make predictions about what will be in/win magazines' end of year polls - 2003...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (172 of them)
Oh, and Dizzee Rascal, obviously, though it only really has two great songs and the rest of it is pretty weak.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Saturday, 1 November 2003 16:07 (twenty years ago) link

the strokes. everybody's, like, crazy about the new album. it seems that only i don't understand what is so good about it...

frankiez, Saturday, 1 November 2003 18:37 (twenty years ago) link

laika record is ludicrously overpraised by fast'n'bulbous. she's fallen to callahan's level. four tet will be in every top ten.

keith (keithmcl), Saturday, 1 November 2003 18:47 (twenty years ago) link

Ott is quickly becoming The Nu Geir

Sonny A. (Keiko), Saturday, 1 November 2003 18:59 (twenty years ago) link

The ones mentioned by most people here: White Stripes, Outkast, Four Tet, Calexico, Radiohead, Dizzee Rascal, Super Furry Animals. At least if the Acclaimed Music site has any value as far as summing up 2003 critics faves goes.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 1 November 2003 19:15 (twenty years ago) link

Ott is quickly becoming The Nu Geir

Geir has another avatar far more worthy of that distinction.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 1 November 2003 19:53 (twenty years ago) link

It's you, isn't it Ned?

Sonny A. (Keiko), Saturday, 1 November 2003 19:55 (twenty years ago) link

*bows* I've heard stranger. ;-) (But no, not me.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 1 November 2003 20:10 (twenty years ago) link

http://hem.bredband.net/b132682/2003a.htm

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 1 November 2003 23:54 (twenty years ago) link

I hope everyone's gotten that riduculous Radiohead record out of their systems, but I imagine we'll see that showing up in publications that read Pitchfork to stay hip.

M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:27 (twenty years ago) link

Radiohead
The White Stripes
Outkast
Jay-Z
Basement Jaxx
Dizzee Rascal (I don't like his work. Whatsoever. I don't understand the hype behind him. He'll get the irrational hype, regardless of the banality of ripping off Run-DMC ripping off Billy Squire)
The Strokes

I'd like to see a lot more raving press about Aesop Rock's record, but it seems too angular to be singularly praised.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:36 (twenty years ago) link

'ned raggett reads the almanac' is HUGE in japan right now

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:37 (twenty years ago) link

what does "too angular to be singularly praised" mean? (also, it's been getting nothing but good press from what I've read, but I haven't read everything, so.)

M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:37 (twenty years ago) link

can we instate a one-year ban on the word 'angular'? i'm so tired of hearing it! (goes back to post-punk research)

ps. yo matos!

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:40 (twenty years ago) link

Chris Ott hurts my head like a hundred dogs etc.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:42 (twenty years ago) link

Ur not the only 1.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:45 (twenty years ago) link

ditto etc

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:49 (twenty years ago) link

Matos, on an immediate listen, it can be a bit of an awkward record. But on further inspection, it grew on me like few albums before. And when I say singularly praised, I mean, among the underground rap canon, not the indie rock pen prodigal. The general talk on Bazooka Tooth at, say, the Hip Hop Infinity boards is that they downloaded the promo and wrote it off immediately, much like most underground rap heads I've spoken with personally. I'd like to see more propers from the people that would probably, in actuality, enjoy the record most is all.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:58 (twenty years ago) link

'ned raggett reads the almanac' is HUGE in japan right now

Woohoo! Japanese secret bonus track required!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:07 (twenty years ago) link

I totally haven't gotten the Yeah Yeah Yeahs out of my system (hell, just converted a friend to it last night), so I'm hoping for people to still give it props.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:11 (twenty years ago) link

that, Ted Leo, Electric Six, Outkast and Drive-By Truckers. I don't expect Neil Young to get as much but I think he should be up there with 'em too.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:13 (twenty years ago) link

haha since when the fuck does "sampling" equal "ripping off"?!?!

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:19 (twenty years ago) link

When you want to find a reason to be rude about a great track, perhaps?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:23 (twenty years ago) link

i could not stand the irrational hype timbaland got for ripping off run-dmc ripping off bob james!!

