MC Garage/'Rap Cultue' blamed for rising gun violence in UK

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Minister labelled racist after attack on rap 'idiots’ Culture Minister Kim Howells v So Solid Crew + the NME.

Why hip-hop must take its share of blame for spread of violence among teenagers Caroline Sullivan, whose obviously never heard Schooly D.

Reflecting reality or creating it? Dodgy racist bollocks or uncomfortable truth telling? Large amounts of gunshots + gun talk on my stereo this past week at any rate.

stevo (stevo), Monday, 6 January 2003 09:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Hang on, this is riddiculous.

It must be possible for someone to say "gun culture in rap music is bad" without people assuming it's an attack on ALL rap-culture.
What the hell is the academic at the end of the first piece doing trying to say ... "well, there are rap bands who speak out against gun culture therefore all rap is innocent"? Huh?

Nor do I see why criticising garage music for promoting guns is racist. Garage is far less uniformly "black" than hip-hop was back in the days of NWW)

Having said that, I don't remember any particularly gun oriented lyrics on the So Solid album. What about their videos (Which I haven't seen)? Mind you, the idea of So Solid claiming to reflect the "poverty" they see around them, when the whole album is focused on boasting about their success and wealth, is pretty disingenuous.

For once I think industry seem to be the ones overreacting here.

phil jones (interstar), Monday, 6 January 2003 09:35 (twenty-three years ago)

''What the hell is the academic at the end of the first piece doing trying to say ... "well, there are rap bands who speak out against gun culture therefore all rap is innocent"? Huh?''

he said that rap is a wide church. he didn't say whether it was 'innocent' or 'guilty'.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 6 January 2003 10:54 (twenty-three years ago)

The thing is - speaking as a total outsider, obviously - that the gun violence and the violence- and gun-oriented lyrics are both symptoms of the same thing, not symptom-and-cause, surely? Respect for violence and criminality starts in real life and infects the music. That's not to say the music doesn't reinforce attitudes and behaviours - when I was 16 I was looking for music which did exactly that, made me feel like I was normal.

But saying that a poor kid on a gun-ridden estate should listen to uplifting conscious lyrics not violent ones is like saying that 16-year-old Tom should have been listening to happy love songs not songs about how miserable people were and how they couldn't get laid: they were exactly the songs I was rejecting for not being credible.

Guns work in music as a metaphor for power and respect - the reason they work is that they have become a route to those things in real life. How do you tackle *that*? I have no concrete idea. I think that musicians not bigging up guns would help a bit, I think trying to enforce that, or letting it seem as if it's authority getting the musicians to do it, doesn't help at all.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 6 January 2003 11:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Julio : Yeah ... but what's the implication? Why is the quote there?

The point is that we're beyond treating "rap" as a single monolithic thing. We should be beyond treating all criticisms of rap as "generalized attacks on black culture"

This kind of overgeneralization could be made by either side ... politicians or the musicians. In *this* particular case, reading the quotes, sounds to me like the over-generalizing is being done by the music people rather than Howells.

phil jones (interstar), Monday, 6 January 2003 11:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I didn't feel that was the implication, actually.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 6 January 2003 11:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know what's worse, a political establishment that believes ppl are so stupid that L Farrakhan isn't allowed in the country ('Britain PLC - Guaranteed Social Cohesion4Everybody Else*(*just don't ask questions we can't/won't answer)) or rerun 10,000 of "It's REAL and it's A CULTURE & besides everything we say is true and justified and you don't understand us besides we hate you" etc. I'd prefer rappers/garagistes who just shrugged and said "Fuck all to do with me, eh"

dave q, Monday, 6 January 2003 11:35 (twenty-three years ago)

So Solid Crew on Channel 4 documentary

..they talk about the frustration of how they are often perceived, denying that they promote the gun culture associated with them.

"When they listen to our music, they're just hearing gun, kill, you get me? Drugs, weed, listen to what we're talking about," explains Megaman.

"I'm just ringing alarms, I'm ringing alarms for all the people that can help these people.

"I don't see no wrong in doing that. If I'm talking about a gun or I'm talking about weed, this is my experience, this is my lifestyle.

