would you wear those google-internet-cyborg glasses?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

https://plus.google.com/111626127367496192147/posts

Poll Results

OptionVotes
this shit makes me want to move to a log cabin in the woods 22
our cyborg future does sorta bother me but who am I kidding I'll be wearing these one day 16
YES 14
(I have a v. nuanced answer) 2


iatee, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:13 (thirteen years ago)

YES

recent thug (k3vin k.), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:15 (thirteen years ago)

log cabin

and i don't even care, similar to how a badass would respond (Abbbottt), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:15 (thirteen years ago)

from the teaser video it looks like a good way to get run over by a car

dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:15 (thirteen years ago)

log cabin

dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:15 (thirteen years ago)

nooooooo

i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:15 (thirteen years ago)

I have seen enough episodes of nu-Doctor Who to know some villain is going to make a hivemind army out of us as soon as they're adopted en masse.

and i don't even care, similar to how a badass would respond (Abbbottt), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:17 (thirteen years ago)

from the teaser video it looks like a good way to get run over by a car

haha yeah I thought the same thing, manhattan would be a really bad place to wear these

iatee, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:17 (thirteen years ago)

I voted for the 2nd option

iatee, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:19 (thirteen years ago)

not adopting vaguely posthuman tech until we get all the sex/drugs stuff Iain M. Banks promised along with it

and i don't even care, similar to how a badass would respond (Abbbottt), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:19 (thirteen years ago)

Before this becomes mainstream and popular we're gonna have a few years of rich yuppies yelling into extra-large glasses, huh?

"NO MEET ME AT THE BOOKSTORE SHIT I FORGOT TO TURN THERE I GOTTA GO"

I will transmit this information to (Viceroy), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:25 (thirteen years ago)

i'm guessing these things track eye motion to trigger events, which kind of enhances the "crazy person or bluetooth user?" quandry with an exciting new dimension

i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:27 (thirteen years ago)

100% yes

Jeff, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:27 (thirteen years ago)

hold on i gotta check my email
*eyes roll back in head*

i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:27 (thirteen years ago)

worse than wearing a bluetooth.

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:28 (thirteen years ago)

I am a tech nerd and I think these are the worst idea

it's like some tech ppl get so enamored with technology that they kind of forget about basic survival

God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:29 (thirteen years ago)

was really hoping that video would end with the guy jumping off that roof

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:30 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.atlantainjurylawyer-blog.com/Homer%20Simpson%20Distracted%20Driving%20Blog%20Photo.jpg

Frank Youngenstein (Phil D.), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:32 (thirteen years ago)

"did you just check out that girl in the red miniskirt?? wtf"
"no, i swear, i was, uh... reading wikipedia...?"

i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:32 (thirteen years ago)

I'd be so flipping excited to have something like this. Really, I already use my phone/iPad about 6 hours a day and constantly while I'm commuting, so not having to pull it out of my pocket/bag would be fantastic. I expect this will become common in maybe 5 years? Probably sooner.

Jeff, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:33 (thirteen years ago)

i love the hopeful assumption that we'll all be sharing stuff to our google+ circles

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:34 (thirteen years ago)

google has become like that nerdy kid who makes up his own slang and uses it really ostentatiously hoping it'll catch on

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:34 (thirteen years ago)

yeah I should have included "I will wait til apple comes out w/ a pair"

iatee, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:34 (thirteen years ago)

My only beef would be I'm sure it's connecting via cellular, which would drive me mad because I already spend 3 of those 6 phone hours a day yelling at AT&T for having a shitty data connection.

Jeff, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:35 (thirteen years ago)

pretty sure it's wired

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:36 (thirteen years ago)

I'll plug the other end into my bioport.

