What are your favourite 'direct address' songs. Like the singer might have just have transcribed the words s/he spoke to someone and set them to music?
Lots of songs are formally addresses to their loved ones, but they are usually dressed up in romantic language and shorn of the awkwardness, trivialities, tangents, dumb choices of words found in the way we really speak in such situations.
I think mine is the Only Ones' 'It's The Truth'. And most of the Wedding Present's catalogue, obviously. Especially 'What Have I Said Now?'
Perhaps it's an indie thing.
― Nick, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
THE SHANGRI-FUCKING-LAS!!!!
OK, so maybe it was the prefabricated chartpop of its day, but goddamn, as songwritered and as engineered and as produced as it was, they were brilliant because they still managed to capture something of the sass and wit and quick repartee that teenage girls from Queens in the 1960s talked... and still talk today!
Leader of the Pack, especially Give Him A Great Big Kiss... even though you *know* it was written by a songwriting team sitting somewhere in the Brill building, the delivery, the attitude, it *still* sounds like a gaggle of girls sitting around discussing a cute boy.
So what colour are his eyes? I dunno, he's always wearing shades. Is he tall? Well, I gotta look up... I hear he's *bad* He's good bad, but he's not evil! Is he a good dancer? What do you *mean* is he a good dancer? Well, he does he dance? CLOSE. Very, *VERY* *CLOSE*.
OK, that one wasn't a monologue, but it's still my favourite. Brilliant monologues of the Shangri-Las include "You Can Never Go Home Any More" and that "it will never happen again" song and so on.
So, see, no. Conversational songwriting is *not* the sole province of whinging, self obsessed indie boys. Thank you kindly.
― masonic boom, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― tarden, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― marianna maclean, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
That's the best ever.
So the key moment in "Past, Present And Future", which sounds otherwise like a prepared-speech is when she says "There were moments when - well - there were moments when." She's going to try to put something into words, she can't/doesn't want to, and so she falls into a sad shrug. And that is SO RECOGNISABLE that it immediately elevates the song into something transcendental.
Similarly the Wedding Present on form do this really well - there is a lot of craft there but it's disguised. On "Dare" for instance where the first verse is totally conversational ("It's on your right just by the telephone") and then the chorus is much more pleading/rehearsed. Their best lyric in this vein is "Come Play With Me" where the shift from conversational to declamatory works like the twist in a short story.
― Tom, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Is there anyone who *hates* this kind of song. I used to hear people slag off the Wedding Present because they objected on principle to this kind of song, strongly believing that music should be all about escaping the mundane, not revelling in it.
A different type of conversational style on Billy Bragg's 'Walk Away Renee', (featuring 'Duane Tremelo' on guitar) - 'I said "I'm the most illegible batchelor in town" and she said "yeah, that's why I can never understand any of those silly letters you send me"'... Sometimes you have to take the crunchy with the smooth.
― stevie t, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Funny that you mention that "Let's just say, there were moments when..." line. (I always forget the name of that song.) The strange hesitancy in her voice as she goes to say something, and then *doesn't* has always made me wonder if that song is not really just about a failed lover affair, but actually about date rape or something. The fact that she *doesn't* say what happened makes it all the more powerful.
Before you think I'm over-reacting and being a total riot grrl again, remember that the girl-groups of the same era *did* deal with so many heavy issues (The Supremes tackling teenage pregnancy and unwed mothers in "Love Child", The Crystals bringing up spouse abuse in "He Hit Me (And It Felt Like A Kiss", the Shangri-Las themselves tackling class issues in their "boy from the wrong side of the tracks" anthems.)
I have just *always* wondered about that song.
― Maryann, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
How much does Emo fit what we've been talking about. Come on, I know some of you lot listen to it....
(Sorry, I *loathe* All Saints, and that insipid pseudo-monologue is just one of a millions reasons...)
Sounds like a pretty rubbish conversation. Are you sure BMcK was actually saying this to anyone?
I think what you say about Wedding Present detreactors is partly true, Tom. I'm sure some people did just hate the drab (matter of opinion, at least from 'Bizarro' onwards) guitars and crap (no argument) voice. But I still maintain that a lot of people just think pop music shouldn't be dwelling in such detail on the banal arguments and attendent household wares that are David Gedge's stock in trade. I guess they only want escapism from such things or else they think that it should all be pared down to some more elegant core. I don't believe in elegant cores a lot of the time.
Tammy Wynette is a good call. I don't know a lot about Country, but people often take the piss out of some of the really long, specific titles you find, I understand. Like 'You stole my tractor and now you're trying to steal my girl' or whatever.
Also a moment of HORRIBLE CLARITY - my understanding of 'conversation' has been totally warped by Instant Messager. So I was probably thinking in terms of:
TomFT26: i'll have a shower & then phone my brother up kortbein*: ok see you later
*or whoever
"i'm gonna talk about the power of love here, i'm gonna tell you what love can do..."
