― Tom (Groke), Monday, 4 November 2002 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Denise Lambert, Monday, 4 November 2002 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― fearful of an ilm spanking (Melissa W), Monday, 4 November 2002 10:52 (twenty-two years ago)
Blimey fearful stop projecting - I didn't mention rockism or imply anything along those lines.
What I actually think: the Neptunes' productions for Britney and Timberlake don't work as well as their hip-hop stuff, and in Britney's case as well as her pre-Neptunes stuff. I'm trying to work out why I think this and hoped some input here would help.
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 4 November 2002 11:03 (twenty-two years ago)
On the other hand the previous dominant production style of teenpop had pretty much run its course - "The Call" for instance is a baroque curio next to prime Cheiron material. So maybe these acts couldn't have gone anywhere else.
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 4 November 2002 11:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Denise Lambert, Monday, 4 November 2002 11:14 (twenty-two years ago)
I think the things your review said about the Neptunes are mostly true; I'm more interested in what it means (for them, for pop stars, for pop) that they're doing those things with Justin T.
Also after "Grindin'" which I love-hate like nothing else this year I sort of wish they'd do more really NASTY stuff - I don't think they're going to top the fizzy tingly pop of Kaleidoscope in a hurry, maybe not ever, so I almost want them to move away from that whole field. "Like I Love You" sounds dependable, not inspirational, to me, and "Boys" just sounded stale.
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 4 November 2002 11:23 (twenty-two years ago)
conversely there's something about Britney's 'Boys' i really like and i think its just down to the hooks so there really is no accounting for ranking Neptunes productions
― blueski, Monday, 4 November 2002 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)
What is the problem with this stuff then? Maybe not the producers so much as the pop stars themselves wishing to ape "urban" idioms and aproaches - the Neptunes' production might in fact be secondary and consequent to Britney's own performance choices. Britney's a hard one obviously because her vocal sultriness was in some ways so unusual for Cheiron chart-pop. In retrospect her work with the Neptunes sounds more fitting to her, but, also in retrospect and as a result, less distinctive.
A different example: the Backstreet Boys. The Neptunes Remix of the "The Call" sounds great to me because of the tension between the boys' dramatic & pop-centric, if somewhat self-consciously "nasty", performances and the Neptunes unusually (even for them) rough'n'ready dirty-disco groove. It's not as good as, say, "Shape Of My Heart" (although really what is?) but there's a friction there that is not really present in the smoother R&B of N'Sync's "Girlfriend" - the sound of The Neptunes and chartpop meeting on neutral ground and laying down all their weapons. So the question is: would rougher, more credible pop production work better with more obviously pop performances?
Also, where does stuff like "James Dean" or "Down Boy" fit into this? Both strike me as a similar shift away from the straightforward pop approach of Cheiron et. al. but at the same time, the connotations of credibility ain't nearly as strong. Are the Neptunes' distinctive because of their overwhelming presence and cross-appeal? Does their production stamp inevitably erase pop persona?
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 4 November 2002 14:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Denise Lambert, Monday, 4 November 2002 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 4 November 2002 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Denise Lambert, Monday, 4 November 2002 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 4 November 2002 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)