Do you still buy vinyl?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well, do you? And what and why? Do you buy used vinyl only now, or do you still get new albums on vinyl? Without getting into a hi-fi debate, does vinyl sound better, worse, the same or just different? Is it better for some kinds of music?

Personally, I buy hardly any vinyl at all now, maybe the odd used 12-inch or rare-ish unreissued album. But I still play my old vinyl regularly.

The reason I ask is that I noticed that someone had bought the Amnesiac on vinyl (Masonic Boom - was it you?), and I was wondering.

Over to You.

Dr. C, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Yes. Predominantly dance singles and second-hand vinyl. Purists claim the bass sounds better with the former, but with me its more a matter of no other format being available (plus a not yet realised ambition to get twin decks and a mixer). I buy more CDs though.

Stevo, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

At the moment, no. Mostly because I don't have a turntable - something I'll be sorting out next month - so it's a choice between getting something for my infrequent DJing exploits or actually being able to listen to it.

But I like vinyl and will start buying it again soon I'm sure.

Tom, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I really only buy vinyl once in a great while: mostly older stuff that I find used, or things that are hard to find on other formats, like certain dance/electronic singles.

I really love vinyl as a format: there's something so nice about seeing a nice big album cover and an illustrated picture sleeve. I guess I enjoy the graphics aspect of it. The sound quality isn't that much different, imho, though I do know certain vinyl purists who will tell you how much warmer vinyl sounds compared to sterile cds. I just don't hear that.

I don't buy much vinyl anymore mainly because it isn't portable, and I like to have cds take to work to listen to and also have in my car, etc. etc. etc.

Nicole, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I would like to buy vinyl from time to time, but as with Tom, I have no turntable so it's a pointless thing for me to get. The only vinyl I have now is up on my wall as artwork, still in its sleeve.

I actually own a lot of vinyl but I left it in Arizona with my dad because he had a turntable at the time. But his broke and now he has no use for them either. I keep asking him to stay his hand on selling them because I want them back one day.

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I usuallyl buy Vinyl if its something odd that I can't find on Cd, like 50 Guitars in Love, or if its a band I creme for, or if its a recor din good shape thats cheap. I usually convert them to Minidisc though, I hate using vinyl. I once found an "Otis and Ally" , original. Its hanging in my oven.

-- Mike Hanley, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

yeah, only format i do buy pretty much. yeah nearly all 2nd hand. 'cause (a) i haven't got a CD player that works (b) i'm a real cheapskate (mainly only buy what's lying around , not keep up with the new stuff) (c) am old, it's the format i started with. yes you can still find lots good that way but yes i am starting to find it restrictive ...

duane zarakov, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

In the weird wild world of Record Company economics, vinyl is still cheaper retail compared to CD's (correct me if I'm wrong, it's been a while since I bought vinyl) despite being more expensive to manufacture.

I went to Camelot the other day and almost fainted at the sight of a $18.95 CD. Time to dust off the turntable.

Steven James, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Yes: two good reasons - contrary to late '80s myth, I have a lot less trouble with scratched records than skipping CDs, and secondly because CDs just go on so fucking long - I have no interest in listening to 70 or 80 minutes of anything in one sitting, whereas 20 minutes seems just right, and if you're digging it, you can put on the other side. Sure, I buy CDs, but generaly when there is no alternative (or the vinyl is way more expensive). (My ten year old nephew recently asked his dad to tape him some songs off "those big discs you have")

Mark Morris, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Avoiding discussions abt sound superiority - Swans fucked my hearing at the ICA years ago, so am oblivious to nuances of 'warmth' etc. - I'd pick CDs over vinyl every time, and am only tempted by recs when they're limited edition 'rarities' (whatever) that you simply can't get on CD. You can program a CD, you don't have to get up and flip it over, they don't build up surface noise, they're easier to carry/transport/store, you can fit more music on 'em etc. etc. Only advantages to vinyl that I can see is that you can speed 'em up or slow 'em down, the covers/packaging look better, and the idea of djing with cds just seems...silly.

Andrew L, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Absolutely, I still buy vinyl. Well, actually, I started buying it a couple years ago when my mom gave me her old turntable. I noticed how damned CHEAP I could get stuff on vinyl, and I have gradually amassed quite a few records, most for between 2 and 5 bucks, quite a few for under a dollar. I'm really not a vinyl fetishist at all, although I do think some things sound incredibly good on record, especially if they were recorded with analog technology ("...this Compact Disc reveals the limitations of the source tape," etc.)--such full, warm bass. I do think vinyl is pretty inconvenient, though, and easily damaged, so if I can get something on CD, I usually will (i.e. new stuff). My main motivation for buying vinyl is not having that much dough but being a compulsive music consumer.

Clarke B., Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Which is why I started buying vinyl - too poor to buy a CD player in my youth.

However, I do have to ask something: maybe I've only been looking into rarer vinyl these days, though I don't reckon I'm looking for things particularly obscure, but everything I try to buy on vinyl LATELY is unreasonably more expensive than a CD, or than I remember it being when I was younger. Granted, since I'm only buying them for the artwork right now, I justify the expense in my mind by pointing out to myself that buying the French ads that I"m so fond of set me back way more than an expensive vinyl. But everything's like $30 or more. Which I can understand for things like the Motown Junk vinyl, but for beaten up madonna albums?

