i realized that we somehow don't have thread for telling rick reilly to fuck off
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 February 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
fuck off rick reilly
dont know if he's done anything recently to provoke this but I cosign 100%
― frogbs, Wednesday, 12 February 2014 16:53 (eleven years ago)
YESSSSSS
http://frontrow.espn.go.com/2014/03/rick-reilly/
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:15 (eleven years ago)
omg i did it
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:18 (eleven years ago)
http://deadspin.com/rick-reillys-latest-self-plagiarism-is-the-worst-1519836119
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:20 (eleven years ago)
"presenting his weekly four-minute human interest features as well as other features and essays for SportsCenter and Sunday NFL Countdown."
This could be awful.
― Prince Kajuku (Bill Magill), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
His "human interest stories" are just pathetic.
reilly's written some of the best sports journalism ever. kind of mailed it in toward the end, but hey, people get old
― k3vin k., Thursday, 13 March 2014 23:03 (eleven years ago)
Not if you don't ever watch those shows!
― polyphonic, Thursday, 13 March 2014 23:04 (eleven years ago)
reilly's written some of the best sports journalism ever
right up there with 'leno used to be a good comic'
i wouldn't credit simmons -- he totally cares about who's going to win the nba title, and some boston stuff, and bro joeks, but that's it -- but: Why the ESPN columnist couldn't survive in the era of Bill Simmons and Nate Silver
― mookieproof, Friday, 14 March 2014 01:25 (eleven years ago)
that makes me pine for the days when Hunter S Thompson was the resident espn.com columnist
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 14 March 2014 01:48 (eleven years ago)
reilly signing and simmons annoyance at that ridiculous deal they gave reilly was definitely a factor in espn giving him grantland. thompson was part of that initial page 2 crew w/ halberstam that simmons came right after, ralph wiley was the best of that bunch and the only one who wasn't cashing an easy check.
― balls, Friday, 14 March 2014 02:00 (eleven years ago)
hi, i know nothing about rick reilly except that during one soccer world cup he essentially dismissed the entire sport as unsophisticated & primitive because it employs the use of legs, which are in evolutionary terms mere transportation devices, and then claimed that american sports were far the superior in every regard because they depend on manual dexterity, which is the mark of an intelligent hominid
obviously it was one of the most profoundly stupid things i've ever seen
― You cannot interrupt his tea stirring because it is his holy trick (imago), Friday, 14 March 2014 02:11 (eleven years ago)
classic reilly then
― mookieproof, Friday, 14 March 2014 02:14 (eleven years ago)
the main problem reilly has, as far as i can tell, is that he doesn't seem to like sports that much. he was a great writer of features that happened to include sports, but that's abt it.
― call all destroyer, Friday, 14 March 2014 02:25 (eleven years ago)
I quit reading Reilly after his ESPN magazine column lamenting how much white guys/athletes get made fun of
― Neanderthal, Friday, 14 March 2014 02:38 (eleven years ago)
the evidence: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/inside_game/magazine/life_of_reilly/news/2002/01/30/life_of_reilly/
― Neanderthal, Friday, 14 March 2014 02:41 (eleven years ago)
the basic problem is that no one has an endless supply of interesting things to say -- even in sports, where there is constantly new material to work with. columnists need term limits
― mookieproof, Friday, 14 March 2014 02:53 (eleven years ago)
reilly's been pretty open about not even liking sports that much, that he just wanted to be a writer and he ended up a sports writer the same way cowherd is pretty upfront about not even liking sports that much he just wanted to be a radio man.
― balls, Friday, 14 March 2014 03:28 (eleven years ago)
reilly's been pretty open about not even liking sports that much
so rough, being forced to write about something you dislike for 30 years. go write tuesdays with morrie *and* gtfo
― mookieproof, Friday, 14 March 2014 03:55 (eleven years ago)
This is a guy who responded to criticism by tweeting a picture of his wife and saying "scoreboard"
― Matt Armstrong, Friday, 14 March 2014 04:34 (eleven years ago)
his human interest stories kinda remind me a bit of the saccharine weeper pieces that walking creepshow bob greene used to specialize in when he wrote for the chicago tribune.
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Friday, 14 March 2014 05:28 (eleven years ago)
― k3vin k., Thursday, March 13, 2014 7:03 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Nope not even close. He may have had some decent articles in the 80s or 90s but that work has been completely obliterated by his stuff since.
― Prince Kajuku (Bill Magill), Friday, 14 March 2014 18:36 (eleven years ago)
some of his old stuff was more than "decent" but I agree with Bill, no way will I be able to look at the career of Rick Reilly with anything more than a *wanking motion*
― frogbs, Friday, 14 March 2014 18:48 (eleven years ago)
― frogbs, Friday, March 14, 2014 2:48 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
not sure this made the point you intended it to
― Neanderthal, Friday, 14 March 2014 20:01 (eleven years ago)
haw
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 14 March 2014 20:15 (eleven years ago)
oh, I think it did :D
― frogbs, Friday, 14 March 2014 20:15 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/rXL16Tr.jpg
― mookieproof, Friday, 13 June 2014 17:43 (eleven years ago)
I'm sure kaymer really appreciates that. Jesus, what could Reilly possibly be thinking.
― Prince Kajuku (Bill Magill), Friday, 13 June 2014 22:12 (eleven years ago)
http://deadspin.com/rick-reillys-still-got-it-1783153148
https://twitter.com/craigcalcaterra/status/750445443381882880
When I was the only person I knew who read Sports Illustrated cover-to-cover (for the writing! I couldn't care less who won what) I had to assume, based on his prominence as the author of the last page of every issue, that the guy had interesting things to say, or knew what he was talking about. So much "old media" got consumed in isolation like this, in my experience anyway, and if nothing else one of the genuinely great things about blogs and social media is getting to have nationwide network effects to help remind each other that no, this guy sucks, and all the other ones like him, it doesn't matter who they work for.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 00:16 (nine years ago)
^^^
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 04:23 (nine years ago)
yeah totally OTM, esp true in sports but in general local newspaper columnists who because i simply grew up in Minnesota so we read the Star Tribune, i had some kind of respect for and now the ones who are still legging it out are like good lord this person is a fucking idiot
― Steve Gunn Mann-Dude (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:01 (nine years ago)
so many reheated hot takes from guys like him all the time, 24/7, in every newspaper in the country.
― nomar, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:04 (nine years ago)
this is great - seeing all those tweets one after the other is like taking a sewage shower
http://awfulannouncing.com/2016/rick-reilly-continues-tarnishing-legacy-one-tweet-at-a-time.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:45 (nine years ago)
that Isis Cafe tweet!
― nomar, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:48 (nine years ago)
kate upton should file a restraining order
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:02 (nine years ago)