i lurv strawberry jam.
― Creeztophair, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 06:50 (fifteen years ago) link
interesting. I wonder what exactly about the sound of SJ hits people's INDIE button that's so diff. from this album (or Feels for that matter)
― HPSCHD, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 06:53 (fifteen years ago) link
this is growing on me...i really love the middle of the first track
― "made smashable" (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 30 December 2008 06:58 (fifteen years ago) link
ya this is great and will prolly be their biggest album, but they were so much better when you couldn't understand the fuck they were saying.
― Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 07:47 (fifteen years ago) link
^
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 30 December 2008 11:24 (fifteen years ago) link
The lyrics are much tougher to decipher on this one than on Strawberry Jam, at least on the Avey Tare songs.
― Hatch, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 13:26 (fifteen years ago) link
on first listen, i don't like the hand claps on 'my girls'
― computer make noise, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 17:32 (fifteen years ago) link
keep liveblogging
― caek, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 17:37 (fifteen years ago) link
wishing you a happy liveblogging new year's eve eve.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 30 December 2008 17:46 (fifteen years ago) link
i wish brothersport extended the arpeggiated middle bit & add amazing 4/4 kick. Even though it is a grebt track altogether, extended raverave would be awesome.
― siskin/skulls, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 18:23 (fifteen years ago) link
^ siskin, there are a couple of songs where they could've extended A LOT. The "when the sun goes down, we'll go out again" in Summetime Clothes should've been repeated again. The big blast in the first track should've surfaced again.
there is a lot to learn from this time around, the only thing better will be their next album.
I think Bluish should've been re-remixed, it's soft and everything, but it just...eh, gets too soft.
― nominal, Wednesday, 31 December 2008 02:50 (fifteen years ago) link
Anyone notice the gaps on the leaked album? At the end of each song? I fixed them in audacity now. I'll re-up for anyone who wants a seamless listen.
― nominal, Wednesday, 31 December 2008 02:51 (fifteen years ago) link
nuh uh. it has that great piano too.the next lp's the kind of 'visual album' they're making.i love the live sound of the record, undulating synths bouncing off the walls.
― schlump, Wednesday, 31 December 2008 03:46 (fifteen years ago) link
"there is a lot to learn from this time around, the only thing better will be their next album."
"the next lp's the kind of 'visual album' they're making."
i can't say for sure and i hope i'm wrong, but i don't think they are ever going to make a better record than this. i have never gotten into their old stuff but every album since sung tongs has been better than the last (not counting strawberry jam and yes counting person pitch). it's more a feeling than anything else, but i anticipated the album so much for so long and now that i'm listening to it and it actually is the most wonderful fucking thing ever... it feels really nice and conclusive.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 31 December 2008 22:16 (fifteen years ago) link
lol @ google auto-suggest:http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x18/gr8080/fdfsdfsdfsdfsd.jpg
― ♪㋡♫㋡ (gr8080), Thursday, 1 January 2009 03:28 (fifteen years ago) link
:D
i'm torn on this still. there's parts that i really love ("in the flowers", "brothersport"), but then there's the six minute snoozefest "daily routine" right in the middle. i still dont think what i have is great quality, so im gonna wait for the vinyl
― k3vin k., Friday, 2 January 2009 08:15 (fifteen years ago) link
they really fucked up summer time clothes
― jordan s (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 January 2009 08:15 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah that and "DR" kinda kill the momentum the first four songs had going. it starts out with four very solid tracks with pretty sublime moments imo, but then tracks 5 and 6 kind of kill it. i still really like "brothersport", but i prefer the live version soso much more. for some reason, the production's the cleanest on "BS"; it's super spacious when the rest of the album is much more cluttered (again, could be the low-qual rip i've got), and i just don't think it works as well. the live version i've got captured the energy and enthusiasm of the song so much better i think
― k3vin k., Friday, 2 January 2009 08:20 (fifteen years ago) link
you're all smoking crack too close to the frame
― Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 2 January 2009 08:50 (fifteen years ago) link
daily routine is the weakest track on the album indeed, but "bluish" is awesome, with it's MBV melody style
― Zeno, Friday, 2 January 2009 11:47 (fifteen years ago) link
it's just that tracks 5-8 are a bit less poppy, but not necessary weaker
― Zeno, Friday, 2 January 2009 11:51 (fifteen years ago) link
must admit they be growin' on me. however, daily routine is neither weak nor the weakest song on the album! that would be either "lion in a coma" or "no more runnin," and even as i type this i'm realizing that i love those songs, too! can we all just agree that this is the greatest album of all time already?
― samosa gibreel, Friday, 2 January 2009 14:24 (fifteen years ago) link
xposts i was referrring to "bluish" not "summertime clothes"
― k3vin k., Friday, 2 January 2009 17:42 (fifteen years ago) link
I hate this album so much.
