The most interesting genre music is not made by people associated with the culture...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
In trying to think of a way to say "I only like country music when it's really indie-rock" Fiona came up with this doozie of an assertion:

Genre Music is more interesting when it is made by people who do not belong to the culture associated with the genre. No, think about it. Abandon all your notions of "authenticity" being urgent and key in music; they are wrong. The best Prefab Pop is not made by well-tanned teenagers from Florida, it's made by Japanese kids with laptops. Velvet Underground impressions are better left to stoners from the East Midlands (see Spacemen 3) than real, 'genuine' Lower East Side trustafarians like the Str*kes. And is the best rap *really* made by kidz from Da Hood, or by middle class escapees with access to the technology which makes the production values of Timbaland and the Neptunes possible?

See, "staying true" and "authenticity" may make for better examples of a particular genre, but it doesn't make for better music. Truly genius music comes from mixing and matching and cross-pollination and a wilful disregard for convention. The best way to get something right is to get it so wrong that you come up with something fresh and original.

I suspect that this may be totally full of shit, but can't really decide if I agree with Fiona or not. What think you...?

(The rest of the article is probably not as interesting)

kate, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I haven't heard suburban New Jersey teenagers play folk music from the Andean highlands, so dunno.

hstencil, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought "trustafarians" referred to rich kids who like reggae.

charlie va (charlie va), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

best? no
most interesting? usually, because what's most interesting is often what you're least expecting.

Horace Mann, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Though I guess she's just trying to say that sometimes a fresh perspective is needed to bring freshness to a stale genre, there are so many stupid things about this:
1. It implies that music has to be accepted by outsiders to give it credibility.
2. It gives no credit to people who originally create the style of music, just the people who add to it (trying to avoid saying "steal it"). What, so kids from the 'hood can't be geniuses?
3. etc., etc.
It just seems to be right on the border of snobbery and condescension, though maybe I'm just touchy today.

Nick A. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)

It's a great theory, but the problem is that there's virtually no evidence to back it up. I can't really think of any genre where the best stuff isn't produced by 'insiders'.

Siegbran (eofor), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Can't access the rest of the article. The big flaw in the quoted bit is that the stuff she's citing in no way ditches 'authenticity', it just swaps around different notions of what's authentic. Japanese kids making pop with laptops conforms totally to stereotypes of Japanese kids as kitsch-obsessed technofreaks; drug users making fucked-up dronerock conforms totally to stereotypes of drug users etc etc. So you're left with "Music made from within a culture as great if it's a culture I like".

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 18:05 (twenty-three years ago)

It really only applies to stale genres. If a genre is just burgeoning, then it will be consitantly fresh for a little while. And in terms of rap, that's really not true. I personally loved rap a lot more when the production was cheap, so they relied on simple beats consisting maybe of only snare and bass.

However, when other people started messing with country, I like. Because there's just so many possibilities that modern "country" artists refuse to take; so hell, let other people take it for them.

David Allen, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 18:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Tom is OTM ... the quote just suggests Geography is not Culture (or Destiny)

phil jones (interstar), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 18:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, echo Tom's comments being OTM. The article assumes that there's a lot of "otherness" between cultures that share more in common than they share differences.

hstencil, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 18:12 (twenty-three years ago)

The problem with alt.country isn't the revivalism; it's that it's all "I'm So Lonesome I Could Die" and no "Kaw-Liga".

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

The other thing that I see as a flaw is that with most of the rest of the world, the flow of cultural product is only one way. That is, everybody else receives Western crap, and there's hardly any flow back. The hybridization of Western pop music styles into more "native" cultures has produced some fascinating results (Tropicalia and Cambodian Rocks come to mind immediately) that do bring questions of "authenticity" into play, but there's not many examples I can think of non-Western musics influencing much in the West (aside from Sun City Girls and Colin McPhee and a few other things, but definitely not like high-profile stuff), which is a problem. Also, not all "rest-of-world" hybridizations of Western pop are that good, either.

hstencil, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 18:16 (twenty-three years ago)

hello? addictive? shania's blue disc?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 18:24 (twenty-three years ago)

1. It implies that music has to be accepted by outsiders to give it credibility.

Well, doesn't it? Isn't that the very definition of credibility? (Rather than "cred")

2. It gives no credit to people who originally create the style of music, just the people who add to it (trying to avoid saying "steal it"). What, so kids from the 'hood can't be geniuses?