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:26 (twenty years ago) link

i mean, the absolute gall of the man

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:27 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I figure writing Bazookle Toof off with a curt "Slug likes him some girls" "no no, more Labor Days pls" is a bit hasty. But I've been listening to it for the past two months and great moments aside ("We're Famous" = MURDER MURDER; "11:35" = Aes' best storytelling ever and Mr. Lif being his usual slick self; "Babies With Guns" = super-fresh hip-hop quotables aplenty), it feels a bit cramped in that "oh shit my last album blew up for the people I wanted it to blow up for -- now what?" sense. I watched the interview segment with him on the Revenge of the Robots DVD where he talked about how the end of '01 was a peak as far as his depression/agoraphobia/neuroses went, and he posted a severe "fuck allayall" message to the aforementioned HHI hataz. He seems a bit into God Loves Ugly-style bristle mode, which hopefully means that he'll get the pressure off his shoulders shortly afterwards and settle down and make his fucking masterpiece in another year. Only Bazooka Tooth > God Loves Ugly.

Actually, the real sticking point is the whole "no no, El only produced one track, I did the first six, and it is just a coincidence that I, too, chose the path of drunken horns and Vangelis Blade Runner synths" sound. I mean, when the beats work, then great, and I like how all the Jukies hang out in the same brownstone indie-rap bunker and learn from each other and swap ideas and shit, but if this is the first sign of a "signature label sound" that will eventually become Neptunian in its exhaustion then oh no oh shit.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:30 (twenty years ago) link

(Still, they're better than Esoteric, ha)

nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:33 (twenty years ago) link

but isn't all praise of individual album singular? I'm still confused by the wording there.

M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:39 (twenty years ago) link

Junior Senior will pop up somewhere on the polls. I'm betting that Entertainment Weekly will give it some love.

Jonathan (Jonathan), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:48 (twenty years ago) link

I heard that "Shake Your Coconuts" will wind up in that new awful-looking Looney Tunes-cavort-with-live-action-people movie. That seems like a mixed blessing.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:50 (twenty years ago) link

anything that gets Junior Senior closer to their inevitable C-C-Can't Stop The Music movie is inherently good.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:56 (twenty years ago) link

maybe he meant singled out for praise.(and stop editing, matos! it's saturday nite. put yer feet up. have a drink!)

scott seward, Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:56 (twenty years ago) link

dude if junior senior made a junior senior movie i would be so there!!

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:01 (twenty years ago) link

junior senior will have to make my top ten. and mebbe even that Luomo album that someone mentioned! see, ilm does keep me hip. thanks again, matos. that long list above makes me feel pretty out of it though. of the stuff on their full list i think i've heard 9 out of 284! do you think it would be alright if i just pretended like all the stuff i haven't heard is really terrible? then i wouldn't feel so bad about being slow and making Katatonia my number one album for, like, 3 years in a row. and my number 2 is definitely the Groovski album and that one came out last year. ah well, it's only november.

Geeta, how do you feel about banning the terms "chamber-pop" and "Beach Boys" for a year?

scott seward, Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:15 (twenty years ago) link

sure thing!

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:34 (twenty years ago) link

Tim Finney knows who I am. I know not who Tim Finney is.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:33 (twenty years ago) link

That's probably because he's an incredible writer.

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:35 (twenty years ago) link

With ideas.

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:44 (twenty years ago) link

And ears.

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:44 (twenty years ago) link

And taste. (cf. click)

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:46 (twenty years ago) link

ILM in self-reinforcement hivemind shocka. (cf. yawn)

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:49 (twenty years ago) link

strongo, I'm a fan of sampling. I make beats, I sample all the time. But I do have a problem with using the same idea twice. How is it okay for Dizzee Rascal to take the same sample that Run-DMC used and do effectively the same thing, when you'd probably villify Puffy for doing the same, repeatedly? Does that mean it's cool for me to sample The People's Choice "I Likes To Do It" and call my song "The Wet Set" as opposed to De La Soul's "Tread Water"? That's my point. I have no issue with sampling. It's just when it's done in such an uncreative manner.

nate, your subliminal diss was funny. But your point is pretty good. I also see the obvious influence of El-P on Aesop Rock's sound. I just feel as if there's enough of a tilt to it to legitimize it. If anything, he's borrowing from his partner in crime, Blockhead, more. And for the record, I hated Labor Days.

matos, I'm just trying to say that the album isn't getting as much praise as I expected it to get and that the people who would probably like it best if they gave it a chance, are avoiding it like the plague. I stated it poorly before.

Tim, rude? Wow, are you just hurt by the fact that I insulted the new sound of Britain or something? I don't understand why he's supposed to be Jumping Jack Jesus and why his album is so acclaimed. After what I've said about sampling, legitimize the greatness of the beat of "Fix Up, Look Sharp"? If it's okay to sample, period, is it okay to use the same sample the same way as someone else?

