Why Are You All Computer Experts?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

I have often wondered this; if I have asked it, it hasn't been answered.

To prove the premise of the question, here is a list of Things That People On ILX Can Do:

- make their answers appear with italics, bold etc

- blue writing

- make pictures appear on the screen

- make cartoons appear on the screen

- produce their own websites

How / why / where did you all learn to do that stuff?

the pinefox, Monday, 9 September 2002 07:23 (twenty-three years ago)

The first four are just simple HTML commands. I suspect most people have discovered these mysterious incantations by googling 'HMTL italics' or some such and then managing to remember that <i> stands for italic, <b> for bold etc. This is hardly expert territory.

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 9 September 2002 07:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't produce my own website.

I can't make my text appear in blue either, though I could probably find out how to do that the same way I found out how to make text appear in italics and include links or pictures in posts - by going View - Source and seeing how the HTML code handles such things. I work with computers a lot, and although I don't work with HTML it's not much of a leap to figuring out what bits of HTML do. I think I heard about the View - Source thing from friends.

Actually, the first few times I put a picture in a post I had to mail the code to my clever girlfriend to check I'd got it right. The Dirty Vicar is not infallible.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 9 September 2002 07:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I am k-grebt at pooters! Ph3344r m333 lam3rzzzz!!

Ur

10 PRINT "starry is better at pooters than rickyt"
20 UR something about 10 = FALSE...?

ARGH! SYNTAX ERROR!
ABORT, RETRY, FAIL?

Bloody pooters.

Sarah (starry), Monday, 9 September 2002 07:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Here are a few codes to get you started you need to replace the [ with < and replace ] with >

[I]Italics[/I]
[B]Bold[/B]
[U]Underline[/U]

For images they must be on the web somewhere and end in jpg. To find out the address of an image left click on the image and then the properties tag will list the address. Ctr C the address eg http://www.zpub.com/un/pope/papaeast-s.jpg and write it like this to paste an image:

[img SRC="http://www.zpub.com/un/pope/papaeast-s.jpg"]

That’s all I know me = computer bonehead

Kiwi, Monday, 9 September 2002 07:44 (twenty-three years ago)

BTW Pinefox, here's the code to make the blue writing:
Writing you want to be blue
Go on, try it. It's not that difficult really.

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 9 September 2002 07:44 (twenty-three years ago)

GRAHAM! You have made it impossible to show the Pinefox how to do the blue writing. GRRRRR!

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 9 September 2002 07:45 (twenty-three years ago)

(ie: please don't break perfectly vaild HTML with yr automagical linking)

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 9 September 2002 07:46 (twenty-three years ago)

on the otherhand automagic means that you pikchers dead easy, heh heh. just past the URL and add "i" in front of http. also simple blue links are easy. you paste an URL and it goes BLUE.

Alan (Alan), Monday, 9 September 2002 07:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I learnt it from hanging around with computer minded friends at university.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 9 September 2002 09:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Pinefox to answer yr actual question - I wanted to start a website and so I bought a v.cheap second-hand book on web design and got a web editor program off the front of a CD. I figured that was still easier than wanting to start a print zine and learning about distribution, printing, desk-top publishing etc.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 9 September 2002 09:21 (twenty-three years ago)

I http://home.graffiti.net/runmdc/crazy_heart.gif POINTLESS GEEK STUFF!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 9 September 2002 09:21 (twenty-three years ago)

The front of a CD? You see this is the kind of thing that's just going to fox the pinefox.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 9 September 2002 09:26 (twenty-three years ago)

sorry a CD off the front of a computer magazine.

Pinefox how do you get a book published?

Tom (Groke), Monday, 9 September 2002 09:29 (twenty-three years ago)

It's just something you pick up Pinefox, and it's certainly not hard to deliberately learn, you don't need to be an expert to do this stuff.

Graham (graham), Monday, 9 September 2002 09:31 (twenty-three years ago)

He's not listening la la la.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 9 September 2002 09:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Pinefox, print this document: Webmonkey Reference HTML Cheatsheet

As others have said, once you start it's easy to pick up the basics.