― Turangalila, Friday, 2 January 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago) link
why?
I still like this, but I might want to wait until the CD actually comes out to listen again. I wouldn't say there are diminishing returns... but now the inital shock has worn off. I am occasionally wondering if it's actually that good after all. It definitely skirts very close to some awfully hippy-drippy zone but (I think) mostly pulls off being GOOD hippy music.
It might be that good, next time or another, but I do also find it drops off, or my attention starts to wander somewhere around the last third of the album.
That's still a good run though! and I'm still interested to finish the record (even if I might skip some of this bit).
Which is pretty much how I tend to play "Loveless", this has a similar (prematurely) exhausting feel to it for me, even if it's superficially perhaps, a little more consciously varied. So this isn't a large complaint by any means.
I also think Daily Routine -needs- to be there, for pacing. I mean otherwise are we talking about a 1-2-3-4-5 punch opening?? And don't understand how Summertime Clothes kills any momentum when it's the most uptempo track in that whole sequence? I mean, you can not like it, but that's a different thing really.
"Lion In a Coma" is a bit... iffy. I guess it's the token old-style Animal Collective type song for people who like this record but might not be that enamoured with their previous stuff ?
(esp. Strawberry Jam, which I've reinvestigated, appreciate a bit better now, but am not hugely moved by)
― fandango, Friday, 2 January 2009 18:39 (fifteen years ago) link
I loved their EP with Vashti Bunyan. This album just seems to emphasize everything I’ve never liked about them, e.g., that tacked-on, cartoonish posturing which they now seem too comfortable with. Most of the melodies are desperately saccharine---like jingles, even. And there’s no real sense of tension or weirdness to balance it all. The overwrought production only makes it worse.
― Turangalila, Friday, 2 January 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago) link
i actually listened to this irl and yow this band is just unbearably precious - and a big lolwtf to all the animal collectors repping their pop tunesmithiness
― ❤¯\㋡/¯❤ (ice cr?m), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link
wht were you thinking?! wd never listen to this irl
― cozwn, Friday, 2 January 2009 21:46 (fifteen years ago) link
lol
― rox qua rox (roxymuzak), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:46 (fifteen years ago) link
"my girls" is still dope imo-- the rest is aight
― ♪㋡♫㋡ (gr8080), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:50 (fifteen years ago) link
but dont take my word for it-- http://link-protector.com/673613/
― ♪㋡♫㋡ (gr8080), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:52 (fifteen years ago) link
it saddens me, but i'm not all that into this. a few great songs, lots of others with really weak melodies and ideas. and seriously, every damn song is drowning. SJ was so consistent comparatively!
― HPSCHD, Saturday, 3 January 2009 05:25 (fifteen years ago) link
This album just seems to emphasize everything I’ve never liked about them, e.g., that tacked-on, cartoonish posturing which they now seem too comfortable with. Most of the melodies are desperately saccharine---like jingles, even. And there’s no real sense of tension or weirdness to balance it all. The overwrought production only makes it worse.
^^^OTM
― psychgawsple, Saturday, 3 January 2009 06:18 (fifteen years ago) link
xp whiney would like this album
― k3vin k., Saturday, 3 January 2009 07:01 (fifteen years ago) link
I loved their EP with Vashti Bunyan.This album just seems to emphasize everything I’ve never liked about them, e.g., that tacked-on, cartoonish posturing which they now seem too comfortable with. Most of the melodies are desperately saccharine---like jingles, even. And there’s no real sense of tension or weirdness to balance it all. The overwrought production only makes it worse.
― Turangalila
xpost Turangalila, so from what I gather you've never really liked them (except for one e.p.) and still don't like them now?
I don't get it, I've not been too fond of them for a lot of the same reasons (and their supposed weirdness HAS always sounded like posturing to me, maybe not 'cartoonish' but still...) if anything I feel like they've dialled back some on the preciousness/affected qualities here for the better. I mean, couldn't you say all the same things about the Panda Bear record?
I'm never quite sure about this line of argument that anything genuinely happy sounding and emotionally uncomplicated and open about it in music has to be "balanced" by some darkness/tension/weirdness. I doubt there's anyone that doesn't have at least ONE record they love that makes a mockery of this.
and all the people complaining about the "underwater"-ness just sound like people hearing MBV for the first time and asking "is this the right speed??" a little.
anyway, I'm mostly enjoying this so don't really want my buzz harshing just yet lol, or to become a cheerleader for it just yet (i'm probably in the 'new fan' category here)
and about listening to this "irl" yeah, cheap lols & and a good zing but have you heard how popular MGMT are? This doesn't sound any more embarrassing to me than that, maybe if AC work their nipples a bit they too can be in the charts :P
― fandango, Saturday, 3 January 2009 14:59 (fifteen years ago) link
(sorry didn't mean to requote the whole post there..)
this line of argument Heh. Dude, you make it seem like favoring particular musical signifiers is somehow bigoted. Or that I'm implying that certain musical signifiers are inherently wrong.
