If necessary for your survival, do you think you could resort to cannibalism?

i think i probably could

only if it meant eating you

I dunno. I definitely couldn't "prepare" the meat (cut up another person), but if it were served to me and I was on the verge of starvation I'd probably give it a go.

yes and i'd also be the dude who's enjoying it a little too much and making the rest of the plane crash survivors really uncomfortable

wouldn't do this

not into killing other people - who determines who goes first, etc. is a fucked up process I would refuse to participate in.

what if a dude JUST DIES on his own and you realize you have to eat him before he goes bad

If it were an Alive situation then yest I would do it without question and I don't even eat meat in general.

That is to say that if the people were already dead * really think it would be a no brainer for me. If they were alive as Shakey is describing it would be totally different.

I wouldn't kill someone (probably) but yeah, if someone else prepared the meat I could imagine being able to eat human flesh.

*om nom nom*

i wonder what would be the choicest cut of manmeat

Your username possibly provides an answer?

I get really cranky when I don't eat, I could prob eat human flesh after...3 days?

not that I *want to* but if I were on a desert island w/ no food and a dead body, sure, 3 days

i'm a vegetarian cuz i want to avoid killing things but in an Alive situation the moral permission to find out what people taste like would probably be the one bright spot of the entire scenario

more curious about the people who think they just absolutely couldn't do it, even if it was someone who was already dead. seems like an underestimation of what truly facing death by starvation would be like. but i'm pretty sure there were people in the donner party who refused to partake and died of starvation.

not that I *want to* but if I were on a desert island w/ no food and a dead body, sure, 3 days

pretty sure by 3 days that meat has gone bad

I am choosing to parse "an 'Alive' situation" as meaning "whenever you hear the Pearl jam song"

voted yes

Yeah, idk. Eating someone who is already dead just doesn't seem that bad to me if it means I get to live. If it were all frozen and stuff it probably wouldn't even be really gross. I read that book a bunch of times (why I have no idea) and I think they cooked some of it by laying it out in the sun and drying it out.

weren't there people who made it out OK without having to eat their buds in both alive/donner party?

AS far as Alive goes, I don't think so. Everyone that refused to eat their friends wound up dying. I think.

I have also seen that movie several times but I know why I did that - Ethan Hawke never looked hotter than he did playing a sunburned unshaven cannibal.

as long as we're talking dead bodies, if you're an atheist its sorta just one of those biological reactions that you just have to get over, sorta like 'can two siblings get married if they agree to have no kids'

the donner party story is pretty involved and confusing and most of what we know about it comes from (often conflicting) stories from people who were there who had their own motivations etc., there were two different groups (one who camped out waiting for rescue and another that tried to continue on to california and get help) that resorted to cannibalism, etc so i don't know if there's really 100 percent reliable info about who did what exactly

like the group that was trying to get to california ended up killing their indian guides and eating them but there's conflicting info on how close to death the guides were before they were killed (ie was it a mercy killing scenario or not)

sunburned unshaven cannibal

read this as 'sunburned buttshaven cannibal'

What I think now, in the comfort of my home, with a full belly and a nice cuppa, is probably irrelevant should this situation ever arise.

i remembered reading some book which i think was alive where the church gave them post facto dispensation to eat their pals, but that some of the dudes didn't need it because they abstained, and i always imagined the pope doing a little aside like, "this applies to everyone except timmy and jeffy, who unlike SOME people, don't fill up on snacks before getting rescued."

If necessary for your survival, do you think you could resort to cannibalism?

http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/romney-santorum.jpg

With relish.

obviously we want to respect the dead but i think if my loved ones were trapped w/ my dead body i sure as hell would rather they live than me get a decent burial.

one thing i wonder about is if i just died one day in the house, after a few days would my dog start chomping on my nose and cheeks or would he sit with my body and starve to death

also i really wonder whether its possible for me to predict exactly what i'd do if i crash-landed in the andes or was trapped in a tiger cage or whatever

What I think now, in the comfort of my home, with a full belly and a nice cuppa, is probably irrelevant should this situation ever arise.

cuppa WHO

the idea that respecting the dead = preserving their dead body as long as possible is ultimately cultural and prob a good thing to trend away from

I was going to say something about some people living by the credo of not doing to their loved ones in death what they wouldn't do to them in life but then I saw the massive rationalization for necrophilia lurking behind that statement and now I am just looking at my subconscious like this:

http://hellinahandbasket.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/skeptical-baby-looks-askance.jpg

I put human flesh on my rider just so I have a little every night in case I do at some point find myself having to subsist on it

I am imagining you with a huge Dagwood-sized placenta sandwich, chomping away merrily backstage while the apocalypse rains down

"...can you push stage time back 10 minutes and get me some bromo? that placenta reuben's really rearing up on me"

how much does a lb of flesh go for these days anyway?

oz of prevention iirc

xpost Would it be bad after three days? You hang game for longer. I think you've cut and prepared and hung that juicy human flesh in a cool, dry place, you're OK. If, on the other hand, you've got a whole corpse and you're in the rainforest then it might be unappetising fairly quickly. But if you were in the rainforest you might be able to find something else. Cannibalism as a necessity seems to arrive in icy circumstances, where there is no opportunity to forage for anything else, and where the meat must keep pretty well. I think your cooking options might be limited, so a carpaccio or a tartare might be the best way to serve it.

Sorry: that should be "I think IF you've cut and prepared …"

if you starve in a rainforest I kinda think you must be a little stupid

Just in case anyone finds themselves stranded in a rainforest over the weekend, here's quick guide to finding food.

God, "a quick guide". I keep missing words today.

I dont value being alive enough to eat ppl

you say that now

i'm pretty sure the industrialized food chain has made cannibals of us all in very fractional ways.
there's some food guidelines for insect parts allowed in veggies/fruits, but there should also be guidelines for allowable human body parts.

