parallel lines, corners, Rothko, Mondrian, up and down...a square has everything.
circles are laaaame.
― gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 15:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― dleone (dleone), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 15:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 15:33 (twenty-three years ago)
And anyway, triangles, I choose you!
― jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 16:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― Gordon, Tuesday, 1 October 2002 20:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Rebecca (reb), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 20:56 (twenty-three years ago)
http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/cov75/dre100/e140/e1402413549.jpg
― Rebecca (reb), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 20:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― fractal (fractal), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)
ahh but the circle is the subject of way more crap New Age metaphors
and its not square's fault that the laws of physics favor the circle!!
there's sad story about a cubical planet whose sharp, elegant corners were slowly, brutally rounded off by the blind force of gravitation.
the square: an inspiring symbol in Man's doomed struggle against the cruel, arbitrary laws of a dying Universe.
*steps off podium*
― gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 22:35 (twenty-three years ago)