Indie acts doing covers of pop/rap/RnB songs: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (163 of them)
when did beck colaborate with timbaland?

robin (robin), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 12:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

Are the Vines "indie"? (I didn't know Capitol Records had such hpecat clout!)

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 12:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

Beck and Timbaland did a cover on Moulin Rouge ("Diamomd Dogs" I think) and it was remarkably forgettable. Cuz I forgot it.

Sasha Frere-Jones (Sasha Frere-Jones), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 12:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

Vines aren't so much "indie" as "cock"

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 12:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

i quite liked the eels' cover of sophie b hawkins' 'damn i wish i was your lover', and i don't even like the eels

minna (minna), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is Sophie B Hawkins pop/R&B? Eels' "Get Yr Freak On" is great as well, I've still not heard their version of "Because

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

I Got High" (with Afroman on guest vocals!)

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

The thing is, they just kind of all do it like it's oh-so-funny, but they all seem to be failing to realize that the songs they are poking fun at are TEN TIMES BETTER THAN ANYTHING ANY OF THESE ARTISTS HAVE DONE IN AGES, IF EVER. I mean, Beck laughing at "Cry Me A River" is hysterical. Beck? "Sorry, Mr. Hansen, but you are now irrelevant."

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Aren't ironic covers just so "90's" by now? I mean, "har har...the dichotomy of this po-faced uber-serious indie rocker playing lightweight pap and lending it creedence....oh the juxtaposition!!!" Yawn.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Mis-Teeq don't do Wedding Present covers

But if they did, they'd do them brilliantly... I can hear them covering My Favourite Dress - Alesha chatting about Armani, Gucci and Prada - in my head now

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Beck/Timbaland's "Diamond Dogs" is wretched, but I think to say Beck is "mocking" r&b or Timbaland (or "Hot in Herre" which he also apparently covered recently) is kind of missing the point: he loves r&b, obviously, he's just not very competent at performing it; he can't sing with any of the range required, for starters (a problem across the board with most of the folks being discussed here).

Anyway, who cares about the intent or the "sincerity" of these? The pleasures in this sub-genre are few, and probably all of the good ones are good despite themselves.

Also, uh, mashups.

s woods, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is a band ironically covering a song well worse than a band sincerely covering a song bad (qf Atomic Kitten)?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

Way worse in every way... because of the irony...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

Irony is SO last year's thing

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

Anyway, who cares about the intent or the "sincerity" of these?

The question of sincerity comes in in that it ends the performances an air of smarminess, which really isn't appealing in these cases. Dom posted while I was posted--quite honestly, I don't think most of the covers in question were done well. Admittedly I didn't hear Beck's one that I singled out, but Beck makes me want to break things.

Dude, this is a whole new thread, what pop/rap acts should cover what indie songs. That could turn particularly ridiculous.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

But I hear smarminess in a lot of these bands OWN music (incl. Beck, who I really like by the way). This sort of thing came up all the time with the Pet Shop Boys, whose cover of U2 was also supposed to be "ironic" (I think they said so themselves) but was also truly amazing.

s woods, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

This dates back at least to Age of Chance's "Kiss" in the mid 80's
There was a brief fad following this - PigBros (IIRC) did Word Up etc

bham, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Aren't ironic covers just so "90's" by now? I mean, "har har...the dichotomy of this po-faced uber-serious indie rocker playing lightweight pap and lending it creedence....oh the juxtaposition!!!" Yawn.

But Alex (and maybe because it's "80s" you forgive it), on some other thread once you said you liked Lords of the New Church's Madonna cover! (Which to me just oozes smarm and grossness and sounded completely OBVIOUS even back then.)

s woods, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

Let's burp on a Madonna cover--what rebels, huh?

s woods, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well, then I guess what it comes down to is that I think these artists are bullshit. Like I said, Beck makes me want to break things. Travis does nothing for me. The Vines are terrible, and Coldplay just sound like hideous sub-Radiohead whinging. Perhaps if the White Stripes or another indie/rock band that I like showed up and did a cover of "I'm a Slave 4 U" ironically, maybe I'd like it.

The thing is, it's really difficult to make fun of something that is so much better than you, and that's what I think these acts are doing. The songs in question are so superior to the recent singles by these artists that it just isn't even funny.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

But Alex (and maybe because it's "80s" you forgive it), on some other thread once you said you liked Lords of the New Church's
Madonna cover! (Which to me just oozes smarm and grossness and sounded completely OBVIOUS even back then.)

