― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:45 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:49 (twenty years ago) link
― Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:58 (twenty years ago) link
Woohoo! Japanese secret bonus track required!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:07 (twenty years ago) link
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:11 (twenty years ago) link
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:13 (twenty years ago) link
― strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:19 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:23 (twenty years ago) link
― strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:26 (twenty years ago) link
― strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:27 (twenty years ago) link
Actually, the real sticking point is the whole "no no, El only produced one track, I did the first six, and it is just a coincidence that I, too, chose the path of drunken horns and Vangelis Blade Runner synths" sound. I mean, when the beats work, then great, and I like how all the Jukies hang out in the same brownstone indie-rap bunker and learn from each other and swap ideas and shit, but if this is the first sign of a "signature label sound" that will eventually become Neptunian in its exhaustion then oh no oh shit.
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:30 (twenty years ago) link
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:33 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:39 (twenty years ago) link
― Jonathan (Jonathan), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:48 (twenty years ago) link
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:50 (twenty years ago) link
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:56 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward, Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:56 (twenty years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:01 (twenty years ago) link
Geeta, how do you feel about banning the terms "chamber-pop" and "Beach Boys" for a year?
― scott seward, Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:15 (twenty years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:34 (twenty years ago) link
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:33 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:35 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:44 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:46 (twenty years ago) link
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:49 (twenty years ago) link
nate, your subliminal diss was funny. But your point is pretty good. I also see the obvious influence of El-P on Aesop Rock's sound. I just feel as if there's enough of a tilt to it to legitimize it. If anything, he's borrowing from his partner in crime, Blockhead, more. And for the record, I hated Labor Days.
matos, I'm just trying to say that the album isn't getting as much praise as I expected it to get and that the people who would probably like it best if they gave it a chance, are avoiding it like the plague. I stated it poorly before.
Tim, rude? Wow, are you just hurt by the fact that I insulted the new sound of Britain or something? I don't understand why he's supposed to be Jumping Jack Jesus and why his album is so acclaimed. After what I've said about sampling, legitimize the greatness of the beat of "Fix Up, Look Sharp"? If it's okay to sample, period, is it okay to use the same sample the same way as someone else?
― Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:54 (twenty years ago) link
Which is my feeling re: "Work It"; I was swarmed on ILM for stating it, but what's the fucking point of playing an old record in the middle of yours. "OH SHIT I KNOW THAT!" Appropriation/nostalgia/respect...what-fucking-ever. How about some creativity, it's supposed to be an art form.
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:05 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:07 (twenty years ago) link
― Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:08 (twenty years ago) link
"How is it okay for Dizzee Rascal to take the same sample that Run-DMC used and do effectively the same thing, when you'd probably villify Puffy for doing the same, repeatedly?"
I can't speak for Jess but I suspect he'd agree with me when I say that I wouldn't have a problem with Puffy doing the same thing. Often when Puffy *does* do the same thing (or something very similar) it works brilliantly; sometimes it sounds shit. The determinative factor is not the obviousness of the sample or its prior use.
As for Dizzee, you're totally taking this one song out of context and making it representative for Dizzee's craft as a whole. All the other tracks on Boy in da Corner are self-produced and don't like they rely on much sampling at all (except the occasional Playstation game noise maybe). The fact that "Fix Up Look Sharp" deliberately uses a familiar sampled beat and nothing else suggests that it's very deliberately trying to do and be something else; that "something" is two-fold, I think:
1. it's a demonstration of Dizzee's talent for freestyling over the beat, for being a raucous MC with no concerns about production/songcraft. The point of garage MCing is to ride other people's beats, to take them and make them your own. The backstory behind "Fix Up Look Sharp" is that Dizzee was in the studio, heard someone playing the instrumental break, and just started freestyling over it. If anything, the beat having a lineage and tradition makes it more ideal, because the assfuck-recontextualisation by the MC is consequently more radical and impressive.Oh, and see also: Jamaican riddim culture. And then see also: the eternally piratical nature of sampling throughout the hardcore continuum (hardcore--> jungle--> garage--> grime)
2. "Fix Up Look Sharp" is an old-skool beat in an album full of new-school beats. It's a very deliberate attempt by Dizzee to show that he's not "just" garage, but at the same time it's something of a very enjoyable novelty. Dizzee doesn't take the tradition of hip hop beatcraft seriously a la Jurassic 5 or DJ Shadow-style producers because he's working in a genre that is more forward-looking than tradition-venerating. For that reason, the sole purpose of the tune's old-skoolizm is to announce itself as old-skool. And it's much more effective to use an actual old-skool beat that is vaguely recognisable than it is to find something new and obscure. As I said in relation to Missy's Under Construction album (which has a fairly similar attitude to old-skool as "Fix Up Look Sharp" does), if you're going to an Eighties Revival costume party, you don't go as some obscure indie icon no-one but yourself will be aware of; you go as Cyndi Lauper or Madonna or Prince. This is about the past as fun, as shared history, rather than the past as a chessboard for beatmining fetishists.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:25 (twenty years ago) link
Oh my god I bet you'd be the most boring DJ in the history of existence!
