― jones (actual), Wednesday, 20 November 2002 22:38 (twenty-three years ago)
----------go.to/stevek
― steve k, Wednesday, 20 November 2002 22:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 20 November 2002 23:09 (twenty-three years ago)
does anyone who doesn't liberally pad their reviews with them even read these things?
― jones (actual), Thursday, 21 November 2002 00:28 (twenty-three years ago)
(note: this is only helpful in matters of letting me completely avoid said CD entirely)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 21 November 2002 00:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Thursday, 21 November 2002 01:35 (twenty-three years ago)
This only applies to crappy bands, of course.
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 21 November 2002 01:57 (twenty-three years ago)
But as a former college radio program director who went through several hundreds each week, the most informative press releases accompanying music for inclusion into playlists of any sort usually had the following three attributes:
1. Definite/non-waffly(waffley?) statement of genre/category RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING so I know who to pass it off to if need be. Try to do this without using the dreaded 'influences' list.2. Other bands you've played out with or are related to (not just a list of other bands from the same town, for chrissakes) (basically, should I have already heard about you?)3. Track-by-track one-liners - this way I don't assume the first three are the whole of your stylistic range and might be inclined to FFWD to some standouts. If you don't include this I might very well just listen to part of the first three or four and then make my judgement based on that.
Understand that TIME IS OF THE DAMN ESSENCE for program directors, music directors and journos. For some reason or another it often happens that OTHER BANDS ALSO SENT US PROMOS TODAY. Quite a few of them, actually. And chances are one or two are albums we want to get to right away, from established artists.
Just like a resume, you want to be BRIEF, GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT, FREE OF SPELING ERORS, and INFORMATIVE regarding what your target audience needs to know to do their job. NOT a little story about how you got started and why your band is so much better than those other guys, breaking new ground, etc. vomit.
If your press release is full of long-winded hyperbole of any sort it's quite likely I'll never even unwrap the record.
Yes, we're bastards. But we want to get home on time just like everybody else.
― Tom Millar (Millar), Thursday, 21 November 2002 02:01 (twenty-three years ago)
Your post is probably the most worthwhile thing I have read on ILM in a long while.
― Mike Taylor (mjt), Thursday, 21 November 2002 06:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 November 2002 07:19 (twenty-three years ago)
Were I not feeling peckish or puckish, I'd go w/ his answer - proper grammar, pertinent info, no thesaurus-humping hyperbole. Showing a sense of humor (or humanity! - oh, the humanity!) works, too - Cory Brown (the head of Absolutely Kosher Records) included this cover letter w/ some promos which downplayed the whole promo / writer rush thing quite nicely.
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 21 November 2002 14:39 (twenty-three years ago)
I wish bands would include not only a one-sheet (which, BTW, is called a ONE-sheet for a reason), but also include the most important points from that sheet in a little card that would fit inside the CD. Have a website with further press materials if we want to find out more about you.
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:16 (twenty-three years ago)