Indie acts doing covers of pop/rap/RnB songs: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (163 of them)
i like that jolene cover too

minna (minna), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

It seems a bit snarky to on one hand decry people for not being open minded enough to enjoy pop/r&b etc. because they are knee deep in indie rock whatever, then turning around and saying that it is crap commentary when they do a cover of such music.

Mind you, Johnny Cash covering "Hurt" or Depeche Mode or whatever pop that Rick Rubin can convince him to play is some interesting, but if someone covers Nelly, then they must be pandering.

Never mind that The Big Boys played Kool in the Gang, Urge Overkill did a Hot Chocolate cover, fIREHOSE covered Public Enemy, and Sonic Youth even did an entire record as an oddball tribute to Madonna, those must just be pandering.

It is not like the pop artists need credibility to sell records when they can just take off more clothes or do a soda ad or shoot someone.

It is only a song.

earlnash, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

All I'm saying is once in a while even a bunch of incompetent indie hacks can glom on to someone else's genius and actually do something with it, even if the moment is brief

No, I definitely agree, it's just that the examples in question are not examples of such a phenomenon. The Jolene cover is good, I reckon.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sonic Youth even did an entire record as an oddball tribute to Madonna, those must just be pandering.

that was pandering smarm which sonic youth are very good at, even tho I like 'em...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

Urge Overkill are terrible.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

The Liberty X single was feeble.

Covering a pop song 'ironically' (if/when that's whats happening) is a cop-out, a safe way of admitting to yourself and your fans that the song has had an impact on you but then neutering that impact instead of exploring it. Travis doing BOMT is saying "Hey beneath the pop veneer is a proper song" but their version done Travis-style then HAS to be leaden because otherwise it'd risk sounding better than Travis own songs, and part of the point is (maybe?) to prove that Travis' craftsmanship is better than Max Martin's.

It ties in with the question on that huge long thread Simon Reynolds' site linked to, about 'indie' not wanting to draw on 'black' music anymore. Cos the real question behind both of these is - how do you operate in a 50-year tradition where the music you make is very unlikely to be as good (in YOUR opinion, the audience likes it just fine) as the music you like? (Sampling is one answer) Converting pop songs into second-rate B sides is a way of positioning yourself on the heirarchy - if these pop songs were REALLY any good they'd shine through our versioning, right?

How much does our getting annoyed with covers of pop depend on our experiencing the originals as pop? If Coldplay covered the Crystals I wouldn't give half as much a fuck as if they covered B*Witched.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

i hear ladytron do "oops oh my"

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

just to address the initial post before I get caught up, in what Bizarro universe are the Vines, Coldplay and Beck defined as "indie"?

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

oops! is such a classic, wonderful record that i would probably want to run amok if i heard pallid trash like f***ing ladytron covering it

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

Covering a pop song 'ironically' (if/when that's whats happening) is a cop-out, a safe way of admitting to yourself and your fans that the song has had an impact on you but then neutering that impact instead of exploring it.

At the risk of jumping to the other side, I have to say I really agree with this. It reminds me a little of working in a record store in the late '80s and being disgusted when some "punks" (I think that's what they were called back then) came in the store and started mockingly dancing around to the Michael Jackson we were playing in the store. But (later on) I considered the possibility that they were actually tapping into something that maybe they subconsciously really ENJOYED but would never admit to. Well, it was a theory, sort of.

s woods, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

At the risk of jumping to the other side, I have to say I really agree with this.

Haha, that's not risking jumping, that is jumping! Anyway yr theory is OTM. There's no such thing as liking things ironically, I reckon. It's just a safe way to like things without getting made fun of by your friends.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

What seems evident by many (not all) of these covers is an undercurrent of what some here call Rockism. The implication that BANDS are more genuine/authentic than MERE singers. That a band can take the essence of a pop act (i.e. THE SONG) and conform it to the essence of a rock act (i.e. THE SOUND), is nothing short of arrogant.

At best it's pandering. Though I'm sure there are some worthy exceptions.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't know if you can call my friends and I an act so to speak but we busted out a medley of rap songs and went into the "Ignition" remix on Saturday night. Acoustic style. And the people loved it.

