453487" or some shit like that. I remember realtive position more than exact numbers.

just to reiterate "typos = ouzo" hehehe

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)

i would say don't get over-organized because the price you pay for it is having to be super-careful when you put stuff away. that's why i like the three letter groups - i can just shove stuff anywhere in that section, but worst case i'm only looking through 100 records or so at a time

ron (ron), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:25 (twenty-three years ago)

using the CD booklets, the liner notes are always in the same place, so the initial organization holds without forcing me to be anal.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:28 (twenty-three years ago)

those booklet thingies bother me!!

ron (ron), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:30 (twenty-three years ago)

I had booklets in college because I had no space for cd cases, and i am NEVER going back.

Ron, the A-C, D-F dividers sounds like a good idea, I may investigate that.

lyra (lyra), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:35 (twenty-three years ago)

that is a good point about the booklets holding your organization static. you probably get used to exactly where certain cd's are that way.

ron (ron), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:38 (twenty-three years ago)

do y'all booklet types keep the back tray part of the packaging? i've never seen anyone who saved those in their folders.

ron (ron), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:44 (twenty-three years ago)

archaeological! or er maybe bureacrato-archaeological.

Tantivy's desk is neat, Slothrop's is a godawful mess. It hasn't been cleaned down to the original wood surface since 1942. Things have fallen roughly into layers, over a base of bureaucratic smegma that sifts steadily to the bottom, made up of millions of tiny red and brown curls of rubber eraser, pencil shavings, dried tea or coffee stains, traces of sugar and Household Milk, much cigarette ash, very fine black debris picked and flung from typewriter ribbons, decomposing library paste, broken aspirins ground to powder. Then comes a scatter of paperclips, Zippo flints, rubber bands, staples, cigarette butts and crumpled packs, stray matches, pins, nubs of pens, stubs of pencils of all colors including the hard-to-get heliotrope and raw umber, wooden coffee spoons, Thayer's Slippery Elm Throat Lozenges sent by Slothrop's mother, Nalline, all the way from Massachusetts, bits of tape, string, chalk . . . above that a layer of forgotten memoranda, empty buff ration books, phone numbers, unanswered letters,
tattered sheets of carbon paper, the scribbled ukulele chords to a dozen songs including "Johnny Doughboy Found a Rose in Ireland" ("He does have some rather snappy arrangements," Tantivy reports, "he's a sort of American George Formby, if you can imagine such a thing," but Bloat's decided he'd rather not), an empty Kreml hair tonic bottle, lost pieces to different jigsaw puzzles showing parts of the amber left eye of a Weimaraner, the green velvet folds of a gown, slate-blue veining in a distant cloud, the orange nimbus of an explosion (perhaps a sunset), rivets in the skin of a Flying Fortress, the pink inner thigh of a pouting pin-up girl . . . a few old Weekly Intelligence Summaries from G-2, a busted corkscrewing ukulele string, boxes of gummed paper stars in many colors, pieces of a flashlight, top to a Nugget shoe polish can in which Slothrop now and then studies his blurry brass reflection, any number of reference books out of the ACHTUNG library back down the hall -- a dictionary of technical
German, an F.O. Special Handbook or Town Plan -- and usually, unless it's been pinched or thrown away, a News of the World somewhere too -- Slothrop's a faithful reader.

Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:44 (twenty-three years ago)

ps lyra thanks for making me look up the ul and li tags, always nice to expand the html knowledge

ron (ron), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:50 (twenty-three years ago)

"do y'all booklet types keep the back tray part of the packaging? i've never seen anyone who saved those in their folders"

I keep the jewel cases with the back tray info at home in storage, but that is changing this school year. the back tray info is worth keeping for trade-ins and also for those instances when the booklets don;t list track names.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:53 (twenty-three years ago)

- thomas pynchon, gravity's rainbow, p. 18, © thomas pynchon, 1973, this edition published by penguin books, 1995, PLEASE DON'T SMACK ME DOWN COPYRIGHT LAWYERS

Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll handle this. Go about your businesss.

felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 04:01 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I don't. Now that I was going to move - but apparently will not - I have my CDs literally all over the place. Ah well.

nathalie (nathalie), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 05:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Last spring I completed the tedious process of moving all my cds into cd booklets (stolen from target). Compulsively, I did include the back parts of all of them, and I alphabatized them, trying to leave generous space for future acquisitions in each letter of the alphabet.
now the horrifying part: the rings in cd booklets don't snap open, so if you run out of room in say, the 'D' section, and need a place for your new Diamond, Neil cd, yr only option is to take every cd, liner and back thingy out of its little slot and re-alphabatize the entire fucking thing. which i haven't done. cuz that would be pathetic.

