make predictions about what will be in/win magazines' end of year polls - 2003...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (172 of them)
what the fucking fuck. i feel like i can't reply to one thing here without replying to eveything here, which is just tiring. to limit it to the most recent post: sampling shouldn't be about people recognizing what's being sampled??????!!!! nostalgia isn't enough of a 'creatively legitimate' emotion for smart musicians to want to evoke it in some way? sampling a well known bit of music automatically = 'nostalgia'? (which was tim's point, one of them anyway)

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:06 (twenty years ago) link

Yum!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:08 (twenty years ago) link

No, YUM!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:09 (twenty years ago) link

what'd you think of since i left you, rollie? large chunks of the emotionalism in that record = "let's remind them of this"

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:12 (twenty years ago) link

hmm i'd bet ott and rollie wouldn't think twice about defending a rock song that was thrown together, nasty, hasty, seam-showing, etc., but 'fix up' is this big PROBLEM somehow. well, maybe not, but i'd bet so.

the key is the shock-cut silence between the 'big beat' beats. offends only the virtuous! if that little affront to the Forces of Tasteful Progess gives you a sour-lemonade face then, well, you know which side you're on i guess.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:40 (twenty years ago) link

''So to divorce music from dancing doesn't make sense, just like divorcing music from quarter notes and eighth notes doesn't make sense.''

I guess you're talking abt dance music in the 'divorce music from dancing' (though every record creates some kind of psysiological reaction but it may not lead to what we know as dancing): even so, surely its reasonable to make the argument that, as record is released for home consumption (that is one of its functions) (passive listening) then it may not work as that.


Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 2 November 2003 11:02 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, Julio, but Tim said:

The mistake is concretizing "danceability" into a definite property rather than a tendency that is present in varying (and ocasionally indectable) amounts in all music. Even my depiction just then is wrong because it suggests you can somehow quantify the amount of danceability of any given music; styles of music which often seem impossible to dance to from an outsider's perspective (gabba, drum & bass etc.) would suggest that it's actually about a level of compatability between the music and the dancer's body. ie. danceability is not a property, but praxis, something we do. It's like there's a hermeneutic horizon where the technical properties of the music mesh with the dancer's ability to interpret those properties physically.

I heart Tim and Geeta, btw.

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 2 November 2003 11:27 (twenty years ago) link

i don't understand how that para has to do with what i said.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 2 November 2003 11:42 (twenty years ago) link

What bothers me about Under Construction is not so much that it's a nostalgia album in a lot of ways, though of course it is, but that in that nostalgia and self-reflexivity it pulls another skin over the endlessly backward-looking and history-scrambling music of the end of the last century without bothering to contribute too much to the argument.
Know what I mean? A lot of the most exciting music in the last fifteen years or so of the 20th century was, for me, a creative act but also an acknowledgement of the culture of previous generations and the effect it all had on one's perception: understanding that by 1991 all the good melodies had been used up, but through pastiche or cut 'n' paste or whatevs something new could be made of the old. The rap nostalgia of Under C. doesn't contribute too much to the cycle of pop reinvention-- though it could've. We have to assume Timbo doesn't do things by accident, and it's tough to imagine such a whiz would dredge up the formulas of the past for any reason but mass appeal-- especially when he has so much that's new to say.

Shabba (antexit), Sunday, 2 November 2003 12:30 (twenty years ago) link

I hope everyone's gotten that riduculous Radiohead record out of their systems

Why? It is, after all, the best thing they've done since "OK Computer"

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 2 November 2003 14:01 (twenty years ago) link

Cuz it's the 'least African', right?

dave q, Sunday, 2 November 2003 15:05 (twenty years ago) link

But Geir, they use drums?!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 15:25 (twenty years ago) link

Julio, I thought you were questioning how "danceability" could be an appropriate criterion, all of the time -- I think what Tim's post suggests is that it's not a question of whether you dance or not, but simply how the music affects you physically, and that this is a useful way to approach any kind of music (not just dance) (perhaps it makes you lie very still, with your eyes closed; this, too, is noteworthy) (whereas Ott doesn't seem as interested in the phenomenological aspects of music).

