I loved their EP with Vashti Bunyan.This album just seems to emphasize everything I’ve never liked about them, e.g., that tacked-on, cartoonish posturing which they now seem too comfortable with. Most of the melodies are desperately saccharine---like jingles, even. And there’s no real sense of tension or weirdness to balance it all. The overwrought production only makes it worse.
― Turangalila
xpost Turangalila, so from what I gather you've never really liked them (except for one e.p.) and still don't like them now?
I don't get it, I've not been too fond of them for a lot of the same reasons (and their supposed weirdness HAS always sounded like posturing to me, maybe not 'cartoonish' but still...) if anything I feel like they've dialled back some on the preciousness/affected qualities here for the better. I mean, couldn't you say all the same things about the Panda Bear record?
I'm never quite sure about this line of argument that anything genuinely happy sounding and emotionally uncomplicated and open about it in music has to be "balanced" by some darkness/tension/weirdness. I doubt there's anyone that doesn't have at least ONE record they love that makes a mockery of this.
and all the people complaining about the "underwater"-ness just sound like people hearing MBV for the first time and asking "is this the right speed??" a little.
anyway, I'm mostly enjoying this so don't really want my buzz harshing just yet lol, or to become a cheerleader for it just yet (i'm probably in the 'new fan' category here)
and about listening to this "irl" yeah, cheap lols & and a good zing but have you heard how popular MGMT are? This doesn't sound any more embarrassing to me than that, maybe if AC work their nipples a bit they too can be in the charts :P
― fandango, Saturday, 3 January 2009 14:59 (fifteen years ago) link
(sorry didn't mean to requote the whole post there..)
this line of argument Heh. Dude, you make it seem like favoring particular musical signifiers is somehow bigoted. Or that I'm implying that certain musical signifiers are inherently wrong.
I felt nauseous and uneasy after listening to this. Personally, I look for chiaroscuros in music. To me, this is mostly a grotesque blot of pastels. Or like the musical equivalent of Nutrasweet.
― Turangalila, Saturday, 3 January 2009 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link
there is a lyrical reference to that obv"saccharine sheen"u almost got to wonder how the language of these comments are planted, though always as if the band somehow does not seem to be aware of what it has wrought...
― noizez duk, Saturday, 3 January 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link
xpost - sorry, I don't mean to. I just suspect there are whole swathes of music that could be dismissed with a very similar sounding argument (I'm probably thinking of your, at least I think it was.. hating of that one bjork record that Mel W hates too, which I don't agree with at all). You're right about this being pastel-ly though. For me it's more of a gorgeous pulsating jellyfish like blob of pastels though. I don't find it sonically ugly at all. Or artificial sounding (for the first time really w/r/t this band!).
again though, on first impressions I'm starting to think the bottom of this record is hit very quick. I felt the same way about the Panda Bear thing really, but that seemed deliberately surface-ish at least in construction. A few bass hits might not actually signify much depth here after all....
― fandango, Saturday, 3 January 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link
this thread used to be so much fun :(
― ♪㋡♫㋡ (gr8080), Saturday, 3 January 2009 22:52 (fifteen years ago) link
it's the new BOC (again)...
mad hype & hijinks until the leak actually arrives
http://www.mynewplace.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/tumbleweed.jpg
― fandango, Saturday, 3 January 2009 22:55 (fifteen years ago) link
or I'm just draining the fun :/ soz
― fandango, Saturday, 3 January 2009 22:56 (fifteen years ago) link
Still haven't heard the album in full but I expect I will be quite happy if it's all "superficial" and saccharine.
Superficial in scare quotes because I'm wary of surface/depth metaphors for music.
― Tim F, Sunday, 4 January 2009 02:39 (fifteen years ago) link
Food metaphors also annoy me. Unless they're taken to more specific and less value-laden extremes. i.e. I dislike talking about music in terms of fast foods, fine wines, artificial sweeteners etc. but I'm totally cool with people saying "this song sounds like a snickers bar whereas that song sounds like a cherry ripe."