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

If it came out before 1990, when new vinyl records pretty much disappeared off the face of the earth (or at least Canada), then I try to get it on vinyl. It has nothing to do with sound - on *my* stereo, CDs sure sound a hell of a lot better. I started out doing this because, well, I had no CD player at the time, plus LPs were a hell of a lot cheaper, though that's not as true as it used to be. Plus like Nicole, I have a big album cover fetish - I just love the way the good ones look.

I'm still pretty astounded by the *hostility* which new-converts-to- CDs started exhibiting towards vinyl, the minute CDs started getting big... I understand record companies wanting buyers to pay 5-10 extra dollars for the same damn thing, but why music fans started getting this attitude of "now that CDs are out there, vinyl shouldn't be available to anyone at all ever", I'll never know. Spending 20-25 $ for every record you buy is just nuts

Patrick, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I don't understand those people who reckon vinyl is better than CD. The cover art and stuff is lovelier, yes, but there's nothing to ruin a good song like the bloody record getting stuck. And as for 'better sound', yeah, records are great if you like the sound of frying things in the kitchen or Rice Krispies. Sorry, I don't mean to sound too negative, but once again it's the NME's fault for trying to preach to me (ages ago) the virtues of vinyl, and as usual ending up pissing me off.

DG, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Yeah, I know what you all mean about vinyl being expensive as all hell, but I never buy new vinyl. The only new vinyl I've bought has been a few cutouts that were 4 bucks. The most I've ever spent on a record was 10 bucks, for Unknown Pleasures and another time for a live Albert Ayler record. Best ever find: Gang of Four's Solid Gold for a dollar at a thrift store.

Clarke B., Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I still buy vinyl. Why? Cover art's better, they're still cheaper, on my half decent home turntable they sound better than cds when new and it's easier to DJ with records. However, CDs sound better in the long term, I can listen to them at work, it's difficult to find stuff on vinyl and I've recently discovered that I can DJ with cds whilst in a state of extreme drunkenness.

Also, that old scratching thing is just not true. Once a CD is scratched it's utterly fucked, whereas a jump on a record can be remedied by the judicious use of a 2p piece. I have exactly one record that's unplayable (out of a few hundred) and three cds (out of a similar number) that jump like buggery.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Richard, what's that? I'm curious, as a few of my favorite LPs (Trans-Europe Express) have a jump, and seeing as I'm an anal tool, I'd love to rememdy them.

Clarke B., Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I once spent $20 for a vintage vinyl copy of Scott 4 even though I have a cd copy -- I couldn't help it, I just have to buy all things scott walker. It's like an illness.

But with new vinyl -- I remember seeing that double vinyl of Kid A for about $28 maybe? That's just ridiculous. At least you can usually find cds much cheaper than that, especially when there's sales.

Nicole, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

A 2p piece is a coin of roughly the right weight to put atop the cartridge to stop the stylus skipping. Play through the skip a few times with the 2p on and this usually deepens/'straightens' the groove enough to stop the skipping altogether. Warning: this almost always leads to a loss of sound quality, and works best on recent scratches.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

You lot all need to take better care of your CDs. Am I the only person without one single CD that skips? Actually, this isn't true. My copy of Let's Get It On skips, but that's because it's not MY copy, as I sold my copy when I moved back home. It's actually Fred's copy, and I'd say about 35% of his CDs skip cos he takes awful care of them.

I suppose this is another thread but why doesn't anyone take decent care of their CDs? They're not meant to be tossed around or thrown shiny-side-down on a desktop or anything like that. I almost came to blows with the IT guy at my workplace for taking my copy of THB out of my computer at work and hurling it, VIOLENTLY, face-down on the desk (he apparently does this to everyone, and I was left unwarned that you're meant to clean out all disks from your computer if you know he's coming because he tries to break things). I told him that if I took it home and it skipped, I'd hunt him down, and I would.

My CDs are all in fantastic condition, so I'm wondering what everyone does to make their CDs skip so much :)

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

But Ally, when CDs first came on the market they were marketed as the records you COULDN'T break/fuck up. Totally not true, of course, but this must have encouraged people's less reverent treatment of 'em...

Andrew L, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

See, I don't remember the original CD marketing (other than those ridiculous enormous boxes they came in - what the hell?), but you'd think after you screwed up your first CD, you'd be more careful.

I suppose I was always careful with them because I couldn't really afford them and had to pay with my own cash, etc, so I was like, oh, don't want to screw this up and have to shell out another $15, let's be nice to this one.

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Count me in as the digital fetishist. ;-) I haven't bought one thing on vinyl since I got my first CD player in 1988 aside from a goofy album by the unknown band Ned in the early seventies, picked up solely for the name.

Whoever mentioned the Rice Krispies crack is onto something -- by the time I got that player, I had been into music long enough to be utterly frustrated by skips and crackles and stuck grooves and the like. Bah. I want to hear the music, not the mistakes of the medium, thanks.

The cover art deal...*shrug*...eh. Again, music, not the artwork. As for expense, this is why I shop used.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I'm no perfectionist, but I got sick of virtually every other piece of vinyl I bought having pops and scratches, so I just about stopped buying vinyl around 5 years ago. I have developed various techniques for getting rid of 'grit in the grooves', but it's just something I don't want to spend time having to do. I guess it depends on your tolerance level for playability. Mine's low-ish - in other words pops and crackles piss me off. Also if something's REALLY good, I want it on the best available format. CD has no surface noise and is portable, it's a no-brainer.