i have considered cutting all the leaves out of my stolen cd booklets and sticking 'em into openable 3-ring binders, but i figure that by the time i get around to this, the idea of storing one's data in like, actual physical space will be laughably old-fashioned.

so yeah, this is a HUGE problem that we should all drop everything to solve for the good of the cd-buying-public...

gabe, Wednesday, 4 September 2002 06:03 (twenty-three years ago)

I have gone partially booklet. It saves a lot of space and they're lovely to leaf through, but I must admit I have been favouring my non-booklet CDs for listening purposes. You wouldn't believe how much those jewel cases weigh when you've got a bin bag full of them. I have tried to organise the booklets by how unlikely I am to want to listen the the CDs, but it's very addictive and eventually they are all going in. I didn't know they were called booklets, there's nothing '-let' about them, they're quite hefty. Up until now I have been referring to them as 'folders'.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 06:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Nobody favouring the filing by acquisition date here then?

I have roughly half my collection in a huge unsorted "recent acquisitions" pile that runs back about 2 years.

tigerclawskank, Wednesday, 4 September 2002 07:18 (twenty-three years ago)

That's a bit to close to Mr. Cusack's "Chonological-Biographical" filing technique. Miss a turn.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 09:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I have a fruit crate, singles in 2 rows on the left, albums on 2 rows on the right, and overflow piles blocking the ventilation on my amplifier, no real order at all, apart from stuff I put away last is at the front. I can usually remember what the spines look like well enough to be able to find things.

Graham (graham), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 10:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Graham, re the overflow pile blocking ventilation on your amp: heat leads to warpage and ruined records.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 10:30 (twenty-three years ago)

I just can't accept these folder things. The ones I've seen seem to screw up the booklets - the pockets aren't big enough for a chunky booklet. Do you people throw away the case and the back cover artwork? Or do you take the back cover thing off and put the rear sheet in with the booklet?

Either way it's too much hassle, AND the paper will get creased, AND if you throw away the rear artwork you can't trade the CD...

I guess I'm lucky to have plenty of space for lots of shelving (those lovely tall Ikea towers) and not need portability like if you're going back and forth to Uni.

Vinyl lives in my front room in a cupboard away from cats and kids.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 10:40 (twenty-three years ago)

For a long while mine were organised by spine colour, so you had a luvley gradually-changing spectrum of CDs going round the room.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 10:46 (twenty-three years ago)

(those lovely tall Ikea towers)

The rotating ones? Last time I went to get another of those I was told they no longer stock them. (a safety or reliability problem was implied). Sadly I had to substitute a cheap & nasty one from Argos. Horrible colour & style, but practical. And, as I said, cheap.

As for sorting, the vinyl is in an old trunk in the living room, in a kind of "order of geographical origin, followed by chronological order". The tapes (so many 100's of tapes ...) are in black drawers stacked up in 3 places now. I lost it completely with sorting those into any kind of order a couple of years ago. Now it taked ages to find anything amongst them. CD's are roughly grouped by genre, but country of origin has a say too. Recently the CD's got split in half, between "current" & "old/CD of something this spendthrift had in an earlier format already"

David Moore (Mooro), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:03 (twenty-three years ago)

In case you're interested, Ikea seem to have caught up with the idea that some of their customers might have big CD collections.

I couldn't find this on their website, but on p125 of their 2003 catalogue, there's a huge black/white-lacquered thing with sliding doors called Dromme which stores 882 CDs in six compartments of three shelves each. The one person I know who owns one reckons you can nudge towards the 1000 mark if you have enough slim CD-singles, digipaks, slipcases, etc. He's taken the doors off the upper third and redistributed the shelves to store 7" singles.

I'm a boring alphabetical keep-the-jewel-case kinda guy, so no insights from me.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:31 (twenty-three years ago)

What is this keeping things in order. Things are where they are .If you need it you will find it.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I need a million pounds, can I find it? Can I fuck as like.

chris (chris), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:44 (twenty-three years ago)

**The rotating ones? Last time I went to get another of those I was told they no longer stock them.**

No - sounds hellish complex. I get the tall thin colums ones which hold, I think 180 'normal' CDs. (15 x 12). They're called 'Benno' in the catalogue and you can get them in various colours, but the bleachy pine is obv the one to go for ;) Weirdly, they are ALWAYS CHEAPER every time I go - I think the first one I bought was £50, and I paid £29 for the last couple. I've got 7 and they house most of my stuff, although there are various CD piles (recently bought pile, the 'kitchen' pile etc)

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:54 (twenty-three years ago)

You have a seperate pile for Kitchens of Distinction records? AJAJAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHa or as they wd say in SPANISH jejejejejejejjejejejejje (possibly).

Hi Dr C!

Sarah (starry), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Kitchens of Distinction pile = pile to be taken down to the Record and Tape ASAP!

