taking sides: gyórgy ligeti vs steve reich

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
creeping up behind people vs dancing around with your bits adangle

bob snoom, Thursday, 7 November 2002 11:30 (twenty-three years ago)

i swear that was an umlauted "o" i have been misrepresented

bob snoom, Thursday, 7 November 2002 11:31 (twenty-three years ago)

For listeninf pleasure it'd have to be Reich.

Ligetti's requiem (the thing in 2001 is the requiem isn't it) is great but I'm not sure I like his other stuff so much. I have a CD of his concertos which never grabbed me.

Reich on the other hand is the Steps of minimalism with his ear friendly stuff like Electric Counterpoint.

The Reich remix CD is very enjoyable too.

tigerclawskank, Thursday, 7 November 2002 12:35 (twenty-three years ago)

the reich remix cd is like being forced fed candyfloss!!! ligeti is THE MAN! grand macabre indeed -= one of the only living composers who can still get away with an opera! i used to love steve reich (and believe it or not - i still think "the cave" is great!) but the tunes are too easy to remember - i don't even need to play the records if i'm in the mood (glenn miller). whereas i can never remember the exact pattern of ligeti's nebulous squiggling so they remain fascinatingly alien for the time being. i think i even prefer scott joplin to reich these days

bob snoom, Thursday, 7 November 2002 12:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Steps good or Steps bad, tcs?

both much more interesting when they started: both do "accessible" fairly lamely => however my fave reich is TEHILLIM

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 7 November 2002 12:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Ligetti is the best.

As we all know, Ligetti's Requiem has been proved mathematically to the world's best album, and indeed the only one anyone needs to know.

It is excerpts from the Requiem but also Lux Aeterna and maybe even something else of Lig that is in 2001.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 7 November 2002 12:59 (twenty-three years ago)

atmospheres

zebedee, Thursday, 7 November 2002 13:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Don't forget that Pierre-Laurent Aimard disc of Etudes and Musica Ricercata--pretty vital, that.

I dunno, I like a lot of early Reich and don't imagine I'll ever stop responding to stuff like Music for 18 Musicians, but Ligeti offers music to chew on, you know? The fact that it isn't as immediately approachable while being just as intriguing indicates to me I'm probably going to be puzzling over and enjoying it for a long time to come.

Lee G (Lee G), Thursday, 7 November 2002 14:40 (twenty-three years ago)

i agree that you never rilly NEED reich once you get the trick, but it's so simple it always brings a smile. that said when i do play some to (usually delighted) others i get surprise just how well it works. there's always a different melody to follow

bob zemko (bob), Thursday, 7 November 2002 23:22 (twenty-three years ago)

As much as I do love Reich's sampling and all, I agree with Bob Snoom on how I too can't completely remember a Ligeti passage--like hearing it new each time! I personally love Ligeti's organ stuff, as well as piano and Harpsichord stuff, but noting organly, the Two studies for Organ (esp. Harmonies) are completely astounding (Harmonies has this sound that carries me so sweet-sick, it's wonderful).

Ashley Andel, Friday, 8 November 2002 01:32 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.