Like Ally, I've had no problems with CDs, except in my portable player, which skips sometimes. My 'best' stereo is starting to skip very occasionally on CDs, but it's always OK after cleaning the CD. In other words the laser seems to be getting more sensitive to small amounts of dust.

The only CD I've bought which skipped horribly on each one of my 4 CD players was the Lemon Jelly album. I got a replacement and, guess what, the same thing happened. However the the reason for the skipping had NOTHING to do with the surface of the CD or the tracking. Each time I loaded it into the player I heard a tiny scraping sound as it spun the CD around. It turned out that the hole in the middle had a sort of slightly raised "lip" on the underside which was "catching" on something and physically moving the CD out of alignment. Once I filed it off it worked fine.

The reason for boring you all stupid with the details of this is that it might be something to check for if you've got a skipping CD.

Dr. C, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I've also got very few damaged CDs, I take good care of them - what do you people do? Use them as frisbees/beermats/ashtrays, eh?

DG, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Yes, still buy plenty of vinyl. Mostly used, though. I like to think of the $1 bin as my own personal Napster (basically free music) plus I get to listen over my stereo in my living room. I've found that you can tell from looking at a record in a store whether it will sound good, and most of the ones I come accross are in good shape. Back catalog stuff I never buy on CD when I can get it for $1 to $3. Simple economics. All the cover art and so forth is a major bonus.

Last year I considered buying a copy of _Surf's Up_ on vinyl used, but they were going for $20 because it was out of print. Now that it has been reissued on CD, I just picked up a perfect copy for $2. Interesesting how vinyl used to be sequenced; the title track of this record would have never been the last track on a CD if it had come out on that format originally. As it ends, it ends the album on the perfect note.

Mark, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I still buy vinyl but only second-hand stuff cos I'm a cheapskate, I couldnt be bothered buying a new album on vinyl. Like Somg's "Dongs of sevotion" was on sale for 14 pound on vinyl, why bother when you'd get it for the same price on CD?. As for Ally giving out about her workmate throwing her copy of THB about the place, I thought you'd have 5 or 6 copies of that, no?

Michael Bourke, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

aLLY SeZ: See, I don't remember the original CD marketing (other than those ridiculous enormous boxes they came in - what the hell?), but you'd think after you screwed up your first CD, you'd be more careful.

I presume yr refering to the "Long Box" format, where the CD case would be at the bottom of a 12" x 5" cardboard sleeve. This AFAIK only happened in the USA (over here, "Long Boxes" were quite prized among CD import fetishist types. I didn't go for it that much, but I still have a couple of blue oyser cult boxes from when these LPs were unavailable over here in the attic somewhere. Anyway, the reason for this was that when the CD format started to take off, US recors stores concerted their 12" vinyl racks into CD racks by putting dividers down the middle. The long boxes were so you could browse more easily.

I don't buy vinyl anymore, mainly due to lack of space, and partly due to having a 2-year old wandering aruond, looking for stuff to put jammy fingerprints all over. Personally, I prefer CD sound. A lot of the complaints RE the sound of early CD reissues was down to cheap ass & stupid rekord kompanies using master tapes EQ'd for cutting to vinyl to do their CDs from. What converted me to CD was hearing a disc of Dvorak's "Hymnus". Before the choir came in, you could hear them drawing breath. I know it's a bit wanky, but it was really spooky, & sent shivers up me spine. Also, I got a CD of "Leige & Leif", and it just sounded so....good

x0x0x

Norman Fay, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Cds can skip on crapier cd players more than on higher quality ones. Also, as far as records having "more bass", it sounds like "more mudd" to me. I once heard and engineer say "I can make digital sound like analog but I can't go the other way. "

-- Mike Hanley, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I mainly only buy 12" singles on vinyl now, but they're a quick seller. I ummed and ahhd over whether to buy 'Pyramid Song' 12" on the day of release. I didn't. Made my mind up two days later, went to buy it - all sold out. Had to settle for the CD single. And I just hate CD singles. Three tracks on a CD?? Seems such a *waste* of plastic packaging.

I don't mind CD's. But I've always wondered why don't they package CD's in a vinyl album sized sleeve - with the CD positioned in a thin card tray or something? Best of both worlds.

Vinyl artwork is superior of course. I recently purchased Air's 'Playground Love' 12" single. Aside from the fact that I love the song and it only cost 99p, the real clincher was the artwork. I have one wall in my bedroom covered in choice album sleeves - cuts down on the decorating, I can tell you.

DavidM, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

How do you do that without damaging the wall or the sleeves ?

Patrick, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

New vinyl is ridiculously expensive. At least it is in these parts. I think the last new record I bought was Washing Machine and I remember that costing me 23 bucks. When I was in high school, I had this silly No CD policy and only allowed myself to buy music on vinyl or cassette. Over time I realised how limited my resources were and I became increasinly irritated by buying new records and discovering cracks in the sound and surface noise. I remember buying this very rare "mint" 7" once and being heartbroken when I came home to find the record skipped.

The only time I buy vinyl now is if it's used, new at a good price, or if it's something rare that I can't find in any other format.