(To my mind artificial sweetener comparisons never quite signify what they're intended to signify, because I never find nutrasweet or other artificial sweeteners terribly sweet. Milk chocolate vs dark chocolate (with milk chocolate as the superficial option) makes a lot more sense I suppose, but I actually prefer milk chocolate. Maybe it's just that I'm a sweet tooth both when it comes to food and when it comes to music)
― Tim F, Sunday, 4 January 2009 02:44 (fifteen years ago) link
First pat so otm. What I hate about the food comparison is that fast foods etc are scientifically proven to be bad for people whereas music can never be proven thus.
This album is probably giving me bigger buzzes than anything I can think of in oh...fuck knows how long. It's like Underworld and the Beach Boys in an elevator in a blender on drugs on acid.
― Local Garda, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:12 (fifteen years ago) link
*first par
I like this and all, but it seems a little straight forward somehow? Their previous work had a slightly looser feel which i liked but these songs don't really seem to fly off in too many different directions, despite all the nice weird noises
― Number None, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:18 (fifteen years ago) link
I never find nutrasweet or other artificial sweeteners terribly sweetRight. They're a sort of toxic, quasi-sweet that tends to make people sick.
― Turangalila, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:35 (fifteen years ago) link
No music has ever made me sick I must say. If your doctor has warned you off listening to this album Salvador I'd encourage you to follow his or her advice!
I'm assuming this album is relentlessly cheerful in the same way as Since I Left You, which also has its fair share of lovers and haters.
"It's like Underworld and the Beach Boys in an elevator in a blender on drugs on acid."
Woah.
― Tim F, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:45 (fifteen years ago) link
I think it was Tobias who first suggested the Underworld comparison. It's certainly nowhere near as dark or as conventionally UK prog/techno as Underworld but some of the use of vocals in that flailing almost instrumental way reminds me a lot of them. I keep thinking of terms like "indie-dance" etc as lazy impulsive reactions to this album, even in the sense that I want to compare it to past definitions of such terms, but the truth is this deserves to be considered as a good psychedelic record in its own right, free from the kind of cheap genre mashing terms that are so prevalent...
― Local Garda, Sunday, 4 January 2009 03:51 (fifteen years ago) link
Have you heard the Gang Gang Dance album Ronan? I think you would like it.
― Tim F, Sunday, 4 January 2009 08:41 (fifteen years ago) link
I pretty much am never sure how much I like whatever AC affiliated release for about 3 months, then I end up either loving it and overlistening to it or never listening to it again, and again, I'm not sure with this. I ended up loving (most of) Strawberry Jam but I can't say I don't have massive reservations about some of it. But then, when they're good ('Chores', 'My Girls', 'Brothersport', 'Prospect Hummer', 'The Purple Bottle'), they're totally beyond wow.
Panda Bear >>> Avey Tare lyrically though. In a brilliant way.
― Mister Craig, Sunday, 4 January 2009 12:21 (fifteen years ago) link
this reminds me a little of disco inferno, around the "second language" e.p. "lion in a coma" = "the atheist's burden" with rubber balls bouncing on the bass
― kamerad, Sunday, 4 January 2009 20:24 (fifteen years ago) link
So, I posted a tell-all all blog about this rickrolling escapade.
animal cololctive: what happened?
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 08:58 (fifteen years ago) link
hahaha
― jordan s (J0rdan S.), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:05 (fifteen years ago) link
i'd like to think it's worth it just for the laurence bell pic
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 09:17 (fifteen years ago) link
web sheriff email is pretty priceless
― jordan s (J0rdan S.), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:18 (fifteen years ago) link
woohoo!
― choom gangsta (deej), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:20 (fifteen years ago) link
o michael chornomaz
― choom gangsta (deej), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:21 (fifteen years ago) link
Music can be provable to be actually bad for you in the same way as food can.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:24 (fifteen years ago) link
laurence bell could be played by a healthy john goodman
― choom gangsta (deej), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:26 (fifteen years ago) link
denzel as the web sheriff
― jordan s (J0rdan S.), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:28 (fifteen years ago) link
also lol @ "forcing me to behave more and more like the Joker as portrayed by Heath Ledger in 2008's critically acclaimed "The Dark Knight.""
