Cinema ads vs other art forms

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (11 of them)
Actually, I don't mind the "coming attractions" bit. Sometimes the trailers can be more entertaining than the main feature. *Any* trailer would be better than "titanic". Once, we saw a trailer for "bill & ted's something or other" which was pretty funny. When we saw the film though, it was embarassingly bad. However, shortly thereafter, we saw the trailer again at a different film, and THE TRAILER WAS STILL FUNNY. Sometimes they can give an impression of what a film is going to be like, too, which can save you money, if it looks really awful. Actually, I quite enjoy the cheap-rate local ads you sometimes get in cinemas up here in the grim north. You can get a larf out of them, as well as the '80's throwback bladerunner rip-off ads for vodka & the like that seem to go on for ever...

Lots of books feature "trailers" for other books in the back, BTW

x0x0

norman fay, Thursday, 19 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Trailers are brilliant, still the best way of deciding whether a forthcoming film is worth seeing.

Interestingly, when I was in San Francisco recently I went to see Enemy at the Gates (it's shite). One of the trailers before it was for this brilliant looking hard-hitting courtroom drama with James Woods in it - and then it turned out to be an anti-smoking advert. So not all cinema ads are rubbish.

Books do carry ads - they often carry lists of other books you might want to read in them.

Dirty Vicar, Friday, 20 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.