If you want your own weblog, sign up at Blogger and you can use a free blogspot host.

To update your weblog, consists of two parts: the template editor, and the weblog posts editor part. Indeed the weblog posts editor has automatic buttons, to do bold, italic and even add URL.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 9 September 2002 10:20 (twenty-three years ago)

re the "cheatsheet": martian, are you taking the piss?!

bob zemko (bob), Monday, 9 September 2002 10:26 (twenty-three years ago)

no, it's got the basics a good introduction.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 9 September 2002 10:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Tom E: publishing is hard, at least for me. I can't say there's an easy route to it. It needs lots of luck, lots of time, lots of advice, lots of money. And there is something mysterious about it all.

The physical process about how books are made I haven't a clue about - I only know a bit about a) negotiating with publishers and b) typing the text. I think you'll agree that these, while in their own terms potentially complex, are more 'basic' skills than the computer ones you're talking about.

Also Tom E: thanks for answering the question, which was "WHY are you computer experts?", not "HOW do computers work?". The latter kind of advice is testimony to a) ILx people's goodwill and willingness to share expertise, b) the complexity of the machines.

Graham: I think you are being modest. Your redesign of ILX shows you to be one of the most talented programmers on ILX, at least as far as I can see. I would guess that your prowess at these things outstrips most other posters'.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 September 2002 10:34 (twenty-three years ago)

pfff pf.

Graham (graham), Monday, 9 September 2002 10:40 (twenty-three years ago)

(Do not be so modest Graham. You have put together an apparently bug free discussion site in very little time which doesn't crash servers, something which seems to have defeated even Mr Greenspun himself)

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 9 September 2002 10:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the kind of answer the PF wanted was along the lines of:

In our (my) working life time, offices have gone from being places where there was maybe one computer and a printer to places where everyone is hooked up, via their terminal, to internal and external networks, not to mention the interweb. Either through personal interest, office training or practicality, a lot of people now know far more about how computers, their languages, their hardware and software work (in much the same way that people who have a car end up knowing a bit about how engines work, I guess). This kind of multi-skilling (deskilling?) is common in most modern jobs, apart, it would seem, from modern university lecturers, whose work unusually still involves talking to people and reading and writing on bits of paper. I'm sure there would probably be short courses for faculty to help you learn this stuff.

Actually, the above is probably only true for people in their thirties. Ver kids today learn html while they're still on farley's rusks, don't they?

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, what Jerry said. Not that *most* people now know basic HTML tags, but a lot of other stuff anyway. HTML tags are actually among the easiest things to learn, but they aren't of use in that many jobs.


Me? I did do a course in HTML as part of my MSc years ago but I think even if I hadn't I would have picked it up. Just natural curiosity about computery things.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:07 (twenty-three years ago)

pinefox I learned how to do all that stuff in 1992 when I was a freshman in high school. we were given new computers with this grate 'interweb' on it and I very quickly uh started a server on one with my own web pages and the blue writing etc. but the 'lots of us work in computers' answer someone gave you before still probably matters some, together with what jerry sez above.

Josh (Josh), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Mmmmm! Farleys rusks!!!

God I want some rusks.

Rusks rusks rusks.

What's a computer?

Sarah (starry), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:18 (twenty-three years ago)

When I was 7, my mother enrolled me in a computer class that met on Saturdays at the Science Museum. I thought it was really cool that you could make this machine print out stuff and draw pictures. The desire to play with computers just hung around throughout college.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I learnt it because I saw other peoples blogs and thought they were shit, and that I could do something more fun than them.

I learnt a bit of HTML for that. And I was stuck in a tiny village and BORED OUT OF MY MIND...

Also NUMBER FIVE IS ALIVE! That was all done with compuders don't you know (also a complicated system of mirrors and pulleys and soap)

Sarah (starry), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:27 (twenty-three years ago)


The Nipper's answer is the best of a good, relevant bunch.

The Nipper and others do seem to assume a kind of osmosis effect: hanging around computers makes you find out about them (?). But doesn't this underestimate their complexity? The skills involved, let alone the frigging machines themselves, are very specific and intricate - beyond a certain level, I doubt that you just 'pick them up'.

