Pitchfork Top 50 Albums of 2002

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Pitchfork Top 50 Albums of 2002

The sneaky Pitchfork types have only gone and published it a day early: Pitchfork Top 50 Albums of 2002

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Analysis....

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Boring Top 10. 50-31 Interesting mainly due to never having even heard of most of the folk.

dwh (dwh), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)

50: Comets on Fire
Field Recordings from the Sun
[Ba Da Bing!]

49: Dälek
From Filthy Tongue of Gods and Griots
[Ipecac]

48: Tom Waits
Alice and Blood Money
[Anti]

47: Songs: Ohia
Didn't It Rain
[Secretly Canadian]

46: Blackalicious
Blazing Arrow
[MCA]

45: Acid Mothers Temple
In C
[Squealer]

44: Hrvatski
Swarm & Dither
[Planet µ]

43: Pretty Girls Make Graves
Good Health
[Lookout!]

42: Beck
Sea Change
[Geffen]

41: Talib Kweli
Quality
[MCA]

40: Derek Bailey
Ballads
[Tzadik]

39: Kevin Drumm
Sheer Hellish Miasma
[Mego]

38: Eminem
The Eminem Show
[Interscope]

37: Secret Machines
September 000
[Ace Fu]

36: DJ /Rupture
Minesweeper Suite
[Tigerbeat6]

35: Hot Snakes
Suicide Invoice
[Swami]

34: Tim Hecker
Haunt Me, Haunt Me, Do It Again
[Alien8]

33: Rjd2
Deadringer
[Def Jux]

32: Philip Jeck
Stoke
[Touch]

31: Isis
Oceanic
[Ipecac]

30: Mr. Lif
I Phantom
[Def Jux]

29: Sigur Rós
()
[Fatcat/PIAS/MCA]

28: Missy Elliott
Under Construction
[Elektra]

27: The Walkmen
Everyone Who Pretended to Like Me Is Gone
[StarTime]

26: GZA
Legend of the Liquid Sword
[MCA]

25: Neko Case
Blacklisted
[Bloodshot]

24: McLusky
McLusky Do Dallas
[Too Pure/Beggars]

23: Ekkehard Ehlers
Plays
[Staubgold]

22: Fire Show
Saint the Fire Show
[Perishable]

21: Wire
Read & Burn 01 & 02
[Pinkflag]

20: Hot Hot Heat
Make Up the Breakdown
[Sub Pop]

019: Deerhoof
Reveille
[5RC/Kill Rock Stars]

018: The Streets
Original Pirate Material
[Vice/Atlantic]

017: Fennesz/O'Rourke/Rehberg:
The Return of FennO'Berg
[Mego]

016: Black Dice
Beaches & Canyons
[DFA]

015: Enon
High Society
[Touch & Go]

014: Sleater-Kinney
One Beat
[Kill Rock Stars]

013: Keith Fullerton Whitman
Playthroughs
[Kranky]

012: Max Tundra
Mastered by the Guy at the Exchange
[Tigerbeat6]

011: El-P
Fantastic Damage
[Def Jux]

10: Liars
They Threw Us All in a Trench and Stuck a Monument on Top
[Mute]

09: Sonic Youth
Murray Street
[Geffen]

08: Boards of Canada
Geogaddi
[Warp]

07: Notwist:
Neon Golden
[City Slang]

06: Spoon
Kill the Moonlight
[Merge]

05: Flaming Lips
Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots
[Warner Bros]

04: The Books
Thought for Food
[Tomlab]

03: And You Will Know Us by the Trail of Dead
Source Tags & Codes
[Interscope]

02: Wilco
Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
[Nonesuch]

01: Interpol
Turn on the Bright Lights
[Matador]

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't agree with everything listed but this poll is far better than the established British rock magazines: Mojo, NME, Q, Uncut.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:17 (twenty-two years ago)

The introduction and list imply that Interpol's is the best album of the past two years.

Time for mass suicide, then.

Really, I found 2001 to be much more interesting in so many ways.

The thing about this year was there were a whole lot of albums that were fair to good, but really none that rose above that.

But anyway, yeah, proclaiming this year to be so great and then putting Interpol at #1 just negates the very idea of 2002 being great for music.

(This isn't making grammatical sense to me, either. Sorry, I'm on hour 24 here.)

Melissa W (Melissa W), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

But anyway, yeah, proclaiming this year to be so great and then putting Interpol at #1 just negates the very idea of 2002 being great for music.

Pfft ha no.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)

The blurb for Deadringer makes me want to hit people. (Not necessarily the guy who wrote it - just people in general.)

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Pfft ha no.
The very idea of Interpol being the best the past two years had to offer makes me want to destroy all music and start all over again.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Fine, who IS the best of the past two years?

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)

(Of course, I should probably mention that Spoon's Kill the Moonlight did a great huge heaping truckload of nothing for me.)