JC, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I think most rock music sounds *shit* on compact disc. Way too flat and tinny. Most of what I buy is electronic/sampled so I'm not too bothered. 'White Light/White Heat' or 'Totale's Turns' sound utterly horrendous on CD.

I've found many vinyl delights in charity shops and car boot sales recently... Stevie Wonder, Chic, Donna Summer, Astrud Gilberto. I do find vinyl more *engaging* than CDs, though the surface noise is still a big pain in the arse.

Johnathan, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I should have thought that Totales Turns would sound utterly horrendous on any medium going (but in an utterly fantastic sort of way)

I.M.Belong, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Being on CD destroys it's utter horrendous fantasticality. Um.

Johnathan, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Patrick: Erm, you'd have to damage the wall to hang up anything, ie nails or thumbtacks, but they're easy enough to cover up when you need to. As for damaging the sleeve - they make special frames specifically for putting album covers in. I buy mine at Urban Outfitters but they're probably overpriced there.

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

It was actually my BF that bought Amnesiac on vinyl, but I was the one listening to it... (we have since been sent a free promo CD of said album. After blowing £20 or whatever on the special vinyl edition... sigh...)

It took me a long, long, time to disengage from vinyl and go to CD. Mainly because I didn't own a CD player until about 1997. I still haven't made up my mind which I prefer. Obviously, I like the "not having to get up to turn it over" and the programability of the CD, but I do admit that it misses something, both sonically and in terms of packaging.

It's probably something I learned at home- my dad was a sound engineer at a folk cafe, and utterly loathed *any* form of digital sound- be it CDs, digital effects, or even digital direct boxes. He was the one who pointed out the frequences that "you can't hear, but you can feel" and I think that's why I notice it.

I still own loads of CDs, in fact, at this point, I think I have more CDs than records (sigh, especially in the UK) but some things just sound ridiculous on CD - have you ever tried listening to the first JAMC album on CD? It's like watching a home movie on widescreen, it just misses the point.

I think that's also part of it- when and *how* recordings were made. I suspect a good engineer or masterer will compensate (maybe subconsciously) for frequency loss on music which is digitally generated, digitally recorded, and created for CD, and will compensate with certain tonal ranges that actually sound good on CD. While it's much harder to get music which was created and recorded on analogue to sound "right" on CD.

I also remember in music lectures at college, my soundgeek proff talking about how the recording techiniques have changed because of digital- not just the problems of recording totally digital instruments, but the problems of recording completely acoustic instruments to digital media. Especially with orchestras and things where you can't have absolute sound isolation. Multiple mic-ing becomes a problem because of differences of phase cancellation which are much worse in digital than analogue. (Ironically, the way this proff recommended recording was a return to sensitive single-mic-ing as used in the days before the invention of multi-tracking!)

So, yeah, maybe it takes a soundgeek to notice it, but there are differences in sound, and differences in recording technique.

And I just like the packaging of vinyl so much better. And skipping? Schmipping! Invariably, the people who complain most about skipping records are the ones who lose their inner sleeves and never have dust jackets.

Luckily, Paul has no less than FOUR turntables, and if he had his choice, would probably own nothing but vinyl, as it's "better for DJ- ing with", so I'm slowly being pulled back into my bad old habits.

However, it's annoying, knowing that vinyl is cheaper to produce, why the heck are records still more expensive? Or is this just cause of the ridiculous "ten inch, coloured vinyl" formatting type of them or what?

masonic boom, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

As mentioned, I pretty much buy only vinyl. I'll only buy something on CD if it's not available on record, which thankfully is pretty rare. I like records because they are, indeed, easier to DJ with (though watch me lugging crates of records around and see if you agree), their cover art is better, and so on... Also, records are actually generally slightly cheaper. Go to Berwick Street in London and you can get albums for £8.99ish on vinyl or £10.99ish on CD.

But most of all, vinyl just feels nicer. Don't know what it is about it. I love the warmth of it, and the crackles when you play something you've played to death. I love the noise you get when the record ends and gets stuck in the last bit of the groove. I have a copy of Add N To (X)'s 'Metal Fingers In My Body' which I play almost every time I DJ, to the point that it skips in the same place every time. And if I hear that track without the crackles and the skips, it just doesn't feel right.

In fact, I'm such a flipping vinyl fan that even when I get sent free records on CD, if I like them, I'll go and buy the vinyl version...!

Paul Strange, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I believe it's much more expensive to manufacture vinyl. I was under the delusion that vinyl could be had more cheaply than CD's. And if you shop at Camelot (where a new CD will cost you 19 bucks) it can, but the discriminating consumer can usually buy a CD more cheaply.

An album that sounds fantastic on CD is the Mojave 3 ('out of time' I think). It sounds warm even in digital.

Steven James, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Correct steven. Warth comes from equalization, not just format. Warmth is a euphamism for "no definition" I find.

-- Mike Hanley, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

No, actually, wrong. Warmth has a lot to do with overtones and undertones.

Digital recording actually cuts off sounds above and below certain frequencies, the argument being that the human ear cannot hear them.

However, due to harmonic overtones and undertones, those frequencies which the ear cannot hear, can still combine harmonically with audible frequencies to produce a certain "warmth". A good engineer or a good mastering process can compensate for those lacks by adding EQ in certain frequency ranges, so good EQ will produce the illusion of warmth.

