i don't know if it's just the mp3s i have or if these guys actually have no low end at all, but in any case they are way too in love with that upper-middle treble range. all that wind-in-the-willows babbling-brook shit, they need something on the bottom to keep it from just all washing away.
and i know that's the range they've always worked in, and i liked it early on when it was more clattery and less precious, but even the clattery stuff now to me seems wispy. it's like being assaulted by eggbeaters.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:23 PM
It absolutely must be the mp3s. I listen to the CD in the car and it's a trunk-rattling affair.
― DJ Mr. Face Stabba, M.D. (Whitey on the Moon), Monday, 23 February 2009 04:25 (fifteen years ago) link
Nick Southall OTM. That's all I'll say about this record for now (apart from the fact it does *absolutely* zilch for me barring, say, "In The Flowers", with its (the record's) prevailing air of not entirely disagreeable if thoroughly surface-level "look at the pretty colours!" burblement, an array of bright (monotonously so; EVERYTHING is spangled) clothes strung out on a linear washing-line). We can wait for the dismal rush of year-end plaudits to rouse any actual ire.
― I want sprinkles (country matters), Monday, 23 February 2009 08:07 (fifteen years ago) link
I guess I think they could've profitably shaved about ten minutes off the album.
(Cue response from Ned: "I guess I think they could've profitably shaved about fifty-two minutes off the album.")
― M.V., Monday, 23 February 2009 19:31 (fifteen years ago) link
Oh why stop there, a full hour. Negative time.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 23 February 2009 19:35 (fifteen years ago) link
fuck, this is an album of flabby time. of leaving your watch at the door. Of irresistible washes of Kompakt Pop Ambient interrupted with shrieks and washes of sound I can't really hate this album considering I waited so long for it. I kind of love it, for all its obvious arrival at this point, for all its obvious balearic chanting shouting sampladelic arrival. for the way it makes the journey from sung tongs to feels resolve, for the way the bass bows out of brothersport and the vocals dip and swerve and everything goes blue.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 23 February 2009 23:19 (fifteen years ago) link
you could take the whole thinga away and you'd be missing the point, the point is those flabby expanses of wasted time, of swerving peaks and long days filled with sunshine and no reason to go home.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 23 February 2009 23:21 (fifteen years ago) link
and you'd be missing the point.
Or I could just listen to something else I actually liked. :-D Which I will do!
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 23 February 2009 23:43 (fifteen years ago) link
That does sound like fun! : )
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 21:05 (fifteen years ago) link
My Girls sounds quite like The Tough Alliance :)
― O Supermanchiros (blueski), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 23:36 (fifteen years ago) link
liking this but i also want a bonus version that takes all of the main vocals off and replaces them with fatter drums :/
― O Supermanchiros (blueski), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 23:58 (fifteen years ago) link
wow this album sounds bad on mac speakers
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 00:01 (fifteen years ago) link
How the hell can Nick and I be on the same page about anything.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 00:04 (fifteen years ago) link
yes it does. like there's tin cans caught in the fanbelt. (i know macs don't actually have fanbelts, but if they did.)
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 00:21 (fifteen years ago) link
You guys must be using old Macs -- it sounds great on my two month old MacBook!
― ilxor, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 00:26 (fifteen years ago) link
my macbook is a year old. but i don't really think the problem's with the speakers. i think animal collective just sounds like tin cans caught in a fan belt.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 00:28 (fifteen years ago) link
"I kind of love it, for all its obvious arrival at this point"
yep, makes me wonder how the next record will sound.
so i see this thread is in the big backlash phase..this record will be more objectively appreciated from 2010 and forward, when all the buzz will eventually end.in the meantime, i think it's good, not as good as feels/sung,but still
― Zeno, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 00:29 (fifteen years ago) link
sort of understand the perception that this is a treble/midrange album with no low end. though there's a big bass pulse in a lot of tunes, it often sounds grafted on, like a decorative afterthought. also, though i liked MPP a lot up front, i'm finding that it doesn't reveal much beyond what it first gives away. not a record of unexpected depths (despite the promo art). this isn't a complaint so much as an observation -- i still like it, but i suspect people will be a lot less enthusiastic about it by year's end.