"You put me in this system, you put me down here, you put my parents down here to live, so I have no choice but to grow up round these things. If you want me to talk about Bentleys and nice cars you gotta put me in that environment, you get me?"

"Directly, we say that we speak about our lives, our experiences - that's what we've experienced so that's what we have to speak about."

Lisa Mafia adds: "I think that's where our downfall come - because we are street guys. We used to be street guys, we're coming out of it now.

"People are reflecting off the yardie killings and stuff like that and putting it with us because we came from there. They're just guessing that we're the same kind of people but we're not."

stevo (stevo), Monday, 6 January 2003 11:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I understand that if you're So Solid, from a bad neighbourhood, you get success, you get hated, you get paranoid, you carry a gun to defend yourself.

Fine.

But where did the hataz come from? How come all rap stars have mobs of hataz when 70s rock giants had the odd lone nutter? Who made hataz into a lifestyle choice equivalent to fans or groupies?

Or maybe hataz don't really exist, part of the rap fantasy lifestyle. But rappers believe their own hype and get paranoid anyway?

phil jones (interstar), Monday, 6 January 2003 12:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Is it Fiachra Gibbons (arts correspondent at the Guardian) or the NME editor who equates rap with black? Do arts correspondents usually write about pop (as in popular as opposed to classical music)?

None of the quotes attributed to Kim Howells mention black people or black music.

So Solid Crew have different colored members (either oxide or neutrino is white for a start). Eminem (though not British he is the worlds most famous rapper) is white.


But where did the hataz come from?

Perhaps because the people come from such poor, tightly packed communities there are people left behind who don't 'make it' and who get jealous. Perhaps the musicians just aren't nice people? Perhaps the displays of conspicuous wealth stick in some people's maws?
This kind of music does benefit from an enemy.

These are all questions by the wat, not my answers. I Don't know.

mei (mei), Monday, 6 January 2003 12:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Conor McNicholas loves 'black music' when it's having a good old fight with 'the man' but he's got precious little to say about the actual music - witness the NME's bestest singles ever ever.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 6 January 2003 13:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Too bad Geto Boys didn't blow up as big as NWA - an epidemic of urban necrophilia might be more interesting than all the gunplay

dave q, Monday, 6 January 2003 15:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Garage is far less uniformly "black" than hip-hop was back in the days of NWW

Imagine if Nurse With Wound had released _Straight Outta Compton_!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 15:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Moral Panic!

_gi**y_, Monday, 6 January 2003 16:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Tom is so OTM

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Garage is far less uniformly "black" than hip-hop was back in the days of NWW

Imagine if Nurse With Wound had released _Straight Outta Compton_!

Oh God! Freudian slip ... but my, what a concept!

phil jones (interstar), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:32 (twenty-three years ago)

did the minister at any point specify black music, or did he specify particular bands who brag about shooting shit?

matthew james (matthew james), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 00:50 (twenty-three years ago)

bizarrely, it seems largely kneejerk liberal media whove attatched blackness to the debate - the conservative elements like Howells simply talk about a very specific cultural phenomena (violent garage) and hardcore crime.

matthew james (matthew james), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 00:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Very interestingly, Howells sneered at "Somerset folk musicians" when such things were mentioned by a Lib Dem MP from the West Country. That pretty much says it all about NuLab; their cultural centre ground means nothing because it resists anything culturally specific: it tries to please everyone so how can it mean anything?

Last year I commented that "Robbie Williams takes elements of daytime Radio 1 and Test Match Special but fatally removes the meaning from both" and that I liked and trusted "Jay-Z and Fairport Convention, and nothing in between". That's my aesthetic, right there.

Ah well Carmody, stop the waffling. I agree with everything Tom said and also with Matthew's and Phil's comments. I think the reason for the "white liberal media outrage" is that the complete independence of the music industry from any sort of government intervention has been so well-established in Britain for so long, and has been part of so many of our national moral positions (ie our staunch opposition to Communism and status as America's strongest European ally in the Cold War, etc etc) that any hints otherwise are viewed with suspicion.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 04:52 (twenty-three years ago)

http://images.thesun.co.uk/picture/0,,2003010170,00.jpg

"Government sources last night indicated that a massive anti-rap campaign will be launched to nail the lie that guns are cool."

