Live for 1000 years vs the ability to turn invisible.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Personally i'd settle for my meagre lifetime and be able to walk around naked and not get arrested. Think of the fun you could have!!

Mckenzie (Mckenzie), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 22:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Would you physically be 1000 or would you stick around at your current fitness/body function level? BecauseI don't want to be a sentient bag of dusty sticks.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 22:52 (twenty-three years ago)

s'ok

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 22:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Invisible would totally rock. 1000 years, all your loved ones would die, new people would appear, then die. Then you eventually die. Sounds kind of depressing to me.

Joe (Joe), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 22:55 (twenty-three years ago)

(and then they- NO I WILL SHOW RESTRAINT)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 22:58 (twenty-three years ago)

1000 years, assuming that my aging process would be slowed-down proportionally or that I'd stay physically the same as I am now (age-wise, anyway). I'll take the gamble that in a thousand years, someone may be able to come up with a way to turn me invisible. Hell, in a thousand years I might be able to figure it out. I'd have plenty of time to kill.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 22:59 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, you can stay fit and healthy until a thousand years are up and then, errr,...you explode.

Mckenzie (Mckenzie), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 23:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(and then they- NO I WILL SHOW RESTRAINT)

or not, if you're invisible.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 23:00 (twenty-three years ago)

haha people dont want to live forever because they get sad when weeples die and they dont!

boxcubed (boxcubed), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 23:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Dude, I would totally live for a thousand years and then explode. Can it be a thousand years -exactly-? I would plan my day around it. "7am: shower. 7:15: breakfast. 8:00: deliver cats to neighbors in Antares. 8:45: boom."

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 23:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Being invisible means you're blind, since there's no opaque back of eye for light to hit. Therefore, I'll take the 1000 years, thanks.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 00:03 (twenty-three years ago)

ned, science would take care of that.

today i'd take invisible, but my fear of death and my fear of longevity are sort of canceling each other out so i may change my mind when one rises to the top.

Maria (Maria), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 00:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I would be so bored after the first 200 years or so.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 00:43 (twenty-three years ago)

ned, science would take care of that.

But science also said we'd be living on the moon by now, so I mistrust science, which is clearly a smooth, oily talker.

And I wouldn't be bored -- my heavens! You have a chance to learn languages, read so many things, hear so many things -- you could really catch up with all the things you think you could in this lifetime but never in fact will. You'd see much suffering and loss along the way, to be sure -- a thousand year old person who died just yesterday, say, would have seen plenty of horrors -- but the benefits I think would be worth it. And having a long perspective would give you the chance to see something that those of us here and now could only guess at in terms of hopes, fears, aspirations, mindsets, whatever. Bring it on. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 00:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I thing it would just be a case of the same situations happening over and over again, just in different incarnations. Sure it would be fascinating at first, but after awhile I feel it would be very frustrating and tiring -- humanity making the same mistakes over and over again, and you basically can't do anything but sit back and watch.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 00:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Just think of how much people in the computer industry have had to change in the last twenty years (I picked computers cause it's what my father did) -- I wouldn't get any more bored than I do already, we'd constantly be inventing new things to learn/do/etc.

(Humanity making the same mistakes over and over again, etc., that doesn't bother me -- I'm a history person, I already deal with that daily.)

BESIDES, I refuse to die until the Red Sox win the World Series.

... so, can I have 1500 years, maybe, speaking of which? 2500?

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 00:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd personally forfeit both of those 'gifts' in exchange for the ability to freeze time, mess around with stuff, and unfreeze time again. Can you imagine the fun (originally typed as 'fuck') that could be had?

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 01:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh dear, not another Nicholson Baker thread (he was the guy that wrote the book about that, yes?)

humanity making the same mistakes over and over again, and you basically can't do anything but sit back and watch

Naive as it might sound, I'm still a believer in...not progress with a capital P, but some sort of progress, however in fits and starts. Mistakes may be repeated and/or intensified -- no Industrial Revolution, no mechanism for the Holocaust to occur in, for instance. But still, I'd rather be here than even a hundred years ago -- hell, even fifty -- and there's still some sort of quixotic hope in my system.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 01:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, Fermata was the Nick Baker book. (There have been regrettable Baker threads?)

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 01:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Not really, it's just that I think there was more than one! But nowhere near as many as for The Royal Tenenbaums.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 01:17 (twenty-three years ago)

At least there haven't been any threads about Double Fold.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 01:20 (twenty-three years ago)

*scratches head, checks google for info*

Oh dear. Yeah, I can see where you would have problems with that. It strikes me as the complaint from someone who never had to sit in on a space-planning meeting for a library in a budget crunch.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 01:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Unless I missed it, nobody has made the obvious teenage whine "but I *am* invisible already"?
Anyways, I would choose the thousand years, but with one reservation. I have this fear that I would spend most of it working. Imagine working 900 years to save up enough money to retire!
On second thought, I think I will just be invisible because the only thing that is in need of work right now is my id.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 02:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey, if you are guaranteed to live to 1000 and be healthy that means you cannot die before then? C'mon Kids you would be invinsible. You could jump off buildings. Swim to the bottom of the sea. You could walk on the sun, naked. I pick that one.

