I know two opposite kinds of people with music opinions: non-record collectors with singular and passionate opinions, and record collectors with wide-ranging and eclectic factual knowledge.
As an example of the first, I'm thinking of my friend who's in a great simple band and is v.poor, so has maybe 10 records and thinks that these are the GREATEST and all other music is shit (so he just has like Blondie, Stooges, Chrome or something) and won't listen to reason about anything else (even though in about a year he'll add ONE MORE BAND to the list of bands he likes then pretend he always liked them) - now record collectors, does it annoy you when people like this, with singular and passionate opinions, pipe up with their almost-fascist music opinions?
In other words, is knowledge or devotion more important?
(MODERATOR'S NOTE: E-mail address changed cause it was sending out Message Failures)
― Maryann, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Actually thinking more about this, people who like specific bands annoy me more than people who like specific records or like music in general. Its the focus on artist not listener, I suppose.
― Tom, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
yet
Devotion to Gary Numan or Sabbath or [much shorter list] = charming
I was aware of this feeling long before I myself gave in to my Inner Numanoid. I think Nicole put her finger on why: sidling up to Winners is rubbish, but puppydog wuv for utter bullied losers is a Good Thing.
Which list is Morrissey in? Mark E. Smith?
― mark s, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Patrick, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Your friend is exactly what I want to be. Except not in a band. Or poor.
― Kris, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Otis Wheeler, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sean Carruthers, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Otis Wheeler, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ally, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Wasn't Mick Hucknall recently caught placing an ad in a lonely hearts column?
― Nick, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Ally, this is exactly the same point *I* was making. But it was also a past-tense observation (dated before I gave my all the Numan): at which point — timesense very muzzy — you couldn't move for SR topping the charts. Singleminded and exclusive devotion to the Monumentally Successful (money-wise mainly, tho "success" can be measured many ways drone mumble). The problem-child in my not-ontologically-coherent list is Zappa.
News Flash kids: when I capitalise, I'm very likely being sarcastic.
You're not a yuppie, Ally, because your attitude to capital accumulation is that of a live-now wastrel. And I'm not a yuppie because I'm VERY VERY old. Hurrah!
How's that?