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 2 November 2003 18:26 (twenty years ago) link

"Know what I mean? A lot of the most exciting music in the last fifteen years or so of the 20th century was, for me, a creative act but also an acknowledgement of the culture of previous generations and the effect it all had on one's perception: understanding that by 1991 all the good melodies had been used up, but through pastiche or cut 'n' paste or whatevs something new could be made of the old. The rap nostalgia of Under C. doesn't contribute too much to the cycle of pop reinvention-- though it could've. We have to assume Timbo doesn't do things by accident, and it's tough to imagine such a whiz would dredge up the formulas of the past for any reason but mass appeal-- especially when he has so much that's new to say."

Here's the thing I don't understand....you guys are acting like he just took the beat from Run DMC (re:I forget the name of the original sample..."take me to the mardi gras"?) and used it flat out...but he didn't. He worked it into the music and incredibly forward thinking beats that he'd already created in a clever and creative way. He's not just biting, he's really using it to great effect. When I hear those drums, I immediately think "Peter Piper," and its a really cool affect. A call of nostalgia that fits Missy's vibe perfectly. I mean, look at her videos; her whole steez is that she's a new millenium b-girl, with style from the 80s plus some sort of futuristic shit goin on.....

ddrake, Sunday, 2 November 2003 19:48 (twenty years ago) link

rollie were people unaware of p-funk until g-funk?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 2 November 2003 21:47 (twenty years ago) link

"tell the truth, james brown
was old / till eric and rak
did 'i got soul'" --stet

Haikunym (Haikunym), Sunday, 2 November 2003 23:15 (twenty years ago) link

"what'd you think of since i left you, rollie? large chunks of the emotionalism in that record = "let's remind them of this" "

Ha ha Mitch I was thinking of bringing up Since I Left You too (especially the bit with the bassline from "Holiday") but I pheared that it would be a huge invitation for Chris and Rollie to miss the point again.

Rollie's position wrt to sampling is the very essence of Mark S's reformulation of "rockism" - wherein the problem with such a position is that it ultimately undermines the fundamental elements of the style it seeks to defend. Just as rockist approach wrt rock music impliedly casts rock as inferior to classical/jazz etc, Rollie's demand for new/obscure samples adopts the same line of thinking which considers the act of sampling itself to be inherently uncreative; after all, the act of sampling is fundamentally about using bits of music that already exist, both materially and in the memory of music listeners.

As ddrake points out, Timbaland/Missy's new-found love of sampling is a direct corollary to their emphasis on unusual production approaches. Like the other factors which tend to induce a return to sampling (new genre, new technology, new performance style), their old skoolism is all about recontextualising the old within the context of the new. I don't think it's really feasible to maintain that tracks like "Gossip Folks" or "Play That Beat" or even "Bring The Pain" sound the same as the tracks they're referencing.

Obv. we can boil this whole argument down to whether you choose to care about which samples are being used or what's being done with (and against, and around, and alongside) them. In my opinion, discussing Missy entirely in terms of which samples she uses is the equivalent of pointing at someone in the street and saying "Oh my God, did you realise that underneath your clothes you're entirely naked!?!"

"Still, I see what you say about the purpose of Under Construction. But what's the point of her seemingly taking the same approach with this new album? Or Timbaland with his and Magoo's Under Construction 2 album?"

The tracks I've heard from Under Construction 2 seem to run the gamut of Timbaland's styles - Indian, electro-bass etc. Retro is just another style he can throw into the ring. Meanwhile the tracks I've heard from This is not a Test (which is not many, and then only once) don't seem explicitly old-skool so much as deliberately raw and unpolished: lots of enormous farting bass and really chunky beats, it's actually kinda unplaceable, like EPMD meets Public Enemy meets current crunk (and this is ignoring the obvious example of "Pass That Dutch", which stills more from the Diwali riddim than anything else)*. I'm not sure if the point is really "retro" anymore so much as loud, obnoxious club music. I suspect that Missy wants to downplay the production skillzor side of the equation in order to focus attention on her (increasingly surrealistic/silly) MCing, ie. continuing the process that began with "Work It". Certainly she seems to be moving away from the R&B side of things; whereas before she pitched herself between Lil Kim and Aaliyah now she seems to be pitching herself between Fatman Scoop and Busta Rhymes.

