This is another thread where we senselessly pick on Pitchfork

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
"Aside from Eminem, Missy "Misdemeanor" Elliott's the most interesting pop persona of the moment. Unlike other video stars, she has yet to attempt a beatless hip-hop album (I'm looking at you, Lauryn Hill), disrobe on TRL in a psychotic rage (Mariah Carey), or project herself as finger-licking jailbait for repressed pedophiles (take your pick)."

sez this Missy review.

And it makes no sense because all these things she hasn't done ARE interesting!

and then she's a:

"mainstream, female version of Kool Keith-- albeit one without the hip-hop pedigree, lyrical skills, or off-camera insanity."

which leaves me sputtering helplessly. a-and get this:

"He even kicks off low-rider "Funky Fresh Dressed" with the same "here's a little story that must be told" sample that introduces DJ Premier's Deep Concentration. "

because you know that Timbaland is totally giving ups to DJ Premier and not like slick rick or anyone with that sample!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 22 November 2002 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)

oh yeah -- I forgot about that review! Early this morning I stopped reading after that first bit made my head hurt for the same reason as you mentioned above, and then never went back to it.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Friday, 22 November 2002 22:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm really happy that Pitchfork exists. It's pointed me toward a slew of good records this year (Books, Hrvatski, Keith Whitman) and they regularly publish some good writers that I don't see anywhere else. And it's free. A lot of the writers aren't as knowledgable as I might like, and some of the writing sucks, but I can't think of any mag or website where that's not the case.

dan (dan), Friday, 22 November 2002 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm looking at you, Lauryn Hill

One thing's for sure, she ain't lookin' back.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 November 2002 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)

It may be "senselessly" but nothing could be more senseless than Pitchfork. I don't care if it's free, it still sucks.

hstencil, Friday, 22 November 2002 22:39 (twenty-two years ago)

i dont even pay attention to it enough to form an opinion!

chaki (chaki), Friday, 22 November 2002 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the main reason we love to pick on the 'Fork so much is because there isn't really anything better out there - but it's necessarily kind of a love-hate relationship. ("out there" = "on the Net")

o. nate (onate), Friday, 22 November 2002 22:51 (twenty-two years ago)

"only Missy doesn't have the burden of having to spend years laying broke in the gutter, studying the nuances of the culture"

sigh ... all those years spent in the company helicopter, tooling back and forth between Portsmouth VA, the Dwight School and daddy's Swiss Chalet ... thank god she's finally made something of herself.

vahid (vahid), Friday, 22 November 2002 22:53 (twenty-two years ago)

The most sloppily executed, most poorly researched, most insipidly "trendy" review website I have ever seen. They regularly get all kinds of facts blatantly wrong, steal their "news" from blogs and other less reputable sources, and regularly publish the most mean-spirited "aren't we cool because we hate this" reviews on the web.

I think Dusted Magazine is miles ahead of them.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 November 2002 22:53 (twenty-two years ago)

why do you read it, Mo?

dan (dan), Friday, 22 November 2002 22:59 (twenty-two years ago)

shakey mo is OTM with regard to Dusted (plus that Sam is just soooo dreamy)

just for kicks, look at this news item from today:

Swami Reissues Drive Like Jehu's Yank Crime

Catherine Lewis reports:
Put down your Starbucks, folks: Drive Like Jehu's signature 1994 LP, Yank Crime, was re-released this week on frontman Rick Froberg's label, Swami.

wrong guy, it's john reis' label.

This new-and-improved version includes all the tracks from the original release, plus three bonus tracks: "Bullet Train to Vegas" and "Hand Over Fist" (from the out-of-print 1992 Merge seven-inch), and the original version of "Sinews" from the Head Start to Purgatory compilation. The original version! Score one for the completists!

The San Diego-based group got together in 1990, as an outlet for Rocket from the Crypt members John "Speedo" Reis and Rick Froberg (aka Eric Froberg, aka Rick Farr, aka Rick Fork).

Rick was never in RFTC.