― welcome little swetty (contenderizer), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 00:50 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah the brightness of their sound didn't bug me as much on feels for some reason, and i really actually like the skittery quality of some of the older stuff. but on this one it seems overdone to me.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 01:17 (fifteen years ago) link
all the reasons for the question: what happend to AC in this record? are in My Girls lyrics
― Zeno, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 01:20 (fifteen years ago) link
so i see this thread is in the big backlash phase..
This leaves 10 months for the counter-backlash to take hold before the 2009 best-of poll.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 25 February 2009 01:47 (fifteen years ago) link
saw these guys live last night. they sounded tired, i felt old.
― sonderangerbot, Friday, 6 March 2009 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link
i hope they're bored of playing the same songs over and over again. i like this album more and more every time i listen to it, but it's about time they change it up
― HPSCHD, Friday, 6 March 2009 17:09 (fifteen years ago) link
I saw them last week and was blown away. I like the new album fine, but seeing them live made me like it more.
― scott pgwp (pgwp), Saturday, 7 March 2009 02:26 (fifteen years ago) link
it's about time they change it up
Why, are you seeing them at every show?
I'm rather looking forward to the "tired" setlist with all the "hits" as it's rather unusual for them to do.
― ilxor, Saturday, 7 March 2009 22:28 (fifteen years ago) link
Anyone see them last night in London?
It was like seeing Ozric Tentacles at a free festival, they should have gotten The Enid to support.
― MaresNest, Wednesday, 25 March 2009 09:56 (fifteen years ago) link
Yeah.Thought they were pretty great. Esp start, Lion in a Coma into My Girls, into Summertime Clothes. Pretty much loved it, but never seen them before so don't know if this was their 'usual' kind of show or not.
― pandemic, Wednesday, 25 March 2009 14:26 (fifteen years ago) link
I woz there!
It was great, but again, I'd never seen them before and only know a couple of the records.
I get yr Ozrics ref. It kind of reminded me of seeing the Orb in 1992, but I think that was just the giant glowing white globe suspended above the stage.
Anyway, it was WAY more electronic than I was expecting (although I shouldn't have been surprised) and there were just great chest-shaking bass whoomps everywhere and loads more reverb and FX on the vocals than on record. Just totally exhilerating disorientating stuff.
Shame the crowd were so diffident.
― Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 25 March 2009 14:36 (fifteen years ago) link
so I finally got to spend some time with this record, I was out of the country during the whole leak/hype/rickroll merriment and too busy to listen during the backlash phase. I like it more than Strawberery Jam for sure, but it all seems downhill after Summertime Clothes because it is front loaded like crazy. The jew's harp on Lion In A Coma is questionable, the last song is like an AC parody, and daddy issues recur throughout, but the first four tracks make it all worthwhile.
― sleeve, Saturday, 11 April 2009 06:39 (fifteen years ago) link
oh, youre just in phase one.thats not the end of the story:wait till you get tired of track 1-4, than discover the middle section of the record and think it's great,and than (phase 3) get tired of the whole thing and neglect it till next year, when youll miss it again.
― Zeno, Saturday, 11 April 2009 06:51 (fifteen years ago) link
I dunno 'bout that but I will certainly continue to throw the record on for a while to come. No More Running is also v nice, I think the rest of the record is way stronger than SJ. I'm not sure what I think about the whole low end issue discussed above.
― sleeve, Saturday, 11 April 2009 06:58 (fifteen years ago) link
"also, though i liked MPP a lot up front, i'm finding that it doesn't reveal much beyond what it first gives away. not a record of unexpected depths"
kinda otm
― Zeno, Saturday, 11 April 2009 07:06 (fifteen years ago) link
it all seems downhill after Summertime Clothes because it is front loaded like crazy
I agree generally, but track 5 is the album's best so no way does it go downhill after "Summertime Clothes," not quite yet.