I felt nauseous and uneasy after listening to this. Personally, I look for chiaroscuros in music. To me, this is mostly a grotesque blot of pastels. Or like the musical equivalent of Nutrasweet.
― Turangalila, Saturday, 3 January 2009 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link
there is a lyrical reference to that obv"saccharine sheen"u almost got to wonder how the language of these comments are planted, though always as if the band somehow does not seem to be aware of what it has wrought...
― noizez duk, Saturday, 3 January 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link
xpost - sorry, I don't mean to. I just suspect there are whole swathes of music that could be dismissed with a very similar sounding argument (I'm probably thinking of your, at least I think it was.. hating of that one bjork record that Mel W hates too, which I don't agree with at all). You're right about this being pastel-ly though. For me it's more of a gorgeous pulsating jellyfish like blob of pastels though. I don't find it sonically ugly at all. Or artificial sounding (for the first time really w/r/t this band!).
again though, on first impressions I'm starting to think the bottom of this record is hit very quick. I felt the same way about the Panda Bear thing really, but that seemed deliberately surface-ish at least in construction. A few bass hits might not actually signify much depth here after all....
― fandango, Saturday, 3 January 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link
this thread used to be so much fun :(
― ♪㋡♫㋡ (gr8080), Saturday, 3 January 2009 22:52 (fifteen years ago) link
it's the new BOC (again)...
mad hype & hijinks until the leak actually arrives
http://www.mynewplace.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/tumbleweed.jpg
― fandango, Saturday, 3 January 2009 22:55 (fifteen years ago) link
or I'm just draining the fun :/ soz
― fandango, Saturday, 3 January 2009 22:56 (fifteen years ago) link
Still haven't heard the album in full but I expect I will be quite happy if it's all "superficial" and saccharine.
Superficial in scare quotes because I'm wary of surface/depth metaphors for music.
― Tim F, Sunday, 4 January 2009 02:39 (fifteen years ago) link
Food metaphors also annoy me. Unless they're taken to more specific and less value-laden extremes. i.e. I dislike talking about music in terms of fast foods, fine wines, artificial sweeteners etc. but I'm totally cool with people saying "this song sounds like a snickers bar whereas that song sounds like a cherry ripe."
(To my mind artificial sweetener comparisons never quite signify what they're intended to signify, because I never find nutrasweet or other artificial sweeteners terribly sweet. Milk chocolate vs dark chocolate (with milk chocolate as the superficial option) makes a lot more sense I suppose, but I actually prefer milk chocolate. Maybe it's just that I'm a sweet tooth both when it comes to food and when it comes to music)
― Tim F, Sunday, 4 January 2009 02:44 (fifteen years ago) link
First pat so otm. What I hate about the food comparison is that fast foods etc are scientifically proven to be bad for people whereas music can never be proven thus.
This album is probably giving me bigger buzzes than anything I can think of in oh...fuck knows how long. It's like Underworld and the Beach Boys in an elevator in a blender on drugs on acid.
― Local Garda, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:12 (fifteen years ago) link
*first par
I like this and all, but it seems a little straight forward somehow? Their previous work had a slightly looser feel which i liked but these songs don't really seem to fly off in too many different directions, despite all the nice weird noises
― Number None, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:18 (fifteen years ago) link
I never find nutrasweet or other artificial sweeteners terribly sweetRight. They're a sort of toxic, quasi-sweet that tends to make people sick.
― Turangalila, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:35 (fifteen years ago) link
No music has ever made me sick I must say. If your doctor has warned you off listening to this album Salvador I'd encourage you to follow his or her advice!
I'm assuming this album is relentlessly cheerful in the same way as Since I Left You, which also has its fair share of lovers and haters.
"It's like Underworld and the Beach Boys in an elevator in a blender on drugs on acid."
Woah.
― Tim F, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:45 (fifteen years ago) link
I think it was Tobias who first suggested the Underworld comparison. It's certainly nowhere near as dark or as conventionally UK prog/techno as Underworld but some of the use of vocals in that flailing almost instrumental way reminds me a lot of them. I keep thinking of terms like "indie-dance" etc as lazy impulsive reactions to this album, even in the sense that I want to compare it to past definitions of such terms, but the truth is this deserves to be considered as a good psychedelic record in its own right, free from the kind of cheap genre mashing terms that are so prevalent...
― Local Garda, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:51 (fifteen years ago) link