Other example of failed osmosis: I have been eating TONS OF FOOD for many years but still know nothing about it; also I have been hanging around kitchens for many years, eg. at parties, but can hardly cook anything. For that matter, I have been in tons of cars but will never be able to drive one.

Perhaps this is to say that those of you who are experts are underestimating the level of your expertise.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 September 2002 11:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Computers are nothing like food. (if only, num num)

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)

PF why don't you give us a list of all the things you CAN do? If one of them is a bit like computers we can point it out.

mark s (mark s), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Better analogy - a car. You need to know a certain set of skills to drive it at all. Many people pick up other stuff (how to change a tyre, check the oil, maybe tweak the performance) if they're interested cause they find it useful or enjoy being able to do such things for themselves. Not by osmosis, but by fiddling about, asking other people etc. The good thing about computers is that once you've reached a certain level of competence, any other info you want to know about them is out there on the interweb.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:48 (twenty-three years ago)

I think in this case you can just pick them up, or rather that the 'certain level' you can pick them up to is higher than you seem to think. Once you've reached the stage of posting things to the Internet (already a level of complexity you've mastered PF), then making a word bold, for instance, needs only seven additional keystrokes. And the key thing is that once you've done it once you know it'll be the same procedure to make any word bold at any time. The principle of HTML - invisible 'tags' that modify the appearance of objects and words onscreen - is not a hard one to grasp surely?

Tom (Groke), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:48 (twenty-three years ago)

And yes, pf, before you say it, I *know* you have to take driving lessons but that's only cause of the safety issue. Otherwise we'd just all jump in and pick it up slowly, with a mate there to help us at first. Luckily, it's hard to kill someone with a PC (unless you drop it in their bath or on their head but NEITHER of these are on any recognised path to computer expertise)

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 9 September 2002 11:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I once read that if you can give directions to your house, you can pick up HTML. This is obviously nonsense and not just because I can't give (good) directions but I can do (some) HTML. However, I have no idea of the underlying principles of any programming languages or computers in genral. It's mostly to do with interest I think - if you're interested you will tinker and pick up a certain amount. Some things get easier with repetition (even something mostly counter-intuitive like HTML) but I've always believed that ultimately there are computer-friendly minds and non-computer-friendly minds.

Archel (Archel), Monday, 9 September 2002 12:13 (twenty-three years ago)

ok, but chances that pf has ye picked up what a "house" is? (let alone "directions"?)

(i cannot do left<=>right so this is harder than cookery obv)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 9 September 2002 12:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Is basic HTML really all that counter intuitive? Sure, when you get onto tables and frames and stylesheets it does get complicated, but the idea of marking up plain text with special markers for bolding, underlining, paragraph breaks, 'insert image here' etc doesn't seem that complex to me. It's just like fancy punctuation or the correction marks my teachers used to use at school.

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 9 September 2002 12:42 (twenty-three years ago)

You fibber, PF - you've made me at least two delicious curries, executed with some flair, in different kitchens in adjacent boroughs of SE London. And you're a successful rally driver.

I was, until recently (geologically speaking), a Computer Programmer By Trade, but I only have a smattering of magic blue writing skillz. My resistance to learning HMTL was the opposite of the PF's - as a lofty software developer (who was secretly quite bad at sw dev'mt) I imagined it must be so easy (all those web-sites run by - ha! - morons) that it couldn't possibly be worth my time to look into it.

This is also why I cannot swim or ride a bike. (I am part-fish/invented the spoke).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 9 September 2002 12:43 (twenty-three years ago)

The Nipper and others do seem to assume a kind of osmosis effect: hanging around computers makes you find out about them (?). But doesn't this underestimate their complexity?