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)

mel's got a point, you know. (and i like two or three interpol songs. not nearly enough to put the album as #1, but they'd be in my top 50.)

i think they pulled that idea of MoB influence out of their ass, tho (wtf?!) echo i can see, but burma?! proof positive that influence does not exist!!

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

geeta otm abt burma though i haven't even heard them (do you SEE?)

none, mel? have you heard the streets album at all? it's phenomenal.

dwh (dwh), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Like all the other lists...I have 4 of them.

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I like some of the electronic picks, or at least they feel more individualistic than most of the list. Other than GZA the hip hop picks are rather lopsided, but that's not surprising. This 50 intersects w/ mine 9 times which is better than the NME's but still.... reading up to the top 5 and realizing Wilco/FlamingLips/Interpol have not been mentioned yet is like being cornered by baseballbat wielding bullies with no way out.

Honda (Honda), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)

(and i like two or three interpol songs. not nearly enough to put the album as #1, but they'd be in my top 50.)

um, maybe in the top 50 of MOST CRIMINALLY OVERRATED ALBUMS. EVER.

really, whats so special about this if you've ever heard and _enjoyed hearing_ Closer ? It's worse than a "watered down" version, it's more like a mockery, what with that voice. notice how the "2 or 3" good tracks are the instrumentals? bitchy as it is to say, the haircuts don't help either. but, right, there's 'potential" there... is potential to become original and musically interesting supposed to count when the only thing that makes you interesting right now is just how unoriginal you are ?

the streets album isn't phenomenal either, it's just wowing people that a "such a young" 2 step guy who made it in his bedroom can actually write witty/funny/intelligent lyrics, and do the mockney accent thing. if the same beats were behind a lyricless album, would it get the same attention?

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

i think they pulled that idea of MoB influence out of their ass, tho (wtf?!) echo i can see, but burma?!

Maybe they were, uh, listening to the vocals?

OH NO GOD FORBID PEOPLE LIKE WILCO AND THE FLAMING LIPS AND INTERPOL! Christ, I thought Trail of Dead was the most ludicrous thing on there.

Can we please have a moratorium on "OMG PITCHFORK ARE INDIE STOOPIHEDZ" threads?

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe they were, uh, listening to the vocals?

nate what about interpol's vocals reminds you at all of MoB? i'm sincerely curious. to me they sound nothing alike

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I think this list reads like

A BUNCH OF THE ALBUMS EVERY INDIE COLLEGE RADIO STATION WILL PLAY AND BUNCH OF RANDOM CRAP THAT ISN'T ALL THAT GOOD BUT WE'LL HEAP PRAISE ON IT

I can't think of an album on there other than maybe Beache & Canyons that I consider "great". Most of that stuff is just "good."

Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

but jonathan! they said they weren't bullshitting us!

that was the first sentence!!

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry thats not intelligently contrivuting to the discussion but eh, hell, p-fork bashing is just too much easy fun, like sailboating

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Well it was the closest parallel I could think of, since a lot of their music isn't quite MoBish (unless you flip on 45, so I can dance to it, or you bring up songs like "Train" or that thing Moby covered, ha ha). I actually remarked somewhere that if Interpol's lead singer hung himself the rest of the band would form Mission of Burma instead of New Order, so it may not necessarily be a vocal thing, but some subtle intangible thing that would be more apparent with some minor tweaking.

Oh, and that list is CRAMMED with great albums. It's got some shit on there, too, but enh. That's just my tastes.

Sailboating? Should Christopher Cross write a song about Pitchfork-bashing?

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, sorry, I'm just baffled. It's not like I went nuts in all-caps outrage, it was more sighs and laughter - oh no them again, I'm surely a dead duck amidst rock critix, my head is battered oh well. And I dont think pfork are indie stoopihedz, the taste-solidarity stretches far beyond them - so don't jump the gun.

Honda (Honda), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:39 (twenty-two years ago)

if Interpol's lead singer hung himself the rest of the band would form Mission of Burma instead of New Order

that makes no sense.

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 22 December 2002 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)

:`(

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:01 (twenty-two years ago)

well there's only one way to find out, isn't there? ;)

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess they've decided not to do individual writer lists this year, but I wouldn't be surprised to find that no one on the staff actually thought Interpol was the best record of the year -- I'm guessing it just fell between 5 and 10 on so many people's lists that it became the consensus winner.

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)

well thats v. v. sad, but still much better than naming white blood cells as # 1, unlike some people

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm a little bummed there aren't any individual lists this year, either. I'd really like to see the following people's lists:

Mark, Nitsuh, Dominique.

Since they're all ILMers, perhaps they'll be gracious enough to share.

JS Williams (js williams), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Or Walking With Thee.

(As long as I'm on my list, Interpol was tied for 3 w/the Roots. Yoshimi was 5th. OMG EL-P!!!!! was second. Do I officially have ILM's Most Boring Taste?)

