Lex I'm surprised you can even talk with your knee so far in your mouth.
― fandango, Monday, 5 January 2009 21:55 (fifteen years ago) link
ah lex you know I'm just joking...I'm sure I'd enjoy the joyous indie atmosphere at durrr too
― Local Garda, Monday, 5 January 2009 21:56 (fifteen years ago) link
better'n the bloodless indie atmosphere of animal collection!!
― lex pretend, Monday, 5 January 2009 21:58 (fifteen years ago) link
captain save a middling-ciara-single lets have an equal opportunity for 'its really not that good' mmkay
― choom gangsta (deej), Monday, 5 January 2009 22:01 (fifteen years ago) link
i mean i agree w/ you but come on now
As a childless, unmarried, overworked hack, slave to the whims of society, I can't help but feel depressed by "My Girls", that beautiful, beautiful song.
It's like listening to a hottie sing about how "looks ain't everything".
― Owen Pallett, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 01:20 (fifteen years ago) link
He Poos Clouds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
― Turangalila, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 03:40 (fifteen years ago) link
Owen, we know Turangalila is your evil narcissist alter ego.
― ecuador_with_a_c, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 04:33 (fifteen years ago) link
Nej nej, but he/she is on the payroll.
― Owen Pallett, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 05:09 (fifteen years ago) link
But what I mean is, "My Girls" is my own personal "Jenny From The Block".
― Owen Pallett, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 05:10 (fifteen years ago) link
Hahahaha.
― Turangalila, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 05:18 (fifteen years ago) link
I like how Mark Richardson appears to have become Emeritus Professor of all things animal collective at Pitchfork.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 06:53 (fifteen years ago) link
i didnt think it was a bad review, but i dont think it would kill them to give an AC review to someone other than the biggest fanboy on earth
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 6 January 2009 07:09 (fifteen years ago) link
They kinda remind me of Ned's reviews of his favourite bands on allmusic.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 07:39 (fifteen years ago) link
MPP review: This album, which finds Animal Collective completely owning their unique sound, feels like the crucial next step in that conversation.
SJ review: Here, more than on any record yet, they own that sound completely.
not to be a dick, just noticed this. i haven't heard MPP yet but does it sound like SJ? i thought maybe it didn't.
― negotiable, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 07:41 (fifteen years ago) link
no
i'm getting the vinyl tomorrow, and im hoping ill like this more than i already do. the good parts are just so great; i want the rest to make it worth it
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 6 January 2009 07:43 (fifteen years ago) link
blaming it on poor qual rip
I might have said this upthread but I was horribly disappointed with SJ when it came out and further discouraged by the glowing reviews it got places that encouraged so many of the (I felt) shitty qualities that pissed me off about it. The one review I really got behind was the one in The Wire where the guy said something like 'At least they've never made the same record twice, right?' which has been basically the principal with which I've been anticipating this one, so whatever about this perfect culmination of their sound bit, Animal Collective do sound like they have way more ideas than any of their Pitchfork pals/indie contemporaries but their career so far has been about drifting in and out of focus even as they move on all the time. I mean, sure there are certain hallmarks of their sound, but their records have had a wildly varying sound to these ears.
Back in the heady days of the rick roll a number of comments were made about the Balearic-ey sound they'd gone with, I'm really confused if this was just part of the rick roll joke or if it was based on what had leaked at that stage, but seriously I thought that would basically give this record a free pass. There are a few things I would have liked, the knob on the vocals to have been turned down a little, maybe, more submersion in the overall song structures, in some songs the vocals sound like they blair out too much. But overall, this is a really good album, I know ILM feels the need to get challopsy about all this white boy indie, like ALL THE TIME. But srsly get over it. This record though, is a pretty good testament to the AC's need for a really good producer, Strawberry Jam might have been more interesting to me if it wasn't so sonically hideous, but it was. Maybe the reason I like this is because of the warm live-sounding synths. God, did I really not sleep tonight/this morning?
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 09:32 (fifteen years ago) link
Man, I don't know what I'm talking about.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 09:35 (fifteen years ago) link
Talking about AC is becoming exciting as the Federal Reserve president's speech about the new monetary policies
― Shin Oliva Suzuki, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 11:36 (fifteen years ago) link
the smug dismissive assholes are pretty funny though
― kamerad, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link
ts: talking about ac vs talking about talking about ac
― rent, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link
let me just tell you where I'm at with this.
I haven't liked an indie record this much in a couple of years, or any record as much as this in a few months. Hence I haven't read many threads about indie records.
What taints this joyous occasion (about a 0.1% taint, enough to make me stop what I was doing and write this post with two feet on the table) is reading the tedious back and forth that surrounds indie records. honestly it's at times (not all the time) like reading football supporters argue about who's going to win the league on BBC Sports blogs. Albeit with better spelling.