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'd like to hear Ally cover Incredible String Band.

hstencil, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

There's no such thing as liking things ironically, I reckon.

There is an ironic way to say you like things though. Another subject, but you only need to look at the way dancehall has become "fashionable" in trendy, ironic London circles - this really ticks me off as I genuinely love it and always have done... these tossers essentially denegrating it is little short of infuriating

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think Scott Woods is onto something with the point about these covers revealing a certain "yearning" - an excuse to explore sounds and sentiment forbidden by cool-ist dogma. the covers that work transcend the real basic nyuck nyuck jokiness and own up to that yearning, sometimes by showboating the cover act's own limitations which in turn just proves the strength of the song itself - like the circle jerks' "what the world needs now is love sweet love" or limp bizkit's "faith." both try so hard to trample the original's friendliness only to find their own schtick co-opted by the song instead of vice versa.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dave can you expand on the dancehall thing? It sounds interesting.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is super-basic, but as a reaction to "club culture", London's fashionable set took a massively rockist shift a while back - cf clubs like the Sonic Mook Experiment, electroclash clubs, like Nag Nag Nag, Renegade Pop Parties, bootleg records, DJs like Erol Alkan etc. I say rockist, as coupled with a strong vein of neo-conservatism ("I'm so bored of raving, I just want, like, real bands and proper music now") a huge amount of this has relied on "irony" and a certain element of camp or "kitsch", too - cf bootlegging and Freelance Hellraiser's Christina Aguilera/Strokes mash-up as the perfect embodiment of this idea. However, now dancehall has been appropriated by these very same circles. The other night someone I met through a friend said to me how much they loved dancehall because it was "so macho it's funny"... I very nearly punched him. I have also been asked to play danchall at these sorts of clubs and have refused every time...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

just points to music-as-fashion accessory rather than life's love and i guess i'm a bit romantic like that...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

One thing that's come up in some interviews I've done with alt-country acts who were formerly just alt is that in country there's more freedom to be honest and unmitigated in melodramatic emotion.
Moreso even than in pop.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

um... dancehall is so macho it's funny - often in a good way, and entirely intentionally - but it's not an untrue observation.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

I can empathise with people thinking dancehall machismo is funny. And I can empathise with people thinking it's repulsive. Cos it is funny. And it is repulsive. It's also exciting - which brings us back to the indie-covers thing, removing yourself from part of your own reaction to a record. Elephant Man is horrible and ridiculous AND sexy and powerful. Britney is cynical and transient AND hooky and thrilling.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

i can see that but i don't like the way it was said and the sort of people who are saying it, nor the reasons they are...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

It seems a bit snarky to on one hand decry people for not being open minded enough to enjoy pop/r&b etc. because they are knee deep in indie rock whatever, then turning around and saying that it is crap commentary when they do a cover of such music.

I actually think this is a core point. The whole 'snarf, ha ha, look at us' attitude is indeed crap, but essentially there's a weird no win scenario posited in all this:

INDIE PERSON: "I like this, that and the other popwise."
OTHER PERSON: "You're only doing that to follow trends/seem hip/to make fun of it."
INDIE PERSON: "No I'm not! Jeez! Here." *plays version of song*
OTHER PERSON: "That was shit and why did you bother?"
INDIE PERSON: "Fine, fuck you."

But you could expand this out if you like. Personally I think it's illustrative not of the power of songs or performers or whatever but ARRANGEMENTS. Which may seem strange, but consider -- I think there's a lot of (justifiable) fear and loathing over the idea of reducing a song down to a guitar jangle, ripping out whatever it is sonically that really captivates. Lingering fears of rockism, if you like, the whole 'argh, it's only validated because you can do a folk singalong to it? that attitude is crap!' And who can blame people for feeling that way?

Britney is cynical and transient AND hooky and thrilling.