Prior to Jehu, the duo fronted Pitchfork, a band that came to define San Diego's booming post-punk sound (but not this website). Pitchfork (the band) released one seven-inch, "Saturn Outhouse", and the 1990 Nemesis full-length Eucalyptus (the seven-inch was appended to the CD version of Eucalyptus). To complete their new band's sound, Reis and Froberg added bassist Mike Kennedy and drummer Mark Trombino, both from the band Night Soil Man. Drive Like Jehu released their eponymous debut album in 1992 on Headhunter, and followed Rocket from the Crypt onto Interscope, who released Yank Crime in May of 1994. The band broke up shortly thereafter.

Well, after two national tours...

Following their demise, Mike Kennedy went on to play in a band called Corrugated with Lane Miller (And/Ors, Swivelneck) and drummer Tim Johnson (who is rumored to be the guy painting his armpits on the cover of RFTC's Paint as a Fragrance). Corrugated released the Future of Crime LP in early 2001 on Flapping Jet. Original members Reis and Froberg teamed with Delta 72's Jason Kourkounis and RFTC's Gar Wood to form Hot Snakes.

Gar Wood was not an original member of Hot Snakes, there's no bass on the first record.

After the release of their debut Automatic Midnight on Sympathy for the Record industry, Reis started the label Swami,

wait, just 2 paragraphs above you said it was Rick's label! The record was not released on SFTRI, it was released on Swami, using SFTRI's distro.

Swami's debut release was THREE YEARS AGO, the 2nd RFTC singles comp.

which-- in addition to the Yank Crime reissue-- released Hot Snakes' 2002 album Suicide Invoice, and is currently finishing up the re-release of Pitchfork's Eucalyptus for February 2003. As for Mark Trombino, he's trying to make ends meet with his little producing gigs for Jimmy Eat World, Blink 182, and Less than Jake.

Track list for Yank Crime re-release:

01 Here Come the Rome Plows
02 Do You Compute
03 Golden Brown
04 Luau
05 Super Unison
06 New Intro
07 New Math
08 Human Interest
09 Sinews
10 Bullet Train to Vegas (Rare 7" track)
11 Hand Over Fist (Rare 7" track)
12 Sinews (Original Version)

as mentioned here:

they switched up the bonus tracks on the sleeve (at least on my copy):
song 10 is "hand over fist"
song 11 is "bullet train to vega$"

gygax!, Friday, 22 November 2002 23:02 (twenty-two years ago)

At this point the only reason I read the 'Fork is to gleefully point out their numerous mistakes. (Like saying Nels Cline is from New York, f'r instance...) It's like watching a train wreck. But honestly, I don't really read it that regularly.

I suppose by way of disclosure I should confess that they recently panned my band's record, but I swear my hatred of them was well-established long beforehand, and had they given the record anything other than a negative review, I would have been completely flabbergasted (and probably disappointed). In a way, a bad review from them is vindicating.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 November 2002 23:15 (twenty-two years ago)

whatd your band called

chaki (chaki), Friday, 22 November 2002 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)

here's the review: http://pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/s/shimmer-kids-underpop-association/natural-riot.shtml

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 November 2002 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)

A 6.9 is far from a pan.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Friday, 22 November 2002 23:34 (twenty-two years ago)

i think the "let's pick at pfork's touch&go catalog no./the spelling of indie guitarist X's last name/how could you forget that obscure lathe cut in an edition of 20 mistakes" is kind of pathetic (but i guess it goes with that obsessive indie boy territory.

but sterling how is anything you've mentioned in your first post "senseless"??! the review just gave me a headache and made me momentarily sad for the children.

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)

(oh and be expecting hatemail from sam "lowjack" chennault shortly for this thread.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)

that's it jess--"a fanboy is a fanboy is a fanboy" (quote stolen from our own mark sinker).

dan (dan), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)

"let's pick at pfork's touch&go catalog no./the spelling of indie guitarist X's last name/how could you forget that obscure lathe cut in an edition of 20 mistakes"

I would suggest that saying Chris Lombardi is Sub Pop's "engineer" (as opposed to co-owner and co-founder) is a rather serious oversight. As is saying a band is from New York when they're really from LA. As is getting tracklistings wrong, or entire band lineups wrong. You think this is nitpicking? Leaving aside the mountains of questionable prose ("wizard's caps" and "gris-gris pinball" guitar playing, etc.) can you really call it "journalism" if there's no regard for actual facts...?