― fred solinger, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― JM, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
None of the last four songs mentioned is a direct address to the object of the song. You know, where the whole lyric could be a transcript of what the singer says to that person.
to be honest, i didn't even read the question. i find my answers to be a lot more natural and interesting when i don't. i just kinda gazed and saw that people were talking about monologues.
to expand upon the hayes song, he spends nine minutes talking about love and giving a back story to the protagonist of "by the time i get to phoenix." the language is very natural; i still don't know to this day if he had this all written down or if he merely had an idea in mind and went off the top of his head.
for a better example of what you're talking about, "your song," anyone? "but anyway, the thing is, what i really mean..." even though it meant to ape the awkwardness of our unrehearsed speech, there's still no way to deliver that line without it sounding planned.
Can you explain again what you mean? I'm afraid it's no use talking about the Wedding Present, cos I have never heard them.
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ally, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Ally: Answering machine tracks are a WHOLE OTHER THREAD I reckon. hey're great - Angelica's "Teenage Girl Crush" and Laptop's "End Credits" use them brilliantly. And of course Green Velvet's "Answering Machine".
"Ansaphone" is interesting cause something Jarvis is very good at is combining everyday language with quite rigidly structured songs, using half-rhymes etc. That's not quite what Nick was getting at I think, though "I'm not trying to be clever / But at least we're not still living together" is a good example of what Jarvis does well from that song.
― Nicole, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Patrick, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I can't really put it much more clearly than I did originally:
By way of example, here's the first verse of 'What Have I Said Now?':
About what I said just before You know, your clothes on the floor I never meant to hurt you I got carried away I guess I've had a long day Look, I'd sooner die than lose you Over something like that Oh, please, next time just shout back And I didn't say that I hate you I think sometimes you forget And now look how we're upset Let's talk about it later
Breaking it down into two criteria:
a) The lyric must consist of lines that the singer addresses directly to a person. So probably lots of "I"'s and "you"'s in there.
b) The fuzzier condition is that these lines must be in the style that people actually speak to one another. Prosaic speech patterns. This is where the mundane thing comes in. Obviously, we might all have different ideas about what normal speech reads like, but most of us don't talk terrifically lyrically in everyday conversations. The only poetic licence allowed is to be fragmentary about it, like in the Wedding Present song above - it has to leave out all the things she says back to him, obviously, or else it would be a duet. So if you're not going for the believable extended monologue, then it can be the edited highlights of one end of a dialogue.
So 'Heaven Knows I'm Miserable Now' fails because no particular listener is implied by the song (to whom is Morrissey addressing his complaint? God? The World? No one in particular anyway.)
Whereas something like the Paris Sisters' "I Love How You Love Me", and a thousand soul records fails the second test, cause, well people just don't talk like that:
I love how your eyes close, Whenever you kiss me; And when I'm away from you, I love how you miss me. I love the way you always treat me tenderly. But darling most of all, I love how you love me. I love how you love me.
Pulp's 'Ansaphone' *almost* passes - it's certainly in the right style. But if you think about it, it can only be a pretend address to his girlfriend, him speaking to her in his head. Except for the last bit when he actually leaves his message. So now do you see, the pinefox?
"Personism has nothing to do with philosophy, it’s all art. It does not have to do with personality or intimacy, far from it! But to give you a vague idea, one of its minimal aspects is to address itself to one person (other than the poet himself), thus evoking overtones of love without destroying love’s life-giving vulgarity, and sustaining the poet’s feelings towards the poem while preventing love from distracting him into feeling about the person. That’s part of personism. It was founded by me after lunch with LeRoi Jones on August 27, 1959, a day in which I was in love with someone (not Roi, by the way, a blond). I went back to work and wrote a poem for this person. While I was writing it I was realizing that if I wanted to I could use the telephone instead of writing the poem, and so Personism was born. It’s a very exciting movement which will undoubtedly have lots of adherents. It puts the poem squarely between the poet and the person, Lucky Pierre style, and the poem is correspondingly gratified. The poem is at last between two persons instead of two pages."
(you can find the full text here: http://www.poetspath.com/transmissions/messages/ohara.html - you should read it, it's a hoot - you should also buy the Collected Poems while you're at it)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Alex Huynh, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Is it me? I really don't understand why people are having trouble with this..
Anyway, talk of Dylan reminds me of a great example: Postively 4th Street:
"You've got a lot of nerve, to treat me like you do" etc.
Oh, and it's a Johnny Cash song.
After seven years behind these bars together I'll miss you more than a brother when you go If only I had not tried to escape They'd pardon me with you I know Won't you tell the folks back home I'll soon be coming And don't let em know I never will be free Sometimes write and tell me how they're doing And send a picture of mother back to me
Say hello to dad and shake his poor hard-working hand And send a picture of mother if you can
I'm happy for you that you got your freedom But stay with me just another minute or so After all the sweat and blood together Go be my fighting partner when you go?