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:54 (twenty years ago) link

I have no issue with sampling. It's just when it's done in such an uncreative manner.

Which is my feeling re: "Work It"; I was swarmed on ILM for stating it, but what's the fucking point of playing an old record in the middle of yours. "OH SHIT I KNOW THAT!" Appropriation/nostalgia/respect...what-fucking-ever. How about some creativity, it's supposed to be an art form.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:05 (twenty years ago) link

Chris, it's a ten second snippet. How uptight ARE you?

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:07 (twenty years ago) link

Clearlake, Books, Handsome Family, Calexico, Quasi, Metric, Crooked Fingers, Kaito, Russian Futurists, Califone, White Stripes, American Death Ray, New Pornographers, Holly Golightly, Four Tet, Outkast, Janet Bean, etc.

Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:08 (twenty years ago) link

I just meant rude as in "negative".

"How is it okay for Dizzee Rascal to take the same sample that Run-DMC used and do effectively the same thing, when you'd probably villify Puffy for doing the same, repeatedly?"

I can't speak for Jess but I suspect he'd agree with me when I say that I wouldn't have a problem with Puffy doing the same thing. Often when Puffy *does* do the same thing (or something very similar) it works brilliantly; sometimes it sounds shit. The determinative factor is not the obviousness of the sample or its prior use.

As for Dizzee, you're totally taking this one song out of context and making it representative for Dizzee's craft as a whole. All the other tracks on Boy in da Corner are self-produced and don't like they rely on much sampling at all (except the occasional Playstation game noise maybe). The fact that "Fix Up Look Sharp" deliberately uses a familiar sampled beat and nothing else suggests that it's very deliberately trying to do and be something else; that "something" is two-fold, I think:

1. it's a demonstration of Dizzee's talent for freestyling over the beat, for being a raucous MC with no concerns about production/songcraft. The point of garage MCing is to ride other people's beats, to take them and make them your own. The backstory behind "Fix Up Look Sharp" is that Dizzee was in the studio, heard someone playing the instrumental break, and just started freestyling over it. If anything, the beat having a lineage and tradition makes it more ideal, because the assfuck-recontextualisation by the MC is consequently more radical and impressive.Oh, and see also: Jamaican riddim culture. And then see also: the eternally piratical nature of sampling throughout the hardcore continuum (hardcore--> jungle--> garage--> grime)

2. "Fix Up Look Sharp" is an old-skool beat in an album full of new-school beats. It's a very deliberate attempt by Dizzee to show that he's not "just" garage, but at the same time it's something of a very enjoyable novelty. Dizzee doesn't take the tradition of hip hop beatcraft seriously a la Jurassic 5 or DJ Shadow-style producers because he's working in a genre that is more forward-looking than tradition-venerating. For that reason, the sole purpose of the tune's old-skoolizm is to announce itself as old-skool. And it's much more effective to use an actual old-skool beat that is vaguely recognisable than it is to find something new and obscure. As I said in relation to Missy's Under Construction album (which has a fairly similar attitude to old-skool as "Fix Up Look Sharp" does), if you're going to an Eighties Revival costume party, you don't go as some obscure indie icon no-one but yourself will be aware of; you go as Cyndi Lauper or Madonna or Prince. This is about the past as fun, as shared history, rather than the past as a chessboard for beatmining fetishists.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:25 (twenty years ago) link

"How about some creativity, it's supposed to be an art form. "

Oh my god I bet you'd be the most boring DJ in the history of existence!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:29 (twenty years ago) link

look out, Tim's on fire!

(i heart tim finney)

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:35 (twenty years ago) link

"The history of existence." Check minus. Tim, I've gotten people so wound up they were thrown out of the club. I'm talking about music, not dancing; creativity vs. appeasement. I can appreciate both, but don't call one the other.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:37 (twenty years ago) link

"Tim, I've gotten people so wound up they were thrown out of the club."

Yeah I'd be pretty angry too if I had to listen to you play "Chris Ott's History of the Best and Most Obscure Breaks Ever!!!"

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:43 (twenty years ago) link

they are, but "Freak" is still the better record

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 04:41 (twenty years ago) link

"Picking up from what Tim was saying, has Missy become a much better MC since 'Miss E', or is it me? The rhymes on 'Work It' and 'Pass That Dutch' are more interesting than 'Get Ur Freak On' by a long shot."