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Good lord I am so stupid - I don't mean Chris Lombardi, I meant Bruce Pavitt. Fuck ME - I could write for Pitchfork!

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

sterling:

a) i thought the comparison to kool keith was very very polite to missy (and i was comparing the eccentric, sci-fi personas more than i was mic skills). you'd have a hard time convincing me that missy is anywhere in the same class as kool keith. and her pedigree...if you don't acknowledge that kool keith's resume is ten times longer than missy's, you really don't know much about the genre.

b) the "here's a little story" sample... I'm not trying to push stuff off on ryan (because he does a wonderful job editing my reviews), but originally it was qualified with "among others." It also originally stated that the sample is taken from the song "DJ Premier in Deep Concentration" and not the album Deep Concentration (as the italics would indicate). And yeah, Slick Rick…but the Premier song is a personal favorite. The comment was just an observation…and I never tried to guess just to who Tim was giving props to (contrary to what your post suggested).

Jess:

I shot you an e-mail after the post on the 80’s list because you made a personal attack on me. As much as I disagree with Sterling and the rest, he has remained respectful (which I guess is something you don’t take for granted around here) and hasn’t tried to cut me down with quick insults. and sorry for the bluntness of "fuck you," but there's really not enough time in my schedule to deal with people such as yourself.

to all:

There certainly is an agenda at ILM that dislikes indie rock, underground hip hop, and pitchfork. But as much as you seem to hate on us, you sure spend a lot of time talking about us. You guys have a lot of interesting things to say about music (and i do check the boards for that reason), but when it comes to hip-hop, you're generally blinded by your politics (and i realize that this is a broad generalization of ILM posters). And so are my friends (many of whom are very invested in hip hop and its culture) who've e-mailed me today asking how the fuck could i give Missy such a good review. I tried to listen to this album without prejudice, and this was my honest opinion. Sorry if you weren’t feeling it.

Samuel Chennault, Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)

practically speaking, any mag which uses a large number of contributors has to employ an in-house fact-checker whose only job is double-checking ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING, to have a prayer of getting a rep for getting things right: cz basically while some contributors will be obsessive and pernickety abt facts, there's no guarantee they're actually going to be the readable or insightful reviewers, and vice versa... of all the many many writers i've subbed and fact-checked in 20-odd years of production work, the only one who i think had a 100% record on absence of error was max harrison (who marcello brought up only today). everyone makes weird slips — and the simple psychological fact is that you the writer will often read and reread the stupid wrong name as the correct name, however carefully you peer at it, until the horrible day it comes back in print and THERE IT IS AAARGH!!

(actually my theory of why, as a sub, i can open the mag on the day it comes back into the office and *immediately* have my eye fall on the only mistake in 120 pages, is because i've already subconsciously clocked it, except production time pressure forced me into denial and wouldn't let my conscious mind see it...)

i haven't the slightest idea abt pf's structure or finances, though it's obviously far easier to correct errors on a website (haha at sight and sound we had an errors and clarifications box on the letters page, addressing errors in previous issues... which wz usually fantastically dull stuff — gaffer on police academy xxiii is derrick bender not derek bender — but always felt like we were parading round in a dunce's cap)

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:40 (twenty-two years ago)

How could there be an "agenda" here; we're just a bunch of random posters!

Sean (Sean), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:42 (twenty-two years ago)

and I like indie rock AND underground hip-hop!

And I don't think Pitchfork has an in-house fact-checker at all, frankly.

Shakey Mo Collie, Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.theoriginalsoundtrack.com/ile/newfite.jpg

this is the agenda (geeta), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:46 (twenty-two years ago)

shakey you misspelt yr own name there!!

yes, sorry, that's what i wz getting at: it has to be as specific and deliberate an investment as whether or not you buy your own watercooler, and that's how you know whether this matters (although affordability is obviously also an issue) (credibility in this area being what economists wd call an "external" i guess)

anyway buffy just started so g'night all

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:51 (twenty-two years ago)

(haha geeta u r a goddess)

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I figure if I make enough mistakes, maybe someone from Pitchfork will offer me a job.