Strawberry Jam highly underrated, btw.
― ilxor, Sunday, 12 April 2009 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link
"bluish" grows on you after a few listens, once the very wilson boys vocal harmony in the chorus bridge sinks in. that is a gateway song to zeno's phase 2
― kamerad, Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:10 (fifteen years ago) link
i dont know how i feel about the "doesnt reveal much beyong what it first gives away" comment(s). every song is so god-damned layered and dense i'm constantly discovering new aspects of a beat or melody that had hitherto gone unnoticed (or at the very elast unappreciated). most of the melodies are really accessible it's true but they're hard to get bored of, and my favourites are constantly shifting positions.
― samosa gibreel, Monday, 13 April 2009 03:19 (fifteen years ago) link
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/feb/06/simon-reynolds-animal-collective
― moullet, Monday, 13 April 2009 05:10 (fifteen years ago) link
I don't care much for Reynolds' music taste, for the larger part, and I find some of his thoughts muddled with nonsense ("black capitalism" as an economic theory in a discussion about Motown?) but his article on AC reminds me of his article on Vampire Weekend: thought provoking and insightful, even if I think he's possibly reading too far into things at times.
What I enjoy about Simon Reynolds is that he's always got a theory for why something is happening in music. No dots are ever left unconnected.
― Cunga, Monday, 13 April 2009 06:57 (fifteen years ago) link
I quite enjoyed reading that article, and I think he makes some interesting and relevant points about middlebrow, etc.
But MPP is still fucking horrific.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 13 April 2009 07:24 (fifteen years ago) link
Comments on that article way better than the article itself...
stoddy
06 Feb 09, 12:25pm
Jesus Christ - this is one of the most tedious, pretentious and pointless pieces of drivel i've seen appear on the Gruniad's music blog. Turgid, unappetising fare and the sound very clearly of one man disappearing happily up his own arse. Rather like Animal Collective in fact...
― uncannydan, Monday, 13 April 2009 13:36 (fifteen years ago) link
another classic...
fakeycakemaker
07 Feb 09, 11:54am
I find it plain funny how Reynolds' stock as an alternative music journalist is just based upon his anxieties from a mid-class, record collecting, obscurist p.o.v over the popularity of a band....he always comes back to the bourgeois experience of listening and watching music as some all encompassing envelope, and it's both interesting and very dull how this gets him nowhere, only repeating the stereotype of the (male) artist in a perpetual child like state of "creativity"
― uncannydan, Monday, 13 April 2009 14:01 (fifteen years ago) link
aren't Animal Collective, strictly speaking, emerging reborn from their own arses.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 13 April 2009 14:11 (fifteen years ago) link
Are there going to be any remixes of "My Girls"?
― I am using your worlds, Monday, 13 April 2009 14:39 (fifteen years ago) link
Does it really need a remix? A coworker of mine was at a recent Prodigy gig and he said that Busy P opened and played "My Girls" as if it were, "just another banger".
― uncannydan, Monday, 13 April 2009 15:13 (fifteen years ago) link
i know Hatchmatik did a remix, for one. but i agree with uncannydan; it's pretty unnecessary.
― myndbloom, Monday, 13 April 2009 18:20 (fifteen years ago) link
― mizzell, Monday, 13 April 2009 21:04 (fifteen years ago) link
i approve of that experiment
― yes threads (country matters), Monday, 13 April 2009 21:12 (fifteen years ago) link
because I am poor and lazy I am just listening to it now and it is good. probably their best yet (altho I haven't heard Strawberry Jam).
― This Board is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 13 April 2009 21:34 (fifteen years ago) link
don't forget that you're also old
― the sultan of ban (J0rdan S.), Monday, 13 April 2009 21:35 (fifteen years ago) link
right. I forgot. alzheimer's, you know.
― This Board is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 13 April 2009 21:37 (fifteen years ago) link
if sick mouthy is against it then it is probably great and the converse is also true.
― keythkeythkeyth, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 03:25 (fifteen years ago) link