Andrew L (Andrew L), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 12:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Michael - how much is this DROME?

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 12:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Dromme CD storage = 65 quid. I can send you a JPG if you like.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 12:21 (twenty-three years ago)

That seems remarkable value. Please do.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 12:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Hello Starry! I have LITERALLY split my sides larfing with mirth and glee an' ting at your VERY GOOD JOKE! Oh me, oh my! You're a one and make no mistake! Kitchen pile! Kitchens Pile!

Guess where I keep Bogshed! In the BOG or in the, wait for it....SHED!

(Hobbles away bent double supressing further titters....)

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 12:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Bogshed filed alongside The Three Johns? Can?

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 12:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Lulu?

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 12:59 (twenty-three years ago)

When I was a small person I used to group CDs together based on how many records I owned by one artist. I think I based it on the idea that if I owned X many Manics records but only Y many (I dunno, say...) Levellers reocrds, I must like the Manics more and therefore they'd need to be easiest to find.

Then I realised I owned far too many records, so now they're alphabetical. If I own more than one record by any one artist they're listed in chronological order of release.

Sorry.

Alex M., Wednesday, 4 September 2002 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Kings Of Convenience?

David Moore (Mooro), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 13:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I have got IKEA shelves (non-revolving) too, blue was the only colour they had left. The overspill used to be in a vegetable rack. As for the folders, the very chunky bookletted CDs stay on the shelves along with the doublers. I keep the tray artwork, but chuck the jewel cases away. I just found I was becoming a slave to jewel cases. I don't want to sell any CDs because they give me crap money and I spend the next five years hankering for that Verve album with the big hits on it. Yes, some of the booklets do get a bit buckled, but it gives them character. Most liberating experience: throwing away the stupid medicine box that Spritualized album came in. Take twice daily my arse. None of this would have happened if I wasn't obsessed about moving house though. I also threw away the boxes from my box sets, thus enabling me to peel the banana from the VU one. You see what you're missing? It's all about space, weight, efficiency and ergonomic styling.

There's a 2003 catalogue already?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 13:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Cistern of a Down?

Yes, we're all geared up for 2003 'round our way', as they used to say in the Music Halls.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 13:31 (twenty-three years ago)

**I also threw away the boxes from my box sets**

NOOOOOOOOOOOO!

**It's all about space, weight, efficiency and ergonomic styling**

I don't need the space! And hey, my shelves look great - I can't think of anything worse than thumbing through a book thing to see my CDS.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 13:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Confession: the box set boxes are in a kind of decompression chamber on top of the cupboard, waiting to be jettisoned.

One day I hope to thumb through my book thing with a gathering of family and friends, like a photo album, only mentalist.

Hey! Where do you all keep your minidiscs? Mine are in the cat litter.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Mine are in a jiffy bag kicking around my floor and occasionalyy thrust into my backpack. One day I hope they will be crushed so finely they will turn to diamonds.

Graham (graham), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 14:37 (twenty-three years ago)

The CDs that matter to me the most are organized by genre, then to some extent by importance of the artist (sometimes personal importance to me, sometimes canonical importance)/their chronological place in that genre's history (as far as I know). CDs by the same artist are organized chronologically by the order in which they were recorded (as far as I know), though sometimes I'll put "best of" CDs first. The CDs that don't matter to me (as much anyway) are mostly filed by genre and then by artist within genre, with little further breakdown. I only have 500 CDs at most, so it's not a big problem, and I cover enough genres that the genre breakdown already sorts things out fairly well.

DeRayMi, Wednesday, 4 September 2002 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)

If anyone knows of a decent-sized purpose-built minidisc storage thing please tell me and save us from the teetering shoeboxes. Not that we'd USE it, probably. Maybe the whole point of minidiscs is that you should have to rummage among them, or something.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 14:53 (twenty-three years ago)

One day I saw something on the telly where they were offering up crushed CDs as an alterntive to topsoil. I thought this was stupid because toddlers could choke on it, although they could choke on topsoil or wood chippings too, I suppose. But it did prove that CDs are treated with less veneration than vinyl, thus supporting the booklet/folder faction of which I have become a major spokesman.

Minidisc rummaging will soon be an It's a Knockout sport. You can get booklet/folder things for them, but they are aimed at the 'music on the move' market rather than home storage.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 14:59 (twenty-three years ago)

muji do nice minidisc 'racks'. i say racks but they are more like tupperware, hold 20 discs in a single row and hinge along the short side with the other short side molded into a carrying handle type thing (imagine a long thing version of a kid's lunchbox).

have two of those revolving ikea things and still have an argos tower's worth of overflow and piles littering the place. think the way forward is mp3 cds - everything stereolab ever did on a single disc, say, and reclaim that foot of shelf space. or an mp3* server - 160G disk or two should be enough for life. buy cds, rip them, take them down the record and tape exchange...

alphabetically and then chronologically. various artists in the argos tower. mp3 cds in a bad badtz maru wallet. tapes are still waiting to be unpacked since the last time i moved (almost 3 years ago)

andy

*sorry, ogg

koogs, Wednesday, 4 September 2002 15:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Minidiscs? Nice polypropylene (is that what PP is?) Muji boxes with a handle - each stores 20. They seem to have discontinued them, but now offer an acrylic box for 117 discs instead: here.

