Surf's Up Vs A Day In The Life

except that I totally don't hear that in the finished version of the song...? I dunno what's going on here.

― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, November 7, 2011 11:08 PM (53 seconds ago) Bookmark

It is there, believe me. Towards the end.

oh it's in the SECOND refrain.

yeah now I hear it

that is a pretty weird thing to leave in

You are right when you say there's some obvious bleed throughs/bad edits/bad punch-ins on Beach Boys stuff, though. I think 'Here Today' has a near-audible conversation in the background at one point which isn't supposed to be there.

McCartney was responsible for the tape loops on 'Tomorrow Never Knows'

wait I read that that was all Harrison and Lennon

yeah there's a similar page for the Beach Boys (iatee or tylerw might know what I'm talking about?) - but I was kinda surprised how much of the entries on there were things I had actually noticed before. The conversation about cameras in Here Today is noted in the liner notes iirc

from wiki - "McCartney supplied a bag of ¼-inch audio tape loops he had made at home after listening to Stockhausen's Gesang der Jünglinge. By disabling the erase head of a tape recorder and then spooling a continuous loop of tape through the machine while recording, the tape would constantly overdub itself, creating a saturation effect, a technique also used in musique concrète. The tape could also be induced to go faster and slower. McCartney encouraged the other Beatles to use the same effects and create their own loops."

i mean, if that's true, mccartney can lay claim to being the avant garde beatle.

Here's a bunch
xp

Honkin Down the Highwway - (fade) Al sings "Who cares if I gotta spend the night" at the end of the fade -- obviously not the correct lyric, and right after, realizing his mistake, he seems to say, "Oh, shit!"

I mean I love "Love You" and totally noticed this before, it just makes me laugh

now I'm just laughing at this list...

2:26 Carl says "I love you" it is intentional, but I don't like it

In Brian's autobiography on page 326 referring to digital recording which can easily be made flawless Brian says "I learned the lesson that so many people who made albums in the eighties missed: no matter how perfect technology made the sound, an album still boiled down to great songwriting and a spiritual investment in the music."

Mr. Wilson is OTM. Flaws can add 'character' to a release. I know they certainly do to 'The White Album'.

when i saw the pet sounds tour with the wondermints many years ago BW was constantly coughing/clearing his throat into the mic- old habits die hard

All those supposed flaws you hear on the 'White Album' I think I have missed. I always heard it and felt like everything really flowed in its own strange way. Nothing really took me out of the mood. I don't think it's really a bad edit unless it takes you out of the song/flow of the album, regardless of technical standards.

I dunno man, there were a lot of things that were very noticeable to me!

Like, on 'Happiness Is A Warm Gun' for example. I noticed several things right off the bat about that track, and two of them are noted on that anomalies site... the fading in of the word 'down' before John starts singing the "I need a fix..." bit, and right at the end the bleed-through of the falsetto "Guuuuuuuuun!" before the actual lead vocal comes in. One thing that isn't noted on that site that I noticed is during "mother superior jump the gun", the vocal double-tracking goes all to shit.

I've never questioned the intentionality of those elements on the white album. Same guys that went on to attempt to make an album of all live takes next (Let It Be) and went on to make records like Wild Life and Some Time in New York City.

I understood that The Beatles wanted to make a bit more of a 'stripped back' album than the psychedelia of 'Sgt. Pepper's' and 'Magical Mystery Tour'. I honestly don't think that bad edits/punch ins/messy double-tracking was the intention. I just think they had a lot of songs and rushed their way through it. Look at 'Hey Jude' and the single version of 'Revolution', for example. Those two tracks were done during the White Album sessions, but because they knew they were going to come out as a single they paid more attention and care to what they were doing, and it shows!

It's also worth noting that George Martin didn't produce all of 'The White Album' either... he buggered off on holiday half-way through and left The Beatles to it.

Geoff Emerick quit the sessions too... so you've got Ken Scott/Geoff Emerick engineering and Chris Thomas/George Martin/The Beatles themselves producing.

So maybe an engineer does and edit, shows it to a John Lennon who is tripping on LSD, and gets the OK to keep it in.

I honestly don't think that bad edits/punch ins/messy double-tracking was the intention.

Right, but the decision not to do anything about them was intentional and, I've always assumed, aesthetically-motivated rather than just due to laziness. I mean, who knows, but surely something like the editing on "Yer Blues" was intentional.

My theory is that the decision not to do anything about them was because they wanted to record as much of their material as possible and maybe their record company had set a release date. The compiling of the album legendarily took place in their only 24-hour session, which suggests to me that they may have had a deadline. They were in the studio a fair amount of time making that record while they were essentially falling apart... band members and producers going off on holiday or quitting. There may have been an attitude of "okay, that'll do".

I think they spent six months making 'The White Album' ... 'Sgt. Peppers' took five and there's considerably less songs on it.

'Abbey Road' took seven months from start-to-finish, but there were less songs... which means more time devoted to each song, with a producer that was completely in charge and a much stricter recording regime. Still though, this is the band that made 'Revolver' in three months... I just think they became distracted by having so much material and the tension in the studio, really, that's the only real reason I can think of that they spent six months on 'The White Album' and it ended up sounding so sloppy. I really don't think they intended to make a messy record, though, it just turned out that way as a product of what was going on when it was made. Lord knows they had enough studio time to make it non-sloppy, though.

It all seems 'of a piece' to me on an album with a long tape collage piece, the intentional editing at the end of "Yer Blues," lo-fi things like "Wild Honey Pie," the rambling fiddle at the end of "Don't Pass Me By," the little snippet of unidentified song on Side Four, etc.

tell you though, if I had 6 months in Abbey Road, I'd make a damn great double album!

