Stock! Aitken! And Waterman! Gods? Good God!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Stock Aitken & Waterman were gods! Don't argue! They were good gods! Good grief they were good! Filed there on my shelves! "The Hit Factory Volumes 1-3"! "The Megamix"! "The Music Factory"! Right next to Stockhausen! Right next to "Hymnen"! And "Momente"! They kicked! And they swung! Not like Tommy Dorsey! But not like Ruth Ellis either! They were brutalist nostalgic futurists who knew their Coventry Locarno from their Acklam Hall! In 1986-9 they WERE Britpop! With the Pet Shop Boys! And New Order! And the Smiths! And not the Mary Chain! All credit to mixmaster Phil Harding! Who did the same job for Mel & Kim! As he did for Nitzer Ebb! Listen to "FLM"! Followed by "That Total Age"! I'm not underplaying! And real plastic soul! Deeply soulful in its arrogant soullessness! Not like Robbie Vincent's open freezer door! Eugene Wilde! And his fucking bottle of Dom Perignon to get us in the mood! Anita Baker! Who should have been on 4AD! With This Mortal Coil! Could have worked miracles with that miasma of a voice! It's a mystery! No rapture! Digressing! Waterman was a visible visionary! Great for compilation tapes while observing burning lorries on the M25! Along with Janet Jackson! Nasty girl! Test Dept! Comrade Envar Hoxba! Diamanda Galas! Sigue Sigue Glorious Sputnik! Last Exit! Help Me Mo I'm Blind! Tackhead! Without the muso trimmings! But enough 1986! Forward to 1990! Best SAW prod ever! Lonnie Gordon! "Happening All Over Again"! Right at the dying end of their reign! Her screams tear through the admirable cliche! She articulates what Waterman wishes she wants! Neither Gordon nor SAW as a unit heard of again! Either of them! Decline! Take steps re. Steps! But SAW! They gave good gods! For instance! Kylie! Massive with PWL! Fucking useless without! Cf. Midge Ure! Unspeakably cool with Slik! Speakably naff with Ultravox! Grief gushes! I'm just spinning around! Out of harm's way!

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You should be so fucking lucky.

Venga, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Marcello Carlin, you are a god. A good god. Good grief you are good.

"Happenin' All Over Again" is indeed a marvel. Along with Technotronic's equally thunderous "Get Up (Before The Night Is Over)", one of the records that turned me onto pop.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Take or leave 'em babe, but please believe 'em...

tarden, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

S A & W or PWL or whatever you want to call it ruined pop. I don't want to get into an argument over it, I don't want to be the target for anyone's (yes, I'm looking at you, Tom) sermons on the beauty of Abba ;-), I just want to express a contrary opinion and I don't like it. No, sirree.

masonic boom, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

SAW - hated them at the time their mack waz on, but i is quite nostalgic about their SOUND - reverb on dollar stuff etc. they turned me off the charts towards indie when i was bored with metal - so if it wasn't for SAW i wouldn't have wasted so much time on indie music beloved of you ILM americano nonces - so i hate them twice over ?

did they really save the uk singles market ?

Deliah Sands, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I guess they deserve props for "I Heard A Rumour" and "You Spin Me Round", but the other stuff I've heard sounds like run-of-the-mill lowest-common-denominator crapola (they were hugely proud of that, if I remember correctly). And what I didn't hear but only read about looks like it would be even worse.

Patrick, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I once had a porno mag with Mel Appleby in it! Not softcore either, the full graphic details!

tarden, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I prefer ChinniChap to SAW, but SAW are still OK.

Anita Baker on This Mortal Coil - YES! this type of thing should happen more but doesn't due to the Marketing's power to keep things where they *should* be, and give people what they *want and expect*. But you know this.

Dr. C, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The only thing I can really hold against them is Jason Fucking Donovan. I really don't think there's anyone more useless that has ever been in the charts.

Great suggestion re: Anita Baker...

Nicole, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That is the most awesome question I've ever read in my life.

Oh, and unsurprisingly they are classic. Plus they are cash cows. And probably evil whores. That makes them awesome as hell.

Ally, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Jason Donovan had very little personality, but "When You Come Back To Me" can still make me cry. "Nothing Can Divide Us" is good, too. Whatever persuaded him to give it all up for bloody Lloyd Webber?

The fact that they were so proud (Kate would no doubt say "shameless" or some deeper insult) of being a production line is precisely what I like about them.

Robin Carmody, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You spin me right round, baby, right round like a record, baby, right round round round. That's all that needs to be said.

