Itunes, Billboard, and the marginalization of black music and black audiences in America

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2029 of them)

I would just like to go on the record as being a racist. Thank you all.

The Reverend, Sunday, 20 January 2013 06:28 (twelve years ago)

you are a goon, after all.

the legend of bigger yansh (some dude), Sunday, 20 January 2013 12:03 (twelve years ago)

alright, thanks, that part I was pretty close on. I guess I'm just such a cynic about about the music biz that I assume whatever they do is because they think it will make more money.

so that it will always be catering to people with money. an example of this goes back to the 'race' records of the 20's and 30's

great blues, jazz, and gospel music the industry thought would not sell to white people, so they marketed to blacks only

http://www.pbs.org/jazz/images/exchange/racerecords.jpg

when white people started to buy, they not only stopped that marketing to black people, but even influenced a change in the style of jazz (the rise of the white big bands)

nicky lo-fi, Sunday, 20 January 2013 14:21 (twelve years ago)

You do realize this thread is intended to track pretty much the exact same phenomenon, though?

The Reverend, Sunday, 20 January 2013 18:08 (twelve years ago)

is this the rolling macklemore thread

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Sunday, 20 January 2013 18:11 (twelve years ago)

fancy cymbal dude

http://www.tbrucewittet.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Zildjian-Gen-X-Cymbals.jpg

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 20 January 2013 18:19 (twelve years ago)

xp yes, no, Macklemore, "Same Love"

The Reverend, Sunday, 20 January 2013 18:24 (twelve years ago)

who the hell is macklemore?

pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Sunday, 20 January 2013 18:24 (twelve years ago)

hoo boy

The Reverend, Sunday, 20 January 2013 18:26 (twelve years ago)

im in the uk.

pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Sunday, 20 January 2013 18:33 (twelve years ago)

A Macklemore is what we in the scientific community would describe as a cornball.

tsrobodo, Sunday, 20 January 2013 18:42 (twelve years ago)

the best thing about bands like Mumfords and Macklemores is that their names just inherently sound like punchlines.

katherine, Sunday, 20 January 2013 20:19 (twelve years ago)

i have a thread i bet nicky would enjoy

Mordy, Sunday, 20 January 2013 20:29 (twelve years ago)

the best thing about bands like Mumfords and Macklemores is that their names just inherently sound like punchlines.

and Phillip Phillips!

Influential Acid Jazz Pioneer (crüt), Sunday, 20 January 2013 21:54 (twelve years ago)

one month passes...

I'm feeling particularly apocalyptic today.

The Reverend, Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:13 (twelve years ago)

yeah i don't think i even have the energy to rage against Billboard's latest change like i did the last one, even though this one is clearly even worse

some dude, Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:14 (twelve years ago)

this is insanity, truly

J0rdan S., Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:25 (twelve years ago)

What happened?

in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:33 (twelve years ago)

http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/1549388/baauers-harlem-shake-debuts-atop-revamped-hot-100

some dude, Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:36 (twelve years ago)

Counting Spotify streams clearly makes some kind of sense, counting Youtube views is just insane, especially if they are weighted as highly as they appear to be based on that article. "Gangnam Style" would have been number one for months if this had been implemented sooner.

justfanoe (Greg Fanoe), Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:38 (twelve years ago)

it's just going to lead to more hegemony, which i think is the opposite of their intention?

J0rdan S., Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:40 (twelve years ago)

yeah my whole thing at this point is i'm not even so against counting streaming/youtube/etc in charts as how heavily they weigh it, how it can just trump every other factor and put something at #1. (xp)

some dude, Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:41 (twelve years ago)

labels are going to pour even more money into stupid-ass 'lyric videos'

some dude, Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:42 (twelve years ago)

Spotify listeners at least are generally listening seriously as opposed to for lolz

Lame either way

in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:44 (twelve years ago)

I mean, it's also #1 on iTunes so it's not like only YouTube but it's absolutely asinine that it's rated as 3.5 times more popular than the next most song ("Thrift Shop" which clearly deserves to be #1 on popularity though not song merit).

justfanoe (Greg Fanoe), Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:45 (twelve years ago)

it's just going to lead to more hegemony, which i think is the opposite of their intention?