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

no, nate, id rather see someone w/ that taste then someone who lists only albums neither i nor anyone i know has heard of. its more easy to criticize your list ; )

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)

So what else is new.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:36 (twenty-two years ago)

hey at least u got out of your way to hear those albums. after only hearing snippets of flaming lips i knew i wouldn't like it, so didn't bother. u should appreciate your patience

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 22 December 2002 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I would also like to see individual lists of those three above + dare, ott, dahlen. And I guess ryan p., too.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Sunday, 22 December 2002 20:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Can someone explain to me how Secret Machines sound one iota like Built to Fucking Spill??????

ydawg, Sunday, 22 December 2002 20:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it's a pretty damn solid list. If you didn't like PF in the first place, it's not like it's going to change your mind about anything, but as a year-end list it does its job well, which is to say that it reflects the tastes the PF staffers over the course of the last year accurately. There's the usual amount of indie rock and glitchy stuff, but there's also more hip-hop than there's been in the past, and some noisier stuff scattered here and there. It's actually the most balanced and diverse list I've seen PF compile (which isn't saying much, but at least they've been making an effort to escape the indie rock ghetto). Expanding the list to 50 definitely helped matters— it cleared enough space for the obvious top 10 contenders as well as the more interesting picks and PF pet projects.

Nick Mirov (nick), Sunday, 22 December 2002 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)

most diverse in sounds; same sensibilities -- lots of well-meaning hip-hop and IDM/glitch to go w/indie rock. (Although I guess the stylus list will be lots of the same. I'm mostly looking forward to our singles roundup.) I have fewer of these than the Spin top 50!

Most pleasant surprise: dj/Rupture, and a good write-up by Mr. Dahlen.

Surprise omissions to me: Farben or Akufen. I'd have thought Mark and Chris Dare would like them quite a bit, and maybe some others, too.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Sunday, 22 December 2002 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)

[pre-emptive strike: yes, I know it's still an indie site!]

scott pl. (scott pl.), Sunday, 22 December 2002 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)

...to me they sound nothing alike.

But they ARE so alike. Both groups (Burma & the pols') sycophantic reverence towards their idols is inexcuseable. At least Interpol can fall back on simulation theory or something.

V

Venus Glow (1411), Sunday, 22 December 2002 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)

zzz.

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 22 December 2002 22:03 (twenty-two years ago)

the streets album isn't phenomenal either, it's just wowing people that a "such a young" 2 step guy who made it in his bedroom can actually write witty/funny/intelligent lyrics, and do the mockney accent thing. if the same beats were behind a lyricless album, would it get the same attention?

!!! OMG, you didn't say that, vic.

dwh (dwh), Sunday, 22 December 2002 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

If only Vic could hear me do the fake Midwest accent thing.

Andy K (Andy K), Sunday, 22 December 2002 22:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Considering how many actual dreams i've had about Ilx recently (I should revive that thread) - ever since I actually went to sweep, influenced subconsciously by the amount of time i was on here right before - I probably *have* heard you do all sorts of accents Andy.

AMG writers always figure prominently in my ilx dreams, i just havent had a chance to post on that "omg i dreamt of ned ragget" board yet

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 22 December 2002 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark R doesn't like the Akufen album at all I think - which is nice in a way even if I disagree with him because Akufen seems to be the only microhouse producer that the non-dance indie media have taken notice of this year.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 22 December 2002 23:02 (twenty-two years ago)

JS: My list wasn't at all diverse or interesting, just a collection of the type of thing I've been most taken with over the past year:

1. Max Tundra - Mastered by Guy at the Exchange
2. Tok Tok vs. Soffy O - s/t 2 x 12" LP
3. Sugababes - Angels with Dirty Faces
4. Golden Boy with Miss Kittin - Or
5. Schneider TM - Zoomer
6. Ms. John Soda - No P or D
7. Saint Etienne - Finisterre
8. Justin Timberlake - Justified
9. Interpol - Turn on the Bright Lights
10. Akufen - My Way
11. Russian Futurists - Let's Get Ready to Crumble
12. Streets - Original Pirate Material
13. Black Heart Procession - Tropico del Amore
14. Cornelius - Point
15. Royksopp - Melody A.M.
16. Deerhoof - Reveille
17. Fischerspooner - #1
18. Soulwax - As Heard on Radio Soulwax Volume Two (2ManyDJs)
19. Legowelt - Klaus Kinski EP
20. Hot Hot Heat - Make Up the Breakdown

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 22 December 2002 23:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahaha with "token rock records" sprinkled in, apparently.

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 22 December 2002 23:26 (twenty-two years ago)

i still don't really see the appeal of the books. but thanks to this list i don't need to anymore

bob zemko (bob), Monday, 23 December 2002 00:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Nits*h: Why did you write the Missy blurb w/o voting for it? Not that it wasn't well-done!