Sean Carruthers, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If have nothing against the "production line" if the *product* is good. Phil Spector and the Wrecking Crew acted like one massive production line.

I just don't *like* the sound, the songs, or the artists that Waterman produced. That's all.

masonic boom, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

While loving a lot of the records, the only thing I don't like about SAW is the *attitude*. I remember once reading a piece by Craig Brown about Dartington Hall School (for those uninitiated, a well- known progressive liberal leftish boarding school - yes, such things have existed - in the UK), just before it closed in 1987, and he mentioned how the pupils were far, far more conservative than the teachers. I instantly imagined them listening to "F.L.M." and "Showin' Out" while the teachers were listening to, I dunno, the Incredible String Band or someone.

And my *attitude* (though not necessarily my taste) is far more the 60s liberal thing, which is why "F.L.M." makes me feel the same way that Eve's "Gangsta Bitches" does; thinking it is brilliant *and* hating it. Momus knows that feeling ...

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 26 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

They're overrated a little by my pro-pop buddies, though possibly I think this cause they're such awful keepers of their own flame - the Waterman's Greatest Hits 2CD set I got has *so* *much* *crap* on it (eg Undercover, "Thank Abba For The Music") that it almost overshadows the wonder. But then THIS IS THE POINT - SAW were perhaps the last (only?) pop producers to seem to believe wholeheartedly that it was all about the charts and the sales figures. If people liked it, e.g. it sold, then it must be good. To Waterman there probably is no aesthetic difference whatsoever between "You Spin Me Round" and "Baker Street" - they both got to No.1, right? This makes them the most egoless 'artists' in pop.

Their best stuff, though - Mel & Kim, prime Bananarama - there's nothing like it. Like a lot the best pop, you don't really grip what made it so different and essential until it's out of the charts.

Tom, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"This makes them the most egoless 'artists' in pop": Which is of course why SAW fell apart in a particularly nasty legal tussle. 'Egolessness' always costs (just ask Lenin).

mark s, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

SAW were perhaps the last (only?) pop producers to seem to believe wholeheartedly that it was all about the charts and the sales figures. If people liked it, e.g. it sold, then it must be good. To Waterman there probably is no aesthetic difference whatsoever between "You Spin Me Round" and "Baker Street" - they both got to No.1, right?

What?? But this is what drives *all* commercial pop producers & writers. SAW are more high profile because they had a generic sound, but there are hundreds of others who may change styles to suit whatever's popular at the time, but whose *absolute guiding principle* is commercial success.

David, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hmm, maybe I've been misunderstood. Obviously commercial success is the end-all of a lot of pop workers, but reading interviews with most pop-oriented producers you get a sense that they also judge their work - this song was hackwork, this really stands up, this was underrated by the audience, etc. I don't get that impression - perhaps wrongly - from Waterman. His best-of compilation was an opportunity a lot of pop workers would have used to stress their auteur side, whereas Waterman just put on all the hits, not appearing to care which were now well-regarded, kitschly fashionable, generally loathed, etc. etc. The result is a very very uneven, but unusually honest, collection.

Tom, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

His best-of compilation was an opportunity a lot of pop workers would have used to stress their auteur side, whereas Waterman just put on all the hits, not appearing to care which were now well- regarded, kitschly fashionable, generally loathed, etc. etc.

Well either you're right and he simply wanted to snare as many down- market buyers as he could, or he genuinely thinks *all* his hits are wonderful, according to his own artistic criteria.

David, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Probably a bit of both, but predominately the latter. And, like Tom, I admire Waterman for this (because of the complete absence of even mild hints at embarrassment about pop) although it obviously results in him hurtling a lot of his worst productions back at us.

Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one month passes...
SAW was max Martin of the 80`s. No one should doubt their genius, but you may not like it. Thats not the same thing! The likes of vince clarke, neil young, basement jaxx, mirwais (Madonna prod..), the cure, etc.. are all fucking geniuses in their own field. Those who can not hear that has a problem conserning musicality.......

roger g, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not sure about Pete Waterman being 'egoless'. Is tiring hearing all his claims about how he's personally responsible for the success of Motown, reggae, northern soul, disco etc in the UK. Luckily he's not on tv very often, but whenever he is he always comes out with one.

m jemmeson, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ten years pass...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17431482

my worst nightmare 25 years ago!

Any of you saddos going?

Steps, Jason Donovan, Sinitta and Sonia are among a host of Stock Aitken Waterman acts that will perform at a special reunion concert this summer.

The gig will bring together nearly all the artists who found fame on the PWL record label to mark its 25th anniversary.