Fair point when talking about rap, sure. But the article is about Country music, in which case the people who originally created the genre have been dead for half a century. There's an assumption that American alt.country bands have a right to the heritage while other countries do not. What I find is that people who approach this sort of music without the baggage, without the cliches, end up making music that captures the spirit rather than the letter of the "law".

Thinking about the "it requires an outside to give credibility" thing, I see the point when it's something like Paul Simon or Sting or Damon Albarn (delete according to what generation you are) because that is a westerner viewing a non-western genre. But I guess I'm making exceptions for people from a different sub-culture judging/reinterpreting someone from the same general culture... dunno.

I *like* Herman Dune because it's a Swedish/French band offering their take on C&W, which is slightly more of a stretch than American or even English bands taking on C&W. I'd probably like even more to hear a Nigerian musician do their take on C&W, make that one-way flow go more two-way.

So you're left with "Music made from within a culture as great if it's a culture I like".

This is the criticism that I worry about the most, hence the "I only like country music if it's really indie-rock."

anyway, thanks for input...

kate, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Speaking only from personal experience, my forays into Tuvan throat singing have been very poorly received indeed...not without reason

J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:05 (twenty-three years ago)

hahaha

charlie va (charlie va), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Blah. I didn't read the whole article, just the quotes. I'm a busy dude. But I'm also lazy. Everyone else's points are good though.

Another point: Maybe genre music made by people who do not belong to the culture associated with the genre is only more interesting to the people outside of that culture. Like maybe the original musical culture is too foreign or alien to outsiders, so it needs to be tampered with to be made acceptable. I.e., I can't stand modern country music, so for me to like it, I would have to add walls of feedback or something. But modern country music as it is is apparently already interesting enough for millions of other Americans.

Nitpicking: what is genre music? Is there nongenre music?

Nick A. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:57 (twenty-three years ago)

interesting

for me, i think the best comes from insiders not outsiders. outsiders try to 'subvert' genre, but make it safe for different audience (i'm thinking squarepusher/tigerbeat6 here). the best stuff comes from those inside that push at the edges, so theres gradual shifts. outsiders tend to obliterate, throw baby out with bathwater, OR, even worse, be overly reverent, afraid to take risks. i think those that work within the parameters of a scene, but cause frisson at its edge are the most exciting acts. the sense of OCCASION is there with this, which genre outsiders cannot muster

what is also interesting is what is or isnt counted as an insider/outsider. eg, DJ Marky etc, in 96 or whatever, the idea of brazilian drum'n'bass would have been seriously outsider, but today, prime mover, inside the genre...

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:59 (twenty-three years ago)

who originally created the genre have been dead for half a century

Jimmie Rodgers shore is dead, but Wade Mainer is still alive and kicking at 95 (he was still playing the banjo as of a few years ago). You have not heard country music until you have heard the first two volumes of Wade Mainer, Early and Great on Old Homestead. Before "bluegrass" and "country and western" became identified as distinct genres, it was all hillbilly music and it was sweeeeeeeeeet.

The insider/outsider formulation is totally facile and thus DUD.

Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Saying things are facile is facile.

Nick A. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Summing up anything in one word is facile but that doesn't make the insider/outsider dichotomy any more useful outside of very specific contexts.

Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Saying things is facile.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Other then avoiding the use of Storkes as your reference point you might be right rabbit. Write the ballad of KD Lang and her assosication with Nashville in, comparing and contrasting to Hank Snow and Stan Rogers and you got an article.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Hank Snow was an outsider? Only if you think country music = Nashville. Canada has long been a fertile source of country musicians.

Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:49 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, all country does not equal Nashville.

hstencil, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Hank Snow wasn't an outsider and was accepted in Nashville, KD Lang has been tolerated at best by the Nashville establishment despite having her cred entials.
No attempt was made to assume that Nashville = all country and western music. Don't avoid the topic at hand.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 21:04 (twenty-three years ago)

I DIDN'T. Geez, I mean, jeez!

hstencil, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Who is this Noodles and why is he so capricious? And is he related to the Wu-Tang Noodles?

Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 21:39 (twenty-three years ago)

The real lithmus test for this theory re: C&W is of course "Cotton Eye Joe".

Siegbran (eofor), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 21:44 (twenty-three years ago)

He's the fuckin' Offspring's Noodles, probably.

hstencil, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

"Cotton Eye Joe" was the first UK #1 after Sweden joined the EU. Someone write the punchline.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 22:15 (twenty-three years ago)

All music is genre music. That was part of the subtext all along. There is no music that isn't genre music.

I get really touchy with the use of the terms "insider" and "outsider" they are such loaded terms, and besides, who decides who's in and who's out? That was terminology that I was trying to avoid in the article, but now they've been raised, I see my reasoning as even more bullshit.

kate, Thursday, 9 January 2003 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)

i make music for a few of my friends to listen to, but primarily for myself? so is my music genre music?

kephm, Thursday, 9 January 2003 00:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Genre being a socially agreed-on thing, it's latently genre music I'd say.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 9 January 2003 00:49 (twenty-three years ago)

who decides who's in and who's out?
Usually its a trio of girls named Heather. No offical position other then your shuned at social functions, and you find your not invited to the big olde ball (more then a token once).
I mention KD Lang because she was always seen as an oddball. They even called her cowpunk at the time, putting her in the same tiny box of ticky tack as Jr Gone Wild. In Nashville she managed to record albums with the right producer (both for her dreams and the in crowd with Cline's own man Owen Bradley) and singing with Loretta Lynn and Kitty Wells, win a Grammy, sing at the Olympics, have one of the top selling albums in her genre despite the presence of Garth Vader and get on the Tonight Show a couple times but still couldn't hang out with the 'cool people' of her culture. Those that decided the culture and history of her genre or how the vast majority of their fans saw it. Perhaps that has nothing to say to what Fifi wrote, who knows. its enough out of me on this subject.
Who is this Noodles and...
yes, you can indeed eat me.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 9 January 2003 03:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Usually its a trio of girls named Heather.

Noodles: do you like mineral water?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 9 January 2003 03:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I sure like croquet let me tell you.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 9 January 2003 03:59 (twenty-three years ago)

"ES-KI-MOOOooo..."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 9 January 2003 04:03 (twenty-three years ago)

If you don't have a brewski in your hand you might as well be wearing a dress Ned.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 9 January 2003 04:08 (twenty-three years ago)

You two!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 9 January 2003 04:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Velvet Underground impressions are better left to stoners from the East Midlands (see Spacemen 3) than real, 'genuine' Lower East Side trustafarians like the Str*kes.

Isn't that kind of a straw man argument? Sure, Spacemen 3 might be better than the Str*kes, but in order for this thesis to be proved, wouldn't they also have to be better than VU?

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 9 January 2003 04:12 (twenty-three years ago)

There's an assumption that American alt.country bands have a right to the heritage while other countries do not. What I find is that people who approach this sort of music without the baggage, without the cliches, end up making music that captures the spirit rather than the letter of the "law".

Australia has a huge country music scene - some is the C&W we know and (occasionally) love, but some is crazy shit involving indigenous Aussie influences an' that.

Charlie (Charlie), Thursday, 9 January 2003 04:41 (twenty-three years ago)

ps. search Slim Dusty for quality Aussie country...

Charlie (Charlie), Thursday, 9 January 2003 04:43 (twenty-three years ago)

One of the world's biggest C&W collectors, I think his name was John Edwards, was an Aussie.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 9 January 2003 05:30 (twenty-three years ago)

You two!

You love it, you know you do. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 9 January 2003 06:32 (twenty-three years ago)

But... Spacemen 3 WERE better than the Velvet Underground... to me!

kate, Thursday, 9 January 2003 18:59 (twenty-three years ago)

yes, you can indeed eat me.

Well, you are NOODLES, aren't you?

hstencil, Thursday, 9 January 2003 19:04 (twenty-three years ago)

His finest smartass moment, and you're spoiling it!

Kim (Kim), Saturday, 11 January 2003 02:39 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.