This is the Big Lie that kept the software industry afloat for about 20 years. People don't realize how EASY things like HTML actually are.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 9 September 2002 13:26 (twenty-three years ago)

if you can make something bold in Word then you can write html.

the difficulty comes with everything else - you need to organise files (something someone who just sticks everything in My Documents probably can't do), know about relative paths for linking, need to be able to ftp files to a server, need to edit files more precisely than Word lets you - means using something more akin to notepad than word. yes, you could do everything in Word and then Save As HTML but you'd end up with horrible html. i wouldn't trust it any more than i'd trust babelfish to translate anything into french.

this lower level knowledge requirement is a sticking point in a lot of cases.

andy
"Meet Mike - he swims like a fish..." 8)

koogs, Monday, 9 September 2002 13:28 (twenty-three years ago)

what i meant to suggest by what i first posted on the sociology of pop thread, which i meant to post to the soufflé thread, is that people seem to have an increasingly sophisticated knowledge of disciplines associated with computer science, the way people have come to use critical theory to discuss pop music. (maybe i'm overestimating the extent of application in both cases since i don't know anything about critical theory and very little about computers. maybe the concepts have been misunderstood and confused.) stanford has this multi-disciplinary undergraduate major called symbolic systems for which you have to take courses in computer science, psychology, linguistics, philosophy, and mathematics, and i think berkeley has a similar cognitive science major, based upon what my brother's friend said. beyond all this stuff going on at the official level, it would be interesting to see if people will just pick up things from these disciplines as a matter of course and start to apply that way of thinking to other stuff they're interested in.

a funny thing i noticed is that students in my old department all started having "minimalist" web pages with just blue links on a white background. (actually, i think one student started it.)

another is that i overhead my professor explaining the concept behind object oriented programming as focussing on nouns as opposed to verbs, which in turn might get people thinking about how language is structured.

youn, Monday, 9 September 2002 14:06 (twenty-three years ago)

I admit, having an interest in computers when young was a good start for me. But almost HTML I know I learned from free, well-written tutorials on the web, which basically anyone can do. Dan is absolutely right here.

Vinnie (vprabhu), Monday, 9 September 2002 14:25 (twenty-three years ago)


Dan P = native German speaker

Nicky D = learned German at school

Tom E = read Teach-Yourself-German

The Nipper = works with Germans

The Pinefox = je ne comprends pas

Steady Mike = George Steiner

the pinefox, Monday, 9 September 2002 15:33 (twenty-three years ago)

(haha I almost wrote "But I learned German in school..." and then I remembered that there are these mythical beasties called ANALOGIES that sweep across the interweb in gallumphing herds)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 9 September 2002 15:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Select if you learned HTML in an effort to surprise and amuse online acquaintances.


Select if, during that process, you embarrassed yourself with numerous non-functional HTML fiascos.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 9 September 2002 17:38 (twenty-three years ago)


Lookitme I'm the Pinefox and I can do it too!

-- the pinefox (pinefox@hotmail.com), September 9th, 2002.



nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 9 September 2002 17:42 (twenty-three years ago)

(This has been a demonstration of all sorts of issues under discussion. To wit: you can "pick up" bits of skills in the service of trying to be stupidly amusing or whatever else, and -- like any good game -- figuring out how it works becomes entertaining in and of itself. I am not so expert in any of the computer stuff that runs beyond the applications themselves, and thus am sort of pleased to have made my first radio buttons.)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 9 September 2002 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)

That's a rather creepy thing to do to someone looking to understand things, Nabisco!

I did a degree in Computer Science just a few years back to get a job in that area, so I learned a bit of HTML there; but mostly I just picked it up. I think the people who are saying that it's easy may have a different background from PF - its paradigms and mental models are not ones with which PF is familiar, so it may not appear at all easy. This isn't to do with intelligence (he is clearly an exceptionally intelligent man) but with learnt expertise. I got some contemptuous reactions when I started at university, because there was loads of stuff that I didn't know that all of the young students did (I was in my late 30s and hadn't used a computer until the '90s). I was top of the class all the way through by a mile, but even at the end there were things that 90% of the class knew and I didn't - we had such different backgrounds, in relation to computers. I don't know PF's in this regard (or any other regard, come to that), but he may be in the position I was several years ago, though obviously without embarking on studying the subject.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 9 September 2002 18:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Survive oldskool WordStar and HTML is a snap.

