― gareth (gareth), Monday, 4 November 2002 16:38 (twenty-three years ago)
i'm not saying they were, but are we too quick to deify them as pioneers and what have you without actually considering whether the music actually stands up, regardless of their intent?
― Denise Lambert, Monday, 4 November 2002 16:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Monday, 4 November 2002 16:43 (twenty-three years ago)
Krafwerk Neighbour:Hi I just moved in next door, I was wondering if I could borrow a cup of sugar?
Kraftwerk: Boing ping boom tschak ping.
― Anna (Anna), Monday, 4 November 2002 16:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― michael wells (michael w.), Monday, 4 November 2002 16:55 (twenty-three years ago)
i've never reeally thought of them as ironic at all, although perhaps the argument that they got a bit tongue-in-cheek by the time of computer world has some merit
as to the pioneer/krap question, i'd never really connected the 'pioneer' status with liking them, for some reason, in my head, i connect them as uninfluential, a side road. this may be because i don't see them as futuristic and forward-looking at all, but nostalgic, so i dont really connect them with later.
i find their records heartbreakingly poignant and beautiful - perhaps this is why i dont see any irony there
(oh and yes, michael OTM with the revisionism thing)
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 4 November 2002 16:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― michael wells (michael w.), Monday, 4 November 2002 17:05 (twenty-three years ago)
i dont think they pioneered anything in the pop sense however, apart from the use of the synths, sequencers and drum machines...the likes of 'The Model' certainly seem more wistfully nostalgic/romantic rather than progressive and innovative i.e. the song itself sounds like it was written 30-40 years before it was which is part of its magic and appeal, and it remains a rare moment in which the band were not making observational and/or enthusiastic statements about technology
― blueski, Monday, 4 November 2002 17:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Monday, 4 November 2002 17:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Monday, 4 November 2002 17:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 4 November 2002 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)
And even beyond that it's a dangerous game to look back at something that was supposed to be futuristic and call it "ironic," since with futurism more than anything we immediately lose proper perspective as soon as the period's over. (I was thinking about this last night looking at the wardrobe on the covers of The Man-Machine and Numan's Pleasure Principle: awful icky terrible fabrics in Numan's suit and Kraftwerk's pants, the sorts of things only the elderly poor still wear now -- and yet at the time. . .)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 4 November 2002 17:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Monday, 4 November 2002 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Monday, 4 November 2002 18:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 4 November 2002 18:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lord Custos Omega (Lord Custos Omega), Monday, 4 November 2002 20:52 (twenty-three years ago)
Kraftwerk were innovative. But Kraftwerk were not a very good band. Sure they had a few moments but as visionary as "Radioactive" is can you really hum any of it? I'm always hesitant to mention them in the same breath as Can, Amon Duul, or Cluster. Pioneers? Yes. A great band? No.
Anna is right here. Kraftwerk believed in perfection. And their music posses a coldness that goes beyond irony. NEU! were of a similar mind as Kraftwerk yet were far more soulful and interesting.
― Juan, Monday, 4 November 2002 23:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 4 November 2002 23:39 (twenty-three years ago)
A touch of irony there, methinks.
― Ben Williams, Monday, 4 November 2002 23:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 01:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ben Williams, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)
I assume you mean 'Radioactivity' not 'Radioactive'?
Yes! As with many of their more popular tracks it had a strong melody.
Yeah, I fail to see how 'Ohm Sweet Ohm' is ironic. You haven't been at those Alanis pills have you?
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ben Williams, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 02:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ben Williams, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 02:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― Clarke B., Tuesday, 5 November 2002 02:04 (twenty-three years ago)
(Gary Numan on the other hand did not get this, which is why he's such a prat)
― Ben Williams, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 02:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 02:20 (twenty-three years ago)
Actually there is nothing ironic about Senor Coconut which you would know if you have read any interviews with Uwe Schimdt. He genuinely likes Latin music, and when he heard Kraftwerk he heard Latin potential in it. Just because YOU might think Latin music is a joke doesn't mean everyone does.
Kraftwerk ironic? The song "Pocket Calculator", which most see as some kind of joke, I see as one of the most beautiful songs ever written. As an engineer who uses his calculator every day, I can appreciate the joy of adding, and subtracting, and controlling, and composing at futuristic speeds. This means more to me than a million crappy romatic love songs. Also, the song has an excellent melody with kewl bleepy sounds.
― fletrejet, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 02:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 02:30 (twenty-three years ago)
I wasn't necessarily talking about the melodies in Kraftwerk's music. Of all the "Krautrock" bands, Kraftwerk are very difficult to listen to. Kraftwerk are soulless in a way that leaves you cold. Kraftwerk don't really connect with a listener at first. Cluster made music that really gets under your skin, inviting you to want get deeper into the music. It was an bad example on my part, the whole humming thing. The question of rather or not they were ironic was secondary. Kraftwerk were influential, and innovative and all that. But they fail to surprise or excite me the way Can does, for instance. Hope that clears things up.
And yes, I did mean "Radio-Activity".
NOTE: Couldn't figure out how to quote others. Forgive the sloppiness here.
― Juan, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 02:45 (twenty-three years ago)
Have you heard their Krautrockish stuff, pre-Autobahn? What do you think of that? You keep comparing them to Krautrock groups, but after Autobahn they went off into a totally different area.
― fletrejet, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 03:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Clarke B., Tuesday, 5 November 2002 06:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jez (Jez), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 07:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)
No, they're German.
**RIMSHOT**
Thank you, you're too kind. Don't forget to tip your waiters! Drive safely this evening. I'll be here all week!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 14:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ben Williams, Tuesday, 5 November 2002 18:25 (twenty-three years ago)
Quite right. :-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 19:36 (twenty-three years ago)
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10534357
― Kramkoob (Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 21:59 (seventeen years ago)
That's a good interview.
― Poll Wall (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 22:08 (seventeen years ago)
Kraftwerk is amazing and I feel sorry for all the haters.
http://www.plong.com/MusicCatalog%5CK%5CKraftwerk%20-%20Showroom%20Dummies%5CKraftwerk%20-%20Showroom%20Dummies.jpg
― Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)