King Crimson: Classic Or Dud

I just heard both of the Crimson Jazz Trio albums (which is Ian Wallace and a pianist and bassist) and they are really awesome. Highly, highly, highly recommended.

if you like jazz that is.

both good, 2nd one squeaks by due to the Islands Suite. RIP Ian Wallace, it was really a good setting for him

I like the arrangement of One Time a lot on the 2nd one and Islands is great; the Islands material really shines in these arrangements. I read somewhere that Fripp considers these the only covers that add something new to the originals and I agree.

Yes, he seemed to be quite appreciative of the project. They really chose a good range of material. I'd like to read some Jazz-centric reviews of the records to get that side of things.

Listening to Vol 1 nonstop, cheers for hipping me to these

I didn't even know this existed!

That little "Larks Tongues" boxed set was for chumps:

http://www.superdeluxeedition.com/news/king-crimson-the-road-to-red-24-disc-box-full-track-listing/

man, 10 years ago I'd have been all over this. I hardly have time for the Great Deciever boxset despite how excellent that one is. Doesn't look like there's anything particularly interesting like Cat Food on that set - it really is "Lament", "Easy Money", etc. etc. over and over again

But apparently different lengths, depending on the set, and different solos/improvs. Etc. Still, that's a lot of live Crimson.

has any other short-lived band like the Wetton/Bruford Crimson been mined this hard before? did they ever play a show that wasn't recorded and remastered?

Hmm. Stooges Fun House Sessions?

It'd be worth it if there were somehow a live take of 'Red' itself in there...

did any shows with Jamie Muir get out? that would be something...

There were several released in the Collector's Club series as single CDs. I got two of them. I remember wishing the sound qual were as good as the great deceiver box.

should revisit, its been years

Zoom Club release has Muir. The sound is p bad.

yeah, and the other one is a radio broadcast with better sound than zoom but iirc the performance is not all that

I just picked up the reissue of Red the other day, the one with the 2013 Steven Wilson remaster. Other than the In the Court of... I've had on vinyl for years and those awesome mixes some ilxor made a few years ago, this will be my next big step into King Crimson land.

I would be honored to think that you were referring to the mixes I made some while back. I've been thinking of remastering them (using better quality source mp3s) myself.

They've got to be, right? I have those and really enjoyed them as well!!

Cool. That was really fun to do. I've wanted to make more live comps and one for the ProjeKcts as well. Would anybody be up for it?

yes indeed

Massive review here:

http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=45631#.UqjZwWRDv3E

Yeah! It was definitely those mixes and I feel really badly for not remembering it was you!

Bruford's autobio makes mention that his first go round in Crimson was plagued by trouble coming up with new material, and yet "Doctor Diamond" and "Guts on my Side" are A+ jams imo, I wonder who disliked those numbers enough to nip them in the bud...

That all about jazz review'extended analysis' was so lovingly, thoughtfully composed and considered. It was if a superfan had made and resolved every internal argument about the group and ultimately made the case for why such an exhaustive set would be something to look forward to... as if he was justifying the purchase of it to himself as much as anyone else.

as if he was justifying the purchase of it to himself as much as anyone else

Probably had to justify it to his wife—"Hey, honey, I got a review assignment for the thing! Now it's a tax writeoff!"

"Hey, honey, I got a review assignment for the thing! Now we have to listen to 20 hours of King Crimson!"

wife jokes ;_;

You shed rueful tears, but there's no way I'm getting through disc one of this thing around my wife. Let's just say she and I agree to disagree on a few groups and stick to our common musical ground.

Fripp himself "jokes" often in his diary about how Crimson is apparently radioactive to women. I cringe every time he mentions it.

I defiantly know plenty of female prog fans, but Crimson is sort of its own thing.

There are female Crim fans.

There are female fans of everything. It's just sort of rarified. For men, too, I think: Crimson gets pretty geeky, even by geek standards, which is why here they play to 1000 people max rather than to 10,000.

Fripp's relationship with women has made me lol, sob, and cringe in equal measures. Wife jokes are just a window into other people's lives, I guess, but they don't reflect my experience as a wife.

Kinda wish there were more female prog musicians out there, the ones we have totally rule

Wife jokes are just a window into other people's lives, I guess, but they don't reflect my experience as a wife.

If you think that joke was at the expense of the wife, well...OK then.

it all depends on the joke!

xpost If we're talking about it, some of the best and most popular female acts never really get pegged as prog. Think Kate Bush, or St. Vincent, or Bat for Lashes, or Joanna Newsom, etc., who are totally prog but rarely defined as such. Such is the wiggly/useless nature of the term.

FWIW, my wife would actually totally tolerate King Crimson. Just not 18 hours in a row, especially "Red"-era!

Bjork is prog afaic

I was thinking of Newsom. Part of the problem is that I don't really know what 'prog' means anymore. If you open up the floodgates to including groups like Radiohead and Bjork then I think the scene is way more diverse. Which I think is fine, but I know a lot of people think it isn't really prog unless you're imitating Yes or something.

It's kind of a self-reinforcing feedback loop - "girls don't like prog" + "if/when girls start showing up, it's not prog."

xpost Yeah, I think prog-proof is sort of a pseudo tautology: it is prog if it sounds like Yes or Genesis.

"Prog" magazine, which I get for free from my local record store when no one else buys that month's copy, has a column called something like "Prog or Not Prog?"where readers debate the prog bona fides of bands like Talk Talk and XTC.

well I don't think that anyone doubts that say, Rennaissance is prog. but I think 'what is prog in 2013' is a pretty open question

"Prog" magazine, which I get for free from my local record store when no one else buys that month's copy,

love this

haha i've been known to drop the $15 or whatever for an import copy of Prog, but i always feel gross after i do

We talked about women in prog a little while ago (Froggie's Poll?). Kate Bush was on Prog magazine's cover and some of her band and collaborators were from prog (Gabriel, a Procol Harum guy and a few others I'm sure). I watched the Romantic Warriors: Rock In Opposition dvd a few months ago and there was quite a lot of women in it (I highly recommend the dvd).

About the "women dont like it" cliche. People used to use that to dismiss all sorts of things that now have large female fanbases (videogames, metal, pretty much anything that seems geeky). I dont think there really is much left unless it is actively hostile to women.

A lot of people used to make a lot of distinctions about men vs women in the type of porn/erotica they enjoy but these days I dont think there are many safe statements you can make on that either.
I've seen a lot of art and writing that I was surprised that a woman created it but I guess there's no real reason I should be surprised.