battered womens syndrome c/d

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
ok this is topical for the nz-ers as a woman who murdered her husband is about to be released on parole after serving 8 years of a 10 year sentence.
the victims family are very upset and want her deported ( she is uk born ).
the 'authorities' say she is not a threat to the public.
i dont know the case history, it happened whilst i was o/s and they have only given a brief outline in the media, but it seems she was abused by her husband,she cracked, and poisoned then suffocated him and buried him in the back yard.
this is personally interesting to me, i can understand her actions and although i dont condone murder in any circumstance i do see how she might have been driven to such a thing.
what is your view of this?
should a woman who has been physically/mentally/emotionally abused be allowed freedom if she has murdered her tormentor?

donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 18:48 (twenty-three years ago)

btw, we assume for this thread that ANY abuse counts whether it be physical bashing to any extent, emotional isolation etc.....and also it is not confined solely to women being the victims, as there are cases of men being abused just as evilly by women.

donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 18:51 (twenty-three years ago)

what are the exemptions for emotional abuse? how does self-defense work there

boxcubed (boxcubed), Thursday, 3 October 2002 19:08 (twenty-three years ago)

self-defence is a hard one to tackle as apparently the law states it can only be used in the event of someone defending themselves when under attack, whereas most of these victims do the deed when their tormentor is asleep/vulnerable/ not expecting it. which is not surprising really.
what do you mean exemptions for emotional abuse?

donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 19:12 (twenty-three years ago)

i have to go offline for a bit

donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 19:17 (twenty-three years ago)

As it happens I know vast amounts about this: my ex-wife wrote her thesis on the effects of domestic violence, worked in then managed refuges for victims of domestic violence for a decade and was expert witness on the effects in some court cases.

The self-defence law is weighted against women: it is fine if you lose your temper and kill someone immediately, but no good if the abuser has the physical advantage, as is almost always the case - these women have no chance at all any other way. Several men have been let off of murder charges, on the other hand, where they have claimed provocation on the basis of nagging.

A few points: two women are murdered a week in the UK by partners/ex-partners, and no one pays attention. When it is the other way round it is big news.

If you imagine domestic violence is typically the odd slap or punch when the man gets drunk, you are very, very misinformed. I am not going to start detailing how monstrous it gets, because there are things I've heard that are so grotesque and evil that it would feel very nasty to tell you about them. The long-term psychological abuse is, if the woman survives, generally far more difficult to recover from than the physical abuse, horrible as that sometimes is.

Suggestions that the woman could just leave rather miss the mark, in very many cases: the woman is sometimes convinced that no one would believe her, that no one would care, that she deserves the abuse, that if she tells anyone he will kill her. She may have little reason to doubt that - the courts are still pretty hopeless with what some judges still insanely see as a private matter. It's not that long since the police took both parties in one case to the station, then locked them in a room together to sort themselves out. They hadn't even searched the man, and he stabbed the woman to death with a knife he was carrying. And refuges have an ugly reputation, not always deserved, and are not always entirely secure.

Families are very often no help at all, and usually seem to advise the woman to stay with the man - especially if there are children. Most mothers in these circumstances have heard "for the sake of the children" many times. They often believe it - yet in OVER 80% of cases where the mother is being abused, the man is abusing the children too!

That is too long a rant already. Women in these circumstances often feel helpless, with nowhere to turn, and with two ways out: her death (by far the most common, even discounting suicides) or his. If there is strong evidence of serious and sustained abuse, I think that should be enough to clear the woman.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 3 October 2002 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)

yes all very true martin, and i agree with you, yet how do you establish strong evidence of serious and sustained abuse when the abuser is dead, most or all of the abuse has been done in private, the only people who may know of it are the victims friends and that is only hearsay, and all you have is the word of a woman who just killed her husband/partner..?
this is a problem for the women involved also........"who will believe me? he is so wonderful in public etc etc"
this is of course more a thing with emotional abuse. people on the outside often see nothing of what is really going on, and i think this might be the case with this woman in particular. or they want to deny the fact that their brother/father/friend is doing such things to anyone. and i do speak from experience, unfortunately. not that i have any desire to air my private life further than i already have.
my point is, there can be a public perception that 'so and so was such a great guy no way would he do that etc etc '..
this woman about to be released has already received DEATH THREATS for godssake.
and now i am about to go off on yet another tangent so i will stop.

donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 21:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Most mothers in these circumstances have heard "for the sake of the children" many times

i grew up in an emotionally abusive household and this is what my mother always said to me.... she was staying with my dad for the sake of us kids. but we were wearing it as much as she was, my older brother was even more abusive than my father, he would beat me up almost every day and whenever my mum tried to intervene he would just beat her up too. and its so true that abuse breeds abuse, by the time i was 16 i was getting into physical fights with my mother, as if she didn't have enough to deal with. and its left its scar on me permanently, because in every relationship i get into i just repeat mum and dads screaming matches, and i find it very hard to control my anger and i have been known to pull a punch or too.

anon (lucylurex), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:01 (twenty-three years ago)

You're quite right, Donna - I was addressing the effects and my beliefs rather than the legal practicalities. It can be very hard to prove many of the abusive things, though some effects are often clear - the physical ones that couldn't be hidden fully, for instance.

Women are still blamed for their own abuse; women don't want to admit to being abused; it is associated with lower classes (this is stereotyping and nothing to do with reality); it is massively underreported, and almost everyone grossly underestimates its prevalence, and (as I said earlier) its degree. People need to hear more about it. I have no solutions in the case of this woman, but I think changing these false ideas is part of what is needed in the long term in this area.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Sympathies to Anon, and I hope you can recover, both for your own good and to avoid continuing the horrible cycle. There are good counsellors, here and there, if that might help.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:06 (twenty-three years ago)

yes yet another sad and sorry aspect of abuse in families is the carrying on of the pattern.
help is there however, and you should avail yourself of it. there are groups and counselling services specifically for those in your situation. the fact you recognise this is great, but try to stop using it as a reason and look instead at how it can be prevented from repeating itself in your own behaviour.

donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:08 (twenty-three years ago)

i have actually sought counselling in the past but was put off because my counsellor didn't take it very seriously. he was all like "ho ho but siblings play fight all the time". my solution to breaking the cycle has been to not get romantically involved with anyone. i've grown to like being alone and i'd rather be where i am now than unhappy and making someone else unhappy.

anon (lucylurex), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:14 (twenty-three years ago)

i am sorry to hear the counsellor you saw was so out of touch with reality, and i am sorry you have decided the better option is to remain alone.
truly.

donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:21 (twenty-three years ago)

going offline for a bit

donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:25 (twenty-three years ago)

god i am so polite sometimes.!!

donna (donna), Friday, 4 October 2002 00:58 (twenty-three years ago)

I believe the term "battered womens syndrome" is used to refer to those women who are beaten by their partners, and yet stay with them through some weird psychological thing.

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 4 October 2002 03:52 (twenty-three years ago)

it is actually used to describe circumstances where a woman has been abused and becomes emotionally changed to the point where normal logic fails and the only logical escape seems to be doing away with her assailant ( for want of a better word). martin described it in his reply when he mentioned the only way out to be death of either the woman or her partner. at least it is perceived to be that way by a woman in those circumstances.

donna (donna), Friday, 4 October 2002 04:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Thanks for that, clears things up a bit.

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 4 October 2002 04:29 (twenty-three years ago)

thank you both for the sympathy. i hope i can learn to be less destructive.

anon (lucylurex), Friday, 4 October 2002 08:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Anon, I happen to know a fair bit about counselling too, from many different angles. If you are ever inclined to take it up again (and people do cope with all kinds of things without it, so it's not essential), call around and insist on a brief preliminary chat with any counsellors you are considering, and sound them out about domestic violence. You'll know pretty quickly whether they have a clue or not. A good counsellor can help, and any decent one will regard a first meeting as an assessment as to whether you are suited to each other.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:01 (twenty-three years ago)

four years pass...

E-mail this to a friend Printable version

Live: Women's World Cup
This page refreshes automatically every 2 minutes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, 10 September 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany 10-0 Argentina L

Correa o.g. 13
Garefrekas 17
Behringer 25
Prinz 31
Prinz 45
Lingor 51
Smisek 57
Prinz 59
Smisek 70
Smisek 79

Bookings:
Laudehr 60

Bookings:
Gomez 16
Chavez 20
Gonzalez 56

Just got offed, Monday, 10 September 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)

That Martin, he's a good and reasonable guy.