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 23 November 2002 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)

"because there isn't really anything better out there" - bullshit; Pitchfork is CMJ with poorer editing and dumber writers. I doubt there's a blog NYLPM links to that isn't more consistent or insightful than Pitchfork on a good day. The worst of Spin magazine and alt-weaklys combined.

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 23 November 2002 01:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Pitchfork is a review site which reviews 4 new records a day. If that's what you're after there isn't anything else, let alone anything better. 4 new pieces per day = loads more to talk about than any other site, which is why talking happens. I personally am torn between immense admiration for Pitchfork (cos of its workrate) and colossal frustration with it (because it's such a tragic missed opportunity).

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 23 November 2002 02:46 (twenty-two years ago)

at least sam didn't try the "u r all jealous I am roXoR" argument!

(in other news, marcello is joining the so solid crew.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 23 November 2002 02:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Geeta that post is my worshippable guru, please accept my humble obeisances at your lotus feet

(for the record I think Pitchfork is a fun read and it always seems like there's something unspoken informing the P-fork hatin' that goes on hereabouts -- class issues would be my guess but what do I know)

J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Jeez, guys, alright, there's not a correlation between a not-so-well-written review & the reviewer's intelligence. It's giving space to some people who are still practicing the craft of writing-about-music & I don't think that is a bad thing. Tho yes, being in the view of a partic indiecentric audience & having that affect the critical stance can be a problem ! But why get so bent out of shape over a website, really.

daria g, Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

there's not a correlation between a not-so-well-written review & the reviewer's intelligence

sez who?!?!

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)

(i mean, i'm not saying that one bad review = whotta numbskull, but certainly there has to be SOME correlation, no??)

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

you can be very intelligent and still not write very well

man, Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

The reason I said "senselessly" jess is because there's nothing gained or new on poking fun at pitchfork. I just saw the missy review and couldn't resist.

Sam: I personally think Missy has a huge resume considering her impact on hip-hop, the importance of EVERYTHING she's done, and the impact of her collaborations.

Plus if you listen to missy's lyrics, she's never actually rapped about the future hardly at all.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:38 (twenty-two years ago)

the importance of EVERYTHING she's done

Now Sterling is it or is it not fair to say that if Pitchfork resorted to this kind of hyperbole you'd happily skewer them publicly?

J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:43 (twenty-two years ago)

John, class issues???

Pitchfork are fine when they stick to what they do best, but ile this next to last year's Basement Jaxx review as being a collosal missing-of-the-point. It's one thing for pop-rap-hataz to ignore Missy and vibe on Timbaland's production, but praising a Missy album for being reminiscent of DJ Premier is about as useless as praising the Jaxx's "Broken Dreams" for sounding a bit like Stereolab (and in any case both comparisons are such enormously forced leaps that the comparisons become largely meaningless as well as useless).

Should Pitchfork just ignore this sort of music completely? I don't know, but I think they should choose suitable writers carefully; a lot of these articles suggest that the writer was (unknowingly) as uncomfortable reviewing the album as i would be reviewing free jazz. The fact that pop has more public exposure doesn't mean that it's any easier to approach when you have a writer who is miopically focused elsewhere.

It is nice to see a writer branch out like this and try to challenge themselves slightly, but that doesn't mean that readers are going to feel an obligation to smile encouragingly as the writer struggles their way through their private "My First Pop (or Free Jazz or Salsa or Indie Rap) Album" obstacle course. Especially when the reasoning they use verges toward the self-congratulatory so frequently.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Sterling used "everything" to remind us that Missy has done a lot more than just four albums with her name on it (countless songs written for other artists), not to claim that every single thing she has done has been groundbreaking and crucial.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)

really i meant that each of her prior albums has signaled an (ahem) "sea change" in the hip-hop landscape.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean if anyone said that nearly EVERYTHING nirvana did was important to rock in the 90s I wouldn't disagree. Or even if they said that about albini i certainly wouldn't mock them.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, of course he (Sterling) did (what Tim said); just as Pitchfork (maybe) compares Basement Jaxx to Stereolab to draw a potentially interesting parallel, not to illuminate some previously occult fact which will change everybody's opinion for good. This is why I imagine some town vs. gown issues going on in the anti-Pitchfork feeling: the white guys at Pitchfork unabashedly enjoys a lot of stuff deemed "inauthentic" by a bunch of different white guys who look down on the "inauthentic" stuff.

