Tool

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I have a friend who says Tool is the greatest band ever. Now he takes alot of drugs so i assume this explains Tool . But since this fellow has decent tastes in other kinds of music I am wondering if i am missing something , am i ?

anthony easton, Sunday, 27 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To make a long answer short, yes. With the large sea of mediocrity that has flooded music let alone rock n' roll these days, Tool is like a lifeboat. However, if you go back to six years ago and the height of the alternative grunge movement (i.e. Soundgarden, Nirvana, pre-Yield Pearl Jam), Tool would be just another crow on the telephone wire. I find it refreshing in how they can take the dark overtones of music and make a compisition out of it instead of stupid thrash lines like many bands do today.

Luptune Pitman, Sunday, 27 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Personally, I think Tool is a great band. They pull off the great trick of being able to write long, complicated songs with lots of time changes and polyrhythms that are still accessible to mainstream listeners.

It's also good for me (being a drummer) that they are essentially a drummer's band...not very complex harmonically, but consistently interesting rhythmically.

Jordan, Sunday, 27 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Check out the Aenima LP as opposed to the new one. Although it's alright, i found the latest album a bit overlong without the lighter fillers that lifted the mood without making it too cheesy.

Dog Latin, Sunday, 27 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Tool is treading a very dangerous path that seems to be following in the style of OK Computer-era Radiohead and prog. Which is to say the long opuses are becoming terribly, TERRIBLY boring. The new video is poorly cut, and is nowhere near as creepy as Undertow or Stinkfist. Give me NIN.

JM, Sunday, 27 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The packaging of the new one is beautiful, tho.

JM, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That is to say that NIN don't record long boring opuses (What do you call The Fragile, then?)? Please. Both NIN and Tool are pretty worthless, musically. And for the record, OK Computer is 53 minutes long.

Melissa W, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Uh, mel, don't you mean 53 minutes too long? Heh.

Sterling Clover, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

*bites tongue* You will not make me defend Radiohead. Not here, not now. I can get vicious.

Melissa W, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Would you say that you want to hit us with a stick?

JM, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I liked opiate, the two live songs were pretty powerful. And that's it really.

james e l, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I freely fall into the 'pretty damn genius' camp when it comes to taking sides on Tool, the new album is currently my favorite of the whole year and might well stay there for some time. Frankly, I find liking them, Radiohead and NIN collectively to be a Holy and Right Thing To Do. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

More proof that Ned and I are not the same person. Personally, I find nothing at all appealing about Tool. Maynard's voice drives me up the way, I find most of the music that I've heard so far to be warmed over 70s metal with a Sabbath bent or something, and I find this whole "Gee, am I ever evil! Just look how scary these lyrics are! Wow!" thing...well, boring and silly. Same goes for Nine Inch Nails: the guy is a cartoon, for pete's sake. Oh well. Oddly enough, I liked OK Computer, even though I don't really like much other Radiohead too much. I can't totally dismiss the fact that I might be weird. At any rate, I gotta give props to Tool for convincing many of their fans to wear self-descriptive t-shirts. (Not all Tool fans are bad people, but lordy, most of the people I saw buying Tool CDs in my years of record retail looked like they were straight out of Beavis and Butthead. Huh huh.

Sean Carruthers, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You're missing out on what may be the best guitar-driven band that's gained mainstream acceptance in recent years. I find them to be absolutely brilliant, and the new one is no exception.

(You could actually take this as proof that Ned and I are the same person, as I also heart NIN and Radiohead. Just don't mention Moby.)

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

MOBY? *unleashes fire upon universe and bathes in orgy of upheaval of self-destruction*

Excuse me, thought I was Sauron there for a second. Can you tell I've played the new LOTR trailer about ten different times now, if not more?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I quite like Aenima. Yeah, its just hard rock, but its done well, and Maynard can actually sing. NIN's Fragile is very hit or miss. The Downward Spiral, on the other hand, is an excellent album. And I also like radiohead. And Travis. And Jon Spencer Blues Explosion. Certain bands that seem to get quite diced on here and in other elite music circles but what can you do?

bnw, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't think I've ever heard anything by Tool, but what I've *read* about them gives off a strong prog-rock stench.

bnw : Dude, that's fearless. All that's missing is David Gray and Gorillaz (neither of which I have anything against, BTW).

Patrick, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I like how ILM's haughty neurotic pop elitism has now spawned a sub- breed of doubly neurotic elitist anti-elitism whereby people boast about all the bands/scenes they like which get slagged by "us".