Abbott, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 05:23 (eighteen years ago)

ARGENTINA BRINGING THE LAFFS

Just got offed, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

jesus you're a douche.

^@^, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)

Jokes Bruv Jagger

Dom Passantino, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)

Hey hey JBJ, how many lulz did you bring today?

Dom Passantino, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:32 (eighteen years ago)

did louis think of the joke, then wonder if there was a thread on ILX about 'battered women', then search and revive just to make the joke?

break it down for me pip

blueski, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:33 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah Louis wtf?

Matt DC, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)

Oh dear.

Ill-considered.

Matt, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)

http://images.southparkstudios.com/media/images/306/306_enter_the_panda.gif

Dom Passantino, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:42 (eighteen years ago)

This came up on the first or second page of a futile search for 'women's football/soccer', and has hence turned into a progress report on the Argentinian World Cup side, and their heroic if somewhat calamitous defence.

Just got offed, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:43 (eighteen years ago)

please just go away

^@^, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:43 (eighteen years ago)

Do you ever actually think before pressing submit? I mean, ever, at all?

Matt DC, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:44 (eighteen years ago)

To spell it out: Argentina lost their opening game 11-0 to Germany, a game in which their keeper scored two OGs.

Argentina then lost their second game 1-0 to Japan, the goal coming in the last minute as the result of a horrendous keeping error.

Now, as I type, they find themselves 2-0 down to England, with a bullet-header OG and a keeping nightmare responsible for the scoreline.

I couldn't find a women's soccer thread, and since these were only passing observations I felt I could record them here, a thread which came up in the search, 'battered' being light-hearted English slang for losing heavily at football.

This is just the internet, lighten the fuck up!

Just got offed, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)

it's the message not the medium.

Ed, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:49 (eighteen years ago)

Louis, did you actually read the thread before posting your ever-so-amusing joke? I have no idea how much the original 'anon' poster checks in on this board any more and you probably don't either, but ffs get one sense of tact.

Matt DC, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:54 (eighteen years ago)

Settle in, here we go again.

Matt, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)

Louis, save the thread 500 posts. Hold your hands up and go "Shit, yeah, that was unforgivably crass of me", then step away.

Matt, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:56 (eighteen years ago)

i don't get it.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:56 (eighteen years ago)

He's saying that we should bomb all Muslims, I think

Dom Passantino, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

Hmm, having had a glance, the thread's previous incarnation doesn't paint me in particularly favourable colours. Yeah, given the juxtaposition, it was crass. I'm sorry.

I'll start a new thread for the WWC.

Just got offed, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

thanks for spelling that out for us, louis, sometimes us plebs really struggle to keep up to your dazzling intellect. i hadn't realized argentina was on the verge of losing their THIRD straight game; in retrospect that completely justifies your highjacking of a sensitive thread to make a cheap joke about spousal abuse. my bad!

^@^, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

haha shit. oh well.

^@^, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

we have to travel back in time and assassinate me before i start ile

DG, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:00 (eighteen years ago)

i hadn't realized argentina was on the verge of losing their THIRD straight game; in retrospect that completely justifies your highjacking of a sensitive thread to make a cheap joke about spousal abuse

I will only say this in my defence: the original hi-jacking came as a result of Argentina's astonishing 11-0 defeat a week ago, and today's update was just a continuation of that. I'm sorry it came on such a harrowing, serious thread. That's all. Not posting here again.

Just got offed, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:03 (eighteen years ago)

Can we just lock the battered women thread?

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:05 (eighteen years ago)

I kinda wanna see how bad this can get, tho?

Dom Passantino, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:06 (eighteen years ago)

well, louis said he won't post again, so i'm sure it'll be fine.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:06 (eighteen years ago)

^^^ Funniest post to the thread so far

Dom Passantino, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:07 (eighteen years ago)

get one sense of tact

vs

I thought he was already dead so this sort of counted as a pleasant surprise.

onimo, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:10 (eighteen years ago)

Louis 4 Mayor

blueski, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:16 (eighteen years ago)

LJ brings the Bad News Bears Do Japan level of Bad News.

Abbott, Monday, 17 September 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.