Probably yes - but I agree with Matos that this doesn't necessarily make the records better. Perhaps "Get Ur Freak On" and "Lick Shots" work as great pop records because Missy knew she wasn't a brilliant MC and realised she had to compensate for that in other ways. Like, the problem with "Pass That Dutch" is that Missy evidently thinks she's good enough to get away with releasing a first single without a chorus.

I'll also be really sad if she does abandon R&B, as I possibly prefer her in R&B mode - "Sock It 2 Me", "Sticking Chickens", "We Did It", "One Minute Man", "Play That Beat" etc. etc.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 04:59 (twenty years ago) link

She seems to be merging the two into this weird, slippery sort of rapping style. I would call it sing-song but that doesn't describe it properly, she's not pingponging between notes so much as sliding around wherever she sees fit, while shortening/lengthening emphases and cadences as a rapper. It's so cool. She has improved as an emcee but I would be sad too if she abandoned her singing voice altogether, it's gorgeous.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 3 November 2003 05:22 (twenty years ago) link

Hah, I hadn't even noticed that there's really no chorus per se in "Pass the Dutch." There so much happening where the chorus is supposed to be that it sneaks by for me- Missy chanting "pass the dutch," the male voices calling "hoody hoo," various "woo" and "awww"'s going on.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 3 November 2003 05:24 (twenty years ago) link

Belle & Sebastian to be somewhere between #8 and #15 in most places.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:01 (twenty years ago) link

"Hah, I hadn't even noticed that there's really no chorus per se in "Pass the Dutch." There so much happening where the chorus is supposed to be that it sneaks by for me- Missy chanting "pass the dutch," the male voices calling "hoody hoo," various "woo" and "awww"'s going on."

I agree, but the fact that there's no chorus *and* the groove is so tuneless (I don't mean that negatively) mean that it doesn't really stick in the head the way "Work It" or "Get Ur Freak On" did.

I suspect that This Is Not A Test might be the Da Real World to Under Construction's Supa Dupa Fly.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:05 (twenty years ago) link

Regarding The Avalanches, I only heard "Frontier Psychologist" and slept on the album until it was taken of shelves. I'd imagine I would enjoy the rest.

Tim, I thought ODB's 'Welcome Home' track was kind of uninspired. An obvious rush job, nothing really notable about it. I remember being glad that he still had the delivery going, but that's about it.

g--ff, there's a difference between a rock song being loose and unrestricted and a rap song being sloppily produced. This isn't my main argument.

I'm saying, why can't artists evoke previous musics while still utilizing their own outlets? This is why I feel like Under Construction is a boring nod to the past and something like Paul's Boutique winks at it's forefathers while still remaining almost fully forward-thinking and original.

Saying "Bring The Pain" on Under Construction isn't simply a rehash is strange to me. New lyrics, yes, different mood, yes, but how is it such a forward step? What influence is this giving? As long as I have the original artist on the track, it's cool for me to take the frame of a song. Excuse me while I call Sadat X about jumping punks and beatdowns. We have a hit to make.

Your choice of sampling is just a personal preference thing anyway: I prefer El-P freaking "Mexican Radio" by Wall of Voodoo for Cannibal Ox over someone building on top of "Paul Revere", regardless of how funky it is or what nostalgia is promotes. I'm not saying such uncreativity is wholly unenjoyable, I'm saying I like other methods more.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:30 (twenty years ago) link

radical subjectivism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:42 (twenty years ago) link

"Your choice of sampling is just a personal preference thing anyway. I prefer El-P freaking "Mexican Radio" by Wall of Voodoo for Cannibal Ox over someone building on top of "Paul Revere", regardless of how funky it is or what nostalgia is promotes. I'm not saying such uncreativity is wholly unenjoyable, I'm saying I like other methods more."

Fine, you like other methods more, but your subjective preference doesn't make El-P objectively creative and Timbaland/Missy objectively uncreative.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:45 (twenty years ago) link

i.e. your opinion is thoroughly informed by unspoken assumptions as to what constitutes "creativity" that you need to interrogate. Creativity is one of the trickiest concepts to pin down that I can think of; you fling it about as if you've got a reference book that measures out creativity for all musical acts past and present. So your subjective position is false.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:47 (twenty years ago) link

rollie you unfortunately buy into the idea of "progress" in music and also of GIVING influence. which is i guss a logical extension of the idea of influence at all, hence mark's quip that if it does exist it must run backwards in time!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:48 (twenty years ago) link

I agree with Tim (no surprise there!) Creativity seems to be equal to you liking it, which boils down to personal taste. Which kinda reminds me of that awful Prend3rgast book, in which he christened all the music he ever liked as 'ambient'.