You've made killing cool

stevo (stevo), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 08:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Having watched Commando the other night, wasn't Schwarzenegger glorifying guns before Easy E? Admittedly in a fantastical, obviously-fictional way. But culture has always glorified violence, from gladiatorial combat to boxing to rappers dissing each other and shooting each other. At least we don't have banks giving away guns with current accounts over here. Yet. But the outcry over that farmer (I forget his name, Tony something? Martin?) in Norfolk who shot the burglar a few years ago suggests that we're divided on the subject of guns even when it comes to self-defense and defense of property. Maybe middlebrow safe cultural political/economic aspirations encouraged by the NuLab government engender hatred and confrontationalism in those who fall below the line where such middlebrow aspirations begin? The rich get richer, their houses grow almost exponentially in value, the middles want to be rich, and the poor want to be rich too because being in the middle isn't finishing. McLuhan's utopic world wide web and global village, while allowing us all to communicate and share culture and knowledge, has also allowed us all to compare ourselves with people who we are unlike us and have too much. We're contrasting ourselves with the Beckhams and Blairs now rather than our own neighbours, and we don't see the Beckhams or the Blairs being unhappy (or if we do, we don't consider it an option applicable to us in their situation) and so we imagien that were we in their situation we would be happy too, and that our own situation cannot in any way engender happiness or contentment. And while it's a human impulse to always strive on for something better, we ought to be looking one rung at a time, rather than three or four floors. I'm waffling, but I think my point is that we're not going to do anything to solve the root cause of violence and social antipathy/resentment by integrating short-term kneejerk measures, because the problem will still be there, and that is a perpetually growing social imbalance caused by the very basis of the culture in which we (certainly in the Uk and I suspect the US too; I can't speak for France/Europe or Asian/African cultures specifically, obviously, but I get the idea that wherever there is Coca Cola and television and the internet thee will soon enough be the same kind of aspirational/discontentment problems - hell, the Scandinavians invented reality TV and if thats not part of the cult of celebrity-and-money-as-worth-over-actual-happiness-as-worth I don't know what is) are living in. Yes.

And Conor Mcwhatshisface is a tosser. The fact that he's editing NME shows what a travesty the music press is in this country.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:12 (twenty-three years ago)

"Government sources last night indicated that a massive anti-rap campaign will be launched to nail the lie that guns are cool."

I'm tired of this government making up policies on the spot to appease the media.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Fuckin' hell, I agree with Robin C. Strange times. I'm sure he'd rather I didn't but credit due. Spot on - I don't know if it's a NuLab thing or just a whoever's-in-charge-at-the-moment thing, but the fact that the music industry isn't under TOTAL regulatory control must cause them to shake with rage - NOT due to some social problem (they couldn't care less about that, unless there's votes involved), but that it upsets their transparent Divine Right of Kings mentality, which seems to be contracted by everyone 10 minutes after they're voted in whoever they are. I don't even think it's 'power for its own sake' - they GENUINELY BELIEVE they know everything, and if everybody would just stop being awkward and disagreeing and having other perspectives and other FUCKING NUISANCES then everything would be fine! (Kind of like me in fact! But I'm not the PM, lucky for you!) Perhaps this is an even bigger factor in whatever's happenin' than all the capitalist shit, an entire population has got the nagging feeling that the people in power are dishonest and ignorant etc. but the latter still imagine the "Take what you're given" formula will keep 'em quiet. Dunno if the country's ready for democracy yet, but desperate times etc
Also, IMO gangsta shit has the same relationship with IRL murders as 'rispec'' has with actual 'respect', ie none

dave q, Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:30 (twenty-three years ago)

dave q, frighteningly OTM. I think TB's biggest problem is that he actually does think he's doing the right thing.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:35 (twenty-three years ago)

