― chris (chris), Sunday, 24 November 2002 18:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― todd burns, Sunday, 24 November 2002 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― keith (keithmcl), Sunday, 24 November 2002 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Paul (scifisoul), Sunday, 24 November 2002 19:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Sunday, 24 November 2002 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― Richard Copping (avoid80), Sunday, 24 November 2002 19:59 (twenty-three years ago)
however i've noticed recently that some publications will include a single's chart entries as an import along with its official entries - on BBC's Teletext service both DJ Sammi's 'Heaven' and Westlife's Unbreakable' (and possibly 'Dirrty' as well) were not listed as new entries at number one but instead their place in the Top 200 as imports/promo CDs were counted so you had 127 or thereabouts in the brackets for last week's position rather than a hyphen to denote a new entry. not sure whether this means these singles are to be classed as new entries or not but they probably should be.
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 24 November 2002 20:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― Callum (Callum), Sunday, 24 November 2002 20:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 24 November 2002 22:19 (twenty-three years ago)
the Cliff one is interesting because it appeared to be met with mass derision from the media and anyone aged 13-33 that did not consider themselves a devout Christian AND Cliff fan, yet here it was at the top of the charts, propelled by nothing more than the diehard fans buying several copies each as many did with the Diana/Candle In The Wind single (tho that obviously had a much broader appeal).
and i think with Bob The Builder the problem may have just been down to lack of airplay on radio and channels like MTV, The Box etc., the song relying on TV exposure almost entirely on the BBC for its success which meant it took that little bit longer to really hit home as it were.
we may well get another slowburn number one - i'd like to see it, preferably not attached to a film, tv show, merchandise, original version etc. - this is currently more of a 'once every 5 years thing' rather than the 'once every 5th number one thing' it was ten years ago
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 24 November 2002 23:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 25 November 2002 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)
remember in the 70's/80's when new entry number 1sonly happened once every 5 years ? you could name them all,and it was a big deal. then in the 90's you had17 week-ers frequently. like...what happened ?how did it go from total stagnation to in-out-in-out stylein such a short time ?
― piscesboy, Monday, 25 November 2002 11:38 (twenty-three years ago)
They changed the release schedules for singles. It used to be that they'd release a record and radio would start playing it so sales would come in dribs and drabs. Now they send out radio promos around six weeks, I think, before they release to the public. Therefore if a record is popular everyone buys it in the first week of release.
― David (David), Monday, 25 November 2002 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― B.Rad (Brad), Monday, 25 November 2002 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Monday, 25 November 2002 11:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― piscesboy, Monday, 25 November 2002 12:36 (twenty-three years ago)
No I don't think so. With a few exceptions, anything you heard on Radio 1 you'd be able to go out and buy in a shop immediately.
― David (David), Monday, 25 November 2002 13:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― JoB (JoB), Monday, 25 November 2002 13:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 25 November 2002 13:58 (twenty-three years ago)
...in advance
― JoB (JoB), Monday, 25 November 2002 14:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 25 November 2002 17:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 November 2002 00:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Paul (scifisoul), Saturday, 30 November 2002 04:16 (twenty-three years ago)