The hardest time will be on Sunday morning Church bells will ring on heaven hill Please ask Reverend Garrett to pray for me And send a picture of mother if you will
― scott p., Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
sorry about that.
The Modern Lovers were already mentioned, but 'I'm Straight' should definitely fit the bill. That one seems like a genuine monologue, whereas 'What Have I Said Now?' seems like a dialogue with the other person's parts left out. But all we're after is NL. Right.
There's a song called 'Punk Rock Love' by the Barnabys that has conversational parts: "On your way back will you / Stop by the mini- mart / Pick me up a bottle of peroxide / Cos you know the truth is blonde" and "You know you didn't have to leave me in Jersey / That's the way you treat some kind of / Some kind of ignorant punk / There's nothing to do here / And everybody hates me". Is that okay? (I know what I quoted makes them sound like what most people here love to hate, but WAIT! NO! - the Barnabys are GREAT!)
Tom already answered the other part of the question. All I can think to add is that it's not like actual conversations are being replayed in the songs. As Tom said, there's a lot of craft involved. It probably works for the same reasons dialogues are important in stories - showing instead of telling, dramatizing conflict, etc. And disguising craft is hard to do.
― youn, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Look, as I said, what counts as naturalistic language is very much a matter of opinion, and I didn't criticise anyone's choices for that. It was the first, to me *very easy to understand* criterion (given as (a) above)that seemed to be causing so much trouble. And that was really freaking me out. So I thought I'd doggedly pursue it for a while, in a kind of dictator-like way. Unlike most of the other suggestions, 'Ansaphone' was basically spot-on. It only failed for the unusual reason I stated above (the specific context of the song forces you to treat it as an imaginary conversation, until the beep kicks in).
Okay, so what exactly is the point of this thread then?
No fucking idea.
for the record: mother: welsh, brought up in wales, father: canadian: always brought up in canada. At 14 I started to imitate bob dylan.
What accent do I have?
Does it matter?
No........
Just wanted to type.
― ty@hotmail.com, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
BUT IT WASN'T A COMPLEX CONCEPTUAL THEME!!!! I'm as lost as the next man when it comes to formalistic porno or whatever the brainiacs are on about today. It only required a rudimentary understanding of linguistics. No, not even that. Just an appreciation of the difference between "I am asking Ally to put the kettle on" and "Ally put the kettle on".
I'm not really freaked out. I'm just playing up to it now. I like the idea of being a complete neurotic wreck. It undercuts my 'Lenny Lenny Len' laidback reputation.
"darling be home soon" by the lovin' spoonful. there, i think we have one.
http://www.OHHLA.com/anonymous/nas/illmatic/one_love.nas.txt
― Kris, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Shit, that's ambiguous. I meant like in the song. An exhortation. A request. Not a description of what Ally did. I should have put a comma after 'Ally'.
Fred, why are you doing this to me? That's like 'Ansaphone'. He can't have actually said the words in that song 'cause she hadn't come home yet. OK, I suppose it could be on the telephone. But there's the implication in that song that she's somewhere on her way home and he wishes she'd hurry up.
Actually, Nick, I think I understood the question. The song is not about Dylan or Rose, it's Jad talking to a girl ("I think about you always, not sometimes, not most of the time, always, y'know, it's a shame about Pete Rose, blah, blah") and he goes on blabbing on for 10 minutes, and the tone is definitely direct conversationalistic.
How about Wannabe? They're obviously talking to their men. A conversation! Voila! Except that no one actually says stuff like "Zigazigah" in real life, so I guess I just screwed myself over.
And Ally, I think you were right in the first place about 'Wannabe'. I mean people do say 'Zigazigah' round my way quite a lot. Only since 'Wannabe' came out, I grant you, but that makes it all the more clever. It's like a self-fulfulling prophesy. Or at least it would be if it had had "This song is a conversational monologue" printed on the sleeve.
People *do* talk like Dylan, though. I know loads of them. Most of them wish they were A) amphetamine addicts or B) crazy, Warholian hipster characters, maaaaaan. However, this may as much of a studied affectation as the essexian Zig-ahzig-aaaah-sayers.
and you don't even know lovin' spoonful!
― ty@hotmial.com, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
hahaha...
has anyone listened to that all the way through?
Brian Wilson spends most of the song giving directions to his house. Could easily be a phone call conversation even if not, obviously, face to face.
Re. "Mother" - I got 30 minutes into it.
I don't have friends. Grr...
I got 10 minutes into it. Was my ex girlfriend's cd. When we broke up she left Mother behind and took the other one. It's still sitting in a drawer. Terrible.