A Nairn (moretap), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 02:57 (twenty-three years ago)

When you put it that way, A, I guess one could, assured that death is not arriving anytime soon, could do all of the things that would only done by mere mortals if they were invisible.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 03:03 (twenty-three years ago)

you can die but every time you die you have to start over, Donkey Kong style

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 03:17 (twenty-three years ago)

That's why this is an odd question to put to mortals. As it stands, none of us are guaranteed another second of existence; we hardly have the capacity to imagine 1,000 immutable years. Did the original question imply simply that I wouldn't suffer the usual decline after age 70, but continue living provided I kept up proper diet and exercise? Heck, I'm banking on that assumption now!

ls, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 03:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Being invisible means you're blind, since there's no opaque back of eye for light to hit. Therefore, I'll take the 1000 years, thanks.

this makes me so depressed. but not for the reason you'd think.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 05:48 (twenty-three years ago)

another 1000 years of neds tyranny

boxcubed (boxcubed), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 05:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I would be happy to live for 1000 years, why be invisible?

elena (elena), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 06:57 (twenty-three years ago)

No question about it, I'll take the thousand years. I want to see the future. Even if it turns out to be horrible (humans are enslaved by cruel alien overlords, another ice age, never-ending war+famine+pestilence, etc.), I want to see what it's going to be like.

Miss Laura, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 07:08 (twenty-three years ago)

1000 years = see the future.
invisibility = see anybody you want to naked.

The future's overrated.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 07:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Invisibility would be pretty lonely, i'll go for the thousand years. Then I might just be able to finish reading this c++ programming book.

Fuzzy (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 07:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Can we fill in the vital details before I choose? If, to take an entirely random example of not the kind of thing I'd do at all obviously, if I accidentally found myself in a sixth form girls' school's communal showers, would the water hitting my invisible body give me away?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 19:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Assuming I didn't have to be invisible ALL the time, I'd definitely pick that one. I guess I just love snooping around alot. I could learn everyone's secrets. Mwah ha ha!!! (evil laugh)

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 19:15 (twenty-three years ago)

(Nice cover Martin, but WE ARE NOT FOOLED.) ;)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 19:21 (twenty-three years ago)

martin ist der bombf

boxcubed (boxcubed), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 19:25 (twenty-three years ago)

five years pass...

Seems as good a place as any to put this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7553061.stm

Invisibility please.

Upt0eleven, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:29 (seventeen years ago)

is there any reason to desire invisibility other than to commit crimes?

teleportation over either

blueski, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:36 (seventeen years ago)

Getting into concerts and shit for free

Tom D., Monday, 11 August 2008 13:37 (seventeen years ago)

The materials do not occur naturally but have been created on a nano scale, measured in billionths of a metre.

The team says the principles could one day be scaled up to make invisibility cloaks large enough to hide people

surely it's not as simple as just 'scaling' the principle up if they're working on nano levels. Then again, i have no idea how this works.

Ste, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:37 (seventeen years ago)

well i guess it could be used to hide unsightly objects, in otherwise attractive environments - pylons in fields. i guess that could be dangerous though lol.

Ste, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:42 (seventeen years ago)

or concealing expensive items in your house, that would otherwise be on show to evil burglars

Ste, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:43 (seventeen years ago)

why not just hide your whole house when you go out?

blueski, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)

Imagine you did your job for a thousand years? no thank you!

not_goodwin, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)

teleportation over either

OTM

Rock Hardy, Monday, 11 August 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)

travel to distant planets, plz (assuming this doesn't come with the teleportation package).

ledge, Monday, 11 August 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)

Why would you keep your job for a thousand years? More than a few people retire wealthy after several decades and die even wealthier. Sensible financial planning is why Vampires are always loaded.

Kerm, Monday, 11 August 2008 16:41 (seventeen years ago)

imagine running around in your invisibility cloak flashing people in the park

batwing, Monday, 11 August 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)

then getting hit by a car

latebloomer, Monday, 11 August 2008 17:33 (seventeen years ago)

the best part of being invisible: pretending to be a ghost and freaking out people for the lulz.

latebloomer, Monday, 11 August 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)

latebloomer otm.
living young for 1000 years doesn't exclude you from pain or incarceration. fuck that.
i'll take invisibility with the added walk-through-walls ability, though really teleportation with being assured that you wont get stuck in a wall would be the best.
freezing time would suck because you'd age a lot faster than everyone else.

Fetchboy, Monday, 11 August 2008 17:51 (seventeen years ago)

i'd like to say 1000 years, but then again i'm a guy who despairs over a sunday afternoon with nothing to do.

s1ocki, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:17 (seventeen years ago)

How would one best fund a 1000 year long life? I want to pick that, but dread the thought of having to work throughout it, as mentioned above.

krakow, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)

1000 years duh. Why would I need to be invisible.

The Brainwasher, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:58 (seventeen years ago)

to do everything you want to do that other people won't let you do and get away with it

Surmounter, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)

or if you look really ugly one day...

Surmounter, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)

after the first 100 years or so you'd probably be rich enough thru interest not to have to work?

here's a good one: either travel anywhere in space but only in the present time OR travel in time but only in your present space (e.g. if you wanted to go to 14th century or 25th century Tokyo you would first have to travel to Tokyo in the present)

blueski, Monday, 11 August 2008 21:00 (seventeen years ago)

If i can leave the planet and be assured of finding another technologically advanced civilization then I don't really care, as long as I can get far far away from here it doesn't matter if it's in time or space.

ledge, Monday, 11 August 2008 21:28 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.