The example of pomp rockers Marillion — not the hippest of bands — suggests a new business paradigm. Dropped by their record company for being unfashionable, the band had to cancel a US tour, until Jeff Woods, a fan from Raleigh, North Carolina, took matters into his own hands. Woods, who had been to 75 Marillion concerts, raised £37,000 online from other fans and the tour went ahead. Realising the power of the internet to build a like-minded artistic community, within months 13,000 fans had each paid Marillion £16 in advance — totalling more than £200,000 — which allowed the band to record their recent CD Anoraknophobia. Suddenly, Marillion had the biggest recording advance of their career and no record company to call their tune.
“We were the first band to recognise the potential of the internet,” said the singer Steve Hogarth. “We have cut out the middle men in suits, who have been taking most of our money for the past 20 years. What is so brilliant about the net is that we can ask 40,000 fans at the touch of a button what they think about a proposed release. It makes music incredibly democratic.”
Having sacked their manager and fired their booking agent — fans now book the shows — the band employ a full-time web editor to keep www.marillion.com up to date. He sits in the office next to their recording studio — a fan could not get much closer without being on stage — and band members visit the site’s forum twice-weekly to contribute to the debate.
“Sure, the net threatens the record industry,” Hogarth said, “but it doesn’t threaten the artist. It frees the artist.”
(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2103-524948,00.html)
...Are they really the first to do this on a large scale? b'jeezus, it took 'em long enough...
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)
the above story has done the rounds and they've moved on: the latest marillion wheeze is to not only to get fans to purchase the next album in order to fund it but ALSO to charge them £30 a shot in order for them to promote it (ads, radio, tour etc). Jeez, Louise.
“We were the first band to recognise the potential of the internet,” said the singer Steve Hogarth.
Not sure about this... and i think mr h is prone to a little bit of hyperbole (i think the last one of note was of the similarity of marillion to massive attack). I think I read somewhere that Joni Mitchell was doing something similar?
― geoff, Monday, 6 January 2003 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― zebedee, Monday, 6 January 2003 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― geoff, Monday, 6 January 2003 17:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― zebedee, Monday, 6 January 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)
this will probably appear to be apologism, but im sure they would claim not. The deal is pay up front, no say in the music. And to be fair if it were that way then they would be putting out quadruple concept albums about middle earth
― geoff, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)
AND THEYRE NOT ALREADY!!!
just thought id get the obvious in first
― geoff, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― zebedee, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin carmody (robin carmody), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 06:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 06:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 06:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 07:01 (twenty-two years ago)
Is it just coincidence that Marillion tried their noble funding experiment for this album, and then produced one that seems undisciplined, uncharacteristic and unmemorable to me? Probably. But then, maybe not.
But then their whole existance as a band and all the money they want are justified just by this:
http://furia.com/twas/twas0293.html
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 07:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― J (Jay), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ian Johnson, Tuesday, 7 January 2003 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― CUNT, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:02 (twenty-one years ago)
That's pretty sweet. I can imagine the guys back in 1983 BBS-ing on their Apple IIe's on their 2400 baud modems asking all of their gazillion fans on their Apples, Commodores, or Atari 800s which take to use on their mid-album opus.
― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)