Hmm, every record on your list I've heard, I like. I really need to hightail it down to weekend records and pick up that Tok Tok.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Monday, 23 December 2002 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I was thinking this was a better list than I was expecting and then I got to that top ten. Oh, well. But it does have the Isis album on it! (as metal as pitchfork gets, I suppose)

And Nitsuh: You did the Missy write-up and she didn't even make your top twenty? Strange.

original bgm, Monday, 23 December 2002 01:46 (twenty-two years ago)

i was pleasantly surprised that they chose Isis! finally they mention a metal album... they always put the most interesting albums way at the bottom. but it seems to me that they're getting a little better with them lists, i dont know

omally, Monday, 23 December 2002 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)

is april fool's day now december 23 in pitchfork land? Or did Universal just aquire them?

Queen G (Queeng), Monday, 23 December 2002 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)

01. Interpol - Turn On The Bright Lights
02. The Streets - Original Pirate Material
03. Manual - Ascend
04. And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Dead - Source Tags And Codes
05. Wire - Read And Burn 01 & 02
06. Hayden - Skyscraper National Park
07. Isis - Oceanic
08. Sonic Youth - Murray Street
09. Do Make Say Think - & yet & yet
10. Notwist - Neon Golden
11. Doves - The Last Broadcast
12. The Books - Thought For Food
13. Clinic - Walking With Thee
14. Schneider TM - Zoomer
15. Future Sound Of London - The Isness
16. Constantines - Modern Sinner, Nervous Man
17. Keith Fullerton Whitman - Playthroughs
18. Tyondai Braxton - History That Has No Effect
19. South: From Here On In
20. DJ Shadow - The Private Press

The last three slots were really based on astounding single songs rather than being Great Albums ("The Violent Light Through Falling Shards", "Paint The Silence" and "Blood On The Motorway"). I really don't understand people caring about Missy Elliot or Eminem's latest...some of the least creative records I've heard in recent memory, espec. Missy, which has like 10 of the most obvious samples imaginable. The Chameleons and Kitchens of Distinction comparisons, while accurate, presume Interpol have ever heard those bands, which I doubt.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Monday, 23 December 2002 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

The one thing that jumped out at me was that approx. 75% of the blurbs talked more about the "mass media"'s perception of the band or generalizations about genre than about the music itself. The thing is, I like the list and generally like Pfork, so I'm not going to spend a lot of time picking out quotes, but there was def. a pattern.
Can we compare this top 50 to the predicted Pfork top 20s from a few weeks ago?

Nick A. (Nick A.), Monday, 23 December 2002 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Can we compare this top 50 to the predicted Pfork top 20s from a few weeks ago?

I was right about Beck! (#42)

Aaron W, Monday, 23 December 2002 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)

The Chameleons and Kitchens of Distinction comparisons, while accurate, presume Interpol have ever heard those bands, which I doubt.

I'm sure their onstage fashion sense is just a fluke as well, right?

paul cox (paul cox), Monday, 23 December 2002 15:34 (twenty-two years ago)

It doesn't take much delving to come up with outfits like theirs.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Monday, 23 December 2002 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)

They would've been far less derivative with t-shirts and jeans.

Andy K (Andy K), Monday, 23 December 2002 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)

If only Vic could hear me do the fake Midwest accent thing.

I've heard you speak, MC Kellman. You rock the house.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 23 December 2002 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)

They'd be less easy to laugh at, that's for sure.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Monday, 23 December 2002 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

No, it's like saying that when people who don't like soup are served good soup, they're less likely to appreciate what makes the soup good.

Try to ignore the whole "why does ILM hates us?" angle for a second. Claiming a year end list to be effective because it is a year end list seems a bit circular, no?

bnw (bnw), Monday, 23 December 2002 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's my list for 2002:

0. VA, Improvised Music from Japan
1. Bob Drake, Skull Mailbox
2. Ellery Eskelin, 12+1 Imaginary Views
3. Ekkehard Ehlers, Plays
4. Gyorgy Ligeti, The Ligeti Project II
5. Black Dice, Beaches & Canyons
6. Acid Mothers Temple, In C
7. Otomo Yoshihide's New Jazz Ensemble, Dreams
8. Hrvatski, Swarm & Dither
9. John Zorn, IAO
10. Philip Jeck, Stoke
11. Lars Hollmer, SOLA
12. Seiichi Yamamoto, Crown of Fuzzy Groove
13. Satoko Fujii, Bell the Cat
14. Max Tundra, Mastered By Guy at the Exchange
15. Amon Tobin, Out From Out Where
16. Keith Fullerton Whitman, Playthroughs
17. Acid Mothers Temple, Electric Heavyland
18. Christian Vander, Les Cygnes et Les Corbeaux
19. Flying Luttenbachers, Infection & Decline
20. Derek Bailey, Ballads
21. Acid Mothers Temple, Univers Zen ou de Zero a Zero
22. Otomo Yoshihide, Ensemble Cathode
23. Fucking Champs, V
24. Tujiko Noriko, Make Me Hard
25. 2 Many DJs, As Heard on Radio Soulwax
26. Musica Transonic, Hard Rock Transonic
27. Rovo, Flage
28. Paul Lansky, Alphabet Book
29. Yuko Nexus6, Journal de Tokyo
30. Tom Waits, Blood Money