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:10 (twenty years ago) link

oh God Geeta you didn't read that Pendergrast book did you? (I didn't because Douglas's review was so convincingly horrible)

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:54 (twenty years ago) link

I've seen it second hand and I want to pick it up but I keep thinking of mark s' review of it in the wire. The one time where I have read a piece of his and thought that he was actually angry.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:56 (twenty years ago) link

haha Matos I skimmed it but never read it closely (thank god). The only good thing to ever come out of that horrible book were the brilliantly scathing reviews of it by douglas and mark

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 09:00 (twenty years ago) link

didn't see Mark's! you must send me a link sometime.

needless to say, the Sterling-Tim-Geeta front is OTM throughout this thread.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 09:01 (twenty years ago) link

Tim and Geeta have said and will probably continue to say all of my views on this matter...

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:31 (twenty years ago) link

well, somebody's gotta like fun around here, might as well be them

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:10 (twenty years ago) link

radical subjectivism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

*sniff*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:05 (twenty years ago) link

Cuz it's the 'least African', right?

Radiohead has never been "African" in any way. But they, like all other bands, are best when they create melodies with verse and chorus, not just a phrase or two that are repeated endlessly. Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:24 (twenty years ago) link

Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.


Geir, this is really, really, really untrue if the listener is me.
Thus, it is untrue.

scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 14:48 (twenty years ago) link

geir, yr posts need more chorus

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:55 (twenty years ago) link

they certainly have enough repetition!

scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 14:59 (twenty years ago) link

i'm halfway thru a version of 'come on eileen' with lyrics abt geir instead

i'm really stumbling tho with the 'with you in that dress/my thoughts i confess/verge on dirty' bit

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:01 (twenty years ago) link

WTF

pitchfork, Monday, 3 November 2003 16:31 (twenty years ago) link

hahaha that rules.
oh man this post sucks, damn it.
no it doesn't. yes.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 3 November 2003 16:35 (twenty years ago) link

Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.

Miles Davis & Beethoven both strongly disagree with this statement.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 16:41 (twenty years ago) link

These will be in my end of year poll submission to any magazine that asks me:

Dorinne Muraille Mani (Fat Cat)
The Books The Lemon of Pink (Tomlab)
Matmos The Civil War (Matador)
Nathan Michel Dear Bicycle (Tigerbeat 6)
Colleen Everyone alive wants answers (Leaf)
Gal Hinaus:: In den, Wald. (CD-R / radio))
Lullatone Computer Recital (Audio Dregs)
Anne Laplantine Hambourg
Robert Wyatt Cuckooland (Hannibal)
David Sylvian Blemish (Samadhisound)

Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:05 (twenty years ago) link

The Books The Lemon of Pink (Tomlab)

Can someone please tell me some more about this band? The internet doesn't know shit, but "Motherless Bastard" (I think it's called) is fab.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:32 (twenty years ago) link

see Boomkat review >>> The Books - The Lemon of Pink
http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?merchID=11926

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:34 (twenty years ago) link

Also, Mark R. has written reviews on Pfork of both their albums, and his enthusiasm was what led me to seek them out.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:41 (twenty years ago) link

Christ, they sound like the best band in the world. And "chamberclick" is my new favourite genre!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:47 (twenty years ago) link

momus have you heard the mileece album? i find people who dig the colleen record are generally into that one too

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:55 (twenty years ago) link

No I haven't, will track it down, sounds interesting, thanks for the tip.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:08 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.absorb.org/articles/mileece/

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:09 (twenty years ago) link

not at all sampled-oriented (like the colleen record) but still beautiful stuff

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:10 (twenty years ago) link

Hmm, slightly disappointed by the clips here. I must say. It's not a fresh enough sound, rather generic electronica, even FSOL-lifeforms-like. Rather 90s. I was hoping there'd be some acoustic instruments mixed in, something like Mamoru Fujieda's 'Patterns of Plants'.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:18 (twenty years ago) link

fair enough. there's nothing at all acoustic about formations. i guess leaf does that kind of thing best in the end..

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:22 (twenty years ago) link

which reminds me: i havent listened to murcof in ages!

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:23 (twenty years ago) link

(/thread hijack)

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:23 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.