― Local Garda, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 18:08 (fifteen years ago) link
about a 0.1% taint
― merriweather post ironic (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 18:28 (fifteen years ago) link
a taintlet
taintey t. taintgarten
― uncannydan, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 18:43 (fifteen years ago) link
if you take the 0.4 pitchfork gave the black rebel motorcycle club today, and add that to the 9.6 they gave mpp yesterday, you get a perfect 10. maybe they should trade players for the 2010 album season
― kamerad, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 18:44 (fifteen years ago) link
not that anyone here reads pitchfork
― kamerad, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 18:45 (fifteen years ago) link
I still don't know how much I like this record yet. It seems to be pushing more towards liking early 10cc though.
― Mister Craig, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 18:50 (fifteen years ago) link
i still say disco inferno
― kamerad, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 18:53 (fifteen years ago) link
di is not a bad reference point; slightly different vocal approach and world outlook though, eh?
― uptown churl, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 20:10 (fifteen years ago) link
musical similarities is all i'm saying. hazy washes of song. but di don't really yelp and such, for sure
― kamerad, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 20:54 (fifteen years ago) link
Hey I like this album. It seems like something you could listen to while grilling out in the summertime.
― Muomas (vader is hanging onto the nose of the ship like tj-hooker (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 22:18 (fifteen years ago) link
Only if your backyard was Tron.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v136/primrosehill/messofaschlong.jpg
Just received a (second) email from ^Taylor Saporito in re: my most recent blog.
Here it is in full, so that you, too, can marvel along with me that it is possible for one boy to be so completely lacking in self-awareness:
Congratulations. You have successfully embarrassed me and proved your dominance on the internet.
A bit of a back story on the string of e-mails you got. The link was posted on the collected animals board, somebody found your e-mail address, and asked the board to spam you. Immature, yes. Probably not necessary. In a course of like 30 seconds I decided to contribute one to the cause.
Apologies for any offense I caused you by my e-mail, and for not finding your rick roll hilarious. If it wasn't the first time I'd seen a rick roll I may have laughed a little bit. I remember, it was sort of funny the first time.
I understand why you would do some things... filter comments on your blog... leave the link up when it's obvious the majority of the people who see it don't think it's funny... all of those are little things you can do to ensure that you have enough material for a substantial blog post. And in all honesty, I find the post just about as necessary as you find my amazon lists.
I'm not sending you this e-mail in an effort to stop you from blogging or discussing this matter on the internet. If you must get your fulfillment there, fine... god knows we all have to have something. However, I find the fact that you used my real name both on your blog and in forum discussion unnecessary.
I'm sorry to hear that people called your personal number in response to this. That took a stupid internet argument to a personal level it shouldn't go to. But I didn't take your joke personally, I just thought it wasn't funny. Bringing my name into it is completely unnecessary, and I ask that you remove it in all places that you can.
NECESSARYNECESSARYNECESSARY
Most smug apology ever.
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 06:41 (fifteen years ago) link
My reponse:
However, I find the fact that you used my real name both on your blog and in forum discussion unnecessary. Well, I view the fact that you used sexist, violent, and abusive language in an email to a stranger in preeeetty much the same light, so maybe you can suck it up. ;)
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 06:42 (fifteen years ago) link
Roxy have heart, he's had a mess of a schlong ever since he got caught in that disastrous rick roll crash. People on strong pain meds sometimes can't help using sexist, violent and abusive language.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 06:47 (fifteen years ago) link
Hooray oh wait.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:02 (fifteen years ago) link
d.i. go pop>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MPP
― all-seeing eye of horus (psychgawsple), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:05 (fifteen years ago) link
lolll @ taylor saporito
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:05 (fifteen years ago) link
loooooool @ taylor saporito taylor saporito taylor saporito taylor saporito
― opinions4usic (deej), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:09 (fifteen years ago) link
let's get TAYLOR SAPORITO a 77 invite
― jordan s (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:12 (fifteen years ago) link
Amazon Lists by Taylor Saporito
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:15 (fifteen years ago) link
Qualifications: music obsessed, hip teen with a lot of time on his hands
― opinions4usic (deej), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:21 (fifteen years ago) link
taylor saporito's band?
― choke on my mess of a schlaporito (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:21 (fifteen years ago) link
ya that's him
― jordan s (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:22 (fifteen years ago) link
another one
― choke on my mess of a schlaporito (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:22 (fifteen years ago) link
you can really hear the jack johnson influences in that first link
― all-seeing eye of horus (psychgawsple), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:23 (fifteen years ago) link
http://a547.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/107/m_d18c96226ecaf53c573ad2b714b233da.jpgchoke on my mess of a schlong!!
― opinions4usic (deej), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:25 (fifteen years ago) link
That shot makes him look like the excommunicated member of Sunn0))) who smiled too much.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:54 (fifteen years ago) link