Animal Collective - Merriweather Post Pavilion (2009)

Just pre-ordered the album from Amazon.com!

$9.99, shipped (They have this Amazon Prime offer for free shipping, pm me and I'll help you out)

Can't wait 'till the 20th--well, I chose 2-day shipping...Can't wait 'till the 22nd!

DeepDiscount.com often ships early, apparently assuming the album will not reach you till on or after the release date. This assumption is sometimes too pessimistic.

they were playing the promo in Easy Street Records this weekend.

inhibitionist, did your review by chance mention how their singing is often times annoying (maybe in more clever words)?

Then he reread four or five pages of his poem to me. Verbal ostentation was the perverse principle that had guided his revisions: where he had formerly written "blue" he now had "azure," "cerulean," and even "bluish."

hello i have spotted yr Borges allusion

Just listened to it for the first time. Loved it. And this thread actually convinced me to buy the album, which I haven't done in yonks. My Girls is my jam. The cd cover doesn't move though. ;_;

The cd cover doesn't move though. ;_;

OK waht! Does the vinyl sleeve move? This is important information for my buying decision!

well, the cover doesn't move, it's an optical illusion (I haven't read the previous posts so I don't if that's what you're talking about, though...).

ok, sorry, it doesn't appear to be moving when i look at the optical illusion.

http://ww2w.fr/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/animalcollectivemerriweathercdfront.jpg

really ?

it does on screen but not the physical object. as far as i can tell.

I haven't seen the physical object yet.
but this picture must NOT be watched when hungover !

eurgh this thing is making me sick. I hadnt noticed this before. So what - the trick works in the digi-world but not on the physical copies??

Does the image appear to move if you take the inlay out of the case? (I mean, apart from moving, errr, out of the case...)

apparently, it doesn't move or not as much on the physical object as on screen.
weird.

it's not a traditional cd case, it's just a card thing with a little folding thing inside with the cd and inlay and stuff inside. presumably done so to give the full effect of the illusion but it just doesn't work. still looks cool though.

I'm going to use this .jpg as my desktop wallpaper and see how long I can stand it.

i've looked at the vinyl cover and it does move but not as much as that .jpg above.

you could use it as your FLAT's wallpaper (extra special touch : on the ceiling) !

I guess it has something to do with the backlight of a screen compared to printed paper...

maybe the SIZE too

well the size of the picture above is roughly the same as a CD, right ?

that would DEPEND

oh great, I've just discovered that when you scroll the screen up and down while left clicking on the scrolling block thingy on the right of the screen frame (dunno what it's called) instead of scrolling with the thing on the mouse, the little "beans' in the picture move in circle !
(not sure my whole description is crystal clear...)

"my friend argues that the album reminds him of The Beta Band.
after rejecting that opinion cause i hate Beta Band's latest records, i think he is right at least to some extent."

Good call! One of my first thoughts while listening the album was "what a pity that The Beta Band couldn't make it". I like Beta Band's later things though.

everything sounds like the beta band, when will ppl realise

I must have been listening to a different Beta Band. What are you people... British??!?

"I will now sell five copies of...oh great, you shitheads downloaded it already."

inhibitionist, did your review by chance mention how their singing is often times annoying (maybe in more clever words)?

No, because on Merriweather, the two vocalists' voices are at their least annoying, imo. However, if you can't tolerate Beach Boys-like vocals, you may find this album tough going.

While the Beach Boys are certainly a reference point I'm always reminded much more of the Hollies when it comes to the harmonies and vocals of AC. The Hollies (circa 1968) walking in on Disco Inferno and early Mercury Rev making out on the couch before joining in on the fun themselves. There we go.

Welcome!

Oh, and an update on my own situation: I'm teaching English in Korea now. Still basically a bum.

OK, that was meant for 'Introduce Yourselves'. Now I look silly.

Hey I just got this album. It sounds quite good so far.

So what's been happening in this thread then??

xxxposts

ok, so I've checked the vinyl cover. the optical illusion does not work on it. weird.

i don't get this thing with the scrolling, etc.

i think the cover's cobblers to be honest. saw that optical illusion months ago on an ILE thread.

Maybe this is another thread, but these ones actually worked IRL:

http://bigbeat-record.jp/pic-labo/faust3.JPG

http://static.rateyourmusic.com/album_images/131140.jpg

bridget riley is a bit of a headfuck.

what is this one's supposed to do ? I don't see anything special.

Yeah, and her stuff is actually very beautiful to look at too - most optical illusions are pretty gross. (x-post)

ok, so I've checked the vinyl cover. the optical illusion does not work on it. weird.

Yes it does.

let's talk about that some more

I think I can see Rick Astley in it lol

This thread! How did I miss it?

I saw AC last night and they were pretty uncategorisably great. My brain's still recovering nearly 24 hours later. But I've never really loved their recorded output (caveat: Feels onwards only) except Person Pitch which I thought and still think is awesome.

To these ears, the new one sounds like a jump on from Person Pitch, rather than a jump on from Strawberry Jam, but that suits me fine tbh.

This thread, though! Bloody crikey. People are amazing.

this band sucks balls tho tbh

yeah i agree which is why i am more comfortable discussing that craaazy album cover; just tryin to keep it positive for 09.

Ultimately this band strikes me as one of those fever-dream groups people want to will into greatness because it draws on so many things that folks can get invested heavily into. Conversely, that's a step I'm not interested in taking (though I've given into it before, no question -- and may yet again) and while I can't hate 'em, my lord can I ever not love them either.

That very point has been made repeatedly on the former Stylus message board, with varying degrees of effect.

I can imagine!