I wasn't allowed to count the Improvised Music from Japan box because it was 1) live and 2) a box set. I tried to argue that it was as much a part of 2002 as No New York was for 1978, but no dice. Anyway, I'm generally happy when after all the votes are counted, I have anything left to blurb.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 23 December 2002 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Dominique and I are the title fight in the Obscurism Vs. Populism Cage Match.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Monday, 23 December 2002 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Momus I think Cornelius got "respectful" reviews because the record was, well, impressively executed, and there was nothing really wrong with it. But it wasn't anything to get excited about in the least; I wasn't even considering putting it on my list until I realized, quite suddenly, that I'd been listening to it repeatedly all year, in between things I was actually excited to listen to, and in retrospect it was a pretty solid companion.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 23 December 2002 16:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it's nice that the Streets are on there at all. Yay Streets!

Tom (Groke), Monday, 23 December 2002 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I have this sinking feeling that Tujiko Noriko would have been on my list had I, like, heard it. But it'll likely be reviewed next year and therefore eligible again (along with Ms. John Soda and Russian Futurists -- ha, my job next year is only getting easier).

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 23 December 2002 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Try to ignore the whole "why does ILM hates us?" angle for a second. Claiming a year end list to be effective because it is a year end list seems a bit circular, no?

Not sure what you mean by "us" (or "ILM", or for that matter, the whole nebulous "ILM vs. us" construct), but I honestly wasn't trying to be tautological here. The key word is the last word in this sentence: "If you didn't like PF in the first place, it's not like it's going to change your mind about anything, but as a year-end list it does its job well, which is to say that it reflects the tastes the PF staffers over the course of the last year accurately". Too often, the process of compiling a bunch of individuals' lists into one big institutional list can result in some weird, lopsided rankings (which some have argued has happened here, i.e. OMG INTERPOL #1 WTF) depending on how the votes were tallied. For instance, SPIN seems to compile its year-end lists by chucking out the window everything it had been saying for the previous twelve months and starting over from scratch. Pitchfork's list is one of the more coherent and cohesive lists they've put together, but it still managed to surprise regular readers (though no rude shocks— heck, I don't even think that Interpol at #1 is that much of a stretch).

Anyway, back to the actual list: I'm thrilled that the Books album got placed so high, a bit surprised that the Spoon album did well (I'm a huge Spoon booster, but I don't think they've made their career-defining album just yet), Deerhoof yay, and thank god that Beck didn't get anywhere near the top 20.

Nick Mirov (nick), Monday, 23 December 2002 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)

More surprise omissions: Queens of the Stone Age, Mirah, Cornelius, Xiu Xiu, John Vanderslice, Mountain Goats, Radar Brothers, Amon Tobin, DJ Shadow.

Nick Mirov (nick), Monday, 23 December 2002 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, where the hell are QOTSA and Xiu Xiu?

Callum (Callum), Monday, 23 December 2002 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)

The Chameleons and Kitchens of Distinction comparisons, while accurate, presume Interpol have ever heard those bands

Why do people always assume that a comparison between two bands implies intentionality? I don't think it follows at all?

Dominique and I are the title fight in the Obscurism Vs. Populism Cage Match

Who's on which side?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 23 December 2002 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)

"follows at all."

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 23 December 2002 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)

sundar, in some cases similarity is unintentional, but I rather doubt it in the case of Interpol and their paint by the bumbers recorded work.

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 23 December 2002 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)

The fact that no one can seem to agree on which of 1,000 different bands Interpol actually sounds like makes me wonder. It's such a broad pastiche that it seems almost like an amalgam of unspecific half-remembered moves. (The only really concrete things I hear are a lot of Trompe le Monde-isms, a Smiths impression, and a riff that should be from a Chapterhouse song: beyond that it's Joy Division, Echo and the Bunnymen, Bauhaus, the Cure, Kitchens of Distinction, the Chameleons, the Monochrome Set, and on and on and on, all equally applicable, to the point where all of this becomes meaningless.) Those who like the record, I think, like it perhaps out of nostalgia for this general sound but mostly because the pastiche is terrifically well-executed: I think the actual dynamic content of the songwriting and the performances are quite good, and in a particular way that few rock bands right now are really bothering to attempt. The influence-talk just winds up clouding the actual value of the record, which surely lies in the fact that it's tight and energetic and impressive, not that anyone thinks Interpol invented the entire history of indie rock bands from 1977-1991.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 23 December 2002 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)

See already after posting that I have remembered four more bands that should have been in the "possibly sounds like" list. It doesn't really matter. A really good anachronism is still a decent record, isn't it?

