Next batch of Pixar films after the Monsters Inc. prequel

And please, for the love of god, may that be the end of their sequel adventures for at least a long while. Anyway:

THE GOOD DINOSAUR

U.S. Release Date: May 30, 2014
Director: Bob Peterson
Co-Director: Peter Sohn
Producer: John Walker

What if the cataclysmic asteroid that forever changed life on Earth actually missed the planet completely and giant dinosaurs never became extinct? This hilarious, heartfelt and original tale is directed by Bob Peterson (co-director/writer, "Up;" writer, "Finding Nemo") and produced by John Walker ("The Incredibles," "The Iron Giant").

THE UNTITLED PIXAR MOVIE THAT TAKES YOU INSIDE THE MIND

U.S. Release Date:
Director: Pete Docter
Co-Director: Ronnie del Carmen
Producer: Jonas Rivera

Pixar takes audiences on incredible journeys into extraordinary worlds: from the darkest depths of the ocean to the top of the tepui mountains in South America; from the fictional metropolis of Monstropolis to a futuristic fantasy of outer space. From director Pete Docter ("Up," "Monsters, Inc.") and producer Jonas Rivera ("Up"), the inventive new film will take you to a place that everyone knows, but no one has ever seen: the world inside the human mind.

UNTITLED DÍA DE LOS MUERTOS

Director: Lee Unkrich
Producer: Darla K. Anderson

From director Lee Unkrich and producer Darla K. Anderson, the filmmaking team behind the Academy Award®-winning "Toy Story 3," comes a wholly original Pixar Animation Studios film that delves into the vibrant holiday of Día de los Muertos.

All about that last one in particular. But I hope the second title stays as is.

I'm a gonna be first in line for the Dia de los Muertos movie.

hate loveable dinosaurs

What if the cataclysmic asteroid that forever changed life on Earth actually missed the planet completely and giant dinosaurs never became extinct?

already been done, sorry pixar

http://i47.tinypic.com/35kpmkm.jpg

America needs the wisdom of Herman's Head now more than ever

Guillermo Del Toro is also working on a Dia de los Murtos animation

/Muertos

I've always wanted more inventive animation from inside our bodies after this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2h1jUpqzcc

gonna be a sad day when they give that second one an actual name

I can only hope the Dia De Los Muertos movie is inspired by Grim Fandango

but Grim Fandango is perfect as is

John Lasseter has said that the story “takes place inside of a girl’s mind and it is about her emotions as characters, and that is unlike anything you’ve ever seen.”

actually sounds like cranium command from epcot tbh

Apparently Henry Selick is working on a Pixar project as well?

Yeah I'm all about that, whatever it turns out to be.

It's for Disney, technically

Monsters University was thoroughly enjoyable, as good as the first one.

In bad news, I had to sit through another preview of Planes, Disney's Cars spin off. Horrible. but the Disney cartoon before hand (the Blue Umbrella) was sweet.

monsters university was the first movie i took my daughter to, she really liked it and sat through it all and only got antsy at the very end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1t0A_tZGrYw

THE UNTITLED PIXAR MOVIE THAT TAKES YOU INSIDE THE MIND

Joy (Amy Poehler), Fear (Bill Hader), Anger (Lewis Black), Disgust (Mindy Kaling), and Sadness (Phyllis Smith)

I don't think I have time for this tbh. Really hope they manage to pull the dinosaur movie back together.

Damn, if it was a little boy we could call it HERMAN RISING.

are they still doing a day of the dead movie now that Book of Life got a jump on them?

huh.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie/inside-0/review/796483

Barely gave that a skim, because I want to be surprised, but weird that they let that review out so early. Or not, given that Pixar has been so shaky lately.

I don't think I have time for this tbh. Really hope they manage to pull the dinosaur movie back together.

― how's life, Thursday, October 2, 2014 2:19 PM (8 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Eating my words. This was great. Cried a bunch, and I was not alone in that. Loads of laughs too. Very engaging; the first movie that my youngest kid has sat through without a bathroom break.

I still agree with myself that the idea looks dumb. My family had to pretty much drag me in there. The opening short "Lava" was stultifying.

The preview just looks SO bad and explicitly sexist. Can you convince me a little?