It's not the fact of being alive that would make you eat people, it's the fact of starving to death. You don't just disappear in a puff of smoke, you die a long, lingering, painful death.

what's the cutest animal you guys would eat? rabbits, pigs, lambs?

Yes, yes, and yes

zooey deschanel? butters from south park?

I don't think it's about the cuteness, really. More the companionship. Though cats are incredibly cute.

https://www.google.com/search?q=cutest%2Banimal&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&safe=active&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=hkB_T9OLG6egiALh1LDeCA&biw=1178&bih=723&sei=iEB_T66HPIatiALDusDBAw

which of these animals would you NOT eat

personally, this one gets my vote:

http://www.animal-forum.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/spiderc.jpg

i believe some so-called "cute animals" actually routinely engage in cannibalism

http://www.thatcutesite.com/uploads/2009/09/puppy_nose_bite.jpg

i bet there's a weird inflection point where if you've actually decided to eat one, the animal's cuteness now works against it.
like if you had to eat ethan hawke or willem dafoe (i dunno if dafoe was in alive, i just think he'd taste really gamy and scaly.)

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

how much does a lb of flesh go for these days anyway?

― the late great, Friday, April 6, 2012 1:53 PM (3 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Check ManBeef.com.

EASILY

Would you kill the dog or the annoying group member first?

I know my answer.

every time you are swallowing your saliva you are engaging in cannibalism THINK ABOUT IT

WHAT DO YOU THINK HAPPENS WHEN YOU EAT YOUR BOOGERS

p. sure i'd just leap into a crevasse -- i'm a shitty cook anyway

i have enough trouble rationalizing continued existence even before factoring friend-meat into the equation

no, I always keep a Clif bar in my backpack anyway.

not sure i'd even need to be starving, if they were already dead and cooked nicely. if they were a member of the group that i didn't like, it would even be a handy cover for just, y'know, killing them.

best option would be to survive a fiery plane crash that happens to cook your fellow passengers amirite?

does soylent green count? soylent green is people btw.

SPOILERS

ffs mods can we get that poster deleted that isn't even out over here yet

not into killing other people - who determines who goes first, etc. is a fucked up process I would refuse to participate in.

― Disco Bob & MC Criminal (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, April 6, 2012 5:18 PM (3 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^^^ you, my friend, are going first.

i wrote a ten-minute play about cannibalism in lol college.

the central question that i have, as a skinny dude, is whether or not i'd be more likely to be eaten first or less likely. on one hand, i would be skinny and weak in the first place and when instincts turned primal and angry burly dudes started flashing their canines at each other, i'd probably go down quickly. on the other hand, no one would want to eat me because it would be all bony.

if you were a brony nobody would eat you because you would be all brony

save derpy, eat a brony

I think the answer to your question, ZS, turns on whether we're eating people who die naturally (in which case you'd get et) or killing people to eat them (in which case I would).

my haunches look srsly delicious, i've decided.

rip darraghmac he was eaten for his delicious haunches

fingernails and bone marrow is still vegan right?

Yes, without question. I might not even wait till I was hungry.

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

American settlers 'turned cannibal'

laura ingalls wild er

Crazy thing is that they prob didn't need to eat human flesh. America's coastline was a bonanza of naturally available foods: ocean and freshwater fish, shellfish, game and gamebirds, but also scavengable stuff like mushrooms, berries, kelp. The colonists were highly suspicious of such foods and shockingly ignorant of most survival skills.

NO THEY HAD TO

yr all a bunch of savages smdh at these poll results

Was reading about mass cannibalism during the Bolshevik grain requisition Povolzhye famine in '21. The more morally defensible cannibals rationalised eating the dead to survive, but fucking cannibal cafeterias run by human hunters, profiteering during a famine is too much to take. I'd guess similar grotesqueness occurred during Mao's great leap forward as well.

The stealing of corpses from cemeteries became so common that in many regions armed guards had to be posted on their gates. Hunting and killing people for their flesh was also a common phenomenon. In the town of Pugachev it was dangerous for children to go out after dark since there were known to be bands of cannibals and traders who killed them to eat or sell their tender flesh. In the Novouzensk region there were bands of children who killed adults for their meat...

Moreover, the craving for human flesh which starving people can easily develop once they have eaten it was not peculiar to any social class. Hungry doctors often succumbed to eating it after long spells of relief work in the famine region, and they too stated that the worst part of the experience was "the insuperable and uncomfortable craving" which they had acquired for human flesh.

Well, once you've killed and eaten a human being, seeing all those people just walking around has to be maddening, like those old cartoons where the starving man on the raft floating mid-ocean imagines the guy on the raft with him's head turning into a roast turkey or whatever...

I love that old cartoon sight gag, it is brutal and funny at the same time.

I like the South Park episode where all the adults get snowed in and they resort to cannibalism _that night_

that is a great ep

During an 1874 election fight in Tranmere, a 'local cannibal' allegedly attacked a canvasser with no provocation - he 'chawed' him and bit off part of his lip. A newspaper report concluded that 'cannibalism cannot be tolerated, even in Tranmere': pic.twitter.com/ftaNIXB8Jv

— Victorian Election Violence UK (@VictorianEV_UK) April 15, 2020

'cannibalism cannot be tolerated, even in Tranmere'

classic bantz

If I can eat ass, I can eat calf

what if it’s not necessary for your survival and you just fancy sampling a bit of long pig

asking for a friend, like

I think eating members of Longpigs is quite permissible tbf

brb gonna start a ‘which longpig would u eat’ poll

lol these poll results are v revealing

At least five ILXors are liars.

Poll is eight years old, those five have probably been gobbled up by now.