The Stranger you say? do u have a link to ur review?
Also i fuk with My Girls except for the "whoooo" yelp
― wilter, Saturday, 10 January 2009 11:01 (fifteen years ago) link
"whoooo" yelp
― gr8080, Saturday, 10 January 2009 12:53 (fifteen years ago) link
this album is fine but it's fairly forgettable, I'm perpetually flabbergasted by the hype.
― akm, Saturday, 10 January 2009 14:25 (fifteen years ago) link
breath into this paper bag
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Saturday, 10 January 2009 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link
grady is correct as always
― cutty, Saturday, 10 January 2009 14:35 (fifteen years ago) link
I think it just reminds me of fix up look sharp by dizzee rascal
― wilter, Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:18 (fifteen years ago) link
the woooh is amazing.
― Tim F, Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link
Then he reread four or five pages of his poem to me. Verbal ostentation was the perverse principle that had guided his revisions: where he had formerly written "blue" he now had "azure," "cerulean," and even "bluish."
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link
― wilter
which is surely a good thing!
― Women can be captains too, you know? (jim), Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link
also the low-end on that song
― gr8080, Saturday, 10 January 2009 20:29 (fifteen years ago) link
wilter: Review will be online/on the street Wed afternoon, Jan. 14.
― inhibitionist, Saturday, 10 January 2009 21:44 (fifteen years ago) link
Just pre-ordered the album from Amazon.com!
$9.99, shipped (They have this Amazon Prime offer for free shipping, pm me and I'll help you out)
Can't wait 'till the 20th--well, I chose 2-day shipping...Can't wait 'till the 22nd!
― nominal, Sunday, 11 January 2009 21:25 (fifteen years ago) link
DeepDiscount.com often ships early, apparently assuming the album will not reach you till on or after the release date. This assumption is sometimes too pessimistic.
― M.V., Monday, 12 January 2009 03:47 (fifteen years ago) link
they were playing the promo in Easy Street Records this weekend.
― brotherlovesdub, Monday, 12 January 2009 04:13 (fifteen years ago) link
inhibitionist, did your review by chance mention how their singing is often times annoying (maybe in more clever words)?
― ❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Monday, 12 January 2009 05:49 (fifteen years ago) link
hello i have spotted yr Borges allusion
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Monday, 12 January 2009 06:14 (fifteen years ago) link
Just listened to it for the first time. Loved it. And this thread actually convinced me to buy the album, which I haven't done in yonks. My Girls is my jam. The cd cover doesn't move though. ;_;
― a hoy hoy, Monday, 12 January 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link
The cd cover doesn't move though. ;_;
OK waht! Does the vinyl sleeve move? This is important information for my buying decision!
― britisher ringpulls (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 12 January 2009 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link
well, the cover doesn't move, it's an optical illusion (I haven't read the previous posts so I don't if that's what you're talking about, though...).
― AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link
ok, sorry, it doesn't appear to be moving when i look at the optical illusion.
― a hoy hoy, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago) link
http://ww2w.fr/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/animalcollectivemerriweathercdfront.jpg
― AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link
really ?
it does on screen but not the physical object. as far as i can tell.
― a hoy hoy, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link
I haven't seen the physical object yet.but this picture must NOT be watched when hungover !
― AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link
eurgh this thing is making me sick. I hadnt noticed this before. So what - the trick works in the digi-world but not on the physical copies??
― baaderonixx, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link
Does the image appear to move if you take the inlay out of the case? (I mean, apart from moving, errr, out of the case...)
― britisher ringpulls (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 12 January 2009 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link
apparently, it doesn't move or not as much on the physical object as on screen.weird.
― AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago) link
it's not a traditional cd case, it's just a card thing with a little folding thing inside with the cd and inlay and stuff inside. presumably done so to give the full effect of the illusion but it just doesn't work. still looks cool though.
― a hoy hoy, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link
I'm going to use this .jpg as my desktop wallpaper and see how long I can stand it.
― baaderonixx, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:13 (fifteen years ago) link
i've looked at the vinyl cover and it does move but not as much as that .jpg above.
― Women can be captains too, you know? (jim), Monday, 12 January 2009 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link
you could use it as your FLAT's wallpaper (extra special touch : on the ceiling) !
― AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link
I guess it has something to do with the backlight of a screen compared to printed paper...
― AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link
maybe the SIZE too
― ice cr?m, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:19 (fifteen years ago) link
well the size of the picture above is roughly the same as a CD, right ?
― AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link
that would DEPEND
― ice cr?m, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:26 (fifteen years ago) link
oh great, I've just discovered that when you scroll the screen up and down while left clicking on the scrolling block thingy on the right of the screen frame (dunno what it's called) instead of scrolling with the thing on the mouse, the little "beans' in the picture move in circle !(not sure my whole description is crystal clear...)
― AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:31 (fifteen years ago) link
"my friend argues that the album reminds him of The Beta Band.after rejecting that opinion cause i hate Beta Band's latest records, i think he is right at least to some extent."
Good call! One of my first thoughts while listening the album was "what a pity that The Beta Band couldn't make it". I like Beta Band's later things though.
― zeus, Monday, 12 January 2009 21:41 (fifteen years ago) link
everything sounds like the beta band, when will ppl realise
― dugong.jpg (jabba hands), Monday, 12 January 2009 22:45 (fifteen years ago) link
I must have been listening to a different Beta Band. What are you people... British??!?
― Hatch, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 01:46 (fifteen years ago) link
"I will now sell five copies of...oh great, you shitheads downloaded it already."
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 02:37 (fifteen years ago) link
No, because on Merriweather, the two vocalists' voices are at their least annoying, imo. However, if you can't tolerate Beach Boys-like vocals, you may find this album tough going.
― inhibitionist, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 07:56 (fifteen years ago) link
While the Beach Boys are certainly a reference point I'm always reminded much more of the Hollies when it comes to the harmonies and vocals of AC. The Hollies (circa 1968) walking in on Disco Inferno and early Mercury Rev making out on the couch before joining in on the fun themselves. There we go.
― Cunga, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 08:08 (fifteen years ago) link
Welcome!
Oh, and an update on my own situation: I'm teaching English in Korea now. Still basically a bum.
― Millsner, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 09:51 (fifteen years ago) link
OK, that was meant for 'Introduce Yourselves'. Now I look silly.
― Millsner, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 09:52 (fifteen years ago) link
Hey I just got this album. It sounds quite good so far.
So what's been happening in this thread then??
― the next grozart, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 10:21 (fifteen years ago) link
xxxposts
ok, so I've checked the vinyl cover. the optical illusion does not work on it. weird.
― AleXTC, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 10:25 (fifteen years ago) link
i don't get this thing with the scrolling, etc.
― baaderonixx, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 10:31 (fifteen years ago) link
i think the cover's cobblers to be honest. saw that optical illusion months ago on an ILE thread.
― the next grozart, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 10:39 (fifteen years ago) link
Maybe this is another thread, but these ones actually worked IRL:
http://bigbeat-record.jp/pic-labo/faust3.JPG
http://static.rateyourmusic.com/album_images/131140.jpg
― Yehudi Menudo (NickB), Tuesday, 13 January 2009 10:44 (fifteen years ago) link
bridget riley is a bit of a headfuck.
― Women can be captains too, you know? (jim), Tuesday, 13 January 2009 10:47 (fifteen years ago) link