I'm voting Beatles. 'Surf's Up' is gorgeous, but I've never been a fan of VDP's lyrics. The "music holocaust" pun, "adieu or die," etc... are much too "clever" to move me. Arrangement-wise, 'Surf's Up' is certainly more textured than ADITL, but it's nothing that Spector, the Beatles, and the Beach Boys themselves hadn't done at least a few times already. ADITL's crescendos, on the other hand, are some pretty inspired and unique bits of orchestration. ADITL also flows much more smoothly to my ears than the start-and-stop production of 'Surf's Up.' I do love both songs. If you break them down into sheet music, I think Surf's Up is probably the stronger composition. It'd be a beautiful piano piece. But in the end, I prefer Lennon's voice to Wilson's, and Ringo's performance is just too good. I suppose I usually prefer the rougher Beatles sound to the Beach Boys sound.

I've been thinking a lot about album context too. I listened to each of these songs many times tonight, and it's been a little strange to hear ADITL on its own, instead of at the end of 'Pepper.' One of my favorite things about the song, and the album, is that instead of a crowd pleaser, this silly, psychedelic, half-assed 'concept band' ends their night with a creepy existentialist encore. WTF?

Yeah, that's one of the problems with Sgt Peppers. It starts off with the best intentions of being a themed concept album and quickly forgets about it all after the first two-three tracks.

Like most so-called concept albums

What is this "Yer Blues" thing you guys keep mentioning? I know John is singing off-mic for the last verse. Do yall think that is some kind of editing trick or something? It's actually part of the performance.

I really don't think they intended to make a messy record, though, it just turned out that way as a product of what was going on when it was made. Lord knows they had enough studio time to make it non-sloppy, though.

Does not compute. First of all I don't think the "White Album" really is any more flawed than their previous albums, on a purely technical level. Read through that list for yourself for plenty of messy bits even in that paradigm of studio craft "Revolver". As for it being a messy record aesthetically and this not being the intention; this is 100% silly. Look at that track-listing. Listen to the songs. At no point in the recording process was there an attempt to sequence it as a stronger cohesive single album. What is the previous record they did, "Magical Mystery Tour". Is that not a total mess as well? The Beatles love a good mess. Just watch "A Hard Day's Night".

Sgt. Pepper is messy too -- why does the concept go away after a few songs? Well, the concept is just another bit that they stumbled into during the process, it's another part of the journey of making the album, not an end in itself. In fact I think the main Pepper songs were the last recorded for it.

The concept was going to be "Liverpool", but after they had done three songs, they ran out of ideas, and the label insisted on 2 tracks for a single. So, Penny Lane and Strawberry Fields became 2 sides of the "Liverpool" concept single, and "When I'm 64" was kept back for the album.

I don't think anyone but Paul ever really signed onto the "Pepper" concept in the first place

What is this "Yer Blues" thing you guys keep mentioning? I know John is singing off-mic for the last verse. Do yall think that is some kind of editing trick or something? It's actually part of the performance.

yeah I always thought so too. but the suggestion was that that whole verse is just a copy of the musical track from the beginning of the song. could be I suppose, would need to listen to it more carefully and/or consult Lewison

What is this "Yer Blues" thing you guys keep mentioning? I know John is singing off-mic for the last verse. Do yall think that is some kind of editing trick or something? It's actually part of the performance.

Right at the end of 'Yer Blues', it's clear that while the guitar solo is playing, the band are jamming and don't have the faintest clue how to end the song or get back into the main riff. Their answer to this problem? Edit the beginning onto the end and use it as an instrumental - and it sounds jarring as hell. I don't think they meant for it to sound jarring, but it does.

At no point in the recording process was there an attempt to sequence it as a stronger cohesive single album.

But that's not what I'm talking about!

I think the end of Yer Blues sounds great, intentional or not. And they do have a track record for this kind of thing. Look at how I Want You (She's So Heavy) ends...

i kind of forget what we're arguing about re: the white album

so jarring I've never noticed it

just figured it was one of the many many many rhythmic turnarounds/switchups in Lennon's songs

I think the end of Yer Blues sounds great, intentional or not. And they do have a track record for this kind of thing. Look at how I Want You (She's So Heavy) ends...

― B-Boy Bualadh Bos (ecuador_with_a_c), Tuesday, November 8, 2011 10:30 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

Yeah, you're right about 'I Want You (She's So Heavy)' but the editing on that is far more seamless.

so jarring I've never noticed it

just figured it was one of the many many many rhythmic turnarounds/switchups in Lennon's songs

― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, November 8, 2011 10:35 PM (9 seconds ago) Bookmark

The whole track comes to an immediate halt and literally everything gets cut off in mid-everything just as the drum fill comes in!

I hear it now that you've pointed it out

you've ruined it for me forever!

*cries*

I don't care one bit for 'Surf's Up'. I didn't even know it had a following until ILX

I would of preferred an album that's all stuff like "She's Goin' Bald" and "He Gives Speeches"

those are the same song

yeah, they should of stuck in that mindset and made more cracked out pop

in what universe did they NOT make more cracked out pop?!

> I would of preferred an album that's all stuff like "She's Goin' Bald" and "He Gives Speeches"

That's what most of Smiley Smile was.

"Fall Breaks and Back to Winter" is wack but it got darker and more cracked out with "Mrs. O'Leary's cow". I'd like an whole album of cracked out shit - not so much light and wacky