Any competition?
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 3 October 2002 19:50 (twenty-three years ago)
nope.have decided today is 'be serious' day.
take back previous hahaha.
― donna (donna), Thursday, 3 October 2002 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)
"Man dies after shooting himself in head during gun safety lesson"
http://home.post-dispatch.com/channel/pdweb.nsf/98d88f9202f6bdea85256a0f005f18c7/86256a0e0068fe5086256c45003bef01?OpenDocument
― chaki (chaki), Friday, 4 October 2002 06:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Friday, 4 October 2002 07:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 October 2002 08:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― gazza, Friday, 4 October 2002 08:14 (twenty-three years ago)
BLANK PAGE
yeah, right.
what the hell was the purpose of those BLANK PAGEs?
― g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 October 2002 09:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― chris (chris), Friday, 4 October 2002 10:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sofa King Alternative (Sofa King Alternative), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:10 (twenty-three years ago)
See, I try to say something clever and it turns out I can't type. Is that irony? Or am I not Alanis Morrisette
― g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:15 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sofa King Alternative (Sofa King Alternative), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:26 (twenty-three years ago)
haha old text-books and paperbacks sometimes used to have blank pages at the back which wd say "these pages are for your notes"!!
"perfect binding" technology has improved immeasuably since the 60s = you no longer have to print books via the batch or bundle process = they can have exactly the number of pages you want and not for example a multiple of 16 or 32)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:31 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 4 October 2002 16:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 4 October 2002 17:29 (twenty-three years ago)
Okay well beyond that yes, Martin, there are an even number of leaves/pages too, which I assume is what you meant. For any book of decent size the pages are gathered into little folded bundles, which are then sort of glued into the spine. It would be possible to take an odd number of loose leaves/pages and perfect-bind those -- i.e. glue all the ends against a spine -- but then you run into two problems: (a) half of them will pop loose and fall out, as they're only glued in by like the thickness of a piece of paper, and (b) it's pointless anyway, as the pages get printed in sets as well.
Alang and Pyth and Nory will surely back me up when I say that the "this page intentionally blank" is even more important for things that aren't bound but are meant to be, eventually: it's what reminds you not to look at a one-sided manuscript stack and say "oh what's this blank one doing in here?" -- and throw it out and wind up reversing the pagination for the entire rest of the text.
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 4 October 2002 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)