Shameless Self-Promotion: New Momus Essay

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Er, Tom told me this was okay. No, actually he didn't, but I learned in the censorship flame war that anything goes around these parts.

So... there's a new essay on the Momus website. It's called Roomic Cube and it's about urbanism. It contains some good scams on how to escape the rent trap (work to live, live to work). If anyone's bored and wants something to read, or just wants to take a pot shot at me while I'm here in the stocks, the essay is here.

http://www.demon.co.uk/momus/thought130801.html

Momus, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Momus i agree. Moving from a huge apartment to one a 1/4 of its size has taught me things. Being able to travel to the west coast or having friends in Williamsberg, Fresno, Lawrence, Seatle si also helpful.

anthony, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've stayed in one of those "Capsule Hotel"...erm...capsules. It was surprisingly good, but my desired lifestyle needs more (a) room. In the reverse, moving from a broom cupboard to a place of my own has taught me things. It taught me that I really was in a bad way for a long time.

Mascara, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't mind you advertising stuff here Momus, especially as you appear to have become a regular, I only object when someone we don't know turns up out of the blue and advertises their club night, for example. Did anyone go to that night? The one to do with some band called Baptiste? I didn't.

DG, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Thanks, DG. By the way, my essays are totally non-profit. I make them available

a) As a service to humanity. b) To save the world. c) To bolster my self-appointed role as pompously pontificating all- purpose pantomime pundit.

In that order.

Momus, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(Hey: isn't that MY job? Oh, yes, I forgot: I'm JOBLESS...)

mark s, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Cool it Mark, that board's getting to you. Have a cup of Horlicks to bolster your psychic defenses.

DG, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

enjoyed the possibilities, though the che guevara taat on my left arm continues to harp what about capital - cultural.fiancial - to access this...how much does this depend on a govt willing to pay for public services ie japan as opposed to a govt like Oz's where corporate welfare is huge, yet community welfare ie hospitals, libraries, unies are all having their funding slashed and students have to live on 200/wk or less, while rents in sydney are 100 per room...intersting places to travel in thought though.

Geoff, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Japanenglish (the weird and often illuminating way English gets used and abused in Japan).

Do you mean the English used on notebooks, t-shirts, bags and whatnot? It is not meant to be read, is it? It just adds a foreign touch. I love reading those Japanenglish slogans. They are so sweet. However I get headaches when they speak to me in JapanEnglish. I simply refuse to go *down* on their level.

SHAMELESS SELFPROMO LINE: you can see my ugly face (and body) in Kateigahou this month.

I have a love hate relationship with Japan. Sometimes I am the master. Sometimes I am the one tied down.

nathalie, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the question "Does your way of life need a room?" Poses another. Must you live in New York or Tokyo, London or Paris to feel comfortable enough to live transparently?

jameslucas, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

mr lucas, i think so. a countryside,a nd empty space can be beautiful and the people quite charming. but almost invariably one-track. the countryside, as far as the majority concieve it, is a bit of an Old Country. it's old england, how we used to farm, before the corrupting influences of city life. It's one track. The city, on the other hand - such a mix! one becomes more perceptive in the city simply as to funtion there it's necassary to at some point most days to understand how another person from another background, another discipline, is operating.

matthew james, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Momus! And I thought you were just pretentious all the time! I actually really enjoyed that piece but I'm still not sure how realistic it could be for the majority of people.

Bill

Bill, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"the people quite charming. but almost invariably one-track. the countryside, as far as the majority concieve it, is a bit of an Old Country. it's old england, how we used to farm, before the corrupting influences of city life. It's one track."

Yes Matthew it is the same here, unfortunatley right down to the farming. I'm sure Robin would have a take on this if he were treading the thread. One difference, all but a few are charmers up here. However it is still Northern California with the largest contingent of Green party voters, exiled leftists and their right-wing daughters.

The housing is bigger here but I find the most comfort inside, to me all this nature, seems...lonely.

jameslucas, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

An enjoyable essay. Two things kill creativity : work and rent.

The Toffee Focker, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I should make it clear i don't think the countryside is inherently wrong, just singular, which i don't think is healthy in a globalised age. The reason i tend to avoid venturing into the country is that the kind of isolationism often found there can translate quite easily into various kinds of aggression. Oh, and I hate the smell of the english outdoors.

matthew james, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

James, hi and welcome back!

