― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:41 (twenty-one years ago) link
the serious press should be the dance press should be the pop press, it's not getting wells to love dance, it's getting dance to love dance.
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:42 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:44 (twenty-one years ago) link
― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:44 (twenty-one years ago) link
― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:45 (twenty-one years ago) link
maybe these ideas like "canon" and "respect" (and "history"?) are intrinsically anti-dance?
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:46 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:46 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:48 (twenty-one years ago) link
― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:50 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:50 (twenty-one years ago) link
― dave q, Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:52 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:54 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:56 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:58 (twenty-one years ago) link
― dave q, Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:59 (twenty-one years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 10:59 (twenty-one years ago) link
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:03 (twenty-one years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:08 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:12 (twenty-one years ago) link
tom's point is totally pertinent, even if his judgment is on its head (i don't know if it's on its head or not)
(eg one of the loose assumptions of ordinary political journalism is that a mass of "bad" writing can have good political effects => i am agnostic abt this, though i think you can point to eras when it's arguably the case, like the decades in the UK up to the first great reform bill)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:14 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:17 (twenty-one years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:20 (twenty-one years ago) link
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:24 (twenty-one years ago) link
Petridish in the Guardian is a different kettle of fish, I think.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:24 (twenty-one years ago) link
dave- ok.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:25 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:26 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:32 (twenty-one years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:33 (twenty-one years ago) link
This suggests to me that a successful language for writing about rock has been found and is being used. I don't think an equally successful language has been found for most other genres (pop maybe if we're separating it out; hip-hop possibly but I don't read the hip-hop mags enough). My hunch is that the success of the rock language has had bad effects for rock (plus bad effects in forcing other genres to the side, as Ronan says) - in terms of helping to set up a bunch of rock values and expectations, defining 'what rock is' by how we talk about rock (I'm not just referring to paid print criticism).
(I'm NOT saying it's impossible for good writers to write well about other genres or that genres can't be written well about. Good writers can write well about loads of things. What I'm saying is that a mediocre rock writer is more convincing to a rock fan than a mediocre dance writer is to a dance fan.)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:35 (twenty-one years ago) link
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:37 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:39 (twenty-one years ago) link
answer i don't accept: "it is a given that this cannot possibly be the case"
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:41 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:41 (twenty-one years ago) link
steve: the ride on time and rockerfeller skank are better tunes so yes it would be easier! right, i'm off for lunch!
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:41 (twenty-one years ago) link
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:43 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:44 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:45 (twenty-one years ago) link
julio plenty of musics - polka say - are way older than rock or dance andf not written about at all
dave you are confusing the potential effects of what could potentially be written (if the writing was "good" in a sense yet to be pinned down) with the actual effects of what has actually been written
clear effect of WRITING ABOUT MUSIC = the thousands of bands who based their sound on the velvet underground
w/o people writing abt them — esp. in the late 70s, ie long after they'd disbanded — they would have sunk, not w/o trace, but into a tiny tiny TINY cult of no consequence
the VU turned out to be GREAT to write about, and lots of little bands noted this and set sail in that direction
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:48 (twenty-one years ago) link
Yeah, but its a matter of knowing what the listener itself is listening FOR and adapting your writing to focus on these elements, isn't it? (Pitchfork Basement Jaxx review to thread!)
At the same time, I find it pretty difficult to accept that there is really much that can be written about, say, a functional breakbeat track that acts as trough/filler in the context of a DJ set. Actually, I feel the same about functional rock track that appears three quarters of the way through an album - both are far harder to write about than the big singles/anthems or the digressions/oddities.
x-post with Stelfox - in 8/10 cases, is it really WORTH writing about individual dance records, or widening to focus to talking about DJ sets or club nights or cultural movements etc? Surely this is much more what dance is really about? (I am throwing ideas around here, not really stating an opinion).
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:51 (twenty-one years ago) link
but did polka have the 'cultural impact' that rock or dance had/still have?
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:53 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:56 (twenty-one years ago) link
(And then there's the matter of of music for people who don't like to read.)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:57 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 11:58 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 12:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
dancehall massive to thread!
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 12:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
it doesn't really... i don't know of any tabloid that really bother with it much, not counting the daily mail (and coverage there is just plain daft/bad)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 12:02 (twenty-one years ago) link
BUT it always stayed below the radar of mainstream music writing (i'm surely there were also specialist magazines actually) and has tended to fall out of the ambit of routine histories of popular music (except when novelty crossover was achieved)
(rock is basically a local/ethnic music which achieved novelty crossover, except the novelty went on to eat the world)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 12:03 (twenty-one years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 August 2003 12:04 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 28 August 2003 12:05 (twenty-one years ago) link
This is not the case to the same extent with dancehall or soca or hardcore or any music made prior to about 1900 except classical.
If the tabloids WERE writing more about a certain type of music, would more people be listening to it? (I am fully aware that tabloids are followers rather than leaders in terms of cultural trends, BUT...)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 28 August 2003 12:05 (twenty-one years ago) link