2. Tom E's right, I guess - Dylan is too idiosyncratic to be conversational.
3. How sweet of Stevie T to bring up 'Personism' again. He doesn't need its help, of course. Heck, no.
4. Youn said something like: 'craft is hard to disguise'. Hm - I'm not sure about that one. Why?
5. I was going to say: 'There's ANOTHER song called "Punk Rock Love"?'. Then I remembered that 'Punk Love' is called 'Punk Love', not 'Punk Rock Love'.
6. I'm still not totally sure what Nick is / was after here, actually. I have heard none of the songs that he's actually offered or approved as examples.
― Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Simon, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bnw, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Conversations with the over-intense near-lunatic at the bus-stop, maybe, rather than yr auntie or yr boyfriend or the milkman.
What was so vivid and weird and hard to understand — because it was so very clear and unambiguous that you weren't sure if you DARED accept what he was saying, if that makes sense — about "I've got shears pointed straight at my chest" was that it used these extremely concrete, unmythological words ("shears"/"chest"): how many songs hae the wiords "shears" in them anyway. Not "knife", not "switch-blade", not "shotgun"...
Even when he's being cryptic or elliptical, it's still — sort of — something someone would say, like an in-joke among bitter drinking buddies (who read Blake and watch too-much off-peak TV).
Or is this not what you're talking about either?
― mark s, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ally, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Is that better? :)
― Josh, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
In the meantime, Ally, liking one Cure song is still better than liking none. Hurrah!
They say that when you get married It'll be to a millionaire But they don't realize where you came from And I wonder if they really care, or give a damn
Where do you go to my lovely When you're alone in your bed Tell me the thoughts that surround you I want to look inside your head, yes I do
Does anyone say 'my lovely'? They say things like that in Devon, don't they? And the 'yes I do' at the end reminds me of baby talk. Hmm. OK, well how's this then?
Maybe if we think and wish and hope and pray it might come true Baby then there wouldn't be a single thing we couldn't do We could be married And then we'd be happy Wouldn't it be nice?
No, that's not quite right either. This question's rubbish. Hrumph.
― Madchen, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nick, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― youn, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
My impression is that writing dialogues in texts is difficult. If the character is an established type, then there are probably a slew of lines that come with the type. There's definitely an art to this, a mixture of lighthandedness and overstatement, i.e. in the songs of Peter Sarstedt, and the effects can be humorous and enlightening. But writing what ordinary people say in ordinary situations seems extraordinarily difficult.
[...] they are usually dressed up in romantic language and shorn of the awkwardness, trivialities, tangents, dumb choices of words found in the way we really speak in such situations. (Nick)
To stick to ordinary language but to use particulars of the situation, juxtapositions in what is said and what happens, and the momentum of the text to make ordinary language say more... David Gedge is really good at this. Lines like "Orange slices and a Fall lp" say so much in the song. And "your clothes on the floor" in 'What Have I Said Now?'.
But in pop songs particulars get lifted by the context of the song - things which would be dull on the page are lifted by melody and by the relatively minimal nature of the text (ie the pop lyric). So I think details in a pop song actually get given more weight by their genre than details in a novel do. (the pinefox)
The reason I said that I thought it would be harder to convey particulars in pop songs than in fiction is that compression is required in the former whereas in the latter being longwinded doesn't necessarily hurt (but can get annoying, i.e. Stephen(?) Dixon). It's true that melody can 'lift' details, but it also works against lyrics, so to speak, in that there's other stuff to pay attention to. (And I don't think it's good if the lyrics STAND OUT.) It's not like reading a book. It has to be something that sounds good when spoken, or sung. I don't think lyrics have to count: in some songs they're just not that important. (I'm embarrassed by the memory of Sundar saying that he hated lit crit applied to pop songs.) But if they do, it's like they have to say something that is easily recognized (the disguise), yet surprising (craft).
I used to have Submarine Bells by the Chills, and I remember thinking that the lyrics were overwritten (you just couldn't sing along to them), but since Keith and Alasdair have both spoken favorably of them, I'll have to reconsider.
― Emily, Friday, 1 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
>>> It's true that melody can 'lift' details, but it also works against lyrics, so to speak, in that there's other stuff to pay attention to. (And I don't think it's good if the lyrics STAND OUT.) It's not like reading a book. It has to be something that sounds good when spoken, or sung.
This seems right to me (though - come to think of it - *sometimes* it's good when lyrics STAND OUT). But in a sense, it's *because* something can 'sound good while sung' that I think that particulars in a pop lyric are relatively easy to pull off.
― the pinefox, Friday, 1 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(old, old private joke)
― Patrick Nicholls and Anthony Steen, their careers in ruins ..., Friday, 1 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― youn, Saturday, 12 February 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 12 February 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)
― joseph (joseph), Sunday, 13 February 2005 04:51 (twenty years ago)