Matthew, I get your point (2 years ago I'd have agreed, actually) but I think the whole *point* of globalism is that I can escape the singularity of the countryside (or, in my case, the semi-rural, semi- urban no man's land in which far more British people live than you'd guess from most of the print media). I've learnt an inordinate amount about how people from different backgrounds and disciplines function on forums like this, something I find has passed me by from bumping into people in London (no long-term relationship formed, nothing learned). Doesn't Momus end that essay by talking of the irrelevance of national borders and "my nation is the internet"?

Such a conception of the countryside is of course tempting, Matthew, and I've read enough on the subject to come close to it (Patrick Wright on this entire territory: GRATE), but ultimately it's irrelevant to the way people actually live: go to any of these places right now and you will hear the number one from So Solid Crew far *far* more than you will hear, say, Maddy Prior and the Carnival Band. I am, at heart, a realist: I've killed my wandering Romantic heart to deal with the way things are, not the way some imagine them being. That conception no longer haunts me, because I no longer feel the weight of history other than as a tourist, a dilletante, not someone who feels he has to carry it around with him. I live invisibly inasmuch as nobody takes much notice when I'm out, wherever I'm out (the "Is your name Charlotte?" gang = the physical world's D**m*ntr*ll and equally ignorable), and that's how I like it.

The isolationism = aggression you talk about is a factor (used to haunt and frighten me before I got my current self-confidence, though looking back now I think of that fear as simply a byproduct of my depression at the time) but, for me, it's simply a counterpoint to the other ugly (metropolitan) extreme of success and money = snobbery. I can avoid the latter in London by working my way around those places where it will fester, and likewise I can here (actually, there is a *massive* difference between my own part of Dorset - working-class, often Labour-voting, huge influx of people from the rest of the UK, virtually zero foxhunting / Countryside Alliance axis) and the more Tory inland areas where I'd probably agree with Matthew).

On balance, I think Nathan Barley deserved the abuse he got from Oxfordshire farmhands in a TVGH entry some time back, though we are of course talking about two fictional caricatures, both as ugly as each other, and contrived as such, so not relevant to a daily experience which, in lieu of any other phrase that I feel defines it, I would call Superflat.

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, I almost forgot - great essay, Nick, brings out the urbanist in me :). Your best in aeons.

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I agree, Robin, that the internet can act as a nation. But I think humans are ful of agency and without the internet still found the stimulation that's posible here. And more than that, binary distance on the internet bothers me. I like people to be there. Plus we only get a narrow range of people on the internet.
I must also be honest in that i don't feel comfotable with the design of the countryside. It's too big, too open for me. But I must point out that that concept of the countryside, or varying degrees of rural, wasn't mine; I was talking about the Daily Mail Ruralism you've shown disdain for more than once. That this idea, or variants of it (i'm only familiar with northern agricultural) is pervasive in many areas of farmland and countryside i'm familiar with.
I thought this relevant to mention as we were discussing places one might move to "live transparently." And that a move to more ruralism is concieved mostly as a move to simplicity and singularity, and a move to the City a one to cosmopolitanism.

matthew james, Sunday, 12 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Indeed, Matthew: I've got a Dorchester postcode and STD code but live in a different world (wouldn't be surprised if there are more Countryside Alliance members down some streets there than live in the whole of Weymouth & Portland). I couldn't live *there*, and I'm glad I don't.

I knew that "Daily Mail Ruralism" (actually more Telegraph Ruralism as I understand it: the Mail is basically suburban) isn't your *own* conception, though on first reading it reminded me more of the High Romantic idea of "the deep country". My point was that it isn't everyone's conception, and it doesn't have that much relevance to the lives that most of us live internally.

Curiously enough, and relevant to this thread, "Folktronic", despite its cosmopolitan origins, seems incredibly relevant to *me* and the contradictions of my own life: this is the world we're *all* living in.

Matthew, you remind me of myself when I first posted on alt.fan.momus two years ago, with the same blend of intriguing ideas and clumsy overstatements (the latter isn't a criticism: I think you'll mature with time). However I think you're *completely* wrong that we only get a "narrow range" of people on the internet: there are certain places in London where you can choose only ever to see a narrow range of people, and likewise there are uses you can make of the internet to avoid ever meeting certain people. I don't: I can't imagine myself meeting a broader range of people than I've met online.