― choom gangsta (deej), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:29 (fifteen years ago) link
matthew lillard as michael chornomaz
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 09:29 (fifteen years ago) link
roxy: game set match
― negotiable, Monday, 5 January 2009 09:35 (fifteen years ago) link
had to reup cause i forgot this http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v136/primrosehill/messofaschlong.jpg
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 09:42 (fifteen years ago) link
mess of a schlong sounds like that dude recently posted on nsfws
― choom gangsta (deej), Monday, 5 January 2009 09:46 (fifteen years ago) link
lol @ taylor saporito's amazon list of "summer chillout albums" tho
http://www.amazon.com/Summer-Chill-Out-Albums/lm/R1MZ2QDP6ZBWL7/ref=cm_lm_byauthor_title_full
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 10:50 (fifteen years ago) link
pet soundsblonde on blondesgt pepperyankee hotel foxtrotyoshimi...
it's clearly the list that had to be made
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 10:52 (fifteen years ago) link
omg
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful: ***** great bow tie, still a little big at it's smallest, February 7, 2007 There is sincerely nothing more awesome than having a bow tie except for learning how to tie a bow tie.
I purchased this psychedelic treat as soon as I saw it online. I saw an untied bow tie around the neck of Wayne from the Flaming Lips last september in concert, and I have been lusting after one ever since. I have quite the impressive collection of psychedelic neck ties, and this was the perfect bow tie to add to my repertoire.
I was very pleased to see that this bow tie was adjustable. I am a very small man with a small neck, so this is great. I didn't even think of different sizes... it isn't a problem with my neck ties, but I didn't have any concept of how a bow tie was tied.
But even after it's adjusted as small as it can go, It's still a little big for my neck. I have found different methods of compensation in the tying process so I can tie it tightly enough for my uses, I still have the feeling that it's supposed to be a lot tighter on my neck. I wouldn't wear this to a fancy, formal event due to this, but most people I know wouldn't be able to tell the difference. And also I'm stressing that I am a very thin man.
The fabric is awesome for the price. While it doesn't exactly glimmer or shine like some of my more overtly psychedelic neck ties, it still compliments my eccentric wardrobe beautifully.
I need to make a comment for those who have never tied a bow tie before. It's not for the faint hearted. I literally slaved and cursed both at my computer and in front of the mirror for 3 hours while I tried to figure out how to tie the stupid thing. I must have looked at 40 different online instructions and youtube videos combined. But I eventually figured it out. And let me tell you. I have never felt a bigger feeling of accomplishment.
A great bow tie especially for the price. If you are thinking about it, do it. Comment | Permalink
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 10:53 (fifteen years ago) link
wow. every line a gem.
― negotiable, Monday, 5 January 2009 12:04 (fifteen years ago) link
trying to reconcile the two sides of taylor saporito creates a nightmare in your head
― negotiable, Monday, 5 January 2009 12:05 (fifteen years ago) link
its a bad scene alright
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 12:05 (fifteen years ago) link
i emailed taylor a link to the blog this morning. i hope he enjoys his mention.
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 12:11 (fifteen years ago) link
Michael Chornomaz is the crucial detail that makes this total lolz
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 5 January 2009 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link
Michael Chornololz more like!
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 5 January 2009 17:24 (fifteen years ago) link
Hmm... 9.6 at pfork, can't say I'm surprised- even though I haven't got around to listening to it yet...
― ColinO, Monday, 5 January 2009 17:26 (fifteen years ago) link
That's a higher rating (by 0.4) than anything received last year!
Are we looking at the Pfork #1 album of 2009, so soon?
― ilxor, Monday, 5 January 2009 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link
now that this is done we should focus on this Dan Deacon record which is better i ain't bullshittin'
― merriweather post ironic (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:45 (fifteen years ago) link
only if you twitter it.
― carne asada, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:53 (fifteen years ago) link
in about 30 minutes, expect one.
― merriweather post ironic (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:54 (fifteen years ago) link
Fixed!
― ilxor, Monday, 5 January 2009 21:05 (fifteen years ago) link
i haven't kept up with this thread after the beginning, but i just wanted to say that i'm afraid to download this album even from like iTunes
― Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Monday, 5 January 2009 21:08 (fifteen years ago) link
climate of fear
― roxymuzak, Monday, 5 January 2009 21:09 (fifteen years ago) link