However, this does not account for modern records which were recorded digitally which were then transfered to vinyl- the missing frequencies were never recording in the first place, so mastering them to vinyl will do nothing, as they cannot be replaced.

Good god, I'm starting to sound like a Sound On Sound reader, help me, please.

masonic boom, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

ok ok. The Mojave 3 cd gives me the illusion of warmth. Just like alcohol gives me the illusion of happiness.

Steven James, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Illusion of warmth? Excuse me but ..what?Is audio warmth somehow measurably "real"? Actually most analog systems don't have nearly the frquency range capabilities of digital systems. I think you are confusing "compression" with digital recourding.

-- Mike Hanley, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I'm a music lover who will buy a vinyl LP 99% of the time. "Warmth" the way I understand it is a tonal quality, and can be achieved through equilization when recording and mixing. It is true that early CDs were lacking in warmth (actually they just plain sucked), but this is hardly the LP's distinguishing feature. To me, the stand- out feature of vinyl is the the naturalness and realism of the presentation. The band (if it is a band you're listening to) sounds more engaging, tighter, the tune actually sounds catchier. CD does have a complete lack of surface noise in its favor, but this is a small point when the music isn't reproduced properly. Yes, CDs sound way better now then they used to, and I do listen to them a small percent of the time. And if you play dusty, scratched-up records on a cheap plastic turntable placed on a wobbly table with a worn-out needle, you're obviously not getting the most out of the format.

Sean, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

This is an illustration of the difference between analog and digital that I like. If you have an analog alarm clock, and you listen carefully before the alarm goes off, you can hear the clock 'building up' to the alarm. With a digital alarm clock, at 11.59.59 etc there is nothing, then at 12.00 exactly it rings (in digital terms 0 switches to 1 no gradation). Perhaps human consciousness reads the world in terms of cause and effect, and so analog seems more natural and warmer to us.

About record care. I understand that it is important to be able to listen to the song without it stopping in the middle, but I still can't completely identify with caring for objects that much. It almost seems like an *affront* to the content, to me, when the superficial manifestation of it is cared for so deeply. I feel suspicious when I see bookshelves filled with glacially clean books. On the other hand, the people I know who take good care of their records are generally very good themselves.

Maryann, Saturday, 9 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

One of the best advantages of digital is it offers high quality for low cost. TO get the sound from a CDr and 20$ cd walkman on vinyl you would need to spend a hell of allot more.

-- Mike Hanley, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Oh, absolute BOLLOCKS!!! I dare you to come round and listen to the £30 Sainsburys AM/FM/Cassette/CD player that I have in my kitchen and tell me that affordable digital technology really sounds good. You get what you pay for, no matter what the format. It is the fault of the rarity of interest that turntables are so expensive, not because of the expense of the medium.

masonic boom, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Your kitchen stereo may sound bad but its likey due to the speakers, not the cd player.

-- Mike Hanley, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Back to the discussion at hand, I still buy vinyl, but my format of choice is CD. I once heard a piece on the radio about someone who will now only buy 8-tracks, because it's cheap, and you can get a zillion pieces of music for the price of one or two CDs/LPs. Now, used LPs offer that same cornucopia: you can wander into a used record store or pawn shop and come away with an armload of records for only a couple of bucks, and decide which ones you really like with a few quick listens, without worrying that you just blew a twenty on something on an impulse. When they're that cheap you don't have to worry about pops and scratches, which is my biggest problem with vinyl...I hear serious crackling even on supposedly new vinyl (bought the new Nick Cave 10" and was disgusted by the surface noise, straight from the factory). But for some things, vinyl can't be beat. I love getting comedy albums on vinyl, because there's just something wrong about a comedy CD, most of the time. I'm willing to drop 50 cents on some bit of cheese from my youth (say, an early Was Not Was song like "Dad I'm in Jail" or an Abba album) which would just look silly in my CD collection. And, of course, it's great when something just isn't available on CD. The packaging issue isn't so important to me, as I think that CD packaging is every bit as wonderful an art as the old vinyl, if you do it properly. It's the same as with the sound component: when you take an album/artwork meant for vinyl, and just shrink the artwork and bang the master into digital format, both suffer...thus the early CDs with awful sound and lousy artwork. But when you redo them for the CD format, then you can come up with something every bit as nice as the original analogue version, in my opinion.

Sean Carruthers, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Ok, like finally (after what, 15 years?) CDs are beginning to be delivered like something the packagers think you might MIND about. This is because the format is UNDER THREAT. Digital is arguably better for sound which is point-form or constellated in ambient space (classical, jazz, techno) but CRAP for sound which is cloud-form (overdriven guitars i.e. rock), not intrinsically, but because Phillips hurried onto the market with a sound-pixelation size which was too clumsily overlarge, like the Ben Day dots in a Lichtenstein, or a hooligan's face on a fly-on-the-wall police doc (not that music isn't being made which suits this: it's just, it ain't guitar rock). Mike Hanley's various arguments abt definition and upper lower reach seem contradictory to me: yes, it's true that digital can reach higher and lower, and is better at angular or pointillist detail, but this is still often fucked at amp or speaker stage (or actually by your curtains and carpet, or lack of same), but the interplay of guitar amps in studio with the analogue groove's own capacity for resonance with the speakers in your room's vibration makes for a feedback warmth that the digital trandformation just cuts competely out (because sound is converted into light and back, with digital). Metal Machine Music doesn't work on CD. It does on record — I mean, on vinyl. I don't hate CDs, because now you often get little books with them, and I like books, but the granularity of the sound, for the music I like best, is like sand in the cracks. Here's who agrees with me: Neil Young and Steve Albini.

mark s, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

also these days knowing i could d/l and be listening to something like that leon ware in like, 4 minutes tops kills everything really. fucking great album tho. and can it really be that no g-funk dude ever sampled 'share your love'?!?! easiest money ever.

r|t|c, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 11:25 (seventeen years ago) link

I never liked looking through huge amounts of LPs to find something good for too long. The web has made it even more boring though, because now many used records stores often look up the value of stuff online, so there are even less big surprise bargains to be found.

Also, my neighborhood store wants twice as much for their ratty copy of "The Kick Inside" than the CD costs new. Bah!

Oh, I sometimes buy vinyl. I feel more odd these days for still buying a lot of CDs. Vinyl is a sort of fetish thing a lot of people "get", while buying CDs is seen as old-fashioned and stupid.

Øystein, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 11:41 (seventeen years ago) link

There are 2x4 Expedits? This is the solution that I've been looking for [Also my wife, who is tired of my small, but annoying collection of LPs cluttering up the guestroom.]

fukasaku tollbooth, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 12:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes indeed fukasaku tollbooth as seen in Scott's picture above and here on the US IKEA website: http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/70103085

My question is did folks actually anchor their shelves to the wall and how much of a pain was it? And is it necessary?

matt2, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 13:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh, I sometimes buy vinyl. I feel more odd these days for still buying a lot of CDs. Vinyl is a sort of fetish thing a lot of people "get", while buying CDs is seen as old-fashioned and stupid.

Yea, I'm the only person I know of among my friends who still buys CDs regularly. It's not bad though, as the market for used cds is becoming somewhat similar to that of vinyl maybe 10 or 15 years ago (maybe not that great, but still). I've found a ton of great used cds in past couple years, even a lot of recent, well-reviewed stuff, in used bins for less than $6. But I still buy tons of new cds.

Vinyl is still, for the most part, a great deal. There are still plenty of places that charge no more than a $1 per record. And you can often find good deals on used vinyl on Discogs, etc., other online places.

What does suck, though, as was mentioned above, is that a lot of the better-curated shops are now realizing that vinyl is seen more as this fetish sort of thing, that they'll charge $15 for a used LP (in many cases a lot more). Here in DC, a couple new vinyl shops have opened in the past year or so. They often have a lot of decent stock, but the prices keep going up.

I hardly ever download stuff, but I think I probably will in the future. So long as vinyl prices don't get too exorbitant, I might just start buying vinyl for the product/home listening, and then downloading the mp3s for the convenience. I'm sure I'll still buy cds here and there, though, especially since used cds are just going to get cheaper and cheaper.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 13:54 (seventeen years ago) link

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2092/1564484353_04181c21fb.jpg?v=0

i guess i should have explained that the 2nd picture i posted is of two smaller black ikea shelves on their sides. one on top of the other. but people probably figured that out. they fit really nicely like that in the corner.

-- scott seward, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 02:33 (11 hours ago) Link

this pic made me doubletake, i have long bookshelves and a 2x4 expedit in a corner, which is slightly too small to add another. the wife is going to get me another 2x4 for my birthday, she thought of fitting 2 by putting them on their side and stacking much like you did. does this work? any undue stress? i'm pretty sure they're built to lie any way you choose.

sanskrit, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 14:08 (seventeen years ago) link

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/212/518440591_877a9bdbe7.jpg

Except those shelves are all full now, and there is a fourth box of 45s now. plus a big stack of free 45s that should be sitting next to the turntable. i dunno what i'm gonna do. maybe sell some stuff. i'm moving the table outta the room though, to move my stereo under the window, so if i really need to i can maybe fit some more shelves in the corner.

ian, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link

i like vinyl, it's cool.
i just bought two replacement stylii from J&R, via amazon actually. my turntable is nothin special, but i was noticing how warn down and slightly bent my needle was the other day, and i knew my records deserved better.

ian, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link

also these days knowing i could d/l and be listening to something like that leon ware in like, 4 minutes tops kills everything really. fucking great album tho. and can it really be that no g-funk dude ever sampled 'share your love'?!?! easiest money ever.

-- r|t|c, Tuesday, October 16, 2007 6:25 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Link

hah i had this thought too re: 'share your love'

to me there is an element of lifestyle accoutrement to my record purchases. i'm definitely not a 'collector' in the soulstrut sense either ... the prizing of rarity is pretty minimal to me. I like all the albums i own on vinyl but the albums i own on vinyl dont really represent my music taste anywhere near 100%, or even 60%; its mostly disco + some quiet storm/sexytime R&B shit, a few rap singles, dj quik lps and random one-off things i enjoy that i come across for cheap. i've dj'd a couple parties and at small clubs a couple times around town and that x bachelor pad music is pretty much the extent of my interest. Plus i love the album art (see: the ware record upthread)

deej, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

all you dudes are a bunch of slobs ;)

QuantumNoise, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 17:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I need a better way to store my 7"s. I have 4 or so boxes from Boxes Unlimited that sit on top of one of my record shelves (an expensive custom job I had made in the days prior to the Expedit) and then I just have piles of 7"s everywhere. I need shelves for them. Any ideas?

dan selzer, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 18:50 (seventeen years ago) link

Dan, I snap up old beat-up antique boxes, which fit 7"s perfectly. I then store them on my shelving unit.

QuantumNoise, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 18:57 (seventeen years ago) link

buying vinyl for the product/home listening, and then downloading the mp3s for the convenience.

This is what I do... I still buy CDs though, mostly new releases that aren't on vinyl/are too expensive on vinyl.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:00 (seventeen years ago) link

New Balance shoe boxes fit 45's pretty well but the tops of the 45's will stick out the top so you cant stack them. its easy for going through them though.

pipecock, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 12:26 (seventeen years ago) link

two months pass...

As many have pointed out, it looks like vinyl will outlive CD. I'd like our next release to be vinyl-only with a code to download for a DRM-free digital download included in the price. A good idea? Too soon?

caek, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

united record pressing is running a deal on this right now, complete with hosting and tokens of some sort. i don't know if its a good deal though.

Brigadier Pudding, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Vinyl only is always a good idea!

ian, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

URP's download voucher + vinyl service looks interesting. Anyone know of anything similar in the UK/Europe?

caek, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

My Electrelane LP came with a download voucher, but I had err ... already downloaded it.

Alba, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I just bought the Metal Box reissue. It's soooo hot. and not a bad deal for $40.

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

There's this grim looking record shop near my house that I drove by countless times. I was always curious but finally stopped by last weekend. The place is a mess (as I expected) but is a veritable gold mine for old vinyl. I found a Stranglers Live record (X-Cert) that I have been hunting for for years. Also got the "Miles in the Sky" LP. Thee appears to be tons of old psych. records as well but I am going to need at least a few hours to dig around.

I had no idea places like this still existed.

Yes...vinyl lives.

kwhitehead, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

"I just bought the Metal Box reissue. It's soooo hot. and not a bad deal for $40."

you shouldve got an original from ebay for that real analogue to analogue experience ;)

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

haha yeah, they actually had one at the store but it was 100 bucks!

to be a real vinyl a-hole though, i've had metal box on mp3/cd and a friend brought the reissue over and i kinda had to have it...it's really like a totally different record on vinyl, at least compared to the shitty mastered cheapie CD version (they should do some kinda nice deluxe one someday) that i have...i never really got the deep bass like a reggae record before, it doesn't sound brittle or tinny at all like i thought before.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

thats odd - i like it on cd too. i have the cd that came in a metal cd case which im guessing was made in the 90s/80s (avoiding cd reissues/remasters that came out in the last ten years is my new passion) and it sounds pretty good. the vinyl just of course sounds fuller and richer though, and if i didnt find the packaging so fiddly i would probably get it out more often.

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:28 (sixteen years ago) link

@caek:

Our new album </spam> is only available as vinyl (with free mp3 download coupon) or as digital files (on Amazon, iTunes, etc.). Not sure if it will be a "success," but it wasn't too hard to do (one of our band members is a database coder), and the vinyl definitely sounds better than the CDRs I've burned.

schwantz, Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:53 (sixteen years ago) link

i have the cd that came in a metal cd case which im guessing was made in the 90s/80s

mine isn't in a metal case, it's just a really bad blurry picture of (i think) lydon and there's really no liner notes or anything, it says "second edition" not metal box, so maybe yours is a newer, better version

i mean i liked it on CD, until i heard the vinyl, and it was pretty different sounding to me.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:12 (sixteen years ago) link

my cd is in a metal box. i got it sometime in the 90s when it came out.

Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:15 (sixteen years ago) link

hmm i must have some shitty jewelcase version. it sounds more like an 80s cd, mastering and soundwise

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:27 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah second edition cd sounds like crap, i think the metal tin one is a large improvement

resolved, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:34 (sixteen years ago) link

schwantz, that's exactly what I have in mind. Do you know if your authentication system for the download codes is totally home-brewed by your bandmate, or are you using something off the shelf? How many shots are you giving people at downloads? One, three, as many as they like?

caek, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Answers:

"1) Totally homebrewed.

2) All the tokens sent out with records have a max of 5 download attempts."

schwantz, Thursday, 10 January 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks

caek, Friday, 11 January 2008 01:08 (sixteen years ago) link

one year passes...

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/06/vinyl-sales-to-hit-another-high-point-in-2009.html

Vinyl sales to hit another high point in 2009
01:40 PM PT, Jun 11 2009

The resurgent vinyl market isn't showing any signs of slowing down. In fact, recent figures released by Nielsen SoundScan indicate that overall U.S. vinyl sales will once again set a benchmark in 2009, with sales up 50% through the first five months of the year. SoundScan predicts vinyl sales will reach 2.8 million units in 2009, up from 1.9 million in 2008, a record since SoundScan began tracking sales data in 1991. Already in 2009, vinyl sales have topped 1 million. At this point last year, vinyl sales stood at 701,000 copies. To be fair, the number is still tiny compared to overall album sales.

Vinyl, SoundScan points out, accounts for less than 1% of overall album sales. In other words, vinyl sales represent about six months in the life of Taylor Swift, whose late 2008 release, "Fearless," has already sold more than 3.3 million copies. To date in 2009, 121.8 million CDs have been sold, versus 33.2 million digital albums, compared to 151.01 million CDs and 27.52 digital albums for the same period last year.

Yet vinyl appears to be a niche market that's here to stay, and one that's showing signs of expansion. Rock albums account for 70% of all vinyl sold, but country vinyl is enjoying a growth spurt. Year-to-date country vinyl sales are already at 15,000 copies, compared with 5,000 for the comparable period in 2008.

Of course, if someone wants to rain on the vinyl good news, there's this stat: Vinyl sales were up 90% in 2008 over 2007, and the rate of growth has certainly slowed.

-- Todd Martens

Bee OK, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:25 (fifteen years ago) link

i had a great day selling vinyl!

scott seward, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:39 (fifteen years ago) link

the store going well skot? : )

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Haha the pic in that article was taken in a store just down the street from my apartment!

I left all my vinyl in the UK and have only bought CDs for the last five years (and downloaded a ton), but recently got a turntable and am now sort of selling them all off in favor of rebuilding my collection around records (VINYL records) I really love. So now I really do get to buy my favorite records a second time around, which I always wanted to do anyway. This probably has as much to do with me as the format, but CDs seem oddly throwaway and records tend to encourage me to listen a bit deeper. Also yes it's nice that LA suddenly has a couple of new vinyl-only stores even if their selections are frustratingly "vanilla" (vinylla?). Also I'm just getting old.

Ian and Scott are my heroes on this thread.

admrl, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:46 (fifteen years ago) link

i went to amoeba in LA for the first time. it was too overwhelming.

plus i thought the prices on used vinyl were kinda spendy overall.

i ended up buying an arvo part CD they had a great used classical cd collection

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:49 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah I kind of forgot that records are pretty expensive. Atomic in Burbank is pretty reasonable though

admrl, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:50 (fifteen years ago) link

i think i might just be spoiled a little in mpls as compared to west coast prices maybe

though the most evil fucks in the entire ebay vinyl industry now opened a store here

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:52 (fifteen years ago) link

i sold a lot of used tapes today too!

scott seward, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:57 (fifteen years ago) link

i really need to find a cassette deck

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:59 (fifteen years ago) link

what kinda cassettes you got (not to derail a vinyl thread). I've got a tapedeck in my car (and it hates those CD/ipod adapters for some reason) so I'm always on the hunt for cheap tapes to crank while driving.

tylerw, Thursday, 11 June 2009 23:01 (fifteen years ago) link

oh mostly rap and metal. some kid bought, like, 12 tapes today and he got music of the andes, a dead kennedys bootleg, a dri album, a kool moe dee album, a couple of sonic youth albums, and some other stuff.

scott seward, Friday, 12 June 2009 00:33 (fifteen years ago) link

ten years pass...

Interesting profile of a historic L.A. pressing plant that’s shutting down: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2020-01-27/rainbo-records-vinyl-pressing-plant-closes

Black Flag’s “TV Party” 7-inch single? Richard Pryor’s first comedy album for Laff Records? Both pressed by Rainbo, as was “Panic Zone,” N.W.A’s 1987 debut 12-inch, Dr. Dre’s “The Chronic,” Hüsker Dü’s “Zen Arcade” and the Minutemen’s “Double Nickels on the Dime” albums for SST and 2Pac’s “California Love.” (...)

One imposing 300-page book from the mid-1990s tracks orders from punk labels including Epitaph, SST, Touch and Go, Frontier and In the Red; rap imprints Death Row, Priority, Delicious Vinyl, Cold Chillin’ and Sugar Hill; early dance labels Moonshine, Mushroom and Thump; and Concord Jazz, Rhino, Scotti Bros. and American.

dad genes (morrisp), Tuesday, 28 January 2020 04:35 (four years ago) link

I started buying vinyl again. The ex gave me of his technics. So hooked it up. It’s great. Immediately went out and bought a few recs (nas, soulwax,...)

nathom, Tuesday, 28 January 2020 21:10 (four years ago) link

My mate has been transitioning from decades of CDs back to vinyl, and taking the opportunity to thin out his library and really focus on stuff he loves. I admire his restraint!

Gerald McBoing-Boing, Tuesday, 28 January 2020 21:35 (four years ago) link

yes, I just wrote a blog post about it

https://critterjams.wordpress.com/2020/01/24/on-becoming-an-insufferable-vinyl-dude-again/

back when this was a big hobby for me (say, 2004-2006) there were a ton of albums I could only dream of ever getting on vinyl that are now getting repressed. so that's cool. whats not cool (as I mentioned on the other thread) is that you can't just get a stack of Devo & XTC records for $20 anymore

frogbs, Tuesday, 28 January 2020 21:37 (four years ago) link

five months pass...

was just thinking yesterday "man I've got a lot of stuff still in the post"

today:

https://i.imgur.com/eFunVSE.jpg

happy Friday y'all

frogbs, Friday, 24 July 2020 16:19 (four years ago) link

I've never bought vinyl because I've never owned a record player and because shit's expensive. It's an evergreen hip habit I wouldn't mind cultivating some day, though.

pomenitul, Friday, 24 July 2020 16:21 (four years ago) link

yea I used to be concerned that I was spending too much when I'd buy 5-6 LPs every week for 20-30 bucks, now there's a ton of shit I regret not picking up for a few bucks when I had the chance. most recently No. 1 in Heaven by Sparks

frogbs, Friday, 24 July 2020 16:24 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.