Tom, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's that kind of thing that led me to wonder if there is some sort of anti-ILM element out there.

DG, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

elitism breeding anti-elitism that actually manifests itself as elitism, yeah it's always surprising when that happens. :{)

duane zarakov, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

All I can say is that whenever I go to the store now, I think to myself "Well, would *I* like it?", and then if the answer is yes, I put it back on the shelf because I don't want to be trendy. CURSE YOU, ILM.

Sean Carruthers, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

For saving you money? Ungrateful bastard...

Kris, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

four months pass...
Yes, DG, Tom is correct -- there is definitely an backlash against Freakytrigger out there, of which ILM is a part of, sorta kinda maybe. It must be a major source of pride to Tom to have people actually expending effort to put down his creation.

I think Freakytrigger and ILM are boss, but I do agree with some of the complaints levelled at them. First off, I'm sorry, but the contributors to Freakytrigger need to get editors or do it themselves. They're halfway towards becoming that clown of an online reviewer who spends the first three pages of every review elaborating on his new car, european vacation, favorite brand of hot dog, or WHATEVER, which ruminations are somehow tied to the review itself, no matter how tenously. If you've read this guy you know what I'm talking about, you can't forget it. Because the ramblings are certainly interesting to read, but they don't really make for a great review -- this guy is a born blogger, and he doesn't even know it.

My second complaint can be levelled at Freakytrigger and ILM both; it's fun and interesting to come up with all these musical theories and maxims and conondrums and arguments; but it's all too easy to build theory upon theory and start actually excepting it all as reality, if you know what I mean. We have to keep it grounded in reality, methinks. Sometimes the exegisis here gets a bit too thick.

SELF-INVOLVED. I think that's the optimum word that describes the annoying elements of ILM and Freakytrigger. Collectively, we give our musical hypotheses an awful lot of credence.

Hmm, this isn't even tangentially related to the topic. Well, Tool is boss, prog rock rules, rock on. *devil horns*

Jack Redelfs, Friday, 12 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Glenn Mcdonald and his "The War Against Silence," _that's_ who it is.

Jack Redelfs, Friday, 12 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one year passes...
I always wondered quite the opposite of the original question, actually. I suppose the music isn't for everyone, but you have to at least appreciate their style, and what they've contributed to music. Sometime you've got some spare time, pick up a copy of Lateralus, and listen from it from beginning to end --without stopping or skipping a song. The music fades seamlessly from one song to the next, almost like a classical composition. The music is heavy most of the time, yet you feel relaxed when listening to it. Not to mention that Maynard Keenan is one of the best songwriters out there today. The music is genious. Listen to the lyrics.
Perhaps some people just don't have the attention span to actually listen to a full Tool song. They're programmed to hearing the generic three minute pop song with the catchy hook recycled over and over again. They don't realize what they're missing.
Hey, I guess not everybody is going to like it.


"Hey, we're not Green Day, so it'll be more than three minutes long."
-Maynard Announcing the last song of their concert

Marcus, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 00:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Tool are a great band. They do weird shit.

Callum (Callum), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 00:43 (twenty-three years ago)

"people boast about all the bands/scenes they like which get slagged by "us"."

Actually I borrowed the last Tool CD from my friend, who is a fan, because Marcello wrote about it and Jess mentioned it in his last year's Top 20. It's OK, though I was a bit disappointed - some nice guitar sounds and sometimes a good feeling for suspense, but as a whole it's quite...predictable, mainly rhythmically. It is funny how people who like them (my friends at least) always emphasise that they are "the new King Crimson" (like it was a good thing), denying they are metal band (as it was a bad thing per se), even if extraodrinary one.

luke (luke), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 12:36 (twenty-three years ago)

I can see why people emphasize this, seeing that musically and lyrically, and evolutionary they are not connected to metal. But the "grunge goes prog" description fits pretty well I think. The problem is indeed that Tool sounds too much like just that: merely the sum of the parts. Some nice ideas, aiming for a discomforting atmosphere, but in the end you're wondering if it's such a good concept after all. Its commercial success is undeniable though, probably because it appeals to both ex-grunge fans as well as progheads.

Siegbran (eofor), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 13:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, probably you're right, but all the Tool fans I know are ex-grunge fans or ex-metalheads :). I've got the impression that they feel at the same time nostalgic and uncomfortable about their past and Tool fulfill their demand for 'ambitious" music.
And don't think I'm patronizing here, their choice is OK for me - I just don't like needless pretentiousness of them (fans, I mean). Tool are OK on their own standards.

luke (luke), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 13:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I would give the Opiate EP the nod over everything, with an honorary mention going to the live version of the song of the same name that’s worth hunting down, on the b-side of the Prison Sex single where the rt. Rev. Maynard baa’s at the crowd (it also contains a beautiful guitar trick by Jones where he fades back in like a monstrous looming darkness).