Yeah, but my point is that such stunts are NOW DATED! I loved the Lords' cover, but y'know.....that was eons ago. I also liked the Wedding Present's cover of Tom Jones' "It's Not Unusual," but also....ancient!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

what bout Liberty X covering 'Aint Nobody'? is it better than the original? perhaps some of you think so but i dont see how it can 'better' really - certainly it was recontextualised adequately thanks to the 'bootleg' connection and the nature of Liberty X themselves as supposedly disposable pop adds some gravitas to this as a fun exercise in contemporary meta-pop...but thats all it does really. i dont know if its anymore throwaway then an 'indie' or rock band covering a pop song, which i agree is cliched and not as clever as the band might think, especially now but on the other hand it does perhaps indicate how the tolerance and appreciation for the contemporary pop song has shifted favourably among those thought to be 'rockists' - and this is probably a good thing.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is Sophie B Hawkins pop/R&B?

pop, but i just googled her and her website is called 'sophie b hawkins underground' so i dunno! but yeah, 'damn i wish i was yr lover' was a hit, and a great song

minna (minna), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

The songs in question are so superior to the recent singles by these artists that it just isn't even funny.
I totally agree with that Ally. (Also, I totally agree with that, Ally.) All I'm saying is once in a while even a bunch of incompetent indie hacks can glom on to someone else's genius and actually do something with it, even if the moment is brief (God forbid I should provide an example here....)

Also, I'm not so sure that a lot of the great early Stones' covers of r&b and blues tracks are completely smarm-free. Some of them seem exaggerated almost to the point of parody--"Down Home Girl," especially. But for whatever reasons, most of them still work.

s woods, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well, then I guess what it comes down to is that I think these artists are bullshit

Straight to the point - I'm with you Ally!

Just as a side issue, great indie covers that I love are Dinosaur Jr's Cover of The Cure's Just Like Heaven and Snuff's version of I Think We're Alone Now. Put them against Travis, Coldplay, Beck... there's no comparison - and before anyone says it, I know both were ironic and that Snuff were pretty dreadful, but they were an amazing covers band...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Surely The White Stripes take on "Jolene" is exactly the same thing though- we're not meant to be celebrating the song itself, rather the juxtaposition of "blues/country" and "man/women"?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

i like that jolene cover too

minna (minna), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

It seems a bit snarky to on one hand decry people for not being open minded enough to enjoy pop/r&b etc. because they are knee deep in indie rock whatever, then turning around and saying that it is crap commentary when they do a cover of such music.

Mind you, Johnny Cash covering "Hurt" or Depeche Mode or whatever pop that Rick Rubin can convince him to play is some interesting, but if someone covers Nelly, then they must be pandering.

Never mind that The Big Boys played Kool in the Gang, Urge Overkill did a Hot Chocolate cover, fIREHOSE covered Public Enemy, and Sonic Youth even did an entire record as an oddball tribute to Madonna, those must just be pandering.

It is not like the pop artists need credibility to sell records when they can just take off more clothes or do a soda ad or shoot someone.

It is only a song.

earlnash, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

All I'm saying is once in a while even a bunch of incompetent indie hacks can glom on to someone else's genius and actually do something with it, even if the moment is brief

No, I definitely agree, it's just that the examples in question are not examples of such a phenomenon. The Jolene cover is good, I reckon.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sonic Youth even did an entire record as an oddball tribute to Madonna, those must just be pandering.

that was pandering smarm which sonic youth are very good at, even tho I like 'em...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

Urge Overkill are terrible.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

The Liberty X single was feeble.

Covering a pop song 'ironically' (if/when that's whats happening) is a cop-out, a safe way of admitting to yourself and your fans that the song has had an impact on you but then neutering that impact instead of exploring it. Travis doing BOMT is saying "Hey beneath the pop veneer is a proper song" but their version done Travis-style then HAS to be leaden because otherwise it'd risk sounding better than Travis own songs, and part of the point is (maybe?) to prove that Travis' craftsmanship is better than Max Martin's.