But I should say again that I am talking out of my ass as usual -- what I'm reporting is just the feeling I get, not a well-formed opinion. It's just that there seems to be something rather personal going on in the anti-Pitchfork ribbing: the ribbing isn't corrective/helpful, just mean, really uncharacteristic of most ilX0r lighthearted verbal abuse.

J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Saturday, 23 November 2002 04:01 (twenty-two years ago)

The thing about the Kool Keith comparison is that the “albeit” bit contains this offhand subjective judgment which I don’t feel is very relevant to the review. I don’t think it’s necessarily blind politics that’s driving “ILM” or a knee-jerk reaction against the idea that *gasp* somebody might claim and underground rapper has more skills than Missy Elliot. I mean, if one thinks Kool Keith has more mic-skills and so forth, that’s fine, but to assert this in a tossed off manner as if it were a consensus opinion seems gratuitous and misleading. I think it’s a bit irksome especially since it only prolongs the clingy indie-minded fan’s criteria of emcee skills and hip hop in general (not an invalid mindset in itself but often times just as sheepish and blindly accepting of [very] conventional wisdoms as anybody). It’s an internalization of specific value notions and when this leaks into an album review, you end up with unhelpful comments/comparisons which pat a certain listener on the back and alienate, or even outrage everybody else.

On a more general level, I’m disappointed “Gossip Folks” and the 2nd half of the album was not mentioned.

Honda (Honda), Saturday, 23 November 2002 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)

USE OTHER THOUGHTS PLEASE.

Chris Ott, Saturday, 23 November 2002 04:14 (twenty-two years ago)

chris, seriously, if yr so smart then why ARE you wasting yr time writing for pfork?

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 23 November 2002 04:16 (twenty-two years ago)

thoughts like?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 23 November 2002 04:24 (twenty-two years ago)

here's a review of "get ur freak on" by dave tompkins:

And we're back live, Spring Break (boing), Virginia Beach, Timbaland thumps a pigeon on his windshield with his bhangra bass wiper kick. There's a galloping Eohippus tabla underneath and Missy spits (literally at one point) along with the jittery keyboard. Don't dance, convulse. "You like the way I s-s-sup my style", she taunts and there's a dupa fly in your soup. Missy howls "Nigggaaa" the way Kool Keith squeaks "Galaxy raaayys" mid-line Ultramagnetic's "Raise It Up." Tim goes itch me sun sheesh at the end, which, incidentally, is also the name of the choreographer's favorite power shake, the energy required to keep up with this jolt."

first person to tell me why i like THIS k.k. reference and not the one in the pfork review gets a cookie.

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 23 November 2002 04:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Because this one wasn't in Pitchfork, and we don't like Pitchfork?

J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Saturday, 23 November 2002 04:30 (twenty-two years ago)

john disingenuousness doesn't suit you.

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 23 November 2002 04:31 (twenty-two years ago)

then it wouldn't be screw, it'd be ghettotech or something

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, Jess do Dead Prez know that you are part of their revolution? Or are you gonna surprise them and try to join up when they sack Nate's house?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)

"house"?