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 23 December 2002 20:41 (twenty-two years ago)

11-20 includes max tundra, keith whitman, enon, fenn o'berg, and deerhoof making it a miraculously great list. congratulations to pitchfork. screw the haters.

(venus glow: i'd enjoy it immensely if you'd cite your evidence of burma's "sycophantic reverence to their idols". thanks in advance!)

dan (dan), Monday, 23 December 2002 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)

nabisco, I just don't think any of their songs are catchy, despite the excellent sound/execution.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 23 December 2002 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I've actually only heard two songs by Interpol. It just occurred to me that whenever I make a connection/comparison between two artists people always assume that I'm implying one was listening to the other. Offline, anyway.

Anyway I predict that my list will be a chief contender in the "perversely mixing the obscure and populist" sweepstakes. I like the presence of Justin Timberlake on Nabisco's list though. I want to look into a bunch of stuff on Dominique's list.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 23 December 2002 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Can we please have a moratorium on "OMG PITCHFORK ARE INDIE STOOPIHEDZ" threads?

Amen brother.

I really liked the list; although I totally disagree with Interpol. I find them to be okay, but not original enough to be #1. Not by a long shot. I'd have to give that to Flaming Lips.

Sometimes parts of the list reak of token but frankly, I don't give a damn, as it helps me discover music I wouldnt normally listen to.

David Allen, Tuesday, 24 December 2002 03:41 (twenty-two years ago)

But the if the downside to voting for year-end lists is middling consensus picks at #1 (Interpol) then surely the upside is you can't really have tokenism? (I suppose it's possible for the entire staff to have consensus token picks but on the other hand I don't see any particular genre that doesn't have at least two or three entries on here -- come to think of it whick picks are the tokens, anyway?)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 03:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry, my befuddlement killed my typing just then. If there are genre-representing tokens on there they must be the things I don't know anything about.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)

"some of the least creative records I've heard in recent memory, espec. Missy, which has like 10 of the most obvious samples imaginable."

Chris Ott in massive missing the point shockah!!!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll post my individual list later, but the fact that Farben didn't make it had to do w/ some confusion about the rules for the list (Textstar is techically a compilation of previously-released singles.) I had it #2 at one point, and it's certainly one of the best albums of the year if the format fits.

Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

some of u r gay

ron (ron), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 16:10 (twenty-two years ago)

And some of us para gay?

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim, being overt with your influences has no point at all. It's just indefensibly un-creative and/or tributary. Either way, it presumes your audience is either dumb or ignorant enough to tolerate/require garbage like Missy's. Step off, son.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

"being overt with your influences has no point at all"

W-w-what? "Indefensibly tributary????" The point of the Missy record, in one aspect at least, was to recreate this imagined golden age of hip-hop with those samples, with the rhymes, etc. In many ways the record is a period piece -- why is this so hard to fathom?

And what point is created by being covert with one's influences? I mean, does that matter in any way, shape or form? How is that at all relevant? Your post completely baffles me.

eh, Tuesday, 24 December 2002 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)

"being overt with your influences has no point at all. It's just indefensibly un-creative and/or tributary."

Which obviously explains why Interpol was Number 1....


Haven't you heard? Derivative is the new new!

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 24 December 2002 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the point is to have a good time and dance. I'm pretty sure the record says that explicitly several times. You're free, of course, to not like the record, but if you pay closer attention, you might find it very rewarding sonically. It can be good home listening, but that's not the point.

All I really have to say about this list is that if it stopped at 11, it would be nearly perfect.

Adam A. (Keiko), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)

And by perfect I mean not boring at all and including plenty of records I like and plenty I haven't heard.

Adam A. (Keiko), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

(venus glow: i'd enjoy it immensely if you'd cite your evidence of burma's "sycophantic reverence to their idols". thanks in advance!)
For exhibit "A":
Burma's entire recorded output to date. Where occur occasional fake english accents and Clash like "Oh yea's" here and there in chorus's. Notice jury, the Gang of Four like faux politics and stance, which mean and say nothing but sure sounded important at the time, to some. The angular "Television" like guitar slinging says "I praticed and praticed till I had the first Television LP down pat, I never got past that either."
Also guilty as charged for being a lame Pere Ubu cover band and secretly strokin' that "Pink Flag" lp even as an import.

Oh yeah, allowing their jam-band friends on stage in NYC.

Merry Christmas!