It ties in with the question on that huge long thread Simon Reynolds' site linked to, about 'indie' not wanting to draw on 'black' music anymore. Cos the real question behind both of these is - how do you operate in a 50-year tradition where the music you make is very unlikely to be as good (in YOUR opinion, the audience likes it just fine) as the music you like? (Sampling is one answer) Converting pop songs into second-rate B sides is a way of positioning yourself on the heirarchy - if these pop songs were REALLY any good they'd shine through our versioning, right?

How much does our getting annoyed with covers of pop depend on our experiencing the originals as pop? If Coldplay covered the Crystals I wouldn't give half as much a fuck as if they covered B*Witched.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

i hear ladytron do "oops oh my"

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

just to address the initial post before I get caught up, in what Bizarro universe are the Vines, Coldplay and Beck defined as "indie"?

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

oops! is such a classic, wonderful record that i would probably want to run amok if i heard pallid trash like f***ing ladytron covering it

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

Covering a pop song 'ironically' (if/when that's whats happening) is a cop-out, a safe way of admitting to yourself and your fans that the song has had an impact on you but then neutering that impact instead of exploring it.

At the risk of jumping to the other side, I have to say I really agree with this. It reminds me a little of working in a record store in the late '80s and being disgusted when some "punks" (I think that's what they were called back then) came in the store and started mockingly dancing around to the Michael Jackson we were playing in the store. But (later on) I considered the possibility that they were actually tapping into something that maybe they subconsciously really ENJOYED but would never admit to. Well, it was a theory, sort of.

s woods, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

At the risk of jumping to the other side, I have to say I really agree with this.

Haha, that's not risking jumping, that is jumping! Anyway yr theory is OTM. There's no such thing as liking things ironically, I reckon. It's just a safe way to like things without getting made fun of by your friends.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

What seems evident by many (not all) of these covers is an undercurrent of what some here call Rockism. The implication that BANDS are more genuine/authentic than MERE singers. That a band can take the essence of a pop act (i.e. THE SONG) and conform it to the essence of a rock act (i.e. THE SOUND), is nothing short of arrogant.

At best it's pandering. Though I'm sure there are some worthy exceptions.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't know if you can call my friends and I an act so to speak but we busted out a medley of rap songs and went into the "Ignition" remix on Saturday night. Acoustic style. And the people loved it.

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'd like to hear Ally cover Incredible String Band.

hstencil, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

There's no such thing as liking things ironically, I reckon.

There is an ironic way to say you like things though. Another subject, but you only need to look at the way dancehall has become "fashionable" in trendy, ironic London circles - this really ticks me off as I genuinely love it and always have done... these tossers essentially denegrating it is little short of infuriating

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think Scott Woods is onto something with the point about these covers revealing a certain "yearning" - an excuse to explore sounds and sentiment forbidden by cool-ist dogma. the covers that work transcend the real basic nyuck nyuck jokiness and own up to that yearning, sometimes by showboating the cover act's own limitations which in turn just proves the strength of the song itself - like the circle jerks' "what the world needs now is love sweet love" or limp bizkit's "faith." both try so hard to trample the original's friendliness only to find their own schtick co-opted by the song instead of vice versa.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dave can you expand on the dancehall thing? It sounds interesting.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is super-basic, but as a reaction to "club culture", London's fashionable set took a massively rockist shift a while back - cf clubs like the Sonic Mook Experiment, electroclash clubs, like Nag Nag Nag, Renegade Pop Parties, bootleg records, DJs like Erol Alkan etc. I say rockist, as coupled with a strong vein of neo-conservatism ("I'm so bored of raving, I just want, like, real bands and proper music now") a huge amount of this has relied on "irony" and a certain element of camp or "kitsch", too - cf bootlegging and Freelance Hellraiser's Christina Aguilera/Strokes mash-up as the perfect embodiment of this idea. However, now dancehall has been appropriated by these very same circles. The other night someone I met through a friend said to me how much they loved dancehall because it was "so macho it's funny"... I very nearly punched him. I have also been asked to play danchall at these sorts of clubs and have refused every time...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

just points to music-as-fashion accessory rather than life's love and i guess i'm a bit romantic like that...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

One thing that's come up in some interviews I've done with alt-country acts who were formerly just alt is that in country there's more freedom to be honest and unmitigated in melodramatic emotion.
Moreso even than in pop.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

um... dancehall is so macho it's funny - often in a good way, and entirely intentionally - but it's not an untrue observation.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

I can empathise with people thinking dancehall machismo is funny. And I can empathise with people thinking it's repulsive. Cos it is funny. And it is repulsive. It's also exciting - which brings us back to the indie-covers thing, removing yourself from part of your own reaction to a record. Elephant Man is horrible and ridiculous AND sexy and powerful. Britney is cynical and transient AND hooky and thrilling.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

i can see that but i don't like the way it was said and the sort of people who are saying it, nor the reasons they are...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

It seems a bit snarky to on one hand decry people for not being open minded enough to enjoy pop/r&b etc. because they are knee deep in indie rock whatever, then turning around and saying that it is crap commentary when they do a cover of such music.