The preview bit with the mother and father (that also really turned me off) is not indicative of 95% of the film. I really liked it. Though I wouldn't put it up there with their absolute best material, I still cried like a goddamn baby at a certain point, so I have to say it's very good.

I went back and re-watched all of the trailers right now and they still don't make it look like something I'd want to go see, even though I've seen it and loved it. The movie has a pretty complicated world and the trailers spend more time trying to explain and make sense of it than making it look appealing.

this is going to be our first cinema trip since having the baby

There are no bears in San Francisco.

NYTimes stinger:

“Inside Out” is rated PG (Parental guidance suggested). Young children may be mildly alarmed in places, especially at the sight of their parents weeping through the last 20 minutes.

doyy

there's no ilx presence at all for big hero 6, how odd

I thought it was pretty underwhelming, though it looked great.

The short film before the main feature was treacle worthy of enhanced interrogation technique; it looked great though. As for IO, it was rare for a movie -- any movie -- to suggest that happiness and sadness are essential components for a full life.

Man, some friends on Facebook yesterday were saying Lava was alright, but then others shared opinions more in line with this thread. It was then that I realized the people who liked it were those with kids who have to watch Dora the Explorer every day.

It's the sub-Stephen Merritt ukelele strummer that wrecks the thing. Like I said, conceptually and visually it's a coup.

NYTimes stinger: _“Inside Out” is rated PG (Parental guidance suggested). Young children may be mildly alarmed in places, especially at the sight of their parents weeping through the last 20 minutes._

--Josh in Chicago

Completely accurate.

Only redeeming quality for me was that the islands were ostensibly Hawaiians and were portrayed by Hawaiian voice actors. I'd bet that Kuana Torres Kahele did his own strumming, sub-Stephen Merritt or no.

Interesting that Disney's used Hawaii as a setting before and is apparently doing Hawaii again in the very near future.

LOVED this

Movie was great (my son I think liked it a touch less than his parent's did).

LAVA song totally infectious schmaltz.

So excited to see this with my girls when the older one comes back from camp.

Get ready for the tears

there's no ilx presence at all for big hero 6, how odd

big hero 6 was okay, just a bit over calculated

AiSF otm about the lava song

BIG HERO 6 was a big hit with my kid and while it's imminently watchable for adults, I do agree that it's extremely lightweight. Pixar is so far ahead of what anyone else is doing (while okay except for the Fantastic Mr Fox) it's almost unfair to compare.

i will likely now see this movie due solely to this thread so score one for you
preview is just so so bad

there's no ilx presence at all for big hero 6, how odd

― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 21 June 2015 13:50 (9 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I thought it was pretty underwhelming, though it looked great.

― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 21 June 2015 14:10 (9 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah. also didn't follow through on any of the flagged endings afaicr

This seems almost like a parody, but ... Buzz Lightyear prequel?

To infinity and … 🚀 Experience the origin story of a Space Ranger in Disney and Pixar’s #Lightyear, in theaters Summer 2022. 💫 pic.twitter.com/B8kRwSDYSO

— Pixar (@Pixar) October 27, 2021

Finally we will learn how Buzz Lightyear became Buzz Lightyear.

But more seriously, isn't the whole appeal of these Toy Story characters how they interact with the real world?

Part of the appeal is that yes

Part of it is Pixar hasn't really done much with outer space and kids love space shit

We got the whole woody backstory in 2, makes sense to do buzz

Finally, and I admit slightly reluctantly, got round to Luca - and I loved it! Comfortably preferred it to Onward and Soul, so charming and bright and stylish, and refreshingly low key.

Admittedly spending some time in fantasy 50s Italy is an easy sell when you're isolating with covid in the English winter.

It's the most Ghibli-esque of the Pixars.

Except for Soul, the last Pixar I saw was Monsters University eight years ago (!). What are the good ones? Now have covid-enforced time to catchup

You've already seen Soul, which is one of the best recent one imho. After that I would say Coco, and Toy Story 4 of course. The others I could take or leave.

hearing only positive things about turning red

Turning Red is great. Watched it with my family and we all loved it.

One of my daughters watched it with her friend and said it was not bad but it was "weird" and didn't like it. We've been trying to watch it with the other one, but she refuses to watch it at all. Dunno what to make of any of that, given the positive response from critics.