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:29 (twenty years ago) link
(i heart tim finney)
― geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:35 (twenty years ago) link
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:37 (twenty years ago) link
Yeah I'd be pretty angry too if I had to listen to you play "Chris Ott's History of the Best and Most Obscure Breaks Ever!!!"
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:43 (twenty years ago) link
Chris: if hard pressed, could you locate your own genitals? With a map?
(This is another way of asking if you hate fun.)
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:43 (twenty years ago) link
When you talk about music, you talk about the totality: the emotional, intellectual, cognitive, physical. Not to mention that music isn't heard in a vacuum; it's heard in a variety of different places, etc -- in your bedroom, in dance clubs, at the grocery store. You hear music in a variety of states of mind, too -- When you're sad, when you're happy, when you're angry, or indifferent. So to divorce music from dancing doesn't make sense, just like divorcing music from quarter notes and eighth notes doesn't make sense.
― geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:44 (twenty years ago) link
Yes exactly.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:47 (twenty years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:49 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:51 (twenty years ago) link
Yes, exactly. Low and Basement Jaxx are interchangeable.
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:51 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:53 (twenty years ago) link
Re: Low vs Basement Jaxx, I don't get what you're getting at.
― geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:53 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:56 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:58 (twenty years ago) link
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:04 (twenty years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:06 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:17 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:21 (twenty years ago) link
needless to say, the Sterling-Tim-Geeta front is OTM throughout this thread.
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 09:01 (twenty years ago) link
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:31 (twenty years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:10 (twenty years ago) link
*sniff*
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:05 (twenty years ago) link
Radiohead has never been "African" in any way. But they, like all other bands, are best when they create melodies with verse and chorus, not just a phrase or two that are repeated endlessly. Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:24 (twenty years ago) link
Geir, this is really, really, really untrue if the listener is me. Thus, it is untrue.
― scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 14:48 (twenty years ago) link
― mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:55 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 14:59 (twenty years ago) link
i'm really stumbling tho with the 'with you in that dress/my thoughts i confess/verge on dirty' bit
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:01 (twenty years ago) link
― pitchfork, Monday, 3 November 2003 16:31 (twenty years ago) link
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 3 November 2003 16:35 (twenty years ago) link
Miles Davis & Beethoven both strongly disagree with this statement.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 16:41 (twenty years ago) link
Dorinne Muraille Mani (Fat Cat)The Books The Lemon of Pink (Tomlab)Matmos The Civil War (Matador)Nathan Michel Dear Bicycle (Tigerbeat 6)Colleen Everyone alive wants answers (Leaf)Gal Hinaus:: In den, Wald. (CD-R / radio))Lullatone Computer Recital (Audio Dregs)Anne Laplantine Hambourg Robert Wyatt Cuckooland (Hannibal)David Sylvian Blemish (Samadhisound)
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:05 (twenty years ago) link
Can someone please tell me some more about this band? The internet doesn't know shit, but "Motherless Bastard" (I think it's called) is fab.
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:32 (twenty years ago) link
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:34 (twenty years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:41 (twenty years ago) link
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:47 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:55 (twenty years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:08 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:09 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:10 (twenty years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:18 (twenty years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:22 (twenty years ago) link
thread hijack>
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:23 (twenty years ago) link