I was quite into Undertow though for a while, and the vids for Prison Sex and Sober were brilliant - a nightmare vision of Trapdoor (minus Willie Rushton). But by Aenima I was bored - for me, the album has 2 or 3 good tracks and the rest of it’s a pain in the ass. The loss of Paul d’Amour after Undertow was clearly a blow - the bass sound that was so vital to the Tool mystique after that point seems more like caricature or mimicry.

I never bothered with Lateralus, so I’m probably not best qualified to pass judgement but for what it’s worth, I’d say stick with the early stuff I reckon. It’s dark, powerful, driven and intense. And Tool are clearly accomplished musicians and la la la atmosphere – I like the time switches they casually drop (hello Flood). The tracks Hush and Cold and Ugly off Opiate are both excellent, as is Undertow off the same-titled album, and I quite like 4º.

Oh, and Danny Carey is one of the best drummers on the scene - the Sober fill before the start of the first verse sets that in stone; performed with the largest sticks on the market, the world’s strongest man hits the snare then goes to the toms, back to the snare then rolls round off the toms in what sounds like just under a nanosecond before seamlessly sweeping back in with those flapping rides. Or as a drummer friend of mine puts it: "Rotates the moon twice, while pulling off wrist gymnastics comparable only to a frenzied swarm of onanists intent on breaking all records set by any other living thing." It’s the stuff of legends.

Roger Fascist (Roger Fascist), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

four years pass...

Just been listening to Aenima on repeat all day, holy cow does it hold up well!

Just got offed, Thursday, 28 June 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)

Aenima was really genius and so above and unlike anything else they did, except 'Sober' was a flash of what was to come. Sadly, they have gone the way of The Doors in critical circles, as a band that you are not allowed to take seriously because that would be ridiculously uncool, but I still love Aenima.

humansuit, Thursday, 28 June 2007 20:28 (eighteen years ago)

I can't think of ANY other album that does the whole 'serious song->arresting novelty number->serious song' thing so WELL! Moreover, the 'arresting novelty numbers' actually stand up to repeat listens. The album as a whole flows beautifully; after the (incredibly strong) opening triptych, the 'main' songs alternate with intermissions, none of which come across as at all gratuitous, and the best of which ('Die Eier Von Satan', '-Ions') delight and scare the living crap out of me respectively. There aren't any weak links, and the album doesn't drop off in quality towards the end (if anything, it improves, at least with 'Aenema', the best song on the album AFAIK). It's awesome! Fuck the 'consensus'.

Just got offed, Thursday, 28 June 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

I agree. I kill your fucking consensus!

humansuit, Thursday, 28 June 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

the cookie recipe in Die Eier von Satan isnt all that. you need to heat the butter first and dissolve the hash in it. apart from that, great album.

, Thursday, 28 June 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)

The Bill Hicks luv on Aenima and Quay-like videos were what first got my attention when I was 14 or so, but unlike a lot of the crap I listened to back then I still feel pretty affectionate towards Tool. Not really tempted to buy back the albums I sold a long time ago, but hearing them on the radio is always a pleasant surprise.

Telephone thing, Thursday, 28 June 2007 22:54 (eighteen years ago)

I've tried to like Tool, but they just sound like an emo Pink Floyd to me.

I do respect their taste in opening bands, however.

shieldforyoureyes, Friday, 29 June 2007 03:25 (eighteen years ago)

Sadly, they have gone the way of The Doors in critical circles, as a band that you are not allowed to take seriously because that would be ridiculously uncool

I don't think this is true at all! I think maybe people acknowledge the absurdity that runs through their music, which is a different (and good) thing

DJ Mencap, Friday, 29 June 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)

six years pass...

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/new-tool-album-expected-early-in-2014-20130716

markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 02:45 (twelve years ago)

I'll believe it when the album's out.

StanM, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 21:04 (twelve years ago)

Gonna be one epic 78 minute song.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 21:19 (twelve years ago)

Gonna be one epic 78 minute song.

Or just seem that way.

誤訳侮辱, Thursday, 18 July 2013 00:52 (twelve years ago)

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BODY4NzMyMzAzNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODE5MzQ1MQ@@._V1._SX640_SY427_.jpg
Epic grapes.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 18 July 2013 01:30 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.