I still don't have a webdesign clue.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 9 September 2002 18:35 (twenty-three years ago)

test

test

A Nairn (moretap), Monday, 9 September 2002 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)

But I think PF doens't want to know *how* to do this stuff, he merely want to know *why* people *can* do this stuff--which I guess maybe you are answering by showing how easy it is do these mysterious codings--or maybe *why* they *want* to do it. And the answer seems to be coming across as it's easy, why not? Is there a caste system of ILx separating those great people who possess the code from the others who have it not? Obviously I am one of the latter.

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 10 September 2002 03:11 (twenty-three years ago)

It's me job innit

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 10 September 2002 03:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Mary, I think the point people are trying to make is that there's no great jump between knowing how to do it and not knowing how to do it. I realize the question the Pinefox is asking is sort of "even if it's not a great jump, why are some people on one side and others on the other," but maybe the answer really is that the space is so small -- it's something you can start picking up almost by accident, without ever having a clear reason or objective. (?)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 10 September 2002 05:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, I can't think of anything I can do with a computer that doesn't come down to "well, one day there was a computer around and I wanted to do that, so I figured it out.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 10 September 2002 05:46 (twenty-three years ago)

five months pass...
I keep getting a pop-up on my screen asking if I want to check out a certain casino website, even when I don't have the internet open. How do I make it go away? Please?

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Task manager

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 13 February 2003 16:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Thanks. I couldn't figure out what it would be called under Task manager, so I searched for CASINO on my computer and deleted the favorites link.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 16:32 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
This was a good thread. The one thing that I learned to do on my computer, since the thread, c.2.5 years ago, is: italics. Yes - italics.

I am reviving it now to say: my www computer has got screwed up, when I pressed a button or something, so that the things at the bottom of the screen that tell you what other programs are running keep disappearing. They appear again if I put the Mouse over them. Then a few seconds later they disappear. How can I make them reappear for good? I find it disorientating, I think, not to have them visible.

the bellefox, Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Also the top of the screen, which is called the toolbar, or the task bar? - has got screwed up also, in some way, though it does not keep vanishing.

I fear that even if I turn the machine off, the problems will recur.

the bellefox, Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

(Also, when I minimize The Internet, the icons come back. It is only when I am reading a page, like this, that they go away.)

the bluefox, Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Arrgh noooo don't minimize the internet! That would be disastrous for world economy.

But seriously, right-click on your taskbar, choose properties, then unselect "Auto-hide the taskbar".

Steve.n. (sjkirk), Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm afraid I don't think that works. It was already unselected. I tried something about taking off 'Hide Inactive Icons', but that has not improved matters either.

Is the taskbar the thing (that used to be) at the bottom of the screen?

the bellefox, Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah that's the taskbar -- the thing with the Start button on it. If you drag a piece of the taskbar that has no button or icon on it, you can move it to any edge of the screen.

Is "keep the taskbar on top of other windows" checked? Make sure it is.

Steve.n. (sjkirk), Thursday, 14 April 2005 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post: Now I have clicked on something called Show Quick Launch - and the whole bar has gone away and won't seem to come back.

If I can get it, I should try dragging it, then?

I think the thing was checked, that you suggested.

the bluefox, Thursday, 14 April 2005 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)

The whole bar has gone away? Restart yr computer dude. All the Quick Launch thing should do it show some more little icons next to the start button.

If those settings seem to be set correctly, try setting them wrong, clicking OK, seeing if anything changes, then set them right again/

Steve.n. (sjkirk), Thursday, 14 April 2005 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

No - I'm afraid I don't think that worked either.

I suppose I could try restarting the computer as you suggest.

It seems unfortunate that computers are like this: you do something without knowing it, which is debilitating - and then there are no means to rectify it. Yes - that seems unfortunate.

the bluefox, Thursday, 14 April 2005 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

the essence of being an IT support person is undoing something when you (or whoever) do not know what that something is. there are so many somethings you can do and undo, that starting from scratch is often the easiest solution.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 14 April 2005 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm more baffled by how some people are adept at ALWAYS crashing their comps or fuxoring (?!?) up calculator settings. how DO they do it? :-)

nathalie doing a soft foot shuffle (stevie nixed), Thursday, 14 April 2005 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Try pressing the key with the little Windows icon on it, PF.