V

V (1411), Tuesday, 24 December 2002 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)

"Tim, being overt with your influences has no point at all. It's just indefensibly un-creative and/or tributary. Either way, it presumes your audience is either dumb or ignorant enough to tolerate/require garbage like Missy's. Step off, son."

But Chris I still think you're missing the point. The use of recognisable samples in Under Construction is not the result of Missy and Timbaland wanting to make music like they used to dance to and going to the most obvious records on their shelves. Rather, they're deliberately chosen to trigger the most frequent recognition for the most number of listeners in order to make a point about the specific nature of Missy and Timbaland's nostalgia - a nostalgia which is repeatedly explained to be not theirs alone, but a collective nostalgia. Collective nostalgia by its very nature revels in the overly familiar, because it gets by on cultural touchstones that "we" can take for granted as having shaped everyone's awareness. That's why heaps of people go to eighties revival nights as Madonna or Cyndi Lauper or Michael Jackson, but no-one goes as the drummer from The Minutemen (so far as I know!) - what's the point?

Likewise, for Missy and Timbaland, using unfamiliar samples would unnecessarily obscure the nature of the album's retro-fetish - it would bog the approach down in an overly loaded understanding of what their eighties hip hop "golden age" actually was, rather than what it felt like to someone like Missy who, strictly speaking, was probably too young to have an incredibly intimate knowledge of the source material. And it's only really the feeling that the duo are trying to evoke - the samples are largely decorative, and often their retro qualities exist in deliberate contrast to still-very-futurist grooves. In contrast most other current "golden age" hip hop shies away from obviousness in samples but boringly champions an aged + authentic approach to groove construction.

Ultimately I think the retro samples on Under Construction are used in a similar manner to the the way pop songs are used on the 2 Many DJs album, which is pushing an idea about pop as much as Missy is pushing an idea about hip hop. As both are essentially "arguments" as much as they are records, it only makes sense that their creators would cite the most recognised and persuasive precedents in support of their position.

(ten points deducted from anyone who distinguishes the 2 Many DJs album on the basis of it being a mix album)

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 25 December 2002 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

tim i'm going to miss that 'right on' feeling i get from reading your posts once you don't have interweb access anymore :(

minna (minna), Wednesday, 25 December 2002 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Either way, it presumes your audience is either dumb or ignorant enough to tolerate/require garbage like Missy's.

Tom Petty to thread!

original bgm, Wednesday, 25 December 2002 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Said it before, say it again: Tim does this whole pop-write better than damn near ANYONE.

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 December 2002 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)

So...Tim, are you trying to say that it's okay to be retro in content yet not form? Doesn't J5's retro approach to the form of hip hop trigger the same sort of collective recognition as Timberlands, and isn't the mining of obscurity (which is a better term than the vague, undeterminable, and indefinable "futuristic")via samples as valid as Timberland's obscure production tangents? I'm not really defending J5, or dissing Missy, I just find this privilidging of one over the other interesting.

Sam C, Wednesday, 25 December 2002 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

But the Missy LP is a one-off built on samples that trigger collective responses in order to do, well, what tim says above; J5 is building a career based on aping the past, hoping that the qualities and values associated with those who did it the 'right way' in the 'good old days' will be lazily transferred to themselves.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Wednesday, 25 December 2002 23:02 (twenty-two years ago)

"I'm not really defending J5, or dissing Missy, I just find this privilidging of one over the other interesting."

Yes well this is one of the interesting aspects of the Missy album from a critical perspective: as Tom noted originally it turns the entire futurist-mainstream/traditionalist-underground divide on its head. I guess what I'd argue, similar perhaps to Scott, is that there's elements of Missy's approach which do not merely involve but are in fact based upon a (perhaps deliberate) misremembrance of the past, and the subsequent jumbling up of past, present and future within the one track. Essentially, you could take any of these tracks and quite quickly point to an element that could not have actually existed in old-skool hip hop, whether it be in Missy's rapping or the production.

So there's this constant sense of frission and friction arising from the interaction between the various elements; which is probably why the album oddly reminds me of a lot of bootlegs I've heard this year, as well as particularly diverse cross-generational mixes and sample-based albums such as As Heard On Radio Soulwax and Since I Left You - all of which execute deliberate timeclashes as well as soundclashes.

Conversely, the approach of Jurassic 5 - who I enjoy - and groups like them, by attempting to perfect a certain production technique (and flow technique as well) lends them a definite sense of stylistic coherency and cohesion, but as time-travel expeditions go, it's definitely a one-way trip. I'm not going to say that this makes their sort of retro automatically less defensible or appealing than Missy's, but for me it sort of pales in comparison to Missy's brand of time-travel, which is a bit like that wonky New Year's Eve time machine in the video for Will Smith's "Will 2K".