I actually think this is a core point. The whole 'snarf, ha ha, look at us' attitude is indeed crap, but essentially there's a weird no win scenario posited in all this:

INDIE PERSON: "I like this, that and the other popwise."
OTHER PERSON: "You're only doing that to follow trends/seem hip/to make fun of it."
INDIE PERSON: "No I'm not! Jeez! Here." *plays version of song*
OTHER PERSON: "That was shit and why did you bother?"
INDIE PERSON: "Fine, fuck you."

But you could expand this out if you like. Personally I think it's illustrative not of the power of songs or performers or whatever but ARRANGEMENTS. Which may seem strange, but consider -- I think there's a lot of (justifiable) fear and loathing over the idea of reducing a song down to a guitar jangle, ripping out whatever it is sonically that really captivates. Lingering fears of rockism, if you like, the whole 'argh, it's only validated because you can do a folk singalong to it? that attitude is crap!' And who can blame people for feeling that way?

Britney is cynical and transient AND hooky and thrilling.

See, it's funny you say that because I'm still amazed so many people have covered "Baby One More Time" when I think it's incredibly unmemorable and dull. "Oops I Did It Again" is the song that works, and as Kate St. Claire said once, it's all because of the bassline. And interestingly Fuck have in fact covered it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

If their own songs are rubbish, then some other and better indie band should have their recording contract instead.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 15:58 (twenty years ago) link

The recent cover of "crazy in love" by Snow Patrol needs discussing! (xpost)

Jole, Tuesday, 3 February 2004 15:59 (twenty years ago) link

Tom YOU MUST TRACK THIS DOWN. And bring a CD to the next FAP.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 15:59 (twenty years ago) link

It's like the days when Dom originally posted that were a far more innocent age.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 16:01 (twenty years ago) link

I have a new life's work.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 16:01 (twenty years ago) link

http://pub78.ezboard.com/fgaryjulesandthegrouprulesfrm1.showMessage?topicID=62.topic

A disappointing first port of call. Perhaps it doesn't exist. But maybe, just maybe, if we believe hard enough, it will exist...

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 16:13 (twenty years ago) link

I heard a truly terrible cover of Cry Me a River. Don't know who it was, but Lamacq said they were the next big thing from NYC.

One of the worst worst cover is Speedway's Genie In a bottle. Speedway are the most unnecessary band ever?


lid, Tuesday, 3 February 2004 16:15 (twenty years ago) link

coversproject.com says it does exist, though.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 16:25 (twenty years ago) link

Ladytron's "Oops" is like the best song to come out of the noughties period. That said, this argument makes Duchamp's corpse cry.

anode (anode), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 18:48 (twenty years ago) link

How about Richard Thompson's version of "Oops I Did It Again," from his 1000-years-of-popular-music album?

There are certain such covers that can work. Personally, I think it comes down to whether there's real affection for the song. And yes, I think you can hear the difference.


Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 19:08 (twenty years ago) link

The recent cover of "crazy in love" by Snow Patrol needs discussing!

Agreed, it is ace. Also see The Blankket's cover of 'Hey Ya!' which I still haven't hyped enough.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 04:00 (twenty years ago) link

Affection for the song may be a lot of different things. Like, for instance, you may have the same attitude Travis did when it came to "Baby One More Time", that it was a great song, but it needed to be arranged in a completely different way.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 04:01 (twenty years ago) link

"but Elbow's cover of 'Independent Woman' was very funny

-- stevem"

Yes, yes it was.

Stupid (Stupid), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 04:07 (twenty years ago) link

As is the kittens' video for it on http://www.rathergood.com

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 11:26 (twenty years ago) link

I must second that kittens version of Independent Woman as being awesome.

Jole, Wednesday, 4 February 2004 11:46 (twenty years ago) link

"Baby One More Time", that it was a great song, but it needed to be arranged in a completely different way.