See, it's funny you say that because I'm still amazed so many people have covered "Baby One More Time" when I think it's incredibly unmemorable and dull. "Oops I Did It Again" is the song that works, and as Kate St. Claire said once, it's all because of the bassline. And interestingly Fuck have in fact covered it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

The choice of BOMT in that case shows that what's affecting people is Britney-the-concept - or even pop-the-concept. BOMT is Britney's best known song so people covering it might be doing it cos they want to reference BRITNEY or even POP not the track itself.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

A lazy shorthand, then. I figure if you're going to reference pop, go collage.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

dud, every single time, serious or ironic, total and utter fucking dud.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ned, Richard Thompson has also covered "Oops! I Did It Again" in concert. I think the main reason it isn't as canonized as "Baby One More Time" is because the song was kinda forgotten due to the wonderful mindfuck of the "Oops..." video.

As for Tha Irony: Beck is a big, big fan of contemporary R&B, I'd say it's pretty silly to just assume his "Cry Me A River" is ironic, especially considering he's been in such a boringly earnest mode lately, *and* "Cry Me A River" fits in with the songs on Sea Change thematically. Flaming Lips and Fran Healy of Travis have both been very public about their genuine admiration of "Can't Get You Out Of My Head" and "Baby One More Time". So that's that settled then (unless they have IRONY GUILT!)

Apart from that I can't comment because I've never heard any of these versions, except Travis' Britney cover which I remember quite liking at the time (mainly because I've never liked Britney's voice much.)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'd say it's pretty silly to just assume his "Cry Me A River" is ironic

Yeah, I was about to say that whole assertion seemed strange. Too bad the song itself bites, but that's another matter. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

somehow I suspect that if Nelly covered a Flaming Lips song - or if Justin Timberlake did a Strokes tune - the majority of posters on this thread would hail it as "genius", a "hilarious pisstake", etc. Which is total bullshit - the only thing that matters isn't the band's intents or their "attitudes" towards the song or whatever - it's if the cover actually sounds good and does something interesting with the original material. I feel like I'm stating the obvious here... but whatever.

POPISTS!

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

pop has eaten itself so are we now firmly ensconced in the regurgitation era?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

and i'm inclined to agree with Shakey

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

Shakey's probably OTM... really, how different is this from perennial (and unfathomable) ILM favourite DJ Sammy?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

It's very rare for rap or R&B acts to do covers, though - sampling is the preferred method. My preferred method as a listener, too: maybe this discussion is really about 'covers' vs 'samples'.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

Plenty of other R&B people did covers of Phil Collins records and they stank, so I can't see any reason why R&B covers of The Strokes would be any good and I don't rate DJ Sammy!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

Because DJ Sammy is good you fools.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ally he's worse than Nikka Costa ;)

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not agreeing with you on this one Ally... funny I can see, good I can't!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

Chaki doing Prince = CLASSICKER THAN FUCK.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is it that DJ Sammy's good or what he's working with/in that's good, that's the real question. DJ Sammy not some dude in corner in coffeehouse on acoustic guitar = an improvement (is what I think Ally is saying).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

DJ Sammy is good. But Dom is right, he is doing exactly the same thing. He's identifying great songs within the corpulent hulks of AOR classics and de-furring their arteries with a rigorous Eurotrance treatment. Just like Travis etc. allow great songs a 'chance to shine' by turning them into pedestrian strumalongs. Which approach you prefer - and which type of audience button-pushing - is up to you, I suppose.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Irony" needn't necessarily mean not-liking-the-song: plenty of the examples here have the aww-shucks irony of bands who may well like the song but nevertheless find something ironic about their own decisions to perform it. (And surely they know good portions of their audiences will be reacting to the same thing.) The same tension is all over the indie/pop divide, a million times over with hip-hop: no matter how much the acts like what's on the other side, they're all crushed and vexed by some sense that they could never actually be what's on the other side. Because actually crossing would be this bold and massive thing: honestly, can you imagine Fran Healy really performing Britney? What sort of over-the-top lunacy could actually inspire that, and how could it not seem ironic? So it becomes a matter of limitations -- the most these bands can do is to approach the songs in the ways they know how. It's not completely fair to expect much more, but you do run into problems: (a) pop songs often sound pretty boring in a strummy earnest style, and yes, they have trouble singing them; (b) the rhetoric of indie can make it seem like the band's implying that the songs are "better" in strummy earnest style, as if through their immense brilliance and sensitivity they've unearthed the gem at the center of this piece of pop "trash"; (c) they just can't help giving it the ironic karaoke shrug. (Yo La Tengo, when playing that soul-disco track off of their last record, would do faux-Temptations dance moves: they wrote the damn thing, and they still had to chuckle and make the announcement, "Look, we're Yo La Tengo and we're doing some vaguely funky pop!")