I am extremely excited to see my old Toronto Chinatown neighbourhood in that movie, so definitely going to watch that one

Toy Story 4 is fine and people should see it, but I honestly think Toy Story 3 wrapped up the series better and the extra film is like a long epilogue.

Coco and Inside Out both get better every time I rewatch them and are now among my favorite Pixar films.

otoh I was surprised by how much I liked Onward the first time I saw it, but that didn't sustain over follow up viewings.

Turning Red was very good but I was left slightly underwhelmed after all the gushing reviews.

Inside Out, Coco and Soul were the best in that time frame. Toy Story 4 was a huge disappointment, a lot worse than the first three films imo, but I guess watchable

Luca is somewhat underrated. I watched it while restricted to a single room because of you know what, and it offered an irresistible sun-kissed escape. Light but lovingly crafted.

hearing only positive things about turning red

Haven't seen it yet, but my first reaction to the trailer was, how do you take one of the 5 cutest things on the planet (red pandas) and make it so much less cute?

Computers, iirc.

Turning Red was good, best pixar in a while I thought (I didn't like Soul as much as most people I think). Kind of weird to see a "period piece" (no pun intended) set in 2002, I guess this is just one of those movies where cell phones would have ruined the whole plot.

Toronto setting was a novelty but 2002 setting was a bit strange, particularly as the 'markers' of it being set in a different time didn't really work...? Like, tamagochis weren't a thing beyond what, 1998? Hadn't boy bands pretty much died out by then? Would a bunch of junior high kids really all have flip phones in 2002? (I was in high school then and most kids didn't have phones, but maybe Toronto was more ahead of the curve than Alberta)

Anyway thought Turning Red was.. fine, I guess? It's no Coco.

I have yet to see Turning Red, but I have had a lot of the same similar thoughts about the various anachronisms that I am aware of, especially the whole boy band thing. Like boy bands were still kind of a thing in 2002, but a lot of the major ones went on hiatus that year, with various members pursuing solo projects and those that did exist did not really sound like the ones from a few years before. Max Martin wasn't really dominating the charts, and wouldn't really come back till 2004 with Since U Been Gone. Most pop was either going in full on R&B direction, what with the Neptunes working with everyone, or in a more rock/pop-punk direction. The main boy bands I remember at the time was stuff like B2K or Diddy's takeover of Making the Band, which were firmly in the R&B territory. You had groups like Busted, but they were in that "We got Guitars!" cateogry and only ever had a tiny following here in North America, to the point that a bunch of their songs could just be recycled a few years later by The Jonas Brothers. I mostly associate that fall with the most popular group amongst young girls at the time probably being Good Charlotte, as well as an abundance of kids wearing ties ala Avril Lavigne. Maybe life was just different for people in Alberta? I too don't remember many kids having phones at the time either, but I was also living in small town and not a big urban center.

Except for Soul, the last Pixar I saw was Monsters University eight years ago (!). What are the good ones? Now have covid-enforced time to catchup

Must see: Inside Out, Coco, Toy Story 4 (I may be alone in liking it better than 3)

Decent: Finding Dory, Incredibles 2, Onward, Luca

Meh: The Good Dinosaur, Soul

I'm assuming Cars 3 is crap because the first two were crap, and I haven't watched the new one yet.

The original Cars was OK. The second and third ones were, indeed, crap.

I thought Toy Story 4 was surplusage, but then again, I thought Toy Story 3 was too. Ducky and Bunny were about the only real saving grace of 4.

Soul was pretty good. It tried for the emotional punch of Up but didn't quite connect.

I didn't understand the world of Cars at all. Is this supposed to be a world where humans don't exist, and automobiles exist in their place? Why are the horseflies little trucks? Pixar is typically very good at presenting a thought-out logic to the relationships between objects (toys) or just non-humans (rats) and human world, but Cars didn't have any of that. Also, the plot was basically Doc Hollywood. I don't remember why I watched Cars 2, but it seemed to just double down on the Larry the Cable Guy character's bumbling idiocy, which I didn't find charming the first time around. Also, one of the worst end-credits songs in cinematic history.

I liked the antique-store setting of Toy Story 4 and I thought the film displayed more visual inventiveness than I would have expected from the series at this point. I totally get why people might think this series has run its course, though.