Archel (Archel), Thursday, 14 April 2005 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

you do something without knowing it, which is debilitating - and then there are no means to rectify it.

But that's just like real life!!

JimD (JimD), Thursday, 14 April 2005 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I am back on this thread because the problem has not gone away. I just pressed the key Archel recommended. I had never noticed it before. The bar thing came back. But when I clicked on the rest of the screen, it vanished again. This is still no good.

Seeing as you are all computer experts (TM), I would still appreciate the advice that would solve this problem for me.

the bellefox, Friday, 15 April 2005 10:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I think you might have set your taskbar's height to zero by accident.

Solution:

a) close all your programs
b) move the mouse pointer to the bottom of the screen, and see if it changes into a double-headed arrow pointing up and down
c) hold down the left button and move the mouse up until the taskbar reappears

If the pointer doesn't change in b), then I'm wrong.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 15 April 2005 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks for your advice.

I am not sure about the closing programs bit. You mean, close ilx, for instance? Why is this necessary to your plan?

At the bottom of the screen, so far, no, that is not happening. The arrow sometimes goes left to right, but not up and down.

I am quite serious in my appeal for advice, here. Any more available, I would appreciate it.

the bluefox, Friday, 15 April 2005 11:05 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not absolutely necessary, but I think it would probably have made it easier to do. But if the pointer never changes to an up-down arrow anyway, then my guess was wrong and the instructions I gave won't help.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not sure which version of windows you're running but...

Press the windows key again to make your taskbar appear. Once it does keep your mouse over it. Right click your right mouse button over the grey area to show a menu. This menu may have an option that says "lock taaskbar" - if it does, click it. Otherwise click "properties" then a new window will apear. This will have a checkbox option for "Auto hide" - uncheck that (click the wee tick to remove it). Then click 'ok' or 'apply'.

I think.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)

taaskbars are the same as taskbars, they just take a little longer.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)

taskbars = what people in the North of England have on their computers
taaskbars = what people from the Home Counties have instead

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Right click your right mouse button

Pinefox, once you've finished sorting your computer, could you can pass on some of your knowedge of the written word? Anything on avoiding redundancy would be helpful.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)

knowedge

I give up :-(

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post: Onimo: again, thanks for your efforts. But Hide Taskbar is already off, and Lock Taskbar does not keep it on the screen once I have clicked on something else (eg. this box).

the bluefox, Friday, 15 April 2005 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Is The Internet maximised? You might need to check the Always On Top property as well.

Actually, someone already mentioned that.

And restarting the PC which was gonna be my next suggestion.

lock robster (robster), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, it is maximized.

Yes, I clicked taskbar always on top.

And today I restarted the computer.

I think that this all started with me pressing some keys - Return a couple of times? - and suddenly the www screen had enlarged and swallowed the taskbar, which (as I say) since then only comes back sporadically or momentarily. So I suppose I think that there must be a combination of keys that will bring it back.

the bluefox, Friday, 15 April 2005 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Wait a minute - it seems to have come back!

the bellefox, Friday, 15 April 2005 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)

You know, I think that Lobster's maximization thing may somehow have been the key - even though it was maximized (all too maximized) all along.

the bluefox, Friday, 15 April 2005 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Aah. You'd put it into Full Screen mode - which is like maximised, only more so.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Good. So - do you know how I did it, so I can try to avoid it in future; and do you know how I get out of it, if it happens in future?

the bellefox, Friday, 15 April 2005 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)

You may have accidentally hit F11. If it happens again, hit F11 on purpose.

lock robster (robster), Friday, 15 April 2005 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)

It seems unfortunate that computers are like this: you do something without knowing it, which is debilitating - and then there are no means to rectify it. Yes - that seems unfortunate.

It also does not help if the subject patient supplicant continues doing helpful things without being prompted.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 15 April 2005 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.