Ruralism = "simplicity and singularity": well, not necessarily, certainly not for me. But I can understand where such a perception can come from (check the afm archives circa September 1999!).

Robin Carmody, Monday, 13 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Matthew, you remind me of myself when I first posted on alt.fan.momus two years ago, with the same blend of intriguing ideas and clumsy overstatements (the latter isn't a criticism: I think you'll mature with time).

Jesus, Robin. Could you be any more patronising?

Richard Tunnicliffe, Monday, 13 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not being patronising. Just saying that Matthew seems awkward and gauche but absolutely brimming with ideas, as I was like then.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 13 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Keep diggin' that hole, Robin.

Josh, Monday, 13 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ah, everyone likes to be told they'll mature by people of the same age... i'm less awkward and more lazy. but tending towards hyperbole and generalisations, yeah... I shall take comfort in that I've seen a photo of Robin, and i'm miles taller. have-at-ye!
I am quite certain about the narrower range of poeple on the internet. For instance; I am never strolling through the internet to find myself being yelled at by an old west indian man, nor do i find myself buying a paper from a small indian lady pretending not to speak english, so she can put more stuff in my bag and charge me. certainly there's a huge range of people online; logically, an even huger one offline. "only" was a misstatement on my part.

My point was that it isn't everyone's conception, and it doesn't have that much relevance to the lives that most of us live internally.
we were speaking in the context of the traveller, the globalist; i was presuming on the motives of those who choose country over city. which is a little unreasonable, but you know, that's a habit. but the simplicity and singularity really isn't my conception, i'm suggesting that as a motive. obviously modern rural is bound to throw up al the contradictions of Folktronic.

matthew james, Monday, 13 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The essay cheered me up, but I'm not sure why. It added to my list of schemes to consider instead of going to college right away. My current favorite fantasy is living in a car and working on hot air balloons.

Lyra, Tuesday, 14 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, *everyone* is taller than me, so that's no great achievement :). Momus: twice my age, twice my height, half my weight ...

I've no doubt that the singularity and simplicity is a motive for many people: they exist, and not just on the right. How else to explain the back-to-the-land type in the Guardian "Soulmates" the other Saturday who "Dislikes technology" or the roots of the entire High Romantic thing that Patrick Wright has described so wonderfully these last 20 years or so? Matthew, Folktronic was *very* much on my mind, and I really should have mentioned it earlier in the thread: "Simple Men", "Protestant Art" and "Folk Me Amadeus" have me burning with contradictory ideas and thoughts on why I react how I do to what I do, but I can live with it because I see no reason to come to a definite conclusion (conclusions to debates = end of debates = DUD). The Incredible String Band were certainly in search of some kind of simplicity (or at least they were pre-ironic: "Waltz of the New Moon" is the most sustained seven-minute escape from all modern urban life in pop as I've experienced it) and Momus likes them. My relationship with "my" past is one of numerous edges, and most of them are hard for me to work out: what those still in search of singularity feel they grasp is most likely being sold and auctioned, like any other commodity, two clicks away from here. It's my interest in these ideas that gripped me about The Little Red Songbook sleeve notes and all Momus's subsequent work (of course I was a fan before but I connected *instantly* with the Analog Baroque and Fake Folk ideas more than I ever did with, say, Timelord).

After all, there is a direct and strong relevance of both Steeleye Span's "All Around My Hat" and 2 Unlimited's "No Limit" (arguably two records that have had some kind of influence on Folktronic) to the Conservative leadership campaign (a genuine chain of events, incidentally, and the sort of situation my mind thrives on).

Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 14 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

three months pass...
momus' stuff is getting tighter recently. i wuv Robin - fella getz me thinking alwayz

, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

How else to explain the back-to-the-land type in the Guardian "Soulmates" the other Saturday who "Dislikes technology"

Blimey, you can't get anything past Robin and his progressive ruralist media monitoring skeelz.

Nick, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

step two = send the evil "soulmate" b'stard a great sloosh of robot porn haha

mark s, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.