Jeff, Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:37 (thirteen years ago)

jacks in to the base of the skull at the occipital lobe iirc

xp ha

i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:37 (thirteen years ago)

no i mean the wire plugs into your computer, it's just really long

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:38 (thirteen years ago)

was really hoping that video would end with the guy jumping off that roof

hahaha I thought the same thing. "can I show you something really cool?" *shares view* "AAAIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:12 (thirteen years ago)

IMO the coolest function of these is being able to take a picture of something you're looking at

dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:13 (thirteen years ago)

you can already do that!

iatee, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:14 (thirteen years ago)

you could do that 100 years ago!

iatee, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:14 (thirteen years ago)

anyway I'll wait for the wireless contact lens version that's controlled by my thoughts. talking out loud to your eyeglasses pffffffffft

dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

the coolest thing would be watching movies when someone boring is talking to you

iatee, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

you could do that 100 years ago!

eh not by just blinking or whatever

dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

wonder if people will be able to see what's on your screen from the other side

dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:16 (thirteen years ago)

finally, a discreet way to view pornography on public transportation

i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

Can these futuristic spectacles be adapted for use with my future hearing aids?

Aimless, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

First thing I'd do is probably load up skype w a friend who's also wearing them and experiment with the resulting feedback and hopefully mind blowing digital video noise.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:21 (thirteen years ago)

you could do that 100 years ago!

eh not by just blinking or whatever

au contraire, it was just prohibitively expensive

http://www.oocities.org/steph_private_collection/VCD/IMAGES/sixmilliondollarman.jpg

Frank Youngenstein (Phil D.), Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:27 (thirteen years ago)

touche

dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:35 (thirteen years ago)

not sure if my dislike was more from the glasses or the ukelele dweeb wearing them. anyway, i quite literally thought "i'm gonna have to move to a cabin in the woods at some point, aren't i" before even reading the options itt, so there's my vote.

circa1916, Thursday, 5 April 2012 16:58 (thirteen years ago)

I'll be in my log cabin

I like tech/gadgets etc but we are living in 2012 and I don't have a goddamn jetpack yet. I don't want a pair of glasses to watch porn and lolcats, tyvm

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:02 (thirteen years ago)

A few years ago this would be "would you ever really watch a movie on your phone?" or something like that.

og (admrl), Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:03 (thirteen years ago)

idk, having heads-up-display computer vision on your face is kind of a big leap from watching video on a portable device.

circa1916, Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:07 (thirteen years ago)

look at how far we've come...

og (admrl), Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:09 (thirteen years ago)

I remember how amazing it was to have VHS tapes to record things on!!!

og (admrl), Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:09 (thirteen years ago)

and you're like blahblah video on a portable device when there are elephants starving in arctica

og (admrl), Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:10 (thirteen years ago)

the step between 'basically never being offline' and 'really, actually, never being offline' might just be another step but it does seem different

iatee, Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:12 (thirteen years ago)

They would make arguments IRL more like arguments online, in that you could instantly Google whatever it is the discussion's about and appear much smarter than you really are.

beanz meanz lulz (snoball), Thursday, 5 April 2012 17:13 (thirteen years ago)

don't be evil guys

i didn't even give much of a fuck that you were mod (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 4 June 2013 16:39 (eleven years ago)

RIP my childhood dreams of science developing "x-ray glasses"

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 4 June 2013 16:51 (eleven years ago)

xxp Between that and their ban on facial recognition apps, say goodbye to Google Glass 8ukkak3 pr0n

go cray cray on my lobster soufflé (snoball), Tuesday, 4 June 2013 16:57 (eleven years ago)

I don't want this to get into a nerds against the world thing, but I will say that the secret to the Internet, the texting, the Facebook, the pornography, the Amazon, has relied on the ability to not have to speak out loud. Making this part of the operation of how this new fangled machinery works is going backwards.

srsly

if there were still more john-frink-style nerds instead of hepcat stanford grad startup habitues no one would ever have believed talking out loud more would be better

j., Tuesday, 4 June 2013 17:39 (eleven years ago)

Imagine people wearing Google Glass on buses shouting "give me pr0n, dammit!"

go cray cray on my lobster soufflé (snoball), Tuesday, 4 June 2013 17:42 (eleven years ago)