― J0rdan S., Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:40 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Spotify top tracks stay the same for ages, pumped up kicks is probably still number one

in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:46 (twelve years ago)

I can thank The New Paradigm for today's marvel: walking into the student union to watch 500 undergrads performing "Harlem Shuffle" or whatever it's called in the pit.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:46 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMyFgOmu0w8

The Reverend, Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:53 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMyFgOmu0w8

The Reverend, Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:54 (twelve years ago)

surprised you didn't post the marvelous Stones video

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 21 February 2013 02:57 (twelve years ago)

I've never really fuxed with the Stones tbh

The Reverend, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:04 (twelve years ago)

Cultural stuff aside: wouldn't it be really easy for labels to game the system by having computers running scripts to keep refreshing youtube videos?

in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:07 (twelve years ago)

I mean I know there was payola in radio but at least there's some honor & dignity to giving free cocaine to dudes that look like martin mull

in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:09 (twelve years ago)

*furiously refreshes papoose youtube*

乒乓, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:10 (twelve years ago)

mean I know there was payola in radio but at least there's some honor & dignity to giving free cocaine to dudes that look like martin mull

why Martin Mull when Clive Davis is the industry prototype?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:12 (twelve years ago)

I'm a lot more interested in the cultural stuff than the numbers shit at this point and it feels like af-am culture is getting an ever-increasingly raw deal. :/

The Reverend, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:14 (twelve years ago)

Cultural stuff aside: wouldn't it be really easy for labels to game the system by having computers running scripts to keep refreshing youtube videos?

― in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:07 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

theoretically the same has been true since they've been putting Spotify stats in charts, you could just play a song over and over and over. i kind of imagine the effect is negligible, but then YouTube stats have been famously hacked/juked many times, this seems to be just asking for shenanigans.

some dude, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:14 (twelve years ago)

Like it feels like black people have been pretty central to the american cultural discourse at all points in my life except the past few years.

The Reverend, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:15 (twelve years ago)

mean I know there was payola in radio but at least there's some honor & dignity to giving free cocaine to dudes that look like martin mull

why Martin Mull when Clive Davis is the industry prototype?

― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:12 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I meant djs

in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:16 (twelve years ago)

"wouldn't it be really easy for labels to game the system by having computers running scripts to keep refreshing youtube videos?"

why would the labels pay for it when fans do it for free

katherine, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:19 (twelve years ago)

I was thinking more in the early stages, just to push it towards hot counts where it might get featured on the front page or suggested videos

in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:36 (twelve years ago)

I mean, sure, never underestimate the power of people to throw money at things (well, some things), but that's the unspoken wink behind all the fan-activation stuff, premieres, etc.: "support view-spam the shit out of this!" and obviously I don't have raw numbers / more certainly couldn't hurt, but it seems kids with too much spare time do a pretty good job of this on their own.

come to think of it, I'd probably be more surprised if labels weren't already doing this / just now started.

katherine, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:45 (twelve years ago)

"support the artist! AS MANY VIEWS AS YOU CAN HANDLE!" that is.

katherine, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:45 (twelve years ago)

yeah i mean before "Gangnam Style" the most viewed music video on YouTube of all time was Bieber, and i think that was less 'he has the most fans/they watch his video over and over' and more 'his fans are so rabid that they're hell bent on driving up his views and making him #1'

some dude, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:49 (twelve years ago)

I definitely had a friend who had a temp job that involved phoning in requests to TRL back in the day. soooo...

maura, Thursday, 21 February 2013 04:04 (twelve years ago)

haha wow

The Reverend, Thursday, 21 February 2013 04:35 (twelve years ago)

Is this the first big instrumental hit since Crazy Frog? Why is Thrift Shop still listed as #1 at billboard.com?

wk, Thursday, 21 February 2013 04:39 (twelve years ago)

Is Harlem Shake an instrumental track? If so, it might be the first since ... I wanna say Miami Vice Theme? ... to hit number one.

jaymc, Thursday, 21 February 2013 04:59 (twelve years ago)

it has vocal samples but yeah i'd consider it an instrumental

J0rdan S., Thursday, 21 February 2013 05:03 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, so is "The Hustle."

jaymc, Thursday, 21 February 2013 05:09 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.