The rules of the afterlife in Soul were far too complicated--a peeve of mine likely acquired from having watched a lot of similarly convoluted afterlife-fantasies like Made in Heaven,Chances Are, and Heart and Souls when I was younger. It looked and sounded great, though; I appreciated that it took some visual inspiration (at least) from A Matter of Life and Death.

Read upthread for all of the stuff that pissed me off about Soul

I think saying boy bands weren’t cool anymore and about to split up may be missing the point of what a 13 year old girl likes or cares about in this fictional band who haven’t yet split to get sexy with the neptunes. Not everything has to be more music historian nerds. Same goes with the idea that a kid may play with a toy beyond its initial year of being massive.

Turning Red was great. It was hilarious and it’s really refreshing to see a take on becoming a teenager where the character stayed true to her spirit. Not the best Pixar movie but still has so much to enjoy.

I've only just seen Onwards. My 8yo was loving it but clearly felt the end was frustrating (a while afterwards I found him crying and he said it was a stupid film that they never should've made). Would be interested in other kids' reactions... I enjoyed it more than I expected, but can see how the "promise" dangled throughout the whole movie being whipped away might be clever but didn't really land with my kid.

(Plus I feel slight >:( that Ian realised he had someone for all that stuff all along... and the mother gets zero credit for bringing up two kids solo while grieving but it looks like I'm the only person who thinks that's worth mentioning....)

ONWARD, not Onwards!

Pixar should focus on making actual good movies for the children instead of focusing on proselytism

stop posting

look i know we’re all transfixed by barbenheimermania but not nearly enough people are talking about the fact that elemental features two shots showcasing unambiguous visual references to goatse

that's because you're the only person who saw Elemental

and now i can’t unsee it

I hadn't even heard of the latest, which apparently flopped harder than any other Pixar film. $21 million?

Maybe more than that by now, but not much more. Anyway, never so much as seen a one sheet for it, let alone a trailer. No wonder it flopped.

idk i saw quite a few tv ads and youtube ads for it
it just didnt look very good

It did not review very well fwiw

And I saw a trailer, with the lead line of "Best Pixar original since Coco" which really doesn't advertise a great track record lol

It’s odd when one of these mega movies comes out and *crickets*

The family and I went to the movies a while back and saw that Disney movie Strange World. It was good! None of us had heard about it beforehand, we just wanted to watch a cartoon. Heard nothing about it afterwards except it was a bomb.

I

Strange World deserved better, it was fun

People seem to say about a lot of these under-performers. Strange World, Elemental, Luca ...

I think this one actually got generally good reviews, so it sounds like a failure of marketing as much as anything else (supposedly the various teasers and trailers have had significantly different tones). Or maybe it's just that everyone knows that every Disney movie will quickly make its way to Disney+.

Got an A on CinemaScore and A+ from kids so may have the legs to pick up in time.

feels like the days of massive pixar blockbusters is over, to me. I know there were issues making this one; director stepped down or was fired and was replaced with like, three directors. Even in the bay area billboards for this one were scant.

Didn't Inside Out 2 make a bazillion dollars just last year?

It did! But, you know, franchise, already established, etc.

Whereas before it could be 'the latest Pixar film' and it would likely be immediately huge. The franchise issue was long ago established but whether it's the pandemic or things not clicking or whatever, we're in a different spot here.

That's a difference for sure. But of course "Lightyear" flopped, and that was a franchise film. And of course we've talked about Disney proper vs Pixar, or if it really matters. Like, "Strange World" above, that was original and Disney proper: flop. "Wish" was original and Disney proper: flop. But "Encanto" was just a few years ago, and it was original and huge. Then "Moana 2," sequel and huge. Maybe like MCU they just need to start spreading them out more a bit? Maybe they need to lure back Lin-Manuel from his other duties and distractions? "Toy Story 5" will likely be huge, "Zootopia 2" likewise, they should put some wind back in the sails/sales.

Saw Elio yesterday, it was good! In parts it approached great!

Sort of what I suspected. A lot of these movies aren't flopping because they're bad, they're flopping because the studio is incompetent, or at least hampered by incoherent marketing strategies

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/elio-pixar-america-ferrera-director-queer-2-1236301860/

The url led me to believe that America Ferrara was in a movie called “Queer 2”