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_le4q0x5c2w1qaptap.gif
nothing to see here, worf.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 4 June 2013 17:47 (eleven years ago)

one month passes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nm6SptGh4uw

how bad could it be to be stuck to the couch, forever... (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 7 July 2013 14:23 (eleven years ago)

one month passes...

http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-08/watch-drone-piloted-through-google-glass

YOU FOOLS PAY OVER $2.50 for a comic book (forksclovetofu), Friday, 23 August 2013 20:36 (eleven years ago)

three months pass...

http://gigaom.com/2013/12/17/for-3000-metas-augmented-reality-glasses-provide-a-look-at-the-future/

Strangers look on with a discernible, barely contained ‘wow’. (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 18 December 2013 19:35 (eleven years ago)

two months pass...

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/currency/2014/03/whats-the-problem-with-google-glass.html

^ my ongoing fascination will never abide

Lamp, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 17:18 (eleven years ago)

“I didn’t start recording until I got called names and flipped off, in hopes that they would correct and refrain their behavior,” Slocum told me. “Instead, it instigated the situation.”

goole, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 17:47 (eleven years ago)

amazing photo with that story
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/currency/GoogleGlasses-580.jpg

PSY talks The Nut Job (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)

s@rah sl0cum's 15 minutes are getting really old

resulting post (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:03 (eleven years ago)

the story isn't 'the difficulties of being accepted as a google-glass wearer' it's 'just how annoying were you when you were drunk and wearing google glasses?'

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:17 (eleven years ago)

the descriptive phrase 'the end of a pubcrawl' should tell everyone anything they need to know about this 'incident'

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:18 (eleven years ago)

people on a pubcrawl should be kneecapped just because.

goole, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:20 (eleven years ago)

the (anthropological) human spirit rises up indomitable!!

But snapping with your smartphone gets a pass, whereas Glass often arouses suspicion. Part of the reason may be that Glass bypasses the familiar, disarming physical ritual of photography: when a person raises a camera, or a smartphone, everyone know what it means. Somehow an indicator light seems insufficient to overcome perceptions of Glass as furtive and dishonest.

the author was right to contrast this problem to headphone privacy, would have been nice to draw the conclusions further than cellphone-snapping as far as incursion/intrusion into publicly visible/audible spaces goes.

j., Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:23 (eleven years ago)

Slocum doesn’t consider herself a glasshole, but rather an ambassador for the new technology.

pplains, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:32 (eleven years ago)

an ambassahole if you will

PSY talks The Nut Job (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:33 (eleven years ago)

Please, I'm not an asshole. I am an amglassador. Now since you flipped me off, I will stare at you while my weird glasses self-illuminate.

pplains, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:34 (eleven years ago)

greetings meatface. i come in the name of a great new technology which will change the way you poop and shop. do not be alarmed. if you alarmed i will record your reaction to the universe. please do not blame me, i am an empty tube for data and purchases. i can help you chrome your meat so looking at people is less boring and lonely. and you can find nearby pizzerias don't you want to do that with your face.

j., Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:49 (eleven years ago)

IPads looked weird for about 6 months, then everyone got used to it and now most everyone is fine with it. Mobile phones got ridicule for being ugly when they first appeared, right? And kids are bullied for wearing glasses.

One they start making cyborg glasses that look like raybans or whatever I can totally see it taking off, even if all the privacy concerns are kinda valid.

DISMISSED AS CHANCE (NotEnough), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 22:27 (eleven years ago)

i've never seen anyone use ipad as a camera like they do in those somber commercials.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 22:37 (eleven years ago)

the ipad would have been doomed if it was called the ihat

― iatee, Monday, March 4, 2013 3:44 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

iatee, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 22:47 (eleven years ago)

the question w/ the ipad was never 'oh man will I look like a fool' it was 'will I ever use this thing, I already have a phone and a computer'

iatee, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 22:48 (eleven years ago)

Oh sure, as well as people going "it's just a big phone" rather than "it's a tiny but powerful computer". That's got nothing to do with the weird sense (maybe just me?) of entering the future the first time I saw a few of them in the wild.

