True? Or nostalgia similar to the I love 1966 and Roger McGuinn's granny glasses brigade? what remains of the movement, and what are the abiding records?
― Pete Loathsome, Tuesday, 22 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Good things - the avalanche of music which suddenly became available. To begin with it didn't matter if it was good, bad, bogus or stoopid. It was punk, and I accepted it all.
Bad things - it took me nearly 10 years to get over the '1976 is year zero' mentality which we've discussed in other threads. Narrow minded..
The music - a lot of the early bands weren't so great in retrospect - more like revved up pub rock. But my musical touchstones are what came next - Magazine, JoyDiv and Factory, PIL, Cabs, Josef K, Raincoats, Slits, Fall...... I can't think of a band which I loved then that I don't love now.
Yes, it's nostalgia to some extent, but what the hell... I've moved on but looking back to '77 from time to time feels great.
― Dr. C, Tuesday, 22 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The music: I've wondered about this recently, the fact that I really don't like that much pure punk. Never Mind the Bollocks (of course), Dead Kennedy's, early Black Flag and that may be it. Punk for me is somewhat sonically retarded, which is one of the reasons punk for me gor interesting when it started to mix with psychedelia/prog again. Lydon himself started this with P.I.L., and I'll take the blissed-out punk of Huskur Du, Sonic Youth, Dinosaur Jr., Meat Puppets and Butthole Surfers, 'XTRMNTR', Boredomes any day over all your earnest political sound punk rock that Greil Marcus always goes on about.
Punk is of course deader-than-dead, one could say that Frankie Goes to Hollywood were the Last Punk Band and rave/aciied killed it all off (yes the revenge of disco). All attempts of reviving the punk spirit in the 90s have been miserable failures. So i wouldn't be surprised that for a certain generation it's time to get nostalgic. Nothing really wrong with that.
― Omar, Wednesday, 23 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― K-reg, Wednesday, 23 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Omar: one could say Frankie Goes to Hollywood were the last punk band but what would one be saying? Please explain. (Frankie struck me as new romantics except, y'know, "with an edge," albeit a blunt one). I'd presume more "punk" bands existed in Green Day's wake than the Sex Pistols' (presumption based on Green Day selling more records, spawning more wannabes). Though that of course hinges on definition of "punk".
Re: punk's "sonic retardation", yes, and brings to mind Martin Popoff's assertion, "There is such a thing as intelligent punk, it's called heavy metal." Ka'ching!!
― AP, Wednesday, 23 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
As someone who was 'there' I can say that it was incredibly intense and moving to me (and I would love to board a time machine just to wander the streets again). But it was, in retrospect, very limited musically (which it needed to be as a stylistic call-to-arms, and to offend prog-fans etc.).
At the time the music press was full of this punk vs hippy philosophical opposition, which of course looks absurd now - but that's Youth Culture for you.
― David, Wednesday, 23 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(though the definition of musical divides in, by then, 15-year-old terms shows, in retrospect, how the inkies were already losing the plot in the early 90s.)
― Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 23 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)