If it's not clear BTW, I think Under Construction is awesome.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 25 December 2002 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)

once again, i'm not defending J5, but I'd hardly call what they do lazy. they may use the same kind of aesthetics that the old-skool cats did, but it is technically challenging and a progression (within the context of the admittidly narrow form they choose).

rereading it now, i guess i think i see what tim f. is sayin', i.e., that Tim appropriations draw the link between his certain hip hop tangent and the hip hop of the masters. but aren't those old-skool signifiers inherint in Tim's pre-U.C. production (as new skool aesthetics are inherit in J5's sound) without him having to be overt about it? can you imagine the sort of reponse J5 would get if they tried to appropriate Tim's or El-P's sound into theirs?

edit: i just saw Tim's new post, but haven't the time to respond right now.

Sam C, Wednesday, 25 December 2002 23:38 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm equally mystified, Chris: when the first two singles from an album very pointedly drop a few bars of the loops from Peter Piper and Paul Revere, the "obvious samples" complaint seems ... ummm ... like saying there's "too much rapping" on Illmatic? I dunno, is your complaint that she shouldn't even have been tackling the topic in the first place? I'm not entirely following.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 26 December 2002 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I reckon everyone has gone home now & forgotten about this thread, but here was my Top 20(2):

1. Keith Fullerton Whitman - Playthroughs
x. Farben - Textstar
2. Tim Hecker – Haunt Me, Haunt Me Do It Again
3. The Books – Thought for Food
4. Boards of Canada – Geodiggi
5. Yume Bitsu - The Golden Vessyl of Sound
x. Ekkhard Ehlers - Plays
6. Black Dice – Beaches and Canyons
7. Max Tundra – Mastered By the Guy at the Exchange
8. Jim O'Rourke – I’m Happy, I'm Singing, and a 1, 2, 3, 4
9. Philip Jeck - Stoke
10. Aluminum Group – Happyness
11. Acid Mothers Temple – In C
12. Markus Guentner - In Moll
13. Jan Jelinek/Computer Soup – Improvisations & Edits
14. MRI – All That Glitters
15. Phil Niblock - G2, 44+/ x2
16. Tanakh – Villa Claustrophobia
17. Flaming Lips – Yoshimi Battle the Pink Robots
18. Metro Area – Metro Area
19. Schneider TM – Zoomer
20. Fennesz, O'Rourke, Rehberg - The Return of Fenno'berg

Nothing too surprising. I usually want to write about my favorite records, so you've seen me weigh in on most of these.

Akufen wouldn't have made my Top 50. I thought that was a very average record with one unbelievably great song ("Skidoos"). I've been baffled by the appeal of it all year.

My "official" ballot didn't contain either the Ehlers or Farben, b/c my understanding was that they were both considered compilations and thus were not eligible for inclusion. Also, bear in mind that Pitchfork's system allows any album reviewed on the site in 2002 to be eligible (O'Rourke, Hecker, Guenther, etc.).

Compiling the Pitchfork list is difficult b/c of the No Compilations and No Various Artists rules, the focus on the v. trad. usage of the word "album" limits things.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 26 December 2002 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I reckon everyone has gone home now & forgotten about this thread, but here was my Top 20(2):

1. Keith Fullerton Whitman - Playthroughs
x. Farben - Textstar
2. Tim Hecker – Haunt Me, Haunt Me Do It Again
3. The Books – Thought for Food
4. Boards of Canada – Geodiggi
5. Yume Bitsu - The Golden Vessyl of Sound
x. Ekkhard Ehlers - Plays
6. Black Dice – Beaches and Canyons
7. Max Tundra – Mastered By the Guy at the Exchange
8. Jim O'Rourke – I’m Happy, I'm Singing, and a 1, 2, 3, 4
9. Philip Jeck - Stoke
10. Aluminum Group – Happyness
11. Acid Mothers Temple – In C
12. Markus Guentner - In Moll
13. Jan Jelinek/Computer Soup – Improvisations & Edits
14. MRI – All That Glitters
15. Phil Niblock - G2, 44+/ x2
16. Tanakh – Villa Claustrophobia
17. Flaming Lips – Yoshimi Battle the Pink Robots
18. Metro Area – Metro Area
19. Schneider TM – Zoomer
20. Fennesz, O'Rourke, Rehberg - The Return of Fenno'berg

Nothing too surprising. I usually want to write about my favorite records, so you've seen me weigh in on most of these.

Akufen wouldn't have made my Top 50. I thought that was a very average record with one unbelievably great song ("Skidoos"). I've been baffled by the appeal of it all year.

My "official" ballot didn't contain either the Ehlers or Farben, b/c my understanding was that they were both considered compilations and thus were not eligible for inclusion. Also, bear in mind that Pitchfork's system allows any album reviewed on the site in 2002 to be eligible (O'Rourke, Hecker, Guenther, etc.).

Compiling the Pitchfork list is difficult b/c of the No Compilations and No Various Artists rules, the focus on the v. trad. usage of the word "album" limits things.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 26 December 2002 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.