B-but "Baby One More Time" is all about the arrangement....and the melody....and the beat....and the production....and the performance. Oh fuck it, it was perfect and Travis shouldn't have gone near it with their shit stick.

Nick H (Nick H), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 12:11 (twenty years ago) link

one year passes...
Who did that country cover of Snoop's "Gin & Juice" in the 90's? That was pretty hot... I think there were some other subsequent folksy versions of the song.

My point: when a country voice sings gangsta-rap lyrics, you realize that the two worlds and attitudes aren't too far apart. That's just truth, without irony. By the way, mega-pop artists should start cherrypicking through the crates of great punk compositions. Just imagine:

Britney Spears covering Bad Brain's "i against i".
Usher singing "Swallow My Pride" by the Ramones.
Gwen Stefani doing "Straight to Hell" by The Clash.

Alright. I'm dreaming again.


Bobby Peru (Bobby Peru), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 01:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Who did that country cover of Snoop's "Gin & Juice" in the 90's?

The Gourds.

Britney Spears covering Bad Brain's "i against i".

Even after her yawnsome take on "Satisfaction"?

j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 02:18 (nineteen years ago) link

one year passes...
The cover itself isn't that special, but whoever added the video to it made it special
Rock Plaza Central & Youtube Wonderfulness take on
Sexyback

Rufus 3000 (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 18 January 2007 16:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Ted Leo/Kelly Clarkson/Yeah Yeah Yeahs

What a twist!

MRZBW (MRZBW), Friday, 19 January 2007 00:00 (seventeen years ago) link

i did like "creep" by afghan whigs.

bonnie prince billy's live vers. of "ignition" by r. kelly was pretty great.

M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 19 January 2007 00:02 (seventeen years ago) link

I have no idea who Pink Nasty is, but this cover of "Burn" made me realize Usher's performance on that song didn't have as much to do with my enjoyment of it as I imagined.

Jeff Reguil0n (Talent Explosion), Friday, 19 January 2007 00:34 (seventeen years ago) link

nine years pass...

had NPR on while taking a shower the other week and this came on. as he started to introduce it i was like "is he really going to?" which turned into "dude, no, i know this is coming from a genuine place but you can still turn back..."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99ATOTj2xVM

it's definitely worse with video.

sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Tuesday, 16 February 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

this is prob about as bad as pop culture gets

japanese mage (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 16 February 2016 23:46 (eight years ago) link

holy shit

crüt, Tuesday, 16 February 2016 23:53 (eight years ago) link

omg

dc, Wednesday, 17 February 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

The video you posted is private, so I can't see it... What is it?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:11 (eight years ago) link

yeah i can't see it either..

posted with permission by (dog latin), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:15 (eight years ago) link

Make that three of us.

Soon Kenny Loggins will look like this (Tom D.), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:21 (eight years ago) link

it's Chris Thile covering Kendrick Lamar's "Alright" on mandolin, substituting "brother" for the n-word. it is the most cringeworthy thing imaginable.

crüt, Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:33 (eight years ago) link

oh god I actually like Thile / Punch Brothers in general but there's no way in hell I'm listening to that

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:38 (eight years ago) link

dang, it was public yesterday. maybe they read ilx. here's audio.

sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:44 (eight years ago) link

not any more, this cover-up goes deeper than we thought

Chikan wa akan de. Zettai akan de. (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:58 (eight years ago) link

Not listening to this, let alone watching it.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 14:03 (eight years ago) link

two years pass...

Had press tix and saw Chris Thile host and play his Live from Here radio show yesterday. He named off folks having birthdays this week and covered their songs with a big band . Sarah Jarosz sang & he played mandolin on Labelle “ Lady Marmalade,” and Dylan “Twist of Fate.” They also did Miles Davis “So What.” Non-birthday cover of Vampire Weekend

curmudgeon, Sunday, 27 May 2018 21:18 (six years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwHNeDwp77g

Dud

flappy bird, Sunday, 27 May 2018 22:27 (six years ago) link

five years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I0zbAQbl2o

Dethroned Halloween, Alaska's "I Can't Live Without My Radio" for favorite track in this theme.

The "Jesus, take the wheel" line is such a mournful hook that's an aside in the original Thundercat track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8TdgBWEOP8

the body of a spider... (scampering alpaca), Monday, 29 April 2024 21:53 (one month ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.