* I have to assume that you guys would absolutely detest Ol' Dirty Bastard's "Welcome Home" - that's like fifth-hand pillaging going on!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 00:21 (twenty years ago) link

When I hear those drums, I immediately think "Peter Piper," and its a really cool affect.

So how about, say, Soho's "Hippy Chick" or Credit To The Nation's "Call It What You Want" then? Smacks of lazy bandwagon-jumping tokenism from where I'm sat.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 3 November 2003 01:22 (twenty years ago) link

what the fucking fuck.

Uh, quite.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 01:40 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, but what I really want to kniw is...will lots of people still be enjoying the Manitoba record enough to put it on their lists in a month's time?

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Monday, 3 November 2003 01:52 (twenty years ago) link

"So how about, say, Soho's "Hippy Chick" or Credit To The Nation's "Call It What You Want" then? Smacks of lazy bandwagon-jumping tokenism from where I'm sat."

I love "Hippy Chick"! Top tune!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 01:54 (twenty years ago) link

"Hippychick" DEMOLISHES "How Soon Is Now" easy

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 02:55 (twenty years ago) link

Speak not this blasphemy in my ears (they're both great).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 03:02 (twenty years ago) link

they ARE both great. in their own way. it's like comparing abbas with edelweisses.

scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 03:21 (twenty years ago) link

The Von Trapp Family / "Dancing Queen" mashup is only a heartbeat away.

Picking up from what Tim was saying, has Missy become a much better MC since 'Miss E', or is it me? The rhymes on 'Work It' and 'Pass That Dutch' are more interesting than 'Get Ur Freak On' by a long shot.

Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 3 November 2003 04:22 (twenty years ago) link

they are, but "Freak" is still the better record

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 04:41 (twenty years ago) link

"Picking up from what Tim was saying, has Missy become a much better MC since 'Miss E', or is it me? The rhymes on 'Work It' and 'Pass That Dutch' are more interesting than 'Get Ur Freak On' by a long shot."

Probably yes - but I agree with Matos that this doesn't necessarily make the records better. Perhaps "Get Ur Freak On" and "Lick Shots" work as great pop records because Missy knew she wasn't a brilliant MC and realised she had to compensate for that in other ways. Like, the problem with "Pass That Dutch" is that Missy evidently thinks she's good enough to get away with releasing a first single without a chorus.

I'll also be really sad if she does abandon R&B, as I possibly prefer her in R&B mode - "Sock It 2 Me", "Sticking Chickens", "We Did It", "One Minute Man", "Play That Beat" etc. etc.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 04:59 (twenty years ago) link

She seems to be merging the two into this weird, slippery sort of rapping style. I would call it sing-song but that doesn't describe it properly, she's not pingponging between notes so much as sliding around wherever she sees fit, while shortening/lengthening emphases and cadences as a rapper. It's so cool. She has improved as an emcee but I would be sad too if she abandoned her singing voice altogether, it's gorgeous.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 3 November 2003 05:22 (twenty years ago) link

Hah, I hadn't even noticed that there's really no chorus per se in "Pass the Dutch." There so much happening where the chorus is supposed to be that it sneaks by for me- Missy chanting "pass the dutch," the male voices calling "hoody hoo," various "woo" and "awww"'s going on.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 3 November 2003 05:24 (twenty years ago) link

Belle & Sebastian to be somewhere between #8 and #15 in most places.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:01 (twenty years ago) link

"Hah, I hadn't even noticed that there's really no chorus per se in "Pass the Dutch." There so much happening where the chorus is supposed to be that it sneaks by for me- Missy chanting "pass the dutch," the male voices calling "hoody hoo," various "woo" and "awww"'s going on."

I agree, but the fact that there's no chorus *and* the groove is so tuneless (I don't mean that negatively) mean that it doesn't really stick in the head the way "Work It" or "Get Ur Freak On" did.

I suspect that This Is Not A Test might be the Da Real World to Under Construction's Supa Dupa Fly.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:05 (twenty years ago) link

Regarding The Avalanches, I only heard "Frontier Psychologist" and slept on the album until it was taken of shelves. I'd imagine I would enjoy the rest.