You think TB has anything to do with this? I think he's doing what he usually does, egging on the cretins around him to make himself look the model of stability. He's a smart motherfucker, look how he dealt with devolution! "Got no legs? Well, don't come running to me..."

dave q, Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, I guess he's functional as a figurehead largely. But I do think he seems to carry this weight (faux or actual) of moral determination and dilema with him, furrowed brow and wringing hands, 'do the right thing' even if he's hopelessly, cluelessly off-the-mark as to what the right thing actually is. And as such typifies thes rest of the government.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)

They've started appealing to common sense which is always a bad sign. Blunkett is awful on this - he plays the you're-just-trying-to-be-different-so-i'll-ignore-you card on his liberal critics all the time; Howells at least acknowledged and answered them a bit

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 12:01 (twenty-three years ago)

i've suspected for some months that blunkett is actually very carefully and quietly being edged out into a solo "twist in the wind" position, one of the things the core team round blair have done a lot, and despressingly effectively (ie if DB delivers a minor vote-winner policy, then nu-lab and blair get the team credit; if he delivers a clunker, he's on his own)

(sad to say, even those former team-mates who have been hung out to dry for tony's skweekykleen sake tend to take "the tsar is badly advised" line...)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 12:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I WANT TO LEARN MORE ABOUT BANANA BARMY BRITAIN!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Buy The Sun.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:56 (twenty-three years ago)

what sort of nu-punk would it be without a totally out-of-proportion storm of media hysteria surrounding it anyway?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

how come gun crime is up in London thanks to So Solid but its DOWN considerably in New York (no) thanks to gangster-fantasists Irv Gotti and Murder Inc?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 18:37 (twenty-three years ago)

this is more interesting:

http://www.base58.com/misc/sun030107.jpg


(sigh....too much time on my hands again...)

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 18:49 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't mind agreeing with Dave; he's dead right in this thread. So is Nick, whose point re Scandinavia and reality TV is what I wanted to say to an ageing rose-tinted eurosentimentalist on another list who was going on about "collectivism, better social values" blah blah in Scandinavian countries, as if they were all still folk dancing and hibernating in winter (he was also citing Holland, but then Big Brother is originally a Dutch format, so that just furthers the point)

I feel alienated by Blunkett's views on this matter, but his cultural attitude is merely the sort of puritan socialism which dominated the Labour Party until 1963 and was still widespread in the 1980s. He makes me realise why I consider myself to be a liberal social democrat, not a socialist.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 04:39 (twenty-three years ago)

oh lord, they're all at it now:

http://images.icnetwork.co.uk/upl/mirror/jan2003/2/4/0006AA9F-83A8-1E1A-838580BFB6FA0000.jpg

btw top Photoshopping blueski - did you actually rewrite the whole article too? I can't tell...

Charlie (Charlie), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 05:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oh no, for that would be ridiculous

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 12:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Luckily the terrorists are back now so the gangstas can get on with it undisturbed once more.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 12:31 (twenty-three years ago)

The Mirror's general Atlanticist double standard is the most hilarious thing in the UK press at the moment. You really couldn't make up a paper which led on "BLAIR IS BUSH'S POODLE" and went on to detail Justin Timberlake's every daily fart. People would think you were taking the piss. Maybe Piers Morgan (a middle-class Tory whose real surname is "Pughe-Morgan") is indeed secretly laughing at all of us.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 22:21 (twenty-three years ago)

is Morgan the editor now? he used to do News Of The World didnt he? and i used to read his showbiz page in The Sun...talk about abandoning principles and integrity and whoring yourself out for the sake of sensationalist hackism

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 22:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Morgan has been editing the Mirror since at least 1996, steve

robin carmody (robin carmody), Thursday, 9 January 2003 09:29 (twenty-three years ago)

yeh i think i'm wrong about News Of The World...and of course it doesnt matter which redtop you're writing the daily showbiz page for - he's still a nob tho

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 9 January 2003 12:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Update: Kim Howells has saved a considerable amount of face regarding his fatuous "rap makes people kill" comments. And laid into Robbie Williams as well! Chap.

(and no, it wasn't me who asked the question)

Charlie (Charlie), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 04:13 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.