Rick Astley, Bananarama, Pepsi and Shirlie and Brother Beyond will also feature on the line-up.

The concert will take place in London's Hyde Park on 11 July.

Fans can also expect appearances from Dead or Alive, Princess, Hazell Dean, Sybil, Lonnie Gordon and 2 Unlimited, while the concert will be headlined by Steps.

Organisers said the gig would be a "celebration of the hit single" as the performing acts have between them sold 250 million singles.

They also said a "very special duet" which was last performed 23 years ago would form part of the show.

Jason Donovan and Kylie Minogue's hit Especially For You was a hit for the pair at the end of the 1980s.

More acts set to join the bill will be announced shortly, while some proceeds from ticket sales will be donated to Cancer Research UK.

Mike Stock, Matt Aitken and Pete Waterman are considered one of the most successful songwriting and producing partnerships of all time, scoring more than 100 UK top 40 hits during the 1980s and 1990s.

Waterman said: "I've been saying no for years to a Hit Factory concert but now, 25 years on, the timing feels right."

fuck deathcore and metalcore (Algerian Goalkeeper), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:07 (thirteen years ago)

no sputnik, no credibility

mark e, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:12 (thirteen years ago)

No Mandy Smith or Reynolds Girls either. Nor Kim Appleby, for that matter.

(nb: I purposely never look at the top of old threads I started because I'll just cringe and head-desk at whatever I wrote back in the day!)

Here he is with the classic "Poème Électronique." Good track (Marcello Carlin), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 18:16 (thirteen years ago)

Wot no Kakko

Morrissey & Clunes: The Severed Alliance (PaulTMA), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 18:42 (thirteen years ago)

but in this case you did, didn't you marcello?

fuck deathcore and metalcore (Algerian Goalkeeper), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 18:46 (thirteen years ago)

mr carlin.
wonderful to have you back ..
hope you're back on road to your usual self.
and this thread starter was pure class - and you know it.

mark e, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 19:24 (thirteen years ago)

Honest to God, I didn't look it up - it was eleven years ago! - but given the subsequent prompting I've now done so. Oh dear. Totally wrong about post-SAW Kylie and partially wrong about Ultravox (although I meant "speakably naff" as a compliment!). It's true that "Can't Get You Out Of My Head" hadn't come out yet when I wrote my original post, but even so I ought to have known better.

Thanks, Mark, btw; well and truly back to normal(ity).

Here he is with the classic "Poème Électronique." Good track (Marcello Carlin), Monday, 26 March 2012 10:44 (thirteen years ago)

I think so many people were wrong about the SAW. At the time, you either were into it as being 'a new Tamla Motown', or you carried on with yr bright new indie.

Now both are considered landfill, SAW because they never had their "What's Going On" revelation and were quite happy to die on the vine, as long as they got to keep their money.

Mark G, Monday, 26 March 2012 10:52 (thirteen years ago)

They also said a "very special duet" which was last performed 23 years ago would form part of the show.

IT'S THE 1418 reunion!

(only Marcello knows,./...._)

Mark G, Monday, 26 March 2012 10:54 (thirteen years ago)

He came dancing across pete waterman, with his galleons and guns, what a killeeeeerrrrrr

Valéry Giscard d'Staind (NickB), Monday, 26 March 2012 11:12 (thirteen years ago)

I don't think I was at all wrong about SAW. They would probably have balked at the thought of doing their own What's Going On?.

"Either/or" is not part of my critical vocabulary.

Here he is with the classic "Poème Électronique." Good track (Marcello Carlin), Monday, 26 March 2012 12:55 (thirteen years ago)

ah, the 'you' in that sentence was more a general "a person was expected to be" as opposed to you, personally.

I do think the grand statement was made that people would lookback on it as a golden age of pop, whereas people more or less see it as 'lol 80's fashion'.

There's a bunch of it that's OK, a bunch that was pretty bad, and most of the music subscribed to Malcolm McLaren's 'blueprint' of max the treble and shrink the bass so it sounds good on the radio.

Mark G, Monday, 26 March 2012 13:26 (thirteen years ago)

To my ears, nothing sounds as dated as keyboard based pop music from the last 3 years of the 80s. Stock/Aitken/Waterman's productions sound considerably less dated than most of the rest though, so I guess they had something.

Hongroe (Geir Hongro), Monday, 26 March 2012 13:52 (thirteen years ago)

I really rather prefer Stock, Hausen & Walkman, thank you very much.

t**t, Monday, 26 March 2012 14:41 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.