There should be something just interesting about the practice -- cross-genre covers are usually great, an old thing stylized in a new way -- but it seems as if there are just too many tensions and conflicts running between indie mores and pop mores for the acts to be able to do it without stepping, intentionally or not, right on some sort of mine. Unfortunately dud. The acts need to get it out of their systems in their teenage pop-punk band days, if at all possible. And if they're going to try it after that, I for one would like to see them really try it, awful and embarrassing as that would be in most cases.

Is Tico Tico who I think it is?

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

I guess it's just that one approach makes me laugh (and it's not good, it's just fun!) and the other annoys me, so I guess I prefer DJ Sammy

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

NB I don't think DJ Sammy is "rescuing" songs at all, just updating them. The jet-fuel AOR grandeur of those tracks is completely wiped off by age and stylistic change, leaving most of us with no ability to even tell there was any jet-fuel grandeur there in the first place: all DJ Sammy does is load them up with the modern trance equivalent. He retrofits the songs to be exactly what they were in the first place.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm completely dumbfounded by Ally's Beck-hate. WTF!?!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

Teenage pop-punk covers are a bit of an exception here, they're almost always enjoyable.

Nabisco - yes, almost certainly! There's a sensible reason for the identity-switch though.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think the crucial thing with Sammy is also that he seems to give these olds tired records a new lease of life and that's what's "good" about him (although I just can't quite yet get my head around actually saying that he's good!), whereas the other covers just knock the sparkle out of the songs in question...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hm...yes, I now see why Tico Tico is saying what he does in a new guise, bless 'im. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

I love Built To Spill's cover of "I Try", because I really love the song and sing it all the time, but my voice is closer to Doug Martsch's than it is to Macy Gray's.

alex in montreal, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Why is my Beck-hate confounding? Did you expect me to be a Beck fan? Is there something about me that screams "I LOVE BECK"?

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

The video you posted is private, so I can't see it... What is it?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:11 (eight years ago) link

yeah i can't see it either..

posted with permission by (dog latin), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:15 (eight years ago) link

Make that three of us.

Soon Kenny Loggins will look like this (Tom D.), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:21 (eight years ago) link

it's Chris Thile covering Kendrick Lamar's "Alright" on mandolin, substituting "brother" for the n-word. it is the most cringeworthy thing imaginable.

crüt, Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:33 (eight years ago) link

oh god I actually like Thile / Punch Brothers in general but there's no way in hell I'm listening to that

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:38 (eight years ago) link

dang, it was public yesterday. maybe they read ilx. here's audio.

sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:44 (eight years ago) link

not any more, this cover-up goes deeper than we thought

Chikan wa akan de. Zettai akan de. (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 13:58 (eight years ago) link

Not listening to this, let alone watching it.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 17 February 2016 14:03 (eight years ago) link

two years pass...

Had press tix and saw Chris Thile host and play his Live from Here radio show yesterday. He named off folks having birthdays this week and covered their songs with a big band . Sarah Jarosz sang & he played mandolin on Labelle “ Lady Marmalade,” and Dylan “Twist of Fate.” They also did Miles Davis “So What.” Non-birthday cover of Vampire Weekend

curmudgeon, Sunday, 27 May 2018 21:18 (six years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwHNeDwp77g

Dud

flappy bird, Sunday, 27 May 2018 22:27 (six years ago) link

five years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I0zbAQbl2o

Dethroned Halloween, Alaska's "I Can't Live Without My Radio" for favorite track in this theme.

The "Jesus, take the wheel" line is such a mournful hook that's an aside in the original Thundercat track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8TdgBWEOP8

the body of a spider... (scampering alpaca), Monday, 29 April 2024 21:53 (one month ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.