DISMISSED AS CHANCE (NotEnough), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 22:58 (eleven years ago)

lol nyer commenter

'I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what is totalitarian about the goal to organize all information.'

j., Thursday, 6 March 2014 03:46 (eleven years ago)

oh good lord

sleeve, Thursday, 6 March 2014 04:11 (eleven years ago)

wait wait it's the "all" part right?

resulting post (rogermexico.), Thursday, 6 March 2014 07:31 (eleven years ago)

they should've gone with a monocle design

How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 March 2014 00:09 (eleven years ago)

'ok glass'

http://www.harry.pottercostume.com/wp-content/uploads/mad-eye-moody-bio.JPG

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 7 March 2014 12:04 (eleven years ago)

Emotion tracking reads people's emotions and relays them to the GG's display...
http://www.hopeofthefuture.net/references/gunsnroses-ycbm-25.jpg

an office job is as secure as a Weetabix padlock (snoball), Friday, 7 March 2014 12:10 (eleven years ago)

'I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what is totalitarian about the goal to organize all information.'

http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080107201828/en.futurama/images/5/5e/BrainSpawn.png

Nooye's Vagge (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 March 2014 12:29 (eleven years ago)

they should've gone with a monocle design

Why do people wear a monocle?

an office job is as secure as a Weetabix padlock (snoball), Friday, 7 March 2014 14:36 (eleven years ago)

Hot new app monoc.ly

μ thant (seandalai), Friday, 7 March 2014 14:45 (eleven years ago)

google monocle would never work as they would constantly be faced with electonic failures caused by surprised users dropping them in their tea cups

nitro-burning funny car (Moodles), Friday, 7 March 2014 14:54 (eleven years ago)

has this been posted yet? i totally hate this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4VRFuSyzzc

global tetrahedron, Friday, 14 March 2014 20:31 (eleven years ago)

the best part is when it flashes LETTUCE, EGG, CHICKEN as he's eating his salad. i like the idea that he has no idea what anything is

global tetrahedron, Friday, 14 March 2014 20:32 (eleven years ago)

i like how the protagonist of this video is your classic everyman: waking up late, gazing out the window of his manhattan highrise, and then quickly putting on a suit so he can hop in his ferrari to drive to the billiard hall.

Treeship, Friday, 14 March 2014 20:35 (eleven years ago)

for the rich moron

How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 14 March 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)

i wonder what the models who made that commercial thought about it

no war but glass war (Lamp), Friday, 14 March 2014 20:42 (eleven years ago)

Brian Cookson
1 month ago

Wow, it looks like this will finally make everyone's lives so much better! Hooray for the future!!! ;)
Reply
·

Treeship, Friday, 14 March 2014 20:42 (eleven years ago)

has this been posted yet? i totally hate this:

some lolz were had on the LOLZ thread

chive on you crazy diamond (diamonddave85), Friday, 14 March 2014 20:50 (eleven years ago)

lol yessss

http://i1354.photobucket.com/albums/q686/tinyservants/egglettucechicken_zps40d04738.gif

global tetrahedron, Friday, 14 March 2014 20:55 (eleven years ago)

and why is he carrying around so much cash

j., Friday, 14 March 2014 20:56 (eleven years ago)

i don't see why the glasses didn't tell him SHE'S PLAYING WITH HER HAIR GO FOR IT BRO

then later when she comes over the glasses verify her identity like, whew

also shouldn't it end with him giving her a pair of glasses so they can both do that to/with each other

j., Friday, 14 March 2014 20:59 (eleven years ago)

lol, what a fucking horrible person
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx-spe-82w4

We hugged with no names exchanged (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 26 March 2014 05:07 (eleven years ago)

these fuckin bitches

j., Wednesday, 26 March 2014 11:57 (eleven years ago)

Pretty sure everyone involved with that video is "seriously killing san francisco."

how's life, Wednesday, 26 March 2014 12:06 (eleven years ago)

oh look you can also subscribe to sarah slocum's face

j., Wednesday, 26 March 2014 12:25 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.