Tim, I thought ODB's 'Welcome Home' track was kind of uninspired. An obvious rush job, nothing really notable about it. I remember being glad that he still had the delivery going, but that's about it.

g--ff, there's a difference between a rock song being loose and unrestricted and a rap song being sloppily produced. This isn't my main argument.

I'm saying, why can't artists evoke previous musics while still utilizing their own outlets? This is why I feel like Under Construction is a boring nod to the past and something like Paul's Boutique winks at it's forefathers while still remaining almost fully forward-thinking and original.

Saying "Bring The Pain" on Under Construction isn't simply a rehash is strange to me. New lyrics, yes, different mood, yes, but how is it such a forward step? What influence is this giving? As long as I have the original artist on the track, it's cool for me to take the frame of a song. Excuse me while I call Sadat X about jumping punks and beatdowns. We have a hit to make.

Your choice of sampling is just a personal preference thing anyway: I prefer El-P freaking "Mexican Radio" by Wall of Voodoo for Cannibal Ox over someone building on top of "Paul Revere", regardless of how funky it is or what nostalgia is promotes. I'm not saying such uncreativity is wholly unenjoyable, I'm saying I like other methods more.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:30 (twenty years ago) link

radical subjectivism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:42 (twenty years ago) link

"Your choice of sampling is just a personal preference thing anyway. I prefer El-P freaking "Mexican Radio" by Wall of Voodoo for Cannibal Ox over someone building on top of "Paul Revere", regardless of how funky it is or what nostalgia is promotes. I'm not saying such uncreativity is wholly unenjoyable, I'm saying I like other methods more."

Fine, you like other methods more, but your subjective preference doesn't make El-P objectively creative and Timbaland/Missy objectively uncreative.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:45 (twenty years ago) link

i.e. your opinion is thoroughly informed by unspoken assumptions as to what constitutes "creativity" that you need to interrogate. Creativity is one of the trickiest concepts to pin down that I can think of; you fling it about as if you've got a reference book that measures out creativity for all musical acts past and present. So your subjective position is false.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:47 (twenty years ago) link

rollie you unfortunately buy into the idea of "progress" in music and also of GIVING influence. which is i guss a logical extension of the idea of influence at all, hence mark's quip that if it does exist it must run backwards in time!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:48 (twenty years ago) link

I agree with Tim (no surprise there!) Creativity seems to be equal to you liking it, which boils down to personal taste. Which kinda reminds me of that awful Prend3rgast book, in which he christened all the music he ever liked as 'ambient'.

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:10 (twenty years ago) link

oh God Geeta you didn't read that Pendergrast book did you? (I didn't because Douglas's review was so convincingly horrible)

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:54 (twenty years ago) link

I've seen it second hand and I want to pick it up but I keep thinking of mark s' review of it in the wire. The one time where I have read a piece of his and thought that he was actually angry.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:56 (twenty years ago) link

haha Matos I skimmed it but never read it closely (thank god). The only good thing to ever come out of that horrible book were the brilliantly scathing reviews of it by douglas and mark

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 09:00 (twenty years ago) link

didn't see Mark's! you must send me a link sometime.

needless to say, the Sterling-Tim-Geeta front is OTM throughout this thread.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 09:01 (twenty years ago) link

Tim and Geeta have said and will probably continue to say all of my views on this matter...

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:31 (twenty years ago) link

well, somebody's gotta like fun around here, might as well be them

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:10 (twenty years ago) link

radical subjectivism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

*sniff*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:05 (twenty years ago) link

Cuz it's the 'least African', right?

Radiohead has never been "African" in any way. But they, like all other bands, are best when they create melodies with verse and chorus, not just a phrase or two that are repeated endlessly. Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:24 (twenty years ago) link

Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.


Geir, this is really, really, really untrue if the listener is me.
Thus, it is untrue.

scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 14:48 (twenty years ago) link

geir, yr posts need more chorus

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:55 (twenty years ago) link

they certainly have enough repetition!

scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 14:59 (twenty years ago) link

i'm halfway thru a version of 'come on eileen' with lyrics abt geir instead

i'm really stumbling tho with the 'with you in that dress/my thoughts i confess/verge on dirty' bit

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:01 (twenty years ago) link

WTF

pitchfork, Monday, 3 November 2003 16:31 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.