No alphabetisation here (that would be madness), but grouping by field-rec/live-rec/comp/entire album/dicking about, etc.

(I see Koogy has beaten me to the punch on this; I will just say: entire oeuvre of artist on single CD-R in MP3 format = smashing, but sound quality goes out the window).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 15:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Slash!

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I have mine alphabetically by artist, in 20 piles against the wall (on top of record and video shelves), high enough that it's really rather hard to get at those on the bottom. They are never going into books, because I want to be able to cast my eye over them to pick one out, and they make me happy being there anyway.

I do think alphabetical by artist is the only way that you can reliably find things, Lyra - and Ron's divider suggestion is an excellent idea.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)

MaxCDWallet offers removable/rearrangeable CD binder sleeve pages, and a free binder! or something. I'm a shelf man myself, strict alphabetical-by-artist except I don't know what to with all the mix CDs. V/A is getting too big. I guess I had the same problem with cassettes, way back when.

Maybe I should transition to binder. Throwing out all those flimsy damn jewel cases would sure feel good.

Paul Eater (eater), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 19:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I currently file mix CDs by the mixer. Makes sense if they are the attraction, but on some I don't register or remember who mixed it, and that is nothing to do with the attraction. I toy with moving those mixes into the VA section, but it is not obvious where the line is drawn between megastar DJ mixes and Label Sampler Mixes Mixed By The Unknown DJ Who Is Mates With The Owner. I may start a Mix section distinct from both, after I move house soon (good time to reorganise).

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 20:19 (twenty-three years ago)

More recently acquired vinyl is stacked across the bottom shelf of the cupboard that the stereo sits on. Those hinged lid boxes that hold 10 MD's just fit nicely on the shelf in front of the 7"'s. Not really enough of then yet for sorting to be a problem, they are mostly live recordings in chronological order of gig. The compilations have their own box.

4 of the posters on this thread have sent me MD's. Thanks, chaps. Peter I will send you a couple more, er, soon.

David Moore (Mooro), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 20:49 (twenty-three years ago)

If you stack yr LPs and CDs on end you can see the covers much more easily

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 22:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, but my balancing skills.... yikes. They're worse than my alphabetizing skills!

lyra (lyra), Wednesday, 4 September 2002 23:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the 'most recently listened to method' where those are on top, so If I'm looking for a specific CD I try to remember how long ago it was that I last listened to it, and then go that deep in.

A Nairn, Thursday, 5 September 2002 01:54 (twenty-three years ago)

The storage thing's always been a bugger - I used to do the alphabetical thing but now I've got way too many CDs so I now keep them in vague woolly genre groups, with (urgh) "crossover" bands stuck between the relevant genres. I guess if you look carefully you could plot a fluid progression from metal to classical or something inna pete frame rock family rainbows-type stylee...how exciting!

Still keep my vinyl alphabetically tho...go figure. Actually, I recently moved 208 of my favourite CDs into one of those Case Logic things so i could take them travelling, but I've decided, in spite of the massive portability advantages, that I don't like them at all, for the same reason I fear the mp3: you lose all the lovely artwork stuff...

Charlie, Thursday, 5 September 2002 02:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Best thread ever!

Next question: Where do you keep your eight-tracks? Mine are in the glove box of my tow-truck.

Case Logic, say it soft and it's almost like praying...

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 5 September 2002 05:45 (twenty-three years ago)

The Chaos Theory System is my system of choice.

gazza, Thursday, 5 September 2002 05:50 (twenty-three years ago)

If you buy your MDs fifteen at a time from FNAC you get free plastic module boxes which can be linked together to make an efficient MD storage metropolis which can be screwed to the wall. Predictably, I threw mine away.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 6 September 2002 07:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I tend to buy my minidiscs in those packs where you get 5 in a ten-sized box, mind you most of them are either in my bag, on my shel#f or in Vicky's car.

My Cds are in no order whatsoever but they're on a variety opf things: racks on a shelf with loads more on top of that, all the soft cases to one side of that and then a tower next to the stereo. Most again, are either in the living room, the kitchen or other people's houses.

Vinyl is in crates, apart from a small selection which are ones I have played recently, right by the turntable.

I must get more organdised.

chris (chris), Friday, 6 September 2002 08:11 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.