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)

i think he meant more metaphorically

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:04 (twenty-one years ago)

ala run's house

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:04 (twenty-one years ago)

or the house of the rising sun

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)

IF ROCKING THE HOUSE IS A CRIME, THEN LET ME BE GUILTY

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)

rock the 3rd floor apartment y'all

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Guilty. Next case, baillif.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"apartment" would be a great house subgenre/offshoot

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:06 (twenty-one years ago)

apartment is what they should have called microhouse

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

it'd be like house only you'd have to keep the beats turned down

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

junior one bedroom is what they should have called microhouse.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

and you'd have to hold down "9" on your phone before bringing in the guest vocals

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)

haha no "flat"

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)

you're thinking of "chillout"

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

APT is where all the microhouse guys play in New York.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Schuffle-tech should have been called in-law unit.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

when microhouse producers go commercial the purists call it "condo"

(this is kinda dumb)

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahaha NO THEY DON'T NATE THE PURISTS LOVE IT EVEN MORE!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)

sexxx0r commercial microhouse = "latex condo"

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)

who sez there's no condo luv from the apartmentalists?

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)

onward and dumbward

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Are their microhouse purists who are really like, "dude, this Kompakt shit would be great if only they didn't put that whispy pop vocal shtikt all over the place"?!?! Haha man I need to avoid those people.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)

shut up, clobber! I hate you and your saurus kind! >:(

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:14 (twenty-one years ago)

NATE GET MAD! NATE SMASH!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:15 (twenty-one years ago)

this thread is glorious

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:16 (twenty-one years ago)

And really it demonstrates so clearly why Pitchfork fails, too.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)

oh they do just fine themselves.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)

True, they don't need our help. But it's generous to try, ya know?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i've got so much love to give.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:20 (twenty-one years ago)

save some for yourself there, sparky

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:21 (twenty-one years ago)

A love-gusher, I like to think of you as, Jess.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i like to think of me as jess too.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I like to think of you as Strongo, actually. Strongo the Love-Gusher. Also Strongo the Goat-Herder. Perhaps Strongo, Weaver of Small Fuzzy Blankets, as well.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)

strongo, knitter of uteri

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Many of the roles in my imagination are unfilled. I'm still trying to arrange call-backs.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:25 (twenty-one years ago)

What do you knit them into?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Jess can you send me little uterus mittens? Can you make mittens?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:31 (twenty-one years ago)

did you lose them again? dont make me pin them to your jacket.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:34 (twenty-one years ago)

*shuffles feet a bit* sooooorrry.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I have decided that once I get into Harvard my dissertation will be on "Kickin' KKKonfusion: Construction of Race And Difference in Pitchfork and MIM Notes"

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 4 December 2003 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Boston gets cold in the winter. Get Jess to knit you a uterine scarf, okay.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 4 December 2003 06:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Social Studies!

Matt Boch (Matt Boch), Thursday, 4 December 2003 07:17 (twenty-one years ago)

haha Sterling in excusing misogyny because it's, like, art, dude shockah!

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 08:18 (twenty-one years ago)

(OK you don't excuse it. reading hastily again. ignore that plz. thanks)

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

okay not to flog
this dead horse over again
(I don't mind the 'fork),

but Brent D's review
of the new Missy today
has the following:

"'You ain't got ta sell ya' lil' phone / It's all right'"

Clearly this quote is
"Cellular phone", Mr. D!
(I've done this before,

especially when
I'm reviewing reggae stuff
and of course hip-hop)

Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 4 December 2003 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
one of the pitchforkiest sentences ever:

Yeah, while I wish We Are Monster was an Album w/Overarching Concerns and Worldview, not just a Bunch Of Sweet Similar-Sounding Stand-Alone Tracks, I'm also convinced that in fact, a worldview is there, and probably an exciting one at that. I just haven't cracked one yet-- or just won't be able to.

jermaine (jnoble), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)

And but so while I wish that We Are Monster was an Album w/Overarching Concerns and Worldview (hereby the "Aw/OCaW"), not just a Bunch of Sweet Similar-Sounding Stand-Alone Tracks ("BoSS-SS-AT"), I'm also convinced that in fact, a worldview(1) is there, and probably an exciting one at that.

(1) "Worldview" carrying connotations beyond just "perspective" or "outlook" but encompassing the literalness of "world" = international, as Mueller has said that he (i.e., Mueller himself) doesn't consider himself German w/r/t ethnic identity, but that said identity is meaningless within a postmodern digital age.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

I